David Corn's emotional, non-factual and
non-analytic response to Mike Ruppert's research only increases one's suspicions
about 911.
Why doesn't Corn address in a credible way, for
instance, the critical issues of advance insider stock trading, Delmart
Vreeland and the failure to shoot down the hijacked planes?
What's the problem with examining the facts
fairly? Is this asking too much from someone who purports to be a serious
journalist and critical thinker?
With these standards, next Corn will no doubt be
coming to the assistance of the FBI and Henry C. Lee in sweeping the anthrax
case under the rug.
Vreeland, by the way, reminds me much of Patrick
Knowlton in the Vince Foster case -- which means he is probably going to
disappear down a black hole in terms of media coverage. Any government can
get away with anything as long as the media cooperate by censoring inconvenient
facts.
Similarly the Israeli 911 spy scandal which is
being reported in Europe is being almost totally ignored by the mainstream
American media.
Total news blackout.
Can you connect the dots? It's not hard to
do.
We are getting close to living in a
Bolshevik-style police state -- a far cry from the land of the free and the home
of the brave.
The only way this situation can be saved is if a
critical mass of government insiders decide they can't stomach any more and
stage a major revolt from within the system, including from within the CIA, FBI
and similar agencies. Internet gadflies won't save the day -- they
are easy to ignore or swat down.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 6:11
AM
Subject: [CIA-DRUGS] response to David
Corn
When smart, left-leaning journalists like David Corn take
the position
that it's misleading – or even dangerous! – to question the
official
version of what was behind the phenomenal attack that took place
on
American soil on September 11, 2001, then America is in more trouble
than ever.
Mr. Corn's position can be summed up as follows: "sure,
America has
done some pretty nasty things to (mostly black and brown)
foreigners,
and sure, the current president wasn't even elected (he got
into the
oval office because his brother stopped mostly black and brown
people
from voting), but our government would never do such a terrible
thing
to the good folks at the pentagon and the world trade center! I
believe
what President Bush has told me about 911, hook, line and
sinker."
Rather than refute any of the specifics of what Michael Ruppert –
or
anyone else who thinks that Washington was either the designing hand or
at least an accomplice of the 911 attacks – has to say, Mr. Corn's
"proof" that our government is innocent of any charge of conspiring
with the hijackers on that fateful day rests on two points: our
government is neither evil nor intelligent enough to have "done it"
(heck, a CIA guy even told him as much!).
Not evil enough: did you know
that the current president's grandpa and
great-grandpa were bankers to the
third reich, both before and during
WWII? In other words, they helped
finance, among other horrors, weapons
that were used to kill lots of
Americans. Now you might say that I'm
visiting the sins of the (grand)
father upon the (grand) son, but I
think that little fact says a lot about
the culture our leader grew out
of. Operation Northwoods, the FBI plant
with the group that bombed the
world trade center back in '93, the sinking
of the battleship Maine –
does any of that ring a bell? Have you heard the
one about Boris
Berezovsky accusing Vladimir Putin of being linked to the
terrorist
bombings of apartment buildings that killed about 300 Russians
in
September 1999? I seem to recall that Bush said that when he looked
into Putin's eyes, he looked into his soul – and liked what he saw.
Touching, ain't it?
Not smart enough? Believe it or not, the CIA and
NSA sometimes get it
right (in doing terrible wrong). Maybe Oswald really
acted alone – who
knows for sure?
What am I proving here? That maybe,
just perhaps, instead of being
irritated by people who have the audacity
to question our noble
leader's motives and actions, inquiring minds like
David Corn's should
welcome some kind of debate on these issues. After
all, the fact that
our government couldn't intercept the plane that hit
the pentagon is a
little bit odd, isn't it?
Please
let us stay on topic and be civil.
To unsubscribe please go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs
-Home
Page- www.cia-drugs.org
OM
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
| Yahoo! Groups Sponsor |
ADVERTISEMENT
;) |
|
|
Please let us stay on topic and be civil.
To unsubscribe please go to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs
-Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org
OM
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|
