-Caveat Lector- It is a matter of record that sodium fluoride has been used for behavior control of populations. In an "Address in Reply to the Governor's Speech to Parliament" , Mr. Harley Rivers Dickinson, Liberal Party Member of the Victorian Parliament for South Barwon, Australia made a statement on the historical use of fluorides for behavior control. Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride will in time reduce an individual's power to resist domination by slowly poisoning and narcotising a certain area of the brain, and will thus make him submissive to the will of those who wish to govern him. Both the Germans and the Russians added fluoride to the drinking water of prisoners of war to make them stupid and docile." Dave Hartley http://www.Asheville-Computer.com/dave Leading Edge Master Analysis of Fluorides and Fluoridation http://www.trufax.org/fluoride/flmaster.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- http://www.trufax.org/fluoride/f2.html The Effect of Fluoride Consumption on Bone Growth The fact that fluorides can cause brittleness and malformation of bones in children is not disputed, even by the apologists for fluoridation, but the pro-fluoridationists deny that fluoride has this effect at the standard prescribed dosage. Unfortunately for the proponents of fluoridation, bodily storage of fluorides taken in drinking water or food takes place principally in teeth and bones. Amounts stored in other parts of the body vary per unit of time depending on the individual. In a report on fluoridation to the Department of Biochemistry at the Nobel Institute of Physiology and Medicine in Stockholm, Nobel prize winner Hugo Theorell stated: "even if the risks from the viewpoints of enzyme chemistry with water fluoridation up to 1ppm are not be exaggerated, the distance to toxic doses is so short that hesitation should be justified." Osteosclerosis is one of the conditions that may be found in people who have subsisted for a number of years on water containing fluorides. Osterosclerosis is a disease of the spinal column in which the tissues between the vertebrae harden. It may also affect the joints and extremities. It is no surprise that in an era of premeditated medical genocide and "ethnic cleansing", that the water in South Africa contains up to 13ppm of sodium fluoride, and that it is affecting growing children differently from the way it affects adults. The children are affected with pain in the legs, disturbances in bone growth and severely mottled teeth. Their bones become chalky, white and porous. For those in doubt, consult the March 1956 issue of the Journal of the American Dental Association where H.C. Hodge remarks, "skeletal deposition of fluoride is a continuing process in which a considerable portion of the ingested fluoride, perhaps 25 to 50%, is deposited in the skeleton." When the long-continued ingestion of fluoride results in mottling of the teeth, it is only logical to assume the existence of remote systemic effects. Such findings have been reported by Danish researchers among workers in cryolite mining who were inhaling fluorine in dust. Not only did these subjects exhibit dental defects (thickened roots and narrowed pulp chambers), but supercalcification was manifested in ostephyte (bony outgrowth) formations on bones, osteosclerosis, calcification of tendons and fixation of the thoracic wall. These same effects have been noted also in parts of Africa and India where the natives have long been using naturally fluoridated water. Associated malnutrition seems to accentuate the effects. Another study was done in England in 1948 where bone defects in three groups of school boys were studied. Two groups were from districts where the water supply was practically free of fluorine. The third group was from the town of Launton, where the natural water supply contains 1ppm of fluorine (the same as the level deemed "safe" by the U.S. Public Health Service). X-ray examination revealed that 20 percent of the first two groups had mild non-specific spinal irregularities. In the third group, the one consuming 1ppm fluoride in their water, 64% were found to have spinal defects, and lesions were more severe. A study was done by Brandl and Tappeiner where very small amounts of sodium fluoride were fed to young growing puppies for 21 months. Their bones were then examined microscopically. Deposited in the bones were crystals of calcium fluoride. The soluble fluorine salts combine with the calcium of the bones, causing increased brittleness. The bones of the fluorine-fed animals were chalky, white and fragile, as were the teeth. The Consumption of Fluorides and Pregnancy Studies of the effect of consumption of minute doses of fluoride salts and its effect on fetal development have not been done on humans, as yet, but only on animals. The results of these studies confirm that the consumption of fluorides has a profound effect on cellular growth, chromosomal stability and a host of other factors. One such study was done in Japanthat involved examination of fluoride deposition in the fetuses of dogs. It was found that the quantity of deposited fluorine was especially large in bones, largest in the cranial bone as well as the lower leg bone. The quantity of fluorine deposition was parallel with the progression of the calcification. They also proved that the deposit of fluorine on teeth and bones starts through the placenta as early as the embryo period, and then takes place through the mothers milk through the infancy period, and through food, as well as directly through the inside of the oral cavity. As fluorine is a known active enzyme poison, it is known to affect cell division (mitotic) in the fetus, resulting in anatomical anomalies (teratism). Fluorides were used as an enzyme inhibitor in a study by J.D. Ebert that was published in 1959 on the metabolic pathways by which organs in an embryo are formed. In low concentrations, he found that sodium fluoride blocked almost completely the regions destined to form muscle, primarily affecting the heart muscle. In higher concentrations, it caused the entire embryo to disintegrate in a clear-cut pattern, starting with the heart-forming region . Could there be a connection between these facts and the rise in still births in cities with fluoridation? In research conducted on the incidence of Mongolism in cities in Wisconsin, Illinois and the Dakotas published in 1959 in the official publication of the French Academy of Medicine, it was found that as the percentage of fluorides in the water rose, there was a parallel rise in the incidence of Mongoloid births the age of the mothers giving birth to Mongoloid babies also declined with rising fluoride levels. It is interesting that. in the first three years of fluoridation, New Britain, Connecticut experienced a 150% rise in still births, while in nearby Waterbury (unfluoridated), the stillbirth rate remained the same during the same time period. Acceleration of Strontium 90 Absorption Due to Physiological Presence of Fluoride Salts As early as 1959, the knowledge existed that the presence of fluoride in human bodies hastens the absorption of radioactive substances present in the environment. In a report to the Atomic Energy Commission's Division of Biology and Medicine entitled "The Metabolism of Alkaline Earth Metals by Bone" by F.W. Lengemann, professor of chemistry at the University of Tennessee on March 23, 1959, it was scientifically shown that the presence of fluorine and other environmental substances such as lead and cyanide in the human body increased the ratio of strontium 90 to calcium in bone. Keep in mind that the U.S. Government, during this time period and for years afterward, conducted numerous above ground nuclear tests. In addition, radioactive substances are routinely released into the atmosphere by nuclear power plants and other government facilities. What is the relevance of this? The presence of fluoride in the water and food affects the growth of bones in children, and additionally causes accumulation of radioactive material from the environment which impacts the bone marrow, contributing to the rise in childhood leukemia, which is already spurred on by ambient electromagnetic fields. A year earlier in 1958, another scientist arrived at an independent conclusion very similar to Lengemann, but this time relative to the growth of cancers within the body. In October 1958, Dr. J.F. Montague, a medical doctor, published material reflecting his growing concern over fluoridation in the Journal of the International College of Surgeons connecting the presence of fluorine in the human body to cancer. Also in 1958, an interesting piece of work was done by Dr. James Kerwin, a dentist, in which it was shown that the simultaneous presence of fluorine and strontium 90 in the human body may result in a greater accumulation of both substances in which compounds like strontium fluoride are formed. Because of the low solubility of these substances, the body has a very hard time getting rid of them. His report was published in Dental Digest in February 1958. Additional Data on the Effect of Fluorides on the Adult Human Body Two years after Kerwins' report in 1960, the American Dental Association issued a pamphlet for public consumption called Fluoridation Facts: Answers to Criticisms of Fluoridation. In defense of the use of toxic fluoride compounds in public water supplies (which is a grievous crime against humanity, since it means mandated involuntary public medication), they used the logic that "people have been known to live to a ripe old age" in areas where the water supply is fluoridated. Unfortunately, they neglected to mention that the addition of fluoride to the water supply correlated directly with the number of still births, mongoloid children, brittle teeth and enlarged dental root structures, adverse spinal conditions, osteomalacia (softening of the bones) and osteoporosis (abnormally porous and spaced structure inside bone) in the medicated population as opposed to control populations that were unmedicated (see Matrix III, V1). In other words, it contributes toward getting "to a ripe old age" rather quickly, well ahead of your time. Fluoride- Induced Collagen Breakdown, Arthritis, Deformed Teeth and Bones Fluoride at levels as low as 1 part-per-million (ppm) in the drinking order give rise to an increase in the urine concentration of certain biological chemicals that signal the breakdown of collagen, as well as the irregular formation of collagen in the body. Collagen is important, making up more than 30% of the protein of the body. It is the most abdundant of all the proteins in the body, and serves as the major structural component of skin, ligaments, tendons, muscles, cartilage, bones and teeth. Fluoride disruption of the nature of collagen in the body results in premature wrinkling of the skin, weakening of ligaments, irreversible arthritis (as the collagen in cartilage is affected) and stiffness of the joints. Dissent on Fluoridation from within the American Dental Association Within any faction or group, as has been profusely illustrated in the Matrix books, there is always dissent from factions who do not agree with policy not ultimately in the public interest. One such example that applies to the subject under discussion is that of John R. Lilliendahl, D.D.S., who wrote a pamphlet in the 1960's entitled My Reasons for Opposing Fluoridation. In this pamphlet, which discusses the issue of safety and water fluoridation, Lilliendahl says: "Failing to demonstrate safety for fluoridation are the mortality statistic comparisons in the 32 paired cities (paired meaning fluoridated vs. unfluoridated) discussed in Public Health Reports in May 1954. In the case of the 32 cities, 5 more deaths per 100,000 observed in fluoridated areas was deemed 'insignificant'. In the Illinois survey, 98 more deaths per 100,000 seemed 'insignificant' to evaluators. These 'evaluations' were discussed in a report entitled Mortality in Fluoride and Non- Fluoride Areas subsequently published in Health and Statistical Bulletin 21 in 1952. Criticism eventually surfaced relative to this study in technical article in the Journal of the Maine Water Utilities Assn. in March 1956 by B.C. Nesin, which stated that "the erratic nature of these surveys is such that a death rate of 600 per 100,000 is deemed insignificant. We have noted that studies of naturally fluoridated areas prove nothing relative to artificially fluoridated places. Since mortality statistics rarely, if ever, list chronic fluorine intoxication as a disease entity, and since physicians generally know little of the symptomology of fluoride poisoning, the value of mortality statistics in proving anything about it seems slight." In other words, there is an assertion by Dr. Lilliendahl here that not only are there no figures to prove conclusively that fluoridation is unsafe, but also there are no figures which prove it is safe. Since the proponents of fluoridation are the ones asking for its use, the burden of proof should be on them, just as the burden of proof of the safety of a food additive is on the processor who proposes it. In Canada, there were observations of this nature as early as 1959. In that same year, the Ontario Minister of Health, Dr. Dymond, announced that no further fluoridation would be permitted there, because "no one knows for sure what the effect is to persons given fluoride throughout a lifetime." In the Edmonton Journal of the same year, Dymond was quoted as saying, "when I prescribe treatment for my patients, I prescribe a stated amount. It is not possible to prescribe a stated amount by introducing it into the water supply." This is the case because of the technical difficulties involved in the water fluoridation process. Technical Aspects to Water Fluoridation: Why a "standard dose" is impossible to achieve Many authorities have pointed out the difficulties involved in "ensuring equal doses of fluorides" to all members of a community simply by adding the toxic chemical to water supplies. Some people drink more water than others. Some obtain more fluorine from food cooked in fluoridated water. Even if the population could be "persuaded" to take a daily dose of a stated amount of water, the dosages would vary in different parts of the population. Problems also arise with fluoridation equipment. A good example of this arose in the town of Red Deer, Alberta, Canada. In Red Deer, 1ppm was the intended dosage of fluoride. Because of faulty mechanical operation of the fluoridation equipment, the fluoride levels in the first three months of 1961 fluctuated between .32 and 2.30 ppm. In the United States, there was a problem in Morristown, New Jersey in the 1950's when fluoridation was first attempted. Fluoridation attempts were discontinued when it was found that despite efforts to obtain a fluoridation level of 1.2ppm, actual values taken at points in the city ranged from 0.0 to .41 ppm (fortunately for the population). Concord, New Hampshire discontinued fluoridation after it was found that the sludge in the water maintains a concentration of fluorides ranging from 1,693 ppm to 4,491 ppm. In DeKalb County, Georgia, where the intended level was .7 ppm, actual concentrations were found to fluctuate between .7 and 1.0 ppm. In 18 locations in West Virginia, fluoride concentrations were found to fluctuate between .2 and 1.6 ppm. Milwaukee's fluorine concentration, when examined, was found over a period of 4 years to vary from .25 to 1.5 ppm. The New York State Department of Health study on this problem found that this problem happens in every location where fluoride is added to public water supplies. In the report of the proceedings of the 3rd Medical-Dental Conference on the Evaluation of Fluoridation, held on March 7, 1959 in New York City, the committee concluded that "It is apparent that the practice of fluoridation is not the simple is not the simple, trustworthy procedure that the promoting authorities have given the profession and the public to believe. Added to the lack of control of fluorides at the consumers tap are these major uncertainties: the gross variation in individual water consumption, the varied intake of fluorides in food and the fluoride intake from atmospheric and occupational exposure. These unpredictable issues make meaningless any talk about "controlled individual fluorine intake." Most, if not all of this research has been buried by the authorities, who maintain glibly that "fluoride compounds are safe in the water supply". It is an absolute lie, a distortion of the truth and constitutes criminal negligence. Use of Sodium Fluoride for Population Behavior Control It is a matter of record that sodium fluoride has been used for behavior control of populations. In an "Address in Reply to the Governor's Speech to Parliament" , Mr. Harley Rivers Dickinson, Liberal Party Member of the Victorian Parliament for South Barwon, Australia made a statement on the historical use of fluorides for behavior control. Mr. Dickinson reveals that, "At the end of the Second World War, the United States Government sent Charles Elliot Perkins, a research worker in chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology, to take charge of the vast Farben chemical plants in Germany. While there, he was told by German chemists of a scheme which had been worked out by them during the war and adopted by the German General Staff. This scheme was to control the population in any given area through mass medication of drinking water. In this scheme, sodium fluoride occupied a prominent place. Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride will in time reduce an individual's power to resist domination by slowly poisoning and narcotising a certain area of the brain, and will thus make him submissive to the will of those who wish to govern him. Both the Germans and the Russians added fluoride to the drinking water of prisoners of war to make them stupid and docile." The book Fluoride - The Freedom Flight also makes reference to the work of Perkins. The author, Dr. Hans Moolenburgh of Haarlem, Holland, relates: " The story I read gave one the cold shivers. It told of a chemical engineer, Mr. Perkins, who related how immediately after the Second World War, he was the one the Americans put into the well-known I.G. Farben Company in Germany. There, he discovered that I.G. Farben had developed plans during the war to fluoridate the occupied countries, because it had been found that fluoridation caused slight damage to a specific part of the brain. This damage had a very particular effect. It made it more difficult for the person affected to defend his freedom. He became more docile towards authority. Scientists in the camps of both proponents and opponents of fluoride have always dismissed this story as mere poppycock, but it had a life of its own and reared its head again and again. It fed the suspicions of many people that 'there was more to fluoridation than meets the eye.' As far as I know, there is no one who has done any serious research into whether the fluoridated person is really more docile, easier to rule, more impressed with authority than the non-fluoridated one. There is, however, one peculiar thing. Every Dutch doctor has a medical reference book for 1984. One chapter is entitled 'Tranquillisers'. Looking at the heading 'Major Tranquillisers', there are 27 compounds listed. Seven of them are a fluoride compound. One of those is called Semap, and it is one of the strongest anti-psychotic compounds we know. This means that 25% of the major tranquillisers are connected with fluoride." It is interesting that Dr. George Estabrooks, an advisor to the United States Government on hypnotism and psychological behavior control, later became chairman of the Department of Psychology at Colgate University. Internationally, Colgate was and remains today the most ardent producer and advocate for fluoridated toothpaste. The use of chemicals by the government to modify behavior of select population groups is not new. During the first two World Wars, bromides were administered to service men to dim the libido in an attempt to inhibit forrays into local bordellos. Today, in Australia, the military fluoridates the drinking water of the soldiers, ostensibly to protect the teeth. However, since the mythical ability of fluorides "to prevent tooth decay" only exists for those under the age of 12, it is certain that the real purpose is less altruistic. In volume one of Matrix III, we discussed the role of Alcoa Aluminum in the production of fluoride, the role of Alcoa lawyer Oscar Ewing, who eventually gained control of what was to become the United States Public Health Service, his promotion of fluoridation and the use of advertising and false propaganda in an attempt to sell water fluoridation to an unsuspecting public. Interestingly, it turns out that Alcoa transferred its sodium fluoride production technology to Germany in 1939 under the Alted Agreement, and Dow Chemical Company transmitted its experience and technology to Germany during the same period. So, we have the U.S. transmitting technology to Germany before the war that allows Germany to experiment on select elements of the European population, and then after the war Nazi scientists and the results of experiments are brought back to the United States under Operation Paperclip. Curious, isn't it? A little research turned up the fact that I.G. Farben developed organophosphate nerve agents, Zyklon B cyanide-based extermination gas used on the Jews during the war, and many other interesting substances. I.G. Farben, financially supported by the United States, was the first to develop and process heroin and cocaine. They also developed fluorinated nerve gases Sarin and Soman. Farben had many interconnections with companies in the United States and Britain. Consult the illustrative chart in this book. In a letter abstracted from Fluoridation and Lawlessness, published by the Committee for Mental Health and National Security (with obvious implications) from the aforementioned Charles Perkins, U.S. appointed post-war head of I.G. Farben, to the Lee Foundation for Nutritional Research, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, October 2, 1954, we read the following: "We are told by the fanatical ideologists who are advocating the fluoridation of the water supplies in this country that their purpose is to reduce the incidence of tooth decay in children, and it is the plausibility of this excuse, plus the gullibility of the public and the cupidity of public officials that is responsible for the present spread of artificial water fluoridation in this country. However - and I want to make this very definite and positive - the real reason behind water fluoridation is not to benefit children's teeth. If this were the real reason, there are many ways in which it could be done which are much easier, cheaper and far more effective. The real puspose behind water fluoridation is to reduce the resistance of the masses to domination, control and loss of liberty." Furthermore, "When the Nazis decided to go into Poland, the German General Staff and the Russian General Staff exchanged scientific and military ideas, plans and personnel. The scheme of mass control through water medication was seized upon by the Russian Communists because it fitted ideally into their plans to Communize the world. I say this in all earnestness and sincerity of a scientist who has spent nearly 20 years research into the chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology of fluorides. Any person who drinks artificially fluoridated water for a period of one year or more will never again be the same person, mentally or physically." When Major General Racey Jordan was in charge of the massive lend-lease airlift operations from Great Falls, Montana to Russia, via Alaska, he queried the transshipment of considerable amounts of sodium fluoride. He was told frankly that it was to put into the drinking water of the prisoner of war camps to take away their will to resist. It is also interesting that former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, who has a background in academic chemistry, initiated a program involving astronomical expenditures of UK revenue on a fluoridation campaign in Northern Ireland. DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
