-Caveat Lector- Radman, First of all, kindly do not use my name as the SUBJECT, please. That is not the subject and is rude. Secondly, your news release is dated November 11. I posted the results of the "investigation" recently as did a couple of others. Nothing was found that was credible. The police with dogs turned out to be chasing a robbery suspect. The road block had been there for a month and was routine (for those too dumb to drive around the block). Did you not read the current posts about nothing of illegality being found? Every little incident explained. But you may be right about some of these LAWYERS and professional civil rights groups bringing private suits for money. I am sure human nature being what it is some will try to collect some sort of damages. That is what these people do for a living. I cannot count what lawyers and professional racial groups contend. I am talking about real, factual charges brought by the justice department. Crimes, rights violations. None were found. I have read that very same worn out account of the "riot" until I could gag. I watched it on TV replayed over and over ad nauseum, to. The committee said it had NOTHING to do with their decision to stop counting. Period. No matter how badly you want that to be the reason, it was not. They estimated the time needed and decided it was not there. NOTHING to do with the riot which was mostly reporters and not even Republicans. If only they would say they were intimidated! What great PR for the Dems. But they will not lie even for their party, unlike the majority involved in this mess. Repeat: The committee says it was not intimidated nor frightened nor anything else by the "riot" and it head nothing to do with their decision to stop counting. And it would have made such a good story! What is wrong with those people! Spoiling such an opportunity to blame the Republicans like that! So do not show me lawyers claims filed to earn a quick buck. Show me the Dept of Justice charges brought based on fact and not somebody out to make a fast buck pretending to have had their rights violated. And something current not 6 weeks old. Stating that an investigation is going to be held does NOT prove evidence was found. Show me the found evidence as a result of these investigations and pages of testimony and supposed names, found that is by those in authority to do so. Who or what agency has been charged and with what violation? Sorry you went to so much trouble assembling all the old disproven propaganda. Seems a lot of "misunderstandings" occurred. Amelia ----- Original Message ----- From: "radman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2001 2:04 AM Subject: [CTRL] For Amelia (re: disenfranchised voters) > -Caveat Lector- > > radman says: > (Sorry for the length, folks. I wanted to be sure all the relevant info was > included.) > > Amelia says: > > Well, I have four words on the issue of Jesse and the disenfranchised > > voters--PUT UP OR SHUT UP! <snip> > > tell the Attorney General and being a Democrat he will bring charges > > against all guilty parties. > > radman says: > To start with, the Democrats couldn't care less about blacks. Please see: > > 1) "GORE WON'T SAY IT BUT: U.S. ELECTIONS ARE RACIST", and, > > 2) "A Racist Elephant in Our Living Room", both below. > > Amelia says: > > Of course one can find voters whose rights were violated if one is > > fabricating them. Produce one name and address of a credible registered > > voter who will swear then were denied the right to vote in an illegal > > manner. Come on, let's hear it! <snip> > > It did not happen. Repeat, IT DID NOT HAPPEN, folks. <snip> > > So if any of you have information of people who want to pursue charges > > that their voting rights were violated, let's hear all about it. > > radman says: > Public knowledge: > > "The US Department of Justice inquiry, led by the department's civil rights > division, > ... is focusing on allegations by black > community leaders that in the run-up to the election minorities were > targeted by > police intimidation and administrative measures which had the effect of > disproportionately disenfranchising black voters." > > and, > > "...the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People > (NAACP) ... announced that it would bring its case to court on the > strength of 300 pages of testimony and 486 plaintiffs." > > For the complete list of allegations, see: > <http://www.civilrights.org/policy_and_legislation/pl_issues/affirmative_act ion/memo1017.html>, > > <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
