-Caveat Lector-
>From http://www.middleeastwire.com:8080/storypage.jsp?id=14930
}}}>Begin
EU wants proof of Iraq arms programme
Publisher: Jordan Times (Amman)
By:
Posted: 2002-07-10
EU countries will not consider military attack against Iraq until they see proof that
Baghdad is producing weapons of mass destruction, Italian Defence Minister Antonio
Martino said on Tuesday. The Russian foreign ministry, meanwhile, said Moscow
had not yet been consulted by Washington on any specific US plan to unseat the
Iraqi regime as Iraq said the US could not remove President Saddam Hussein from
power.
Also Tuesday, Iraqi Foreign Minister Naji Sabri accused Hans Blix, the chief UN
arms inspector for Iraq, of having blocked, at Washington's behest, last week's talks
with UN Secretary General Kofi Annan in Vienna.
In Rome, the Italian defence minister said he concluded from meetings with
European officials that European countries would not take part in any military action
against Iraq without sufficient proof from the US.
“It has become evident from the meetings I have had with European colleagues that
if the United States were to decide to take action in Iraq, European countries would
not take part unless it were already proven clearly and unequivocally that Iraq was
producing weapons of mass destruction,” he said.
“It is only under these circumstances that European countries would consider a
possible intervention,” he added.
President George W. Bush said Monday that the United States would use “all
methods available” to overturn Saddam Hussein.
The New York Times reported Friday that a top secret US military document outlines
a massive, three-pronged attack on Iraq by land, sea and air with as many as
250,000 troops and hundreds of warplanes.
Commenting on the report, Martino stressed that the use of the word “plan” was
misleading.
“A plan can be something that you intend to carry out in the short-term, that is
destined to be put into operation, but it can also be a hypothetical idea that will
never
be put into practice at all,” he said.
The Russian foreign ministry, meanwhile, said Moscow had not yet been consulted
on any specific US plan to unseat the Iraqi regime.
Reaffirming its strong opposition to any military intervention in Iraq, the ministry
said
in a statement that it had not yet held any detailed consultations with Washington on
the subject. “We do not have any concrete information about some secret plan by the
US administration to topple Saddam Hussein, and we are not leading negotiations on
this subject,” the ministry said in a statement.
“We firmly believe that an unjustified use of force against Iraq will lead to
catastrophic consequences for the whole Middle Eastern region,” the statement
added.
In Pretoria, Iraq's Deputy Prime Minister Tareq Aziz said on Tuesday the US could
not remove President Saddam from power and his country was ready to defend itself
against American aggression.
Aziz told reporters after a week-long visit to South Africa that Iraq was not worried
by
comments on Monday from Bush, who said the US would use all tools at its disposal
to oust the Iraqi leader.
“President Bush and his government did not bring the Iraqi leadership to power —
therefore they cannot remove the Iraqi leadership from its place because of their own
decisions,” he said in reply to a reporter's question.
“The people of Iraq are independent people, they have always made their own
decisions and they are capable of defending their own sovereignty and dignity... We
are very well prepared to defend the country against any kind of aggression.”
Speculation that the US would attack Iraq to oust Saddam has intensified since talks
aimed at putting United Nations weapons inspectors back in the country broke down
last week.
Allowing UN inspectors to return after a 3-1/2 year absence is seen as key to lifting
UN sanctions against Iraq imposed 12 years ago it invaded Kuwait in August 1990.
In Baghdad, Iraqi Foreign Minister Naji Sabri accused Hans Blix, the chief UN arms
inspector for Iraq, of having blocked, at Washington's behest, last week's talks with
UN Secretary General Kofi Annan in Vienna.
“US pressure was exercised to block a rapprochement in the (two sides') points of
view. One such obstacle came from Hans Blix,” who attended the talks, Sabri said on
his return to Baghdad from the Austrian capital.
Blix, who heads the UN Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission
(UNMOVIC), “refused detailed discussion on the seven-and- a-half years of
inspections,” Sabri said.
“Without an evaluation of what has happened, what the UN considers remains to be
done and without agreement on the ways of settling it, we could not go forward,” the
minister said.
Two days of talks between Annan and Sabri broke down on Friday without an
agreement by Baghdad to accept the return of UN weapons inspectors, barred from
the country since they pulled out in December 1998, a precondition for the lifting of
the embargo.
Aziz says UN must respect own resolutions
Aziz said Iraq wanted the 15-member UN Security Council to “respect its own
resolutions”, and Iraqi officials had highlighted concerns about American plans to
attack in talks with UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan last week.
“We have done our best throughout the 1990s to implement all the provisions and
terms imposed on us,” he said.
“There were inspections and monitoring for eight years — they didn't find anything.
Iraq is entitled to have the sanctions lifted,” Aziz added.
UN weapons inspectors began regular visits to Iraq shortly after a US-led coalition
evicted Iraqi troops from Kuwait in 1991. They withdrew in December 1998, just
ahead of a US- British bombing campaign to punish Baghdad for not fully
cooperating with their inspections.
Aziz, who was visiting South Africa for the first time, met President Thabo Mbeki,
deputy foreign minister Aziz Pahad and other top officials during his stay.
He said Baghdad would continue to give preference to companies from impartial
countries when awarding business contracts, and had explored ways of expanding
trade and economic ties with South Africa during his stay.
“We are giving priority to those countries and governments who are taking a just, fair
attitude towards the plight of the Iraqi people and the legal concerns of Iraq. Of
course, South Africa is one of those countries,” he said.
“When the US and British aircraft are bombing Iraq...they should not expect us to do
business with them.”
Western oil companies are hoping to reap the benefits of patching up Iraqi oilfields
when sanctions are lifted. Iraq's massive, low-cost oil reserves are second only to
those of Saudi Arabia.
Aziz said Iraq would “always stand in support” of the 53-nation African Union, which
was launched in Durban on Tuesday in place of the ineffectual Organisation of
African Unity.
© 2002 [Jordan Times (Amman)].
End<{{{
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Forwarded as information only; no automatic endorsement
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe
simply because it has been handed down for many generations. Do not
believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumored by many. Do
not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not
believe in anything merely on the authority of Teachers, elders or wise men.
Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it
agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all.
Then accept it and live up to it."
The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutta
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
