Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector- Dwayne Phillips wrote: September 11, 2001 is the most important alqaeda operation,That's funny, Christopher Carney exposed a direct link to Iraq and Al QaedaEven Clinton's administration and NSA Sandy Berger knew Saddam had his hand in Al Qaeda attacks.Are we looking for the truth folks? Or just excuses in a election year?Dwayne
and that was not Iraqi run. Isn't that the point in any year?
http://www.sitbot.net/cgi-bin/htsearch.cgi?words=atta+mahmud
http://www.sitbot.net/cgi-bin/htsearch.cgi?words=atta+cocaine
The Saudi monarchy came to power by and rests on a support
base of wahabi fundamentalists like Osama bin Laden. The
Saudi monarchy and Pak heroin junta run alqaeda and the
Taliban. Atta and the other Saudi hijackers' training by Air
America heroin network makes the connection from Pak
heroin junta funding of Atta to Air America heroin pilot
training of Atta. That makes 911 a joint op and Iraq was not
in a factor. Air America drugs-guns junta ran the show. Atta
got free cocaine and a narcissist's way out of heartbreak. The
Pak junta got the poppies growing again to support their
civil servants. The Saudi monarchy pruned Osama and
the Taliban in line with their formula of using muslim
fundamentalism while holding it at bay. Air America
legitimized Coup2K.
-Bob
----- Original Message -----From: Tom MooneyTo: cia-drugsSent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 9:45 AMSubject: [cia-drugs] Fwd: Panel Says No Signs of Iraq, Qaeda Link!!!
Panel Says No Signs of Iraq, Qaeda Link
Wed Jun 16, 2004 11:22 AM ET
By Deborah CharlesWASHINGTON (Reuters) - Investigators have found no evidence Iraq aided al Qaeda attempts to attack the United States, a commission investigating the Sept. 11, 2001 hijackings said on Wednesday, undermining Bush administration arguments for war.
The report by commission staff said al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden had met with a senior Iraqi intelligence officer in 1994 and had explored the possibility of cooperation, but the plans apparently never came to fruition.
President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney this week reiterated pre-war arguments that an Iraqi connection to al Qaeda, which is blamed for the Sept. 11 attacks, represented an unacceptable threat to the United States.
However, the commission said in a staff report, "We have no credible evidence that Iraq and al Qaeda cooperated on attacks against the United States."
"There is no convincing evidence that any government financially supported al Qaeda before 9/11 -- other than limited support provided by the Taliban after bin Laden first arrived in Afghanistan," it added.
The staff report was issued at the start of the commission's final two days of public hearings into the attacks, which killed nearly 3,000 people. The hearings were called to find out how the United States failed to prevent the attacks and what it can do now to improve security.
The report stood in contrast to comments this week by Vice President Dick Cheney, who said that ousted Iraqi leader Saddam had "long-established ties" to al Qaeda.
Bush, asked on Tuesday about Cheney's comments, cited the presence in Iraq of Islamist militant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi as "the best evidence of (a) connection to al Qaeda affiliates and al Qaeda."
Bush said Saddam had also supported militants such as Palestinian guerrilla leader Abu Nidal was "no doubt a destabilizing force."
Although Cheney and other officials had suggested Iraq might have played a direct role in the Sept. 11 attacks, Bush acknowledged after the war that there was no evidence of such cooperation.
A separate draft report by the commission also describes confusion in the Pentagon on the day of the attacks, the New York Times reported. It said Pentagon procedures were "unsuited in every respect" for the attacks, and unprepared officials responded with a "hurried attempt to create an improvised defense."
Furthermore, the newspaper quoted commission chairman Thomas Kean as saying "there was a lot of chaos" in the White House response. It said commission members wanted to know why Bush was allowed to continue meeting with Florida schoolchildren after the attacks were known, and why Bush hopscotched around the country on Air Force One before returning to Washington.
AL QAEDA TRYING TO STRIKE U.S.
In a report entitled "Overview of the Enemy," the commission also said al Qaeda has changed drastically and become decentralized since the Sept. 11 attacks, but it still helps regional networks and will keep trying to strike the United States to inflict mass casualties.
"Al Qaeda remains extremely interested in conducting chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear attacks," said the report.
The commission said al Qaeda's ability to conduct an anthrax attack is one of the most immediate threats. Al Qaeda may also try a chemical attack using industrial chemicals, or by attacking a chemical plant or shipment of hazardous materials.
The report said al Qaeda may modify "traditional tactics" to prevent detection.
The CIA estimates al Qaeda spent $30 million a year before Sept. 11 for terror operations, to run the training camps and contribute to Afghanistan's Taliban militia. While it found no convincing evidence of government support, the panel said Saudi Arabia provided "fertile fund-raising ground" for al Qaeda.
FBI and CIA experts are due to testify about the militant Muslim network and give a detailed timeline of the events leading up to the deadly attacks.
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=5438743
peace,
Tom
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage!
Please let us stay on topic and be civil.-Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org
OM
Please let us stay on topic and be civil.-Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org
OM
Please let us stay on topic and be civil.-Home Page- www.cia-drugs.org
OM
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
Yahoo! Groups Links
www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
- To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs/
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
--- End Message ---
