THE WACO BOMB PAGE IS BACK: http://ian.goddard.net/wacorom2.htm Careful measurement of the proper location of the concrete room backed with a new webpage (http://ian.goddard.net/measure.htm) showing how it's done to satisfy one and all that it is correct proves that my initial placement was not more than roughly four-feet off, the result being effectively nill... the blast is decisively on top of the room, not coming from behind it where a propane tank was located, about ten-feet away from the room's rear wall. I have also received many counters that allay the skeptical concerns I cited, which I will cover in subsequent messages. Observe that the base of the stem of the fireball is about ten- feet wide or more, which means that this is NOT a thin jet of gas streaming from the valve of an over-heated propane tank! Those who know about these tanks tell me that an overheated tank venting its contents would NOT produce the explosive fireball seen. Also observe that the fireball has carried debris up with it, which is another phenomena not consistent with gas being ejected from and escape valve. I now feel embarrassed for having retracted my declaration of proof of a military-grade explosive going off. To be frank, there is simply NO other phenomenon that could produce the dramatic distribution of debris seen on the inside http://ian.goddard.net/freezer.jpg of the concrete room. Fire will not do this! I hope people appreciate -- and forgive! -- my often-excessive efforts to be sure that my analysis is accurate. I'm my worst critic! The bomb theory is back and really is one of the major issues of Waco, exactly what happened in that utterly demolished room where the women and children were hideously burned and mutilated? The physical evidence cries out: A BOMB, A BOMB: http://users.erols.com/igoddard/wacorom2.htm
