--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-
One glance at Judge Melinda Harmon's bio says it all:
'The presiding judge in the Andersen criminal case, U.S. District
Court Judge Harmon was named to the federal bench by President George
H.W. Bush in 1989 after spending 12 years as a lawyer for Exxon.
Through the luck of the judge-selection draw, 55-year-old Judge
Harmon also happens to be simultaneously overseeing various civil
cases against Andersen, a class-action lawsuit against Enron and
Enron's $10 billion lawsuit against Dynegy. She has said the Andersen
criminal trial must end on May 29 because she is going on vacation
and has nonrefundable plane tickets'.
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB1021254095151271880,00.html?
mod=special_page_enron_hs_2
--------------------------------------------------------
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB1021249254695582240,00.html?
mod=special_page_enron_hs_2
A Recap of Proceedings
In the Andersen Trial
Arthur Andersen's criminal trial on a single felony count of
obstruction of justice opened in U.S. District Court in Houston on
May 6. David Duncan, the Andersen auditor fired for the Enron
document shredding, testified for five days. The case went to the
jury on June 5.
Latest Developments
Jurors in the Andersen criminal obstruction-of-justice trial retired
to their hotel rooms once again after a fifth day of deliberations
without reaching a verdict.
Week 1
Day One (May 6):
Highlights: Andersen's defense lawyers struggled to pick a jury to
try the document-shredding case that could determine the fate of the
embattled accounting firm. The government, facing a Texas jury and a
fiery Texas defense lawyer, Rusty Hardin, made a last-minute change
in its lineup, giving former Texas federal prosecutor Matt Friedrich
a more prominent role in the case. ... Several would-be jurors
admitted they harbored anger about the fall of Enron, and some said
they couldn't separate the actions of Enron and the actions of
Andersen, its former auditor. ... A jury of seven women and nine men
was picked, including one juror who asked Mr. Hardin what the SEC was.
Full Story: U.S. to Say Andersen Officials Knew of Efforts to Cover
Up Enron Mess
Day Two (May 7):
Highlights: Judge Melinda Harmon allowed prosecutors to introduce
evidence of Andersen's audit failures at Sunbeam Corp. and Waste
Management Inc. during the 1990s. ... Prosecutors laid the foundation
of their case for a motive, contending that they can prove Andersen
feared it would be suspended from auditing publicly owned clients
were it to be found in violation of a consent decree signed with the
SEC last year. It was out of that fear, prosecutors argued, that
Andersen's partners and employees devised a careful plan to destroy
evidence of Andersen's faulty audit work for Enron, the once-powerful
energy trader that collapsed last year ... Andersen's lead attorney,
Mr. Hardin, replied in his opening argument, "The evidence will show
that there was no organized effort to get rid of any specific
documents" in advance of the SEC's probe.
Full Story: Andersen Runs Into Major Setback One Day Into Its
Obstruction Trial
Day 3 (May 8):
Highlights: James A. Hecker, an energy specialist in Andersen's
Houston office, warned colleagues in August 2001 of " 'smoking guns'
that you can't extinguish" relating to the accounting firm's
controversial audits for Enron Corp. ... An SEC attorney testified
that the abrupt resignation of Enron's chief executive and potential
conflicts involving its chief financial officer led the SEC to launch
its investigation into Enron last August. ... Thomas C. Newkirk, who
led the SEC's investigations into accounting fraud at Waste
Management and Sunbeam, testified that the Andersen partner who
signed the firm's SEC consent decree over its Waste Management audits
implored the SEC not to bring fraud allegations against Andersen
because the firm already had "learned its lesson" over the Waste
Management situation. ... Mr. Hardin castigated the SEC as an
ineffective agency from which Andersen would have had little to fear,
in an attack on the prosecution's motive theory.
Full Story: Partner Warned Andersen Over Problems With Audits
Day 4 (May 9):
Highlights: Mr. Hardin unequivocally signaled that the Andersen's
defense strategy will be to convince jurors there was nothing
improper about destroying Enron-related documents last fall in the
weeks before the firm received a Nov. 8 subpoena from the Securities
and Exchange Commission. ... Mr. Hardin held an impromptu news
conference at day's end at which he accused the Justice Department of
witness tampering and called for a federal investigation into the
treatment of witnesses by the government's Enron Task Force. Mr.
Hardin's statements came after Andersen manager Kate Agnew declined
to testify, citing her Fifth Amendment right against self-
incrimination.
Full Story: Andersen Now Claims Shredding of Documents Wasn't Improper
Day 5 (May 10):
Highlights: Judge Harmon denied Andersen lawyers' request for notes
taken by David Duncan's attorneys during government interviews of
their client. ... Prosecutors disclosed that Andersen attorney Nancy
Temple had invoked her Fifth Amendment right against self-
incrimination and wouldn't testify. ... Amy Ripepi, an Andersen
partner, confirmed that Andersen Ms. Temple twice told participants
in an Oct. 20 conference call to "make sure to follow" the firm's
document-retention policy. Under cross-examination, however, Ms.
Ripepi testified that no one during those conference calls made any
mention of the prospect that a SEC inquiry into Enron might extend to
Andersen.
Full Story: Andersen Is Denied in Bid for Notes but Is Helped by
Testifying Partners
Week 2
Day 6 (May 13)
Highlights: David Duncan, former Andersen partner and the
government's star witness in the criminal trial, told jurors Monday
that he ordered subordinates to follow Andersen's "document-retention
policy," knowing the instruction would direct them to destroy -- not
save -- documents related to the firm's audits of Enron. ... Earlier,
prosecutors attacked the credibility of an Andersen partner, Amy
Ripepi, whose testimony last week had offered the most favorable
evidence yet for the firm. ... Judge Harmon allowed prosecutors to
ask Ms. Ripepi several questions about Andersen in-house lawyer Nancy
Temple's notes, even though Ms. Temple last week exercised her Fifth
Amendment rights against self-incrimination. Outside the presence of
the jury, a furious Mr. Hardin said the line of questioning could
prove to be "reversible error" in the case.
Full Story: Duncan Testifies That He Knew Enron Papers Would Be Lost
Day 7 (May 14)
Highlights: David Duncan told jurors he launched Andersen's massive
campaign to destroy documents in October because he feared potential
lawsuits and regulatory inquiries over the accounting firm's audits
for Enron. Prosecutors will attempt to use the testimony by Mr.
Duncan to prove Andersen had a motive for destroying tons of Enron-
related documents. ... If accepted, Mr. Duncan's testimony that he
and others at Andersen knowingly stood by while Enron executives
misrepresented the reason for a $1.2 billion shareholder-equity
misstatement potentially could assist the government in building a
fraud case against Andersen and other individuals. ... Meanwhile,
Enron proved to be a cash cow for Andersen even in its darkest hour.
Mr. Duncan testified that during the one-month period that ended Nov.
9 -- the day after Andersen received its SEC subpoena -- the firm
billed Enron $3.2 million.
Full Story: Duncan Says Fear of Lawsuits Drove Shredding of Documents
Day 8 (May 15)
Highlights: David Duncan testified that he knew he could face a stiff
prison sentence and possible accounting-fraud charges related to
Enron Corp.'s collapse if he didn't cooperate with the government in
its prosecution of Arthur Andersen ... Duncan's testimony has been
notable for the lack of new evidence it has produced to directly
support the government's case.
Full Story: Ex-Andersen Partner Duncan Says He Knew He Faced Fraud
Charges
Day 9 (May 16)
Highlights: David Duncan confirmed that he preserved several
potentially embarrassing records alleging wrongdoing at the Enron.
Andersen attorney Rusty Hardin used his cross-examination to argue
that Mr. Duncan would have destroyed these files, too, if he had
really been trying hide anything from federal investigators. ....
Tempers exploded in the courtroom between Judge Harmon and Mr. Hardin
as the judge complained that Andersen attorneys hadn't acted quickly
enough to share an internal billing-records document with the
government.
Full Story: Andersen Lead Counsel, Judge Have Heated Exchange in Court
Day 10 (May 17)
Highlights: Andersen lawyers extracted statements from David Duncan
that he couldn't recall much at all about the Enron-related documents
he destroyed last fall. Andersen's argument is clear: If Mr. Duncan
had really intended to hide damaging information from securities
regulators, as he testified earlier this week, he would have
remembered what he destroyed. ... Mr. Duncan was dismissed from the
witness stand late Friday afternoon after five days of testimony. ...
Prosecutor Andrew Weissmann sought to rehabilitate Mr. Duncan as a
government witness, using his testimony to remind jurors that he had
already pleaded guilty to obstruction and could face as many as 10
years in prison. Mr. Weissmann had Mr. Duncan explain to jurors that
he could face additional prison time if he is later found to have
lied during trial proceedings. .... Prosecutor Samuel Buell appeared
to be playing down the importance of Duncan's during an evidentiary
hearing, commenting that he believes Nancy Temple is the government's
central witness in the case.
Full Story: Star Witness in Andersen Trial Loses Shine as Memory
Falters
Week 3
Day 11 (May 20)
Highlights: Tom Bauer, a top Arthur Andersen LLP auditor who was
identified by David B. Duncan as one of the people who helped shape
his instructions to destroy Enron-related documents invoked his Fifth
Amendment right against self-incrimination to avoid testifying in the
accounting firm's criminal trial here. Word of the decision came
outside the jury's presence. ... Prosecutors introduced hundreds of
pages of new exhibits, including a stack of handwritten notes by
Andersen in-house attorney Nancy Temple. The only witness Monday was
a Federal Bureau of Investigation agent called by prosecutors to
authenticate the documents, mostly internal Andersen e-mails, and
read portions of them aloud. ... Prosecutors also played portions of
a much-anticipated Oct. 10 videotape showing Andersen partner Michael
Odom delivering a teleconference lecture on how to comply with the
firm's document-retention policy. Prosecutors are expected to use the
video to demonstrate that Andersen crafted its document-retention
policy specifically to thwart anticipated government inquiries before
they even began. However, the tape by itself doesn't appear to
contradict Andersen's rendition of the events that preceded the
firm's receipt of a Nov. 8 SEC subpoena for Enron-related documents.
Full Story: Andersen's Bauer Avoids Testifying by Invoking Fifth
Amendment Right
Day 12 (May 21)
Highlights: Patricia Grutzmacher, an Andersen auditor, testified that
her boss, Tom Bauer, held a private meeting with her last fall to
discuss "getting rid of documents" and explained that if he ever
raised the subject with her it would take the form of "being in
compliance" with the firm's document-retention policy. ... Ms.
Grutzmacher testified that she later began destroying files,
including handwritten notes of which there were no other copies.
Rusty Hardin, Andersen's lead trial lawyer, discounted the
testimony. ... Ms. Grutzmacher also testified about her experience as
an auditor assigned to Enron. On one occasion, she said, a senior
Enron official tried to have her and another midlevel Andersen
auditor removed from the audits of the company's capital-management
unit, because she had refused to bless Enron's proposed accounting
for certain transactions. ... Her testimony was an interlude on a day
when Andersen lawyers attempted to put a favorable light on a paper
trail of e-mails, handwritten notes and other documents that the
government introduced this week.
Full Story: Andersen Auditor Says Her Boss Pressed the Firm's Records
Policy
Day 13 (May 22)
Highlights: A court filing by the prosecution shed the first light on
a long-running fight over the instructions that jurors should receive
before they begin deliberations on whether to find the accounting
firm guilty of obstructing justice. ... Prosecutors have asked Judge
Harmon to instruct the jury that acting "corruptly" simply means
acting "with an improper purpose," and that that it isn't necessary
for the government to prove that an Andersen agent's sole or even
primary motive for destroying documents was to benefit the
partnership. ... So far, just about every major procedural and
evidentiary ruling by Judge Melinda Harmon has gone the government's
way and most trial observers expect her pro-government streak will
extend to her jury instructions. ... A hearing on the two sides' jury-
instruction proposals is scheduled for Thursday morning.
Full Story: Andersen's Fate Could Hinge on Crafting of Jury
Instructions
Day 14 (May 23)
Highlights: In an unusual move, prosecutors asked Judge Harmon to let
the jury consider three Andersen employees' refusal to testify as
evidence that the firm obstructed justice. ... The requested jury
instruction drew vociferous opposition from Andersen lawyers, and
raised what legal specialists said were novel questions about the
scope of the Fifth Amendment. ... The request came as the government
begins wrapping up its case against Andersen; prosecutors said they
intend to rest as soon as Friday. ... Separately, Judge Harmon issued
an unusual apology to the media after holding a bench conference out
of public earshot after the jury had been dismissed for lunch. At the
conference, prosecutors had expressed frustrations about Andersen
attorney Rusty Hardin's courtroom demeanor.
Full Story: Prosecutors Ask Judge to Permit Unusual Evidence
Day 15 (May 24)
Highlights: Prosecutors presented evidence they felt shows an
Andersen partner on the Enron audit account evaded investigators'
questions. ... Prosecutors also introduced a blizzard of e-mails
reconstructed by Andersen after they were deleted last autumn. ...
Defense attorney Rusty Hardin pointed out to jurors that since last
autumn Andersen has produced a host of evidence upon being
subpoenaed. ... Prosecutors had planned to rest their case Friday
after calling their last witness, but the defense's cross-examination
wasn't completed in time. Questioning will resume Monday, despite the
federal Memorial Day holiday.
Full Story: Andersen Prosecutors Aim to Show Partner at Firm Evaded
Questions
Week 4
Day 16 (May 27)
Highlights: Prosecutors rested their case after 15 days of testimony
from government witnesses. ... Arthur Andersen began presenting its
defense by immediately trying to discredit the credibility of
prosecutors. Richard Corgel, a Los Angeles-based partner responsible
for supervising the accounting firm's U.S. audits, testified that
prosecutors' March indictment of Andersen on a single count of
destroying evidence had inaccurately characterized a statement he
made about the quality of the Andersen auditors assigned to
Enron. ... Mr. Corgel also testified that he wasn't aware of any
discussions among partners aimed at trying to prevent the firm from
disclosing Enron-related documents to the Securities and Exchange
Commission. He also testified that he didn't believe Andersen
attorney Nancy Temple had instructed anyone to impede the SEC's
inquiries into Enron or Andersen. ... U.S. District Judge Melinda
Harmon scheduled proceedings on Saturday. Lawyers for the two sides
conferred with Judge Harmon for about two hours to craft the
instructions she will read to jurors before they begin deliberations.
But Andersen did claim at least one significant victory that will
make it more difficult for prosecutors to win a conviction. Judge
Harmon ruled that for Andersen to be convicted, jurors must conclude
that at least one person at the firm committed all the elements of
the obstruction-of-justice charge under which Andersen was indicted.
Full Story: Andersen Begins Trial Defense, Tries to Discredit
Prosecutors
Day 17 (May 28)
Highlights: Andersen partner Richard Corgel's long replies to cross-
examination questions by prosecutor Andrew Weissmann offered
significant support for the government's case that Andersen's
documentation policy was designed to hide information from potential
litigants. ... Andersen lead attorney Rusty Hardin appeared to try
everything he could to stop Mr. Corgel from volunteering answers to
questions Mr. Weissmann hadn't asked. ... Mr. Weissmann introduced a
series of e-mails in which Andersen partners referred to the
term "smoking guns," discussing the importance of not including
certain items in the firm's permanent work papers. ... Mr. Corgel
brushed off "smoking guns" as a "a slang term for information that
can be taken out of context and abused and is extraneous to the files
to support the" firm's audit conclusions. ... Mr. Hardin tried to
rehabilitate Mr. Corgel during the afternoon session once Mr.
Weissmann wrapped up his cross-examination.
Full Story: First Witness for Arthur Andersen Unwittingly Delivers
for Prosecution
Day 18 (May 29)
Highlights: Andersen used witnesses off the government's own list to
counter an allegation in the government's March indictment that
Andersen personnel in the firm's Portland, Ore., office were
instructed to destroy Enron-related documents. ... Still, prosecutors
gained at least some ground during their cross-examinations. ...
Andersen lead lawyer Rusty Hardin called the witnesses to show that
at least some Andersen personnel actually saved Enron-related
documents as the energy company's troubles began to surface, in a
clear bid to undercut part of the government's obstruction-of-justice
indictment. ... Under Judge Melinda Harmon's jury instructions, if
jurors conclude any Andersen personnel intended to prevent the SEC
from obtaining some Enron-related documents that they destroyed, the
fact that other Enron-related documents were saved doesn't, by
itself, relieve the firm of criminal liability. ... The morning began
with testimony from former Andersen manager Jennifer Stevenson, who
told Mr. Hardin she wasn't trying to impede any SEC investigation
when she began following through on instructions to comply with the
firm's "document retention" policy. ... During cross-examination,
however, prosecutor Matt Friedrich elicited the first testimony to
date that at least some people at Andersen's Houston office had
mentioned the prospect that the firm might receive a subpoena at the
same time that staff members there were beginning to destroy Enron-
related documents.
Full Story: Andersen Counters the Prosecution With Some Government
Witnesses
Day 19 (May 30)
Highlights: Andersen tried to counter government allegations that a
coordinated effort to destroy Enron-related documents spread overseas
last fall. But the attempt partly backfired when a London-based
partner testified that a call from the firm's Houston office
triggered widespread shredding in the U.K. ... In contrast with the
Portland office, Andersen's London staff spun into action after the
call, London partner Michael D. Jones said, and destroyed stacks of
documents and wiped clean computer files. ... Prosecutors appear to
be building a case that Andersen higher-ups only directed personnel
to follow the firm's document policy when they wanted to get rid of
damaging information on problem audits. ... Among other witnesses was
John E. Stewart, a Chicago member of Andersen's Professional
Standards Group. ... Mr. Stewart said he gave Andersen lawyer Nancy
Temple a stack of documents chronicling a dispute between the
standards group and Andersen auditors in Houston over Enron's
accounting practices. By highlighting how Ms. Temple kept -- and
didn't destroy -- those documents, Andersen lead lawyer Rusty Hardin
was trying to show she wasn't the "corrupt persuader" that
prosecutors allege.
Full Story: Andersen Tries to Fight the Charge That Destruction Was
Coordinated
Day 20 (May 31)
Highlights: The executive assistant of David Duncan, Andersen's lead
Enron auditor, sobbed as she testified about learning from a news
release that her boss had been fired after revelations of document
destruction. Mr. Duncan said that he didn't understand why this was
happening, because he and the Enron audit team "didn't do anything
wrong." testified Shannon Adlong. ... Ms. Adlong also testified about
the shredding efforts in Mr. Duncan's office, which began on Oct. 15
after Mr. Duncan received an e-mail from the firm's headquarters in
Chicago about being in compliance with the document policy. But it
wasn't until the following week, she testified, that she and Mr.
Duncan started cleaning out his files, shredding nearly a foot-high
stack of Enron and other documents. She also told the court that her
now infamous Nov. 9 e-mail that called for "no more shredding," was
her idea. ... After her testimony, court adjourned for the
weekend. ... Earlier, John E. Stewart, an in-house Andersen adviser,
testified to friction between his colleagues and the Enron team over
the energy trader's frequent attempts to push the bounds of generally
accepted accounting principles. ... Ms. Adlong, whose cross-
examination is set to begin Monday, will be followed by John Riley,
an Andersen audit partner in San Diego who used to work at the
Securities and Exchange Commission, Andersen lawyers say.
Full Story: Andersen Witness Packs a Punch With Her Teary-Eyed
Testimony
Day 21 (June 3)
Highlights: John Riley, an Andersen partner and former top federal
regulator, said that he heard a shredder running when he came to
Houston last October to look into problematic Enron accounting, and
advised David Duncan, the firm's top Enron auditor, against
destroying documents. ... Andersen lead lawyer Rusty Hardin also
tried to show that when it became apparent that Enron needed to
restate more than four years of earnings, Mr. Riley stood firm that
Enron should disclose its need to restate right away. ... While the
testimony further clouds the actions of Mr. Duncan, who has admitted
knowing before Mr. Riley's visit to Houston that the SEC had launched
an informal inquiry into Enron, it won't necessarily help acquit
Andersen. ... Earlier, prosecutor Samuel Buell sought to portray Mr.
Duncan's former secretary Shannon Adlong, who sobbed on the stand
Friday while recollecting the day Mr. Duncan told her he had been
fired, as a loyal employee of Mr. Duncan. ... Mr. Riley is Andersen's
final witness. Prosecutors will continue to cross-examine him early
Tuesday and have indicated they may call one or two additional
rebuttal witnesses. Jury instructions and closing arguments in the
three-week-old case could come as early as Tuesday afternoon.
Full Story: Andersen Partner Riley Testifies He Heard Shredder in
October
Page One: As Trial Nears End, Andersen Case Proves to Be Trickier
Than Thought
Day 22 (June 4)
Highlights: The defense rested. All that is left are the closing
summations and the jury's verdict. ... Judge Melinda Harmon indicated
she would sequester jurors during deliberations. Closing arguments
are slated to begin Wednesday morning. Each side will be allowed as
many as four hours to sum up its case. ... Prosecutors called only
one rebuttal witness, an FBI agent who read a short portion of a
previously released report by Andersen lawyers this spring that
summarized findings from the firm's internal investigation into last
fall's shredding campaign. The section said that two partners deleted
an "unusually large number of e-mails" on Oct. 8. ... Andersen
attorney Rusty Hardin brought the firm's case to an end after the
second day of testimony from partner John Riley. Throughout his cross-
examination, prosecutor Andrew Weissmann hammered at the
reasonableness of Mr. Riley's assertion that he hadn't given much
thought about the prospects for an SEC inquiry into Andersen's work
for Enron until around Nov. 5. ... Mr. Weissmann also questioned Mr.
Riley about his work as a "fix-it man" called in to resolve
accounting blowups at Andersen clients Waste Management Inc. and
Sunbeam Corp. during the late 1990s. ... Separately, Judge Harmon
ruled on what information jurors will be permitted to hear about
three Andersen figures who declined to testify when called as
witnesses by the government. ... Judge Harmon also added a line in
the jury instructions stating that jurors may consider Mr. Duncan's
guilty plea in evaluating the testimony he gave at trial.
Full Story: Defense Rests in Andersen Case, After Tough Cross-
Examination
Day 23 (June 5)
Highlights: The government, in the summation of its case, portrayed
Andersen as a firm whose top lawyers and partners anticipated weeks
before Enron's meltdown that they would face scrutiny from securities
regulators and scrambled to destroy any Enron documents they
could. ... Andersen attorney Rusty Hardin countered with a statement
that focused on how the government didn't prove anyone was told
directly to destroy documents. ... Mr. Hardin said the government had
produced "not one piece of evidence" that Andersen had intended to
impede or subvert an SEC inquiry. ... Late Wednesday night the case
was put in the hands of the jurors, 12 ordinary Texans, who will
decide whether they should find Andersen guilty of obstructing an
official government proceeding. ... Sparks flew again between Mr.
Hardin and Judge Melinda Harmon late Wednesday after Mr. Hardin rose
to complain that prosecutor Andrew Weissmann had begun telling jurors
about evidence already deemed inadmissible. The judge screamed at Mr.
Hardin to sit down. He refused until a federal marshal finally walked
to the defense-counsel table.
Full Story: Trial of Andersen Heads to Jury After Lively Closing
Statements
Day 24 (June 6)
Highlights: Jurors called it quits for the night after spending nine
hours holed up in deliberations without reaching a verdict. ... The
nine-man, three-woman jury sent three notes to Judge Harmon during
deliberations, asking for, among other things, 11 copies of her jury
instructions, a large timeline of the case used by Mr. Hardin, the
Andersen attorney, and the entire testimony of David Duncan. Judge
Harmon ruled that she would read excerpts only, upon request.
Full Story: Andersen Jurors Deliberate for 9 Hours Without Verdict
Days 25-27 (June 7-9)
Highlights: Jurors deliberated thoughout most of the weekend without
reaching a verdict. On their second day of deliberations (June 7),
the jurors spent about an hour listening to a court reporter read
back testimony from David Duncan about his April 9 guilty plea to
directing mass shredding of Enron-related documents. Jurors also
heard testimony of Federal Bureau of Investigation Agent Raju Bhatia,
who said during the prosecution's brief rebuttal case that Michael
Odom, a top partner in Andersen's Houston office, deleted a mass
amount of Enron-related e-mails two days before he promoted the
policy during an Oct. 10 continuing-education presentation. ... The
jury will be sequestered until a verdict is reached.
Full Story: Andersen Jurors Deliberate for Fourth Day Without Verdict
Day 28 (June 10)
Highlights: Jurors in the criminal obstruction-of-justice trial
retired to their hotel rooms after a fifth day of deliberations
without reaching a verdict.
While members of the nine-man, three-woman jury have made no
statements to Judge Harmon about their progress, the length of their
deliberations has triggered speculation that jurors are divided on
how to rule, raising the prospect of a hung jury.
Full Story: Jury in Andersen Case Calls It a Night -- Again
Updated June 11, 2002 12:34 a.m. EDT
Copyright © 2002 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-->
<FONT COLOR="#000099">Will You Find True Love?
Will You Meet the One?
Free Love Reading by phone!
</FONT><A HREF="http://us.click.yahoo.com/Deo18C/zDLEAA/Ey.GAA/xYTolB/TM";><B>Click
Here!</B></A>
---------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Please let us stay on topic and be civil.
To unsubscribe please go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs
-Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org
OM
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
--- End Message ---
