Defense wins the play. MHO Om K ----
-> SNETNEWS Mailing List (sent to USCMike1's 9,000+ readership - please re-post to your own mailing lists) Well, Citizens, Patriots and Constitutional Militia, the TRUTH is OUT. Randy Miller himself started the rumor that in February several Civilian Militia would launch a pre-emptive attack against the federal government. Instantly, I knew it was and had to be FALSE and told you so. Numerous other Patriots and Militia said the same thing when asked. NO respectable Citizen, Patriot, or Militiaman would even consider such an action. Would you consider Randy Miller to be respectable for even suggesting it? USCMike1 Thanks to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ed Wolfe) for his post and the "confession" he obtained from Randy Miller. Subj: Re: Confirm patriot/militia pre-emptive attacks? more like Agent Provocateur ... Date: 99-01-05 23:47:26 EST From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ed Wolfe) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Dear Ed: > > Thanks for your reply, input, and comments. > > As you gathered from my comment on his post, I am highly skeptical that > any such pre-emptive strike has even been in the minds of Militiamen and > Patriots. Sounds like a fed, FBI, BATF, FEMA, CIA, etc. sham by an Agent > Provocateur trying to test the waters or preparing to do a little skirmishing > of their own and blame it on us. > > USCMike1 STATEMENT BY: Ed Wolfe Well, he (Randy Miller) admitted he was testing the waters, but says he thinks patriots might miss an opportunity to force the enemy's hand. "My own men and I created the rumor ourselves to test patriot sentiment on taking a proactive stance vs. reactionary." - Randy Miller Aside from that, he has good ideas about getting in communication and cooperation, etc., but I think he has the wrong motivation. Regardless of what anyone else says, I'm still for a defensive position and don't trust anyone urging an offensive position. That would play right into the feds hands and fully convince the public that we are the danger that the feds/media say we are and that will allow the feds to do just about anything to us with full approval from the public. Not a smart move at all. We may not even have to ever make a defensive move. The gov't may just implode or collapse for a variety of other reasons. Let the gov't screw up first and then try to impose martial law when the people don't agree with the need and then we'll have a lot more people seeing things our way. But I won't be surprised if no violent acts from militias appear to be forthcoming, one is invented. Possibly as soon as this week. Bill's gonna have a double whammy with both the impeachment and the breaking news about his bastard child from a black prostitute. I think Bill's overplayed the Saddam hand and he and we know it. It's time to try something else. "Militia Terrorists Kill 56,000 in D.C." Or something along those lines might be appearing soon on a headline. I *really* don't think we need to do anything in the way of a pre-emptive strike. Ed (Others BCC'd) Do any of you know this person or know of him? -> Send "subscribe snetnews " to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -> Posted by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
