Re: [CTRL] Fw: Magic = technology we don't understand

2000-04-19 Thread WK
According to Bernard d'Espagnat ("The Quantum Theory and Reality", Scientific American, Nov.'79,) the implication of Aspect's (and others) experiments refuting Bell's Theorem and vindicating the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics is that AT LEAST ONE of the following basic

Re: [CTRL] Fw: Magic = technology we don't understand

2000-04-19 Thread ThePiedPiper
EINSTEIN's original claim to fame was that he worked for the Swiss patent office. Was he for Democracy or Communism? It could have colored his thinking. ThePiedPiper WK wrote: According to Bernard d'Espagnat ("The Quantum Theory and Reality", Scientific American, Nov.'79,) the implication of

Re: [CTRL] Fw: Magic = technology we don't understand

2000-04-19 Thread Robert F. Tatman
distiguishable from magic." - Original Message - From: "WK" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2000 2:55 PM Subject: Re: [CTRL] Fw: Magic = technology we don't understand According to Bernard d'Espagnat ("The Quantum Theory and Reality"

[CTRL] Fw: Magic = technology we don't understand

2000-04-18 Thread Robert F. Tatman
The sender of this message included the following comment: "I don't know the origin of this essay -- somebody copied it onto another list I'm on, but it is an eye opener -- among other things it shows underlying ideas behind the magical law of contagion." My own reaction was that it validates

Re: [CTRL] Fw: Magic = technology we don't understand

2000-04-18 Thread tenebroust
Thank you Bob! What a great article, it fits in nicely with my own views of "reality" as we "know" it. It is nice to know that there are some "real" scientists out there who hold this view of reality as Maya. It opens up worlds of possibilities. On Tue, 18 April 2000, "Robert F. Tatman"