-Caveat Lector- www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-

http://www.cjrdaily.org/behind_the_news/the_times_and_the_post_go_sile.php
The Times and the Post Go Silent On Us
December 28, 2005 - 2:26pm.
By Gal Beckerman, CJR Daily
Source: Columbia Journalism Review

Howard Kurtz let us know yesterday in the Washington Post that Bill Keller and 
Arthur Sulzberger were not the only ones to get the Oval Office shakedown over 
a story the Bush administration wanted canned. Apparently, Leonard Downie Jr., 
the Washington Post's executive editor, was also summoned to a meeting with the 
president, to discuss the Dana Priest article in which it was revealed that the 
CIA was running shadowy detention centers in Eastern European countries.

Both the Times and the Post refuse to verify that these meetings took place, 
but Kurtz writes that they "were confirmed by sources who have been briefed on 
them but are not authorized to comment because both sides had agreed to keep 
the sessions off the record."

The decision not to talk about the meetings with the president is troubling. 
Both Keller and Downie have dismissed the significance of what Keller refers to 
as this "back story" to the story. 

But Bush's intervention to try to stop newspaper stories in the works is not 
just a "back story." To the contrary, a case can be made that it is the real 
story. In both instances, it is clear, even just from the surface evidence, 
that the White House had a part in dissuading the editors from, in the Post's 
case, running a crucial piece of the story, and in the Times' case, from 
running the story at all for more than a year.

As we pointed out a few weeks ago, the Post's decision not to name the 
countries housing the secret prisons appears to have been the result of caving 
in to pressure from the administration. And a disingenuous caving in at that, 
since it was clear that once news of the prisons was out, a paper with less to 
lose would publish them (the Financial Times figured out which countries were 
in question and revealed their names). If Downie withheld the names of Romania 
and Poland because Bush held his feet to the fire, readers are entitled to know 
that.

The same goes for the Times. The paper has been confoundingly vague about why 
it withheld the story of warrantless wiretapping for a year. All Keller will 
say is this, as quoted by Kurtz: "The decision to hold the story last year was 
mine. The decision to run the story last week was mine. I'm comfortable with 
both decisions. Beyond that, there's just no way to have a full discussion of 
the internal procedural twists that media writers find so fascinating without 
talking about what we knew, when, and how -- and that I can't do."

But isn't talking about "what we knew, when, and how" the very definition of 
journalism?

It's clear, as Jonathan Alter wrote last week in Newsweek, that Bush met with 
Keller and Sulzberger on December 6 in an attempt to keep them from running the 
story. Was this the only meeting? How often does Bush feel the need to 
intervene like this? And how much of a part in the Times' decision-making did 
this meeting or any other meetings play? And, for that matter, why did the 
Times decide now that the information about the wiretapping was any less 
sensitive or dangerous a story than a year ago when it was first discovered?

We have no answers to any of these questions, and they are important ones, 
questions that boil down to this: What kind of relationship do these papers 
have with the administration and how does it affect what does and does not get 
reported?

We already learned a little of the answer to that question from the Judy Miller 
saga, and what we learned was unsettling. It wasn't a pretty story, and there 
were no heroes.

Both the Times and the Post, each in its own way, has labored mightily over the 
past couple of years to increase its transparency -- to let readers in on the 
who, what, when and where of what gets published and why. But both are still 
loath to tell us what doesn't get published and why. Without what Keller 
dismissively refers to as the "back story," none of us has the whole story.

For our part, we have always believed the function of a journalist is to tell 
people what he knows, not to withhold what he knows, and we still believe it.

Both the story of the Post and the president and the story of the Times and the 
president deserve an audience of more than an inner circle of a dozen or so 
people at the Times, at the Post and at the White House.



------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
<FONT COLOR="#000099">1.2 million kids a year are victims of human trafficking. 
Stop slavery.
</FONT><A 
HREF="http://us.click.yahoo.com/U6CDDD/izNLAA/cUmLAA/TySplB/TM";><B>Click 
Here!</B></A>
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

-__ ___ _ ___ __ ___ _ _ _ __  
/-_|-0-\-V-/-\|-|-__|-|-|-/-_| 
\_-\--_/\-/|-\\-|-_||-V-V-\_-\ 
|__/_|--//-|_|\_|___|\_A_/|__/ 

 SPY NEWS is OSINT newsletter and discussion list associated to 
Mario's Cyberspace Station - The Global Intelligence News Portal
http://mprofaca.cro.net/
http://osint.mywebhut.com/

######## CAUTION! #########
 Since you are receiving and reading documents, news stories,
comments and opinions not only from so called (or self-proclaimed) 
"reliable sources", but also a lot of possible misinformation collected
by Spy News moderator and subscribers and posted to Spy News
for OSINT purposes - it should be a serious reason (particularly to
journalists and web publishers) to think twice before using it for their
story writing, further publishing or forwarding throughout Cyberspace.

To unsubscribe:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

*** FAIR USE NOTICE: This message contains copyrighted material whose use has 
not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Spy News is making it 
available without profit to SPY NEWS eGroup members who have expressed a prior 
interest in receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the 
understanding of intelligence and law enforcement organizations, their 
activities, methods, techniques, human rights, civil liberties, social justice 
and other intelligence related issues, for non-profit research and educational 
purposes only. We believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted 
material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish 
to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair 
use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

 SPY NEWS home page:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spynews

 Mario Profaca
 mario.profaca[at]zg.htnet.hr
 SPY NEWS owner, editor 
 and discussion moderator

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spynews/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to