| http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?id=149495&article=20281
911 - Criminal brief: Sun Mar 10 22:59:25 2002 68.3.132.0 -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Criminal brief: I accuse President Bush, Richard Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz with the first degree murder of thousands of New Yorkers and Afgans --Dick Eastman Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2002 17:04:52 -0800 From: "Dick Eastman" [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "IL SPKR DENNIS HAST" [EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "IL REP HENRY HYDE" [EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "HOUSE JUDICIARY" [EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "AG MR.ASHCROFT" [EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: "HI** SEN. INOUYE" [EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "GA REP BOB BARR" [EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "DE SEN. BIDEN" [EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "AZ SEN. MCCAIN" [EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "AL SENATOR SESSIONS" [EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "AK SEN STEVENS" [EMAIL PROTECTED]> This accusation made by : Dick Eastman of 223 S. 64th Ave., Yakima, Washington 98908 I accuse President Bush, Richard Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz with the first degree murder in their complicity and approval of the deaths of thousands of New Yorkers and Afgans in a criminal operation involving the destruction of the New York World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 and the cruise missile bombing of the Pentagon in Washington D.C. on the same day. Their purpose was to create a fraudulent pretext for a war of conquest against Afganistan and to murder members of the Office of Navel Intelligence in the Pentagon who they knew would discover and expose their conspiracy where these loyal military personel to survive to investigate the New York murders. I call on the legislature of the state of New York to pass a resolution calling upon the Congress of the United States to commence impeachment proceedings at once so in order that the Senate may remove these murderers so that they can be tried for mass murder in the State of New York. Below you will find three pieces of evidence that together completely expose the "cover story" of the named accused. If there was no airliner involved in the Pentagon attack, then it would be impossible for the Secretary of Defense, the Assistant Secretary of Defense, the Vice President and the President of the United States not to know about it. I call upon all American citizens to do you duty and assert yourselves in demanding that the procedures called for in our laws under such circumstances to bring about justice and the apprehansion of these mass murders be undertaken at once. Sufficient proof: All of the above accused must be aware that an airliner did not collide with the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. Clearly a remote controlled jet fighter, capable of skimming the ground as it approached the target was used. The airliner was too big, to clumsy, not carring sufficient combustables to produce the effects shown below. There is not way that these facts can not be known by the above accused. http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm http://www.bosankoe.btinternet.co.uk/pentagon.gif Not even a space rocket blowing up on the launching pad has that much explosion per volume of rocket as that tiny looking plane hitting an office of concrete, desks, papers, file cabinets, computers, people -- the results should have been closer to a big auto crash than to the powerful incendiary bomb we saw I went to http://www.humanunderground.com and from there to their Flight 77- Pentagon page. They show the series of four shots -- the first one before any explosion. In that shot there is a square pedestal on the Pentagon lawn and immediately above that is visivle a long somethwhat indistinct long whitish shape -- that is missing from above the pedestal in the subsequent shots showing explosion. They provide a detail (photo enlargement) of this section of the larger image. (Although in the distance shot it is easier to see (interpret) a flying object of some kind. At any rate something is visible right above (and far behind) the pedestal -- indistinct but definitely there in the first shot and gone in the later shots. Interpreted as a plane -- this must be flying about twenty feet off the ground and horizontal. Only a crusie missile can hug terraine like that or advanced war palnes. An amateur pilot would fly in from higher up and dive on the Pentagon -- air turbulence at those low altitudes is too great for an airliner piloted by slow human reactions to do it reliably -- and the perpetrators are obviously smart enough to want to maximize chances of success (minimize chances of error) I say cruise missile. (Especially given the too-big explosion. DO you think that all THAT energy is needed to push an aerodynamic plane to Los Angeles -- look at that intense heat envelope - look at that damage!! A crusie missile would be vaporized by its own super intense explosion -- as happened here. We've seen big planes crash and burn on takeoff -- nothing like release of energy here. An airliner when it impacted would not explode like that -- that kind of energy was not released by the wtc crashboming planes, notice. Note too that when a plane or anything hits a concrete wall there is compression -- the plane is squeezed tail into nose -- but also and necessaryily -- there is also tension (the sides are squeezed out) -- some of the middle section should have popped out sideways and up and down at collision as well as "accordianing" (flattening) back into front. It was a cruise missile or an F-16 aircraft loaded with explosives that = was flown by remote control functioning as a cruise missile. What ever happens to America now depends upon acts of responsibility and = acts of cowardice on the part of the people. DE March 10, 2002 |
