--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-
According to psyoper Thorne, the 10 largest 'owners' of the Federal
Reserve looks like a list from 'Der Strumer', circa 1930:
i) The Rothschild Family - London
ii) The Rothschild Family - Berlin
iii) The Lazard Brothers - Paris
iv) Israel Seiff - Italy
v) Kuhn-Loeb - Germany
vi) The Warburgs - Amsterdam
vii) The Warburgs - Hamburg
viii) Lehman Brothers - New York City
ix) Goldman & Sachs - New York City
x) The Rockefeller Family - New York City
A list found by Edward Flaherty, Ph.D. Department of Economics
College of Charleston, SC:
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Senate/3616/flaherty5.html
'We can simply look at the most recent list of shareholders to test
the claim that foreigners own the New York Federal Reserve Bank.
According to the N.Y. Fed itself, as of June 30, 1997 the top eight
shareholders were
Chase Manhatten Bank
Citibank
Morgan Guaranty Trust Company
Fleet Bank
Bankers Trust
Bank of New York
Marine Midland Bank
Summit Bank.
All of the major shareholders seen here and all of the banks on the
complete list are either nationally- or state-chartered banks. All of
them are U.S.-owned. Kah's claim that foreigners directly own the
N.Y. Fed is completely wrong. This list is consistent, however, with
Mullins in that all the owners are domestic banks functioning within
the N.Y. Federal Reserve district. The discrepancies are likely due
to mergers, new entries into the banking market, or other significant
changes in the size of district banks since the publication of
Mullins' list. One point is clear: foreigners do not own the New York
Federal Reserve directly'.
Actually, banking in New York in the first half of the 20th Century
was very much a 'white shoe' affair. All the 'Jewish' bankers came
out of two small banks out of over a hundred in the city. I remember
seeing a list of the 500 or so most important bankers of that era and
only three or four were of any real importance.
MacNamara
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> fwd
>
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> <A
HREF="http://www.bankindex.com/Revealing_News/VT_BM/";>http://www.banki
ndex.com/Revealing_News/VT_BM/</A>
>
>
>
> June 12, 2002
> J.Conti
> Contributing Author
> Bankindex.com
>
> Debt into the trillions of dollars, wars encompassing the entire
planet,
> elite agendas, globalization, the Federal Reserve and the future of
humanity
> are just some of the topics author Victor Thorn speaks about in his
books and
> at his web site <A
HREF="www.BabelMagazine.com">www.BabelMagazine.com</A>.
>
> Shocking to some, enlightened to others, one thing is certain,
Victor Thorn
> is more than a passionate author. He is in fact a man with a
powerful message
> for the American people. A message no one can afford to miss.
Victor's
> message is one of extreme urgency and the need for immediate action
to
> prevent a catastrophe of global proportions. As a critical thinker
beyond
> most, as an accomplished author and philosopher, Victor tells us in
his own
> words, "I'm afraid it's now or never."
>
> Following is the text of this world wide exclusive interview with
Victor
> Thorn, conducted by yours truly, J. Conti of Bankindex.com. I have
titled
> this interview "The Cat is Out of the Bag" due to the nature of the
> information discussed. Please read on, you'll see how appropriate
the title
> is.
>
> JC
> Hello, Victor. It's a great pleasure to have you. Please tell us a
little
> about yourself, about the books you have written, and the driving
force
> behind such controversial topics.
>
> VT
> The driving force behind my political writing is fairly simple - I
see this
> country being deliberately undermined by hidden forces that have
seized
> control of our government by nefarious means, and thus use it to
further
> promote their Globalist agenda. These shadowy figures, who I've
labeled the
> Controllers, don't operate with our best interests in mind, but
instead their
> own. Thus, the only hope we have left of saving this nation is to
expose them
> in a dramatic way, then eradicate them as quickly as possible.
>
> JC
> Obviously you are passionate about your work and the message you're
trying to
> convey to the public. Why is it so important for the public to hear
what you
> have to say?
>
> VT
> In my opinion, the importance of what I write stems directly from
survival
> and preservation. Do the American people enjoy being the world's
premier
> superpower, and all that this privilege entails? Do we appreciate
our
> financial status, and the freedoms we're essentially taking for
granted? If
> we do, and this point is very serious - if we do cherish these
ideals and
> rights, we better start acting like it because the die has been
cast to alter
> the way of life we've become accustomed to.
>
> It's time that we look beyond the veil and actually see what the
Controllers
> are planning for us … and believe me, these devils are consummate
planners.
> As of now, China is set to become the world's next superpower,
while America
> will assume a subordinate position (ala Russia in relation to us
right now).
> The reason that China will assume the reins of power isn't because
they
> necessarily want to, but because they've been "selected" due to one
elemental
> factor - exploitation. If viewed from a historical perspective,
you'll see
> what I mean. Three centuries ago, the British Empire stood proudly
as the
> world's preeminent superpower. No one else compared in terms of
military or
> economic might, and if you would have asked any Englishman if
they'd ever get
> toppled from their throne, they would have thought the notion
absurd.
>
> But lo and behold, America entered the picture, and those with
global,
> far-reaching aims realized the potential this land possessed.
Following both
> the American and Industrial Revolutions, our vast potential became
apparent
> in terms of land, resources, and promise. Or, as Alphonse
Rothschild said in
> 1849 while visiting New York City, "Without the slightest doubt,
this is the
> cradle of a new civilization."
>
> So, America boomed, bailed out Europe in a couple of World Wars,
and rose to
> become the greatest nation of modern times. But now China enters
the picture
> with a population of one-billion people, most of whom don't have
cellular
> phones, microwaves, DVD players, or automobiles. So what actions do
the
> Controllers take? They "select" Globalist leaders to implement
their plans by
> not only giving China "Most Favored Nation" status, but they also
sell them
> all the computer software, hardware, and know-how to move them into
our
> league. It's absurd, like a cow deliberately walking into a
slaughterhouse to
> be butchered. Thanks Bill Clinton and George Bush (I & II) for
selling us
> out.
>
> And that's only the tip of the iceberg. Don't even get me started
on the
> atrocities of war, NAFTA, etc.
>
> JC
> Can you tell us about the American money system? That is, how it
really
> works. I think an overview will benefit us all.
>
>
> VT
> For any country to truly prosper, it must have control over its
money system.
> It's that simple. Financial independence (not being beholden to
anybody) is
> the key. That's one of the main reasons why our Founding Fathers
broke free
> from England. Not only did they seek religious freedom, but also
financial
> freedom. Or, as historian Ralph Epperson noted, "The cause of the
Revolution
> was the resistance of the colonies to the idea of borrowed money,
resulting
> in debt and inflation, as well as interest payments, and
not 'taxation
> without representation' as is commonly believed."
>
> I'm afraid, though, that over two centuries later we're as enslaved
as a
> nation can be by outside forces that control the entirety of our
purse
> strings. The money system controls America; and those who call the
shots are
> not located in Washington, D.C., but in the financial centers of
New York
> City and beyond (London, Paris, Germany, etc.). Right now our
country pays
> approximately $360 billion a year in interest payments on the
National Debt.
> That's $360 BILLION every year! Imagine how much we could
accomplish with
> that money if it wasn't funneled into the pockets of men who are
already
> wealthy beyond words. From my perspective, this is the
> least-common-denominator to how our money system works. Usury is
one of the
> greatest evils on this planet.
>
> JC
> Now, about the Federal Reserve. It's no secret that you advocate
the
> abolition of the Federal Reserve, but why? Tell us what makes this
> Corporation so dangerous in your opinion.
>
> VT
> The Federal Reserve CORPORATION (and remember, that's what it is -
a
> privately-owned, for-profit corporation), is dangerous because it
has allowed
> outside influences to usurp our government. Thomas Jefferson once
declared,
> "I believe banking institutions are more dangerous than standing
armies."
> Anthony Sutton, in "The Federal Reserve Conspiracy,"
added, "Nothing is more
> dangerous to the power of the elite than the public discovery and
> understanding of the PRIVATE control of the money supply."
>
> The dangers of this institution lie in the fact that it was created
in 1913
> on a premise of pure deception. Rather than being a part of the
Federal
> Government, as its name implies, the Federal Reserve is actually
closer to a
> "Central Bank" described by Karl Marx in "The Communist Manifesto."
Thus, the
> Federal Reserve System is an aggregate of private banks owned by
> international financiers who meet and make decisions behind closed
doors.
> Being that profits are an integral part of any business enterprise,
what do
> you think the primary stockholders of the Federal Reserve (many of
them
> foreign based) have as their highest priorities - our welfare; or
their own
> agenda? What's worse, money isn't even the predominant factor in
their
> decision-making process. Hell, they already have fortunes beyond
their
> wildest dreams. It was even estimated that in 1900, the Rothschild
family
> owned half the world's total wealth! No, what's really frightening
is that
> power and control are their main motivations, and in that sense we
have to
> ask ourselves, does someone like David Rockefeller or his ilk
sitting in
> skyscrapers overlooking New York City have the same priorities as
we do? The
> answer is no, they don't. That's where the danger lies.
>
> JC
> Do you know who the actual owners of the Federal Reserve are? Can
you tell us
> how the ownership of the Federal Reserve is split?
>
> VT
> In "Economic Solutions," Peter Kershaw provided a list of the ten
primary
> shareholders in the Federal Reserve banking system:
>
> i) The Rothschild Family - London
> ii) The Rothschild Family - Berlin
> iii) The Lazard Brothers - Paris
> iv) Israel Seiff - Italy
> v) Kuhn-Loeb - Germany
> vi) The Warburgs - Amsterdam
> vii) The Warburgs - Hamburg
> viii) Lehman Brothers - New York City
> ix) Goldman & Sachs - New York City
> x) The Rockefeller Family - New York City
>
> What's truly appalling is that 7 of the top 10 stockholders in the
Federal
> Reserve are located in foreign countries! Plus, Jim Marrs adds in
his
> excellent book "Rule By Secrecy" that the Federal Reserve Bank of
New York,
> which undeniably controls the 11 other Federal Reserve branches, is
> essentially controlled by two financial institutions:
>
> a) Chase-Manhattan (a Rockefeller stronghold) - 6,389,445 shares -
32.3%
> b) Citibank - 4,051,851 shares - 20.5%
>
> Thus, these two entities control nearly 53% of the New York Federal
Reserve
> Bank. The power they have is mind-boggling.
>
> JC
> What about our National Debt? How does it work, and ultimately, who
is all
> the money owed to?
>
> VT
> The National Debt at this time is approximately $5.9 trillion. Of
that, $2.54
> trillion is owed to intranational bankers, or 37%. The other $3.38
trillion
> is owed to the public. The interest we pay each year is
approximately $360
> billion. My solution to this colossal problem is as such:
>
> a) Default on that portion of the National Debt not owed to private
American
> citizens. How can we do such a thing, you may ask? Well, if a
person defaults
> on their car loan or mortgage, what happens? The automobile or
house gets
> repossessed. But what are the international bankers going to do -
repossess
> our country? Hardly. We simply tell them point-blank that we refuse
to pay
> them any more interest, or the principal. It may mean going to war,
but it's
> time to show the world that these bankers are the REAL terrorists.
> b) We make a one-time payment to all public holders of our National
Debt.
> c) Finally, return the creation of money back to Congress as is
written in
> the Constitution: Article 1, section 8, subsection 5. Only Congress
has the
> right "to coin Money, and regulate the Value thereof."
>
> As a side-note, our National Debt rose in just 30 years from $409
billion in
> 1971 to $5.9 TRILLION in 2002. That means when Nixon was President,
we only
> owed 1/15th of what we owe today.
>
> JC
> How does the Federal Reserve operate? If at all, can you estimate
their
> profit margin?
>
> VT
> This is the trickiest question of all, and I must admit that there
are
> economic scholars that could discuss the nuts-and-bolts details
better than
> I. But I'll give a brief overview to the best of my ability. The
Treasury
> Department prints money for the Federal Reserve, who in turn loans
it to our
> government, at interest.
>
> Here's where the scam enters the picture. According to Davy Kidd
in "Why a
> Bankrupt America," it costs $23.00 to print 1,000 one-hundred
($100) bills.
> If you printed 10,000 of these bills, it would naturally cost
$230.00 ($.023
> x 10,000). But here's the catch. 10,000 $100 bills would equal
$1,000,000!
> So, the cost of "creating" a million dollars is only $230.00
>
> Those in the financial industry call this practice "seignorage,"
but to me,
> it's closer to outright THEFT. In fact, I view the Federal Reserve
in the
> same light as I do organized crime. This privately owned
corporation
> "creates" money for practically nothing; then lends it at interest
to us.
> Then, to cover its debt, the U.S. government imposes taxes on its
citizens.
> The higher the debt, the more interest we owe, and thus the higher
taxes
> become. It's a vicious cycle, and guess who ultimately wins - the
> Controllers.
>
> JC
> Do you think this is why as Americans we will never be able to
finish paying
> what we owe?
>
> VT
> I'm not a fan of the Republicans, Democrats, Independents, Greens,
or
> Libertarians, so please don't think I'm 'bashing.' I dislike all of
them
> equally. Anyway, George Bush's 2002 Federal budget came to
approximately
> $2.05 trillion. If you stacked this amount of money in one-dollar
bills, it
> would reach all the way to the moon and half-way back again. The
National
> Debt is three times larger, so these stacked dollar bills would
stretch from
> the earth to the moon and back, then from the earth to the moon and
back
> AGAIN, then halfway to the moon yet again. Hell, we have trouble
even paying
> off the interest, let alone the principle, and with our War Machine
set to
> roll at top speed again, the debt will only get worse.
>
> JC
> It has been said that the same people that own the Federal Reserve
own the
> media, the big oil companies, and even have powerful ties to the
government
> of the United States, and those of other countries. If so, how does
this
> affect the dynamics of a true democracy?
>
> VT
> You are correct in that there is a definite pyramid of control in
the world,
> with the international bankers at the top of it, secret societies
and
> European aristocracy/royalty below them, followed by the heads of
> intranational companies and old-money American families at the
third level,
> with … get this … certain political leaders at the fourth tier.
It is my
> assertion that these political leaders (George Bush, Bill Clinton,
Ted
> Kennedy, etc.) aren't elected, but "selected" by groups such as the
Council
> on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, and the Bilderbergs.
If
> Americans ever peered behind the veil and saw the Wizard of Oz
illusion that
> controls their political system, they'd be shocked beyond belief.
>
> In regard to the dynamics of a democracy, again, I would say it is
nothing
> but illusion. Once we examine Votescam, black budget enterprises,
membership
> to certain Globalist groups, and how the true political power base
isn't
> located in Washington, D.C., but in New York City, we'd realize
that our
> say-so in how this country is run is extremely limited.
>
> JC
> In your opinion, do we even live in a real democracy? The Internet
is
> festering with material showing that we are living an illusion,
that our
> leaders are fronting for the 'elite,' and reports of government
misconduct
> can be found everywhere. What does it all mean?
>
> VT
> The best answer to this question can be found in the recent
Bilderberg
> meeting that took place from May 30-June 2 at the Westfields
Marriott in
> Chantilly, Virginia only 7 miles south of Washington, D.C. 120 of
the world's
> most powerful bankers, statesmen, politicians, military leaders,
CEO's,
> royalty, and media members met on the outskirts of our nation's
capital.
>
> Now, when the world's greatest actors meet every year at the
Academy Awards,
> does the media cover the event? Of course. When our two best
football teams
> meet at the Super Bowl, is the media there? Naturally. The
Grammy's - the
> media is there. The Emmy's - the media is there. Paul McCartney's
wedding -
> the media is there. The President's inauguration - the media is
there. Hell,
> the media even covers frog-jumping contests in rural Mississippi.
But when
> the Bilderbergs or Trilateral Commission meet to discuss such
topics as our
> impending war with Iraq, a U.N. sanctioned World Tax, terrorism,
and
> America's dollar becoming the common currency of North, South, and
Central
> America, NOT ONE media source except the American Free Press
covered this
> vitally important event.
>
> I contacted the National Editor at the Washington Bureau of the
Knight-Ridder
> newspaper chain, the Executive Editor of our local newspaper, and a
> nationally syndicated radio talk show host (Mike Gallagher) urging
them to
> cover this conference, while scores of other people notified the
major TV
> networks, CNN, and high-profile newspapers and magazines such as
Time and the
> Washington Post (who even had a representative present at the
meeting). But
> none of them covered the event. Why? Because the same people that
control the
> President, Congress, banks, and major corporations also own the
media.
> (Essentially, five major corporations own the entire mainstream
media in this
> country.)
>
> Of course government misconduct is rampant in America, such as
illegal
> chemtrail spraying by the military and the U.N., but the biggest
crime facing
> us is that our government has been usurped, and that the media
refuses to
> expose the power structure that exists behind the scenes. To them,
the
> chain-of-command stops with George Bush or Bill Clinton. But
nothing could be
> further from the truth. These individuals are nothing more than
> "Implementers" of decisions made by the shadow government. If the
media EVER
> let this cat out of the bag, our world would be dramatically
different, so
> the 'secret' is guarded with obsessive care.
>
> JC
> Do you see any relationship between the "elite" and 9-11? If so,
can you
> explain?
>
> VT
> God, where to start on this one? I guess the best place to begin is
with the
> preponderance of evidence pointing out in glaring detail that those
in
> positions of power were aware that an attack was going to occur on
the
> morning of September 11, 2001. And I'm not talking about vague
generalities -
> but precise times, dates, where's, when's, and how's. Obviously,
due to space
> and time limitations I won't delve into specifics, but if anyone
gets on the
> Internet and starts researching this subject, they'd be blown away
by how
> much so many people knew.
>
> The underground press, alternative news sources, and online
websites have
> been writing about 9-11 foreknowledge since late 2001, and finally
Congress
> has convened to look into this matter. The only problem is, I
examined a list
> of members from both investigative committees, and guess who is
manning them:
> almost every person is a member of the Trilateral Commission, the
CFR,
> Bilderberg, or has received huge campaign contributions from the
Carlyle
> Group or defense contractors. Similar to the Roberts Commission
investigating
> FDR's foreknowledge of Pearl Harbor and the Warren Commission
looking into
> JFK's assassination (both of which, naturally, were shams), these
current
> sessions will be nothing more than window dressing.
>
> Now, you may wonder, why would the Controllers allow hijacked jets
to plummet
> into the World Trade Center and Pentagon? The answer is simple.
Similar to
> the sinking of the Lusitania, Pearl Harbor, and the Gulf of Tonkin,
Americans
> need a dramatic event to raise their ire and pull them into war.
That's what
> 9-11 accomplished. We were rocked to our very core.
>
> The result was also quite evident. (Y'see, the Controllers' motives
are SO
> easy to see once you know what to look for.) Anyway, by setting our
sights on
> Afghanistan and getting the War Machine rolling, the elite are
capitalizing
> on the three biggest "industries" or money-making ventures in the
entire
> world: usury, energy, and drugs.
>
> i) Usury - The Controllers make vast amounts of money off of war
because
> every country involved needs money to finance their efforts, so
where do they
> get their capital? From the international bankers. And what results
from
> loans? Interest - lots and lots of interest. Plus, once each nation
gets
> their money for the War Machine, they need to buy bombs, guns,
tanks,
> bullets, planes, etc. And where do they get these "necessities?" At
the local
> Wal-Mart? Nope, they have to buy them from the major defense
contractors that
> are owned by whom? Yup, the Controllers! In this country, if you
investigate
> the Carlyle Group, you'll see how it fits part-and-parcel into our
war
> efforts.
> ii) Energy - There are huge deposits of oil in the Caspian region
of Russia,
> and we have a plethora of pipelines already in place in the Middle
East. The
> energy companies find immeasurable benefits in getting this oil to
the
> pipelines. The only problem is; there's a little country sitting
between them
> - Afghanistan.
> iii) Drugs - The CIA is the largest drug dealer in the world, and
has been
> involved in drug trafficking since its inception 50 years ago (and
even
> before then as the OSS). All of their black budget projects are
financed by
> drug dealing, along with money laundering, illegal arms sales, and
gambling,
> etc. Anyway, Afghanistan is the world's leading producer of opium
(70% of the
> total), and a few years ago the Taliban stopped all production.
Now, if the
> CIA is deriving huge amounts of money from heroin and opium and
morphine,
> then this source suddenly dries up, there's a problem. Well, I've
just read
> that since the Taliban have essentially been eradicated from
Afghanistan,
> guess what's back in full production again - you guessed it - the
poppy
> fields.
>
> In all, we need to remember that by-and-large, wars don't start
with the
> masses. They're incited by the Controllers to "create a condition"
as Abraham
> Lincoln's Secretary of War, Edwin Stanton, said. And that's exactly
what's
> happening right now. A New World Order is being created, and we're
simply bit
> players in this Theater of War.
>
> JC
> What do you think the "elite" are after? Can they be stopped? If
so, how?
>
> VT
> The Controllers' aim for centuries has been the establishment of an
> occult-based New World Order where national boundaries will all but
be
> eliminated. There will still be certain "regions" such as
the "Americas," but
> the world will more closely resemble modern-day Europe with a
common currency
> and unified States. The United Nations, or a similar organization,
will
> replace individual governments, and there will be global concepts
introduced,
> such as a World Tax, World Court, World Anthem, and World Army.
>
> Specifically in regard to America, there is a battle being waged
between the
> Globalists and Nationalists (or Populists - those who want America
to retain
> its sovereignty and not fall under the rule of a global hierarchy).
> Regrettably, most of the national players you see on TV fall under
the
> Globalist category.
>
> Another concept that must be considered is the United States
deliberately
> being undermined by its leaders who are in the employ of the
Controllers. By
> ratifying treaties such as NAFTA and GATT, and giving our
technological and
> computer know-how to China, we're chopping ourselves off at the
knees. The
> industrial base upon which we built the greatest nation of all-time
is being
> eliminated at a frightening pace. Plus, when you see how our
military is
> being dispatched (thinned-out) across the globe in preparation for
WWIII,
> you'll understand how vulnerable our position is. Keep your eye on
China -
> they're the key.
>
> JC
> Let's say you had access to the floor of the United States Congress
for 10-15
> minutes, and that all the members were present. What would you say
to them?
>
> VT
> In all honesty, I don't think it would matter much what I had to
say to
> Congress. Why? Well, except for a few rebels - Ron Paul from Texas,
James
> Trafficante and Dennis Kucinich from Ohio, and Cynthia McKinney of
Georgia -
> Congressional members are in a position where they're more than
satisfied
> with the status quo.
>
> Here's my rationale: First of all, years ago George Wallace
said, "There's
> not a dime's worth of difference between the Republicans and the
Democrats."
> And it's true. Oh sure, it 'appears' as if there is, but in
reality, the
> entire media-political scene is nothing more than professional
wrestling. How
> can I make such a statement? Well, both have predetermined outcomes
that are
> established out of public view, and both present the results in a
dramatic
> fashion. It's all illusion, folks.
>
> But let's take things a step further. Why SHOULD Congress want to
alter the
> status quo? I mean, in the American Caste System … yes, America
does have a
> caste system … our political leaders are the ones that the system
works for.
> Here's why. The American Caste System is divided into four
categories - the
> rulers, enforcers, slaves, and untouchables; with one variable
class - the
> outlaws. The rulers, of course, are elite families such as the
Rockefellers,
> Morgans, Carnegies, and Kennedy's. The slaves are the workers;
untouchables
> are the drug addicts, gang members, etc.; while the Enforcement
Class are
> those individuals in the media, military, police force, court
system,
> academia, religious hierarchy, and legislature. This is the class
that
> perpetuates the illusion by REFUSING to tell the truth about what's
going on.
>
> In their eyes, injustice and an impending New World Order are
preferable to
> chaos or upheaval. Y'see, as I said, the current system works for
them. They
> have nice houses, a BMW and SUV, a respectable salary, influential
> 'positions,' take vacations in Florida every January, and dine at
the country
> club on Friday nights. But if people such as the "outlaw class"
start riling
> things up, uncertainty enters the picture. That means the stock
market may
> plummet, riots could occur in the streets, or a disruption to the
status quo
> would ensue - thus threatening their valued social and economic
positions.
>
> When viewed in these terms, it's easy to see why college
professors,
> newspaper editors, military personnel, or most Congressmen don't
tell the
> truth, or even seek it out. From my perspective, this sad
commentary on
> American life is appalling, and all those in the Enforcement Class
that turn
> a blind eye to the truth are cowardly at best. A perfect example is
the
> Executive Editor at our local newspaper. I've filled him in one
numerous
> topics that I've discussed in this interview, yet he still prints
lies,
> misinformation, or utter fluff. His actions are inexcusable, and in
my
> opinion, I don't know how he can look at himself in the mirror
before bed
> each night.
>
> JC
> Finally, what do you say to the American people?
>
> Pure and simple - if you want to preserve the rights and freedoms
that you've
> become accustomed to, and if you'd like to see America remain "king
of the
> hill," then immediate, decisive action must be taken. I'm talking
about a
> revolution to overthrow the Controllers that have illegally taken
possession
> of our government. Now don't jump to conclusions or get me wrong.
I'm not
> saying that we should overthrow the government. First of all, it's
against
> the law to make such a statement, and secondly, there's nothing
inherently
> wrong with our government in theory as it was envisioned by our
Founding
> Fathers.
>
> Problems arose when the international bankers, both foreign and
domestic,
> seized control of our money supply. That's who we need to eliminate
in short
> order. If we don't, I promise you that our quality of life will
dramatically
> decrease in the coming years. But how do we get rid of these
devils? Here's a
> partial answer:
>
> a) Abolish the Federal Reserve System
> b) Default on that portion of our National Debt owed to
international bankers
> c) Return the creation of money to Congress, as it was prior to 1913
> d) Abolish NAFTA, GATT, and all other Globalist treaties
> e) Impose tariffs on every product imported into this country
>
> Folks, I apologize if my tone hasn't been overly cheerful during
the course
> of this interview, but things are deadly serious in this country
right now,
> and I have to ask each and every one of you one question: do we
have the
> guts, courage, and BALLS to save this nation, or are we going to
rollover and
> play dead? The Controllers have committed SO MANY crimes and
atrocities
> against the American people that it's time to retaliate. There's an
> individual named Rick Stanley who's running for a Congressional
seat in
> Colorado that's organizing a "Million Gun March" in Washington,
D.C. next
> July 4th, 2003. Such an idea is precisely what we need - to
assemble in large
> numbers with guns in hand, or if you don't like guns, then take a
shovel,
> broom, torch, or whatever else would have an impact and SHOW the
Controllers
> that we're not going to allow them to hold us hostage any longer.
I'm afraid
> it's now or never. If we don't get organized and take back our
country, it's
> all over. It's up to you to decide if America is worth saving, or
if we're
> going to let those bastard Controllers steamroll over us. I'm ready
and
> willing to do my part!
>
>
>
>
>
> <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
> ==========
> CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing
propagandic
> screeds are unwelcomed. Substancenot soap-boxingplease! These are
> sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'with its many half-truths,
mis-
> directions and outright fraudsis used politically by different
groups with
> major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and
thought.
> That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts,
and
> always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
> credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
>
> Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
>
======================================================================
==
> Archives Available at:
> http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
> <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives
of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
>
> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
> <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
>
======================================================================
==
> To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
> SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Om
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
<FONT COLOR="#000099">Will You Find True Love?
Will You Meet the One?
Free Love Reading by phone!
</FONT><A HREF="http://us.click.yahoo.com/Deo18C/zDLEAA/Ey.GAA/xYTolB/TM";><B>Click
Here!</B></A>
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Please let us stay on topic and be civil.
To unsubscribe please go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs
-Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org
OM
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
--- End Message ---
