-Caveat Lector-

 From:  www.copvcia.com

 Don't Blink!

 All Promises Broken - Volume II Hearings Held
 Without Notice - Behind Closed Doors

 You Might Miss What's Next

 by
 Michael C. Ruppert
 Posted June 29, 1999 - Copyright 1999 From The Wilderness,
 Michael C. Ruppert. All Rights Reserved

 On May 25, just four days after we published our last issue, under
 the totally misleading heading of "CIA and Drugs in Los Angeles"
 the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) held
 a closed door hearing.  It took us until June 22 to determine that
 the Committee heard testimony that day from Department of Justice
 Inspector General Michael Bromwich, who had not appeared before
 the Committee since the release of his report last year.  And it
 also heard from current CIA Inspector General Britt Snider, who
 discussed Volume II of retired CIA IG Fred Hitz's report on the
 whole Contra war -- not Los Angeles.  Los Angeles was Volume I.
 That's right -- They have had the hearing on Volume II.  They did
 it in secret.  The press did not cover it.  And it remains unclear,
 at this moment, as to whether HPSCI's final report will even be
 declassified or made available to the public in any form at all.
 This is not only a breach of every promise made to us in 1996 by
 both Houses; it is, in my opinion, a complete breach of trust
 between the government and the people.

 In a June 22 conversation with HPSCI Deputy Staff Director, Tim
 Sample, I was told that the Committee "would like to wrap this up
 this summer."  I was also told that the protocol for closing the
 investigation out had not been finalized.  It is "not known"
 whether there will be another hearing.  It is "not known" whether
 or if the Committee's final report will be declassified or ever
 released.  It is "not known" if any additional witnesses will be
 called.  I and retired DEA Agent Cele Castillo and presumably the
 other major figures in the investigation have all received letters
 asking us to submit whatever other evidence "we are aware of"
 before the Committee closes its work.

 This is a sign of true desperation as the Republican controlled
 Committee must absolutely close the issue -- to protect George W.
 Bush -- before the 2000 Presidential campaign begins in earnest in
 October.  It must also protect the biggest secret of all from the
 American people:  The entire economy, and the entire political
 system itself, is currently hooked and dependent upon - drug money.

 I have been saying for years that you could show a video of George
 Bush ordering drug runs, CIA agents laundering money and flying
 airplanes full of drugs and no one in power would do anything about
 it.  They would not be able to.  In this issue I will tell you,
 and the House, about something almost as damning -- a partially
 authenticated letter, written on CIA letterhead and stamped
 "Top Secret", ostensibly written and signed by CIA Director
 William J. Casey in late 1986, that admits to direct participation
 in the drug trade [SEE STORY THIS ISSUE].  I have been aware of the
 existence of this letter for approximately five months.  I have had
 it read to me in its entirety.  It was not until I was given this
 last chance by HPSCI to present "all of the information of which
 you are aware on the allegations" that I was able to obtain an "On
 the Record" statement about the letter from Attorney Ray Kohlman.
 The letter will be admitted into evidence in a new trial motion for
 former Green Beret William Tyree in the near future.  When that
 happens, From The Wilderness will publish the letter, both on the
 Internet and in the newsletter.

 Now that the House has indicated its intent to close the matter for
 good and all it is time to bring the letter forward -- for good and
 all.  I will also see to it that the letter is widely distributed
 enough so that any of the major news organizations will be able to
 follow up on it.  The information in this issue is enough for the
 House Intelligence Committee to go to the CIA and compel it to
 confirm or deny the letter's authenticity.

 Reading The Right Map

 If nothing happens with further hearings, or with the letter,
 I will tell you in advance exactly why.

 Contributing Editor Catherine Austin Fitts, who was a Managing
 Director at Dillon Read before becoming Assistant Secretary of
 Housing under George Bush and who holds an MBA from Wharton makes
 things very simple.  She points out that the four largest states
 for the importation of drugs are New York, Florida, Texas and
 California.  She then points out that the top four money laundering
 states in the U.S. (good for between 100 and 260 billion per year)
 are New York, Florida, Texas and California.  No surprise there.
 Then she rips the breath from your lungs by pointing out that 80
 per cent of all Presidential campaign funds come from -- New York,
 Florida, Texas and California.

 Civics test:  Who are the current governors of Texas and Florida?

 From The Wilderness has been working on a story for an upcoming
 issue that will show conclusively, using testimony of law
 enforcement officers and U.S. Government records, that Dominican
 drug gangs, who dominate the trade in the northeast United States
 -- especially New York and Pennsylvania -- have been making regular
 campaign donations to the Clinton-Gore-Democratic camp since the
 early 90s.  California drug sales are currently split between
 Democratically allied crime factions and entrenched hard core
 Republican strongholds from the Reagan era.  People who shudder
 at the thought of the Chinese buying into presidential politics
 would choke if they knew how much drug money was involved.  Why?
 Again, the answer is simpler than you might think.

 While the Department of Justice estimates that $100 billion in
 drug funds are laundered in the U.S. each year, other research,
 including research material from the Andean Commission of Jurists
 cited by author Dan Russell in his soon to be published book Drug
 War place the figure at around $250 billion per year.  Catherine
 Austin Fitts places the figure at $250 to $300 billion.  Given the
 fact that the UN estimated that in the early 1990s world retail
 volume in the illegal drugs was $440 billion, $250 billion seems
 about right.  Fitts, using her Wall Street experience as an
 investment banker is then quick to point out that the multiplier
 effect (x6) of $250 billion laundered would result in $1.5 trillion
 dollars per year in U.S. cash transactions resulting from the drug
 trade.  How many jobs does $1.5 trillion represent?  Why do
 President's get re-elected?  As Bill Clinton's staff recognized in
 1992, "It's the economy - Stupid!"  During the Contra years, when
 the CIA and Bill Clinton were swimming in cocaine, and Arkansas
 became the only state in the Union to ever issue bearer bonds
 (laundry certificates), employment in Arkansas rose to an all time
 high because there was so much money floating around.  So what if
 they don't count all the dead bodies like two young boys Kevin Ives
 and Don Henry, shot, bludgeoned and dismembered on a railroad track
 after witnessing CIA drug drops.  "It's the economy - Stupid!"

 The Pop

 Corporations trading on Wall Street, including many implicated in
 money laundering schemes where products are sold with questionable
 bookkeeping throughout drug producing regions, all have stock
 values that are based upon annual sales.  Known as "price to
 earnings" or "The Pop" the multiplier effect in stock values is
 sometimes as much as a factor of thirty.  Thus, for a firm like GE
 or Piper Aircraft to have an additional $10 million in sales based
 upon the drug trade, the net increase in these companies' stock
 value could be as much as $300,000,000.  Did GE sell $10 million
 dollars worth of consumer products in Latin America last year?
 Easily.  And since GE owns NBC is there a chance that accurate
 reporting on the drug trade and CIA's involvement therein might
 hurt their stock?

 Disney owns ABC and has a huge retail, resort and entertainment
 empire that benefits from the "drug multiplier."  Would ABC
 consider hurting its parent's stock value?  Ronald Reagan's
 CIA Director, William Casey had been Chief Counsel to Cap Cities
 Broadcasting until 1981.  His old law firm represented Cap Cities
 when it bought the ABC network in 1985.  ABC's Peter Jennings, by
 the way, had been doing a series of investigative reports on the
 CIA drug bank (and successor to the Nugan Hand bank) Bishop,
 Baldwin, Rewald, Dillingham and Wong when the buyout was initiated.
 Cap Cities (not surprisingly) secured SEC approval in record time
 and effectively and immediately silenced Peter Jennings who had
 previously refused to back down from Casey's threats.  Thereafter
 ABC was referred to as "The CIA network."

 I have no doubt that the ABC "object lesson" was front and center
 for CNN founder Ted Turner and Time-Warner when Henry Kissinger,
 Colin Powell and (CIA vet) John Singlaub put the pressure on in the
 wake of April Oliver's 1998 "dead bang accurate" Sarin gas stories
 connecting CIA to the killing of American defectors.  Every major
 media corporation in the country trades on Wall Street.  There are
 no "independents" left and the American people are left with the
 increasing cognitive dissonance of recognizing that they are being
 fed useless bullshit.  I wonder how they would respond to a real
 news corporation if they saw or heard one.

 It's Legal to be Bad

 It is also perfectly legal for a Wall Street brokerage or
 investment bank to go "offshore" and borrow once laundered drug
 money to finance a corporate merger or leveraged buyout (LBO).
 Why do this?  If you were a major multi-national corporation in a
 cutthroat competition to buy a company with a hundred million in
 sales (which might boost your stock value $3 billion) you would be
 willing to pay a seemingly outrageous price.  [How much would you
 be willing to spend to make $3 billion? - 2.9?].  All an LBO is,
 is an acquisition financed on borrowed money.  If you are
 Goldman-Sachs, arranging the deal, and you can borrow laundered
 drug money at five per cent or a bank's money at ten per cent where
 are you going to go?  Remember that since the cost of capital is
 lower using laundered drug money you are now able to outbid all
 the other competitors because your total payback stays the same.
 Does this actually happen?  In 1998 the Russians asked for only
 $18 billion to save their entire economy.  With $440 billion
 a year moving around how could it not happen?

 And a major drug dealer, like a Carlos Lehder, a Pablo Escobar,
 an Amado Fuentes, a Matta Ballesteros or a Hank Rohn, sitting
 around with ten billion dollars of useless illegal money, is more
 than happy to loan it at five percent because his money is now
 legal and liquid.  And, if one goes to prison or dies, there is
 always another dealer to fill the void so that the supply is
 not interrupted.  The drug trade now has power because it is
 underwriting the investments of the largest corporations in the
 world.  It underwrites politicians.  It has hooked the gringos
 on Wall Street whose own children sometimes die from its drugs.

 Wall Street cannot afford to let the drug barons fall.  Congress
 cannot afford to let the drug barons fall.  Presidents and their
 campaign finances cannot afford to let the drug barons fall.  Why?
 Because our top down economy, controlled by one per cent, cannot
 take the risk of letting competition (business or political) have
 the edge of using drug money.  The third world has its revenge for
 European colonialism but Wall Street still calls the shots.  And
 for every million dollars of increased sales or increased revenues
 from a buyout, the stock equity of the one per cent who control
 Wall Street, increases twenty to thirty times.

 Remember -- The National Security Act of 1947, which created the
 CIA, was written by Wall Street lawyer and banker Clark Clifford.
 Clark Clifford is the man who brought the CIA backed drug bank BCCI
 into the United States.  Allen Dulles who virtually designed the
 CIA and served as its Director, and his brother John Foster who was
 Eisenhower's Secretary of State, were Wall Street lawyers from the
 firm Sullivan and Cromwell.  Dwight Eisenhower's personal liaison
 with the CIA was none other than Nelson Rockefeller.  William Casey
 was Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission under
 Richard Nixon.  Former CIA Directors from William Raborn to William
 Webster to Robert Gates to James Woolsey to John Deutch all sit or
 have sat on the Boards of the largest, richest and most powerful
 companies in America.

 As we near the millenium one thing is clear to anyone who sees the
 economic system clearly.  The system is on the verge of implosion.
 Privately owned and operated prison companies trade on Wall Street.
 One of those, Wackenhut, is a virtual CIA proprietary.  We have
 entered, at the end of the industrial age, a phase of growth where
 we must incarcerate an ever expanding number of people to sustain
 the growth of all the companies profiting from law enforcement,
 crime, imprisonment and war.  And the overheated stock market must
 grow or collapse.

 The reason this nation spends five dollars on prisons for every
 one dollar on higher education -- even after seven straight years
 of falling crime rates -- is because there is more profit in it
 in the current economic model.  Hell, we have turned police
 departments into profit making entities through asset forfeiture.
 This is insane!  This economic model is patently no more
 sustainable than a snake eating its own tail can be considered
 nourishment.  Organized crime has become the government and it
 seeks to make all citizens become subliminally guilty participants,
 fearing for their own livelihoods, believing that the system will
 collapse if someone really tackles the issues facing us -- as
 surely as the iceberg faced the Titanic.

 The system will collapse anyway -- unless the economic model is
 turned upside down -- unless a way is found or offered which will
 make it more profitable than all other ways -- to do the right
 thing.  The only thing that will sustain the current economic
 system, and its dependence on drug capital, is a police state.
 New enforcement programs involving HUD and the Department of
 Justice such as Project "Safe Streets" and "Weed and Seed" -- along
 with their corresponding butchery of the Constitution -- show an
 emerging police state already.  The conduct of Congress and the
 White House in the CIA drug investigations further demonstrate the
 arrogance, the fear and the ever-increasing sloppiness of a system
 out of control.  The veneer, the illusion that we live under the
 rule of law cracks before our eyes, grows thinner and ever more
 difficult to sell with each passing minute.

 All at once the fears of the right of a New World Order and
 the fears of the left, of new concentration camps and genocide
 suddenly become one and the same thing.  Dogma matters little
 to the oppressed.  Pain tastes the same whether you call it
 Fascism or Communism.

 Carlos Enrique Lehder Rivas, co-founder of the Medellin Cartel, who
 was given a life sentence in 1990, now enjoys the sunshine at his
 home in the Bahamas.  He frolics regularly with gaming magnate and
 owner of the Atlantis Hotel Sol Kerzner.  His guests at parties
 include Kevin Costner who played (I am sorry to say) both Elliot
 Ness and Jim Garrison.  Manuel Noriega will probably be out of
 prison before Bill Clinton leaves office.  The Kosovo Liberation
 Army has been funded with drug money and has trained with Islamic
 terrorist Osama bin Laden.  The son of a documented drug
 trafficker, who very few people in this country even know anything
 about, is "scheduled" to become our next President, simply because
 he has the most money and he and his backers control most of "The
 Pop."  How much time can this government have?  How much time does
 it deserve?  Bill Clinton's Farewell Address should probably be,
 "Apres moi, le deluge."


 Mike Ruppert






DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to