-Caveat Lector-

From: Paul Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Wired: Echelon 'Confirmation:' Not


This story in Wired (at least online) contests a BBC article I
mailed to you a few days ago.  Steven Aftergood and John Gilmore
are both quoted in the Wired article as saying that Bill Blick's
comments only refer to the interception of radio signals -
something readily apparent from reading the BBC article and not
requiring expert interpretation - and that Blick did not confirm
anything else.  Wired is right - the quoted material did not
support the journalist's article.  If Blick said nothing more
than was quoted, BBC really didn't have much to write an article
about.

However, the Wired article goes on to cast doubts on the
existence of an NSA telephone interception system.  Wired's
editors should know better.

  "Those who have maintained Echelon exists say that its reach into
  the lives of private citizens is especially sinister. The network,
  believed to have close ties to the US National Security Agency..."

Close ties indeed.  The BBC journalist, by not mentioning other
evidence pointing to the existence of such a system (which has in
one form or another existed for more than 30 years), left himself
wide open, and Wired took advantage of that to imply that it's
all just a hoax.

The BBC author also quoted Duncan Campbell out of context, I
believe, since Campbell maintains that "word spotting" is too
difficult for the NSA to do on a large scale.  (as I've said
before, I don't believe this can be proven either way and don't
find his IC2000 report to be convincing)

By the way, the "jam echelon" campaign mentioned in the Wired
article was apparently led by Linda Thompson, the producer of an
controversial underground video about the Waco massacre, and one
of the leaders of the U.S. "militia movement."  Thompson imagines
that the the FBI goons responsible for the Waco attack were
inflitrated by militia supporters, and that the footage shows
agents shooting at other agents.  I think she's a nut.

Now that I've got all that off my chest, I'm writing a letter to
Bob Barr.  I think we can all agree that whatever ECHELON is
called, and whatever it's capable of, it's time for a
congressional inquiry into what exactly it is the NSA does with
all those 90,000 employees and $ 4 billion budget.  I'll bet
they're intercepting telephone calls and analzying them with
computers.


****
ed. comment: I've been suspicious for a long time that Linda
Thompson at best is being exploited in a discrediting-the-enemy
role and at worst is an intentional pro-dark forces agitprop mule/
****



http://www.icdc.com/~paulwolf/echelon.htm


________________________________________________________________



Echelon 'Confirmation:' Not by Chris Oakes

11:45 a.m. 3.Nov.1999 PST


Spy and security experts yawned at reported comments by an
Australian intelligence official that Project Echelon -- the name
of a purported international surveillance network -- exists.

But the statements by Australia's inspector general of
intelligence, Bill Blick, did fuel one US congressman's call for
his government to investigate the possible existence of the
secret project.

"If these reports are accurate, the sheer power and potential for
abuse created by Project Echelon demands congressional
attention," Representative Bob Barr (R-Georgia) said in a
statement released by his office early Wednesday.

Blick was quoted in a story published Tuesday by the British
Broadcasting Corporation and headlined "Global Spy Network
Revealed" as confirming the existence of a coordinated spy
network.

The Americans and British have consistently denied that anything
called Echelon exists.

"As you would expect there are a large amount of radio
communications floating around in the atmosphere, and agencies
such as the [Defense Signals Directorate] collect those
communications in the interests of their national security,"
Blick told the BBC.

Blick said the DSD forms part of the Echelon network. Asked if
information is then passed on to the United States or Britain,
Blick said that "in certain circumstances" it was.

Others were not so impressed with the implications of Blick's
quotes.

"That doesn't tell me anything I didn't know five years ago,"
said Steven Aftergood, director of the Federation of American
Scientists Project on Government Secrecy. "What he is saying is
that intelligence agencies do 'signals intelligence' -- they
intercept and analyze communications and other signals. And
secondly, [Blick said that] Australia cooperates with its allies
in intelligence matters.

"Neither of those points is either new or shocking," Aftergood
said.

Ditto for Electronic Frontier Foundation co-founder John Gilmore.

"In this article, what's being quoted is already known -- that
the Australians have a Defense Signals Directorate that listens
to signals and that they might be passed onto other countries,"
Gilmore said.

Similar reports came out of Australia a year ago that also
suggested such a network exists, he said.

"It doesn't look to me like news. The news is that the BBC is
talking about it."

Those who have maintained Echelon exists say that its reach into
the lives of private citizens is especially sinister. The
network, believed to have close ties to the US National Security
Agency, can reputedly eavesdrop on any phone call, fax, or email,
anywhere on earth.

Proving Echelon's existence has become something of a Holy Grail
for an assortment of privacy advocates, hackers, and journalists.
A widely publicized effort to jam Echelon's signals by including
highly charged keywords in emails was conducted two weeks ago.

To probe Echelon, Barr earlier this year amended intelligence
legislation in the House of Representatives to require US
intelligence agencies to report on legal standards used in
surveillance activities. The legislation -- which targets the
National Security Agency, the Central Intelligence Agency, and
the Department of Justice -- remains in a House-Senate conference
committee awaiting action.

Barr, a former CIA official and United States attorney, serves on
the House Judiciary and Government Reform committees.

Barr has accused the NSA of conducting a "dragnet" of
communication and "invading the privacy of American citizens."

Blick's comments "underscores the need for open public hearings
on the legal standards [that] intelligence agencies use when they
intercept the communications of American citizens," Barr said
Tuesday.

While skeptical of Blick's remarks, Aftergood welcomed any
progress toward a congressional investigation into the issue of
surveillance in general, if not Echelon in particular.

"What we don't know is the scope of actual collection activities
and the extent and intimacy of our intelligence liaison
relationships," Aftergood said.

"I'd hope that efforts in Congress do lead to that increased
clarity -- and to an affirmation of the privacy rights of
American citizens."

Wired News reporter Lindsey Arent contributed to this report.


http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,32302,00.html?tw=wn19991104

___________________________________________________________

BBC, Tuesday, November 2, 1999 Published at 18:01 GMT

Global spy network revealed

Listening in to your phone calls and reading your emails

By Andrew Bomford of BBC Radio 4's PM programme

Imagine a global spying network that can eavesdrop on every
single phone call, fax or e-mail, anywhere on the planet.

It sounds like science fiction, but it's true.

Two of the chief protagonists - Britain and America - officially
deny its existence. But the BBC has confirmation from the
Australian Government that such a network really does exist and
politicians on both sides of the Atlantic are calling for an
inquiry.

On the North Yorkshire moors above Harrogate they can be seen for
miles, but still they are shrouded in secrecy. Around 30 giant
golf balls, known as radomes, rise from the US military base at
Menwith Hill.

Linked to the NSA

Inside is the world's most sophisticated eavesdropping
technology, capable of listening-in to satellites high above the
earth.

The base is linked directly to the headquarters of the US
National Security Agency (NSA) at Fort Mead in Maryland, and it
is also linked to a series of other listening posts scattered
across the world, like Britain's own GCHQ.

The power of the network, codenamed Echelon, is astounding.

Every international telephone call, fax, e-mail, or radio
transmission can be listened to by powerful computers capable of
voice recognition. They home in on a long list of key words, or
patterns of messages. They are looking for evidence of
international crime, like terrorism.

Open Oz

The network is so secret that the British and American
Governments refuse to admit that Echelon even exists. But another
ally, Australia, has decided not to be so coy.

The man who oversees Australia's security services, Inspector
General of Intelligence and Security Bill Blick, has confirmed to
the BBC that their Defence Signals Directorate (DSD) does form
part of the network.

"As you would expect there are a large amount of radio
communications floating around in the atmosphere, and agencies
such as DSD collect those communications in the interests of
their national security", he said.

Asked if they are then passed on to countries like Britain and
America, he said: "They might be in certain circumstances."

But the system is so widespread all sorts of private
communications, often of a sensitive commercial nature, are
hoovered up and analysed.

Journalist Duncan Campbell has spent much of his life
investigating Echelon. In a report commissioned by the European
Parliament he produced evidence that the NSA snooped on phone
calls from a French firm bidding for a contract in Brazil. They
passed the information on to an American competitor, which won
the contract.

"There's no safeguards, no remedies, " he said, "There's nowhere
you can go to say that they've been snooping on your
international communications. Its a totally lawless world."

Breaking the silence

Both Britain and America deny allegations like this, though they
refuse to comment further. But one former US army intelligence
officer has broken the code of silence.

Colonel Dan Smith told the BBC that while this is feasible, it is
not official policy: "Technically they can scoop all this
information up, sort through it, and find what it is that might
be asked for," he said. "But there is no policy to do this
specifically in response to a particular companies interests."

Legislators on both sides of the Atlantic are beginning to sit up
and take notice. Republican Congressman Bob Barr has persuaded
congress to open hearings into these and other allegations.

In December he is coming to Britain to raise awareness of the
issue. In an interview with the BBC he accused the NSA of
conducting a broad "dragnet" of communications, and "invading the
privacy of American citizens."

He is joined in his concerns by a small number of politicians In
Britain. Liberal Democrat MP Norman Baker has tabled a series of
questions about Menwith Hill, but has been met with a wall of
silence.

"There's no doubt its being used as a listening centre," he said,
"There's no doubt its being used for US interests, and I'm not
convinced that Britain's interests are being best served by
this."



=================================================================
             Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:                    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                      *Mike Spitzer*     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                         ~~~~~~~~          <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
       Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=================================================================

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to