-Caveat Lector-


Begin forwarded message:

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: July 6, 2007 7:57:22 PM PDT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: A Civics Lesson in George Bush's America

July 06, 2006

A Window into the Last Stages of Rome

by emptywheel

http://thenexthurrah.typepad.com/the_next_hurrah/2006/07/ a_window_into_t.html

Lots of people are pointing to the juicy bits of Vanity Fair's huge profile of the burgeoning SoCal bribery scandal. I'd like to return to a point I've made before--the connection between Republican corruption and our (in)ability to defend the United States. The Vanity Fair article portrays the Armed Forces and Appropriations Committees as a fraternity, a team that cooperates closely, down to its own private pimps.

On trips to Washington, [CIA director Bill] Casey recalls, Wilkes was able to usher him into the presence of important members of the armed-services and appropriations committees, including, most notably, Lowery and Lowery's closest friend on the latter, fellow California Republican Jerry Lewis, now 71. The genteel Lewis and the earthy Lowery reportedly loved to dine and even vacation together. "Everyone on the defense committee always works cooperatively," says Casey, who realized pretty quickly that no money came his way without their support. "It was team play, and they emphasized that to me constantly."

And that fraternity works to enrich itself, effectively holding defense and intelligence appropriations decisions hostage to the pet projects of members of the fraternity.

"The enabler in this story is the Pentagon," explains someone familiar with the investigation. "To get what it wants —the F-22, say, or better intelligence— it goes along and funds the shoddy stuff Cunningham and [Wilkes] want. It's thinking, 'Cunningham will fund the Taj Mahal of intelligence for us as long as we take care of his friends.'"

Consider that - -to get what it needs, the Pentagon has to take care of the fraternity. As one anonymous source says:

"People are missing the completeness of the corruption: It wasn't 'Get me a hooker and I'll get you a defense contract from the appropriations committee,'" he says. "It's 'I will take care of you and meet your every wish, need, and fantasy, and in exchange you are going to take care of me!'

And this scamming fraternity has gravitated to the areas of the government where they can do the most damage, both in terms of their own enrichment, because they're the areas with the least oversight. Defense:

"Many felonies went undetected because in the Defense Department a lot goes on in secret, and these crimes grew in the shadow of both 9/11 and one-party rule — with little scrutiny. So what you're looking at is a world where money, secrecy, sex, and indulgence were all in play. Where everyone is guilty of something."

And intelligence:

Like Congress, the C.I.A. is used to doling out huge sums, often with little or no oversight. "Look, the agency guys live in a culture where there's tons of money and a lot of it is cash," explains one intelligence source, "where you say, How much cash are we giving that guy, that asset, and what suitcase was it in? The American Tourister?"

And in terms of the damage they do to our country's security. We've got a bunch of boys who haven't matured beyond their college fraternity days holding our nations' security hostage to their own self-interest. Remind me again why Republicans are supposed to better on security?

The whores and the poker parties and the fancy French antiques are all really seamy. But they have direct consequences for the security of this country.

-------------------

http://www.tpmcafe.com/node/26996

Let's start with Malaysian Prime Minister Matathir's $1.2M meeting with President Bush.

The Prime Minister had some more to add when speaking to the Mayalsian papers. This from Malaysia's New Straits Times:

"It is true that someone paid the money but it was not the Government," he said.

"I did not touch the money at all. In the US, it is a practice that if you want to meet their leader, you have to go through a lobbyist and the lobbyist has to be paid... That is their system. It is not corruption at all and it is very open -- but they don’t reveal names."

A valuable tutorial in U.S. governance, no?

And according to the Prime Minister, though Jack Abramoff was paid $1.2M, the Heritage Foundation deserves more credit than they've been given for the meeting:

Dr Mahathir said the meeting was arranged by the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank.

"They said I would be able to influence (Bush) in some way regarding his policies.

"Secondly, it would be good for Malaysia if the relationship between the two countries improved, and I agreed with that. I thought I could do something good for the country."

Matt Yglesias at Tapped refers us to this Washington Post piece on the Heritage.

-----------------

wonkette.com/politics/porter-goss/index.xml

Harper’s Ken Silverstein, who loves this story even more than we do, is still at it*.

Some of the more sensational stories in Hettena’s book —and he has on-the-record sources— got me thinking. First, didn’t Foggo’s frequent indiscretions (for example, flashing his agency ID to jump the line at a strip club) raise red flags about his character? Second, wasn’t Foggo’s outlandish sexual behavior —like, say, publicly performing oral sex on a hooker (hired by Wilkes) at his own bachelor party— just the sort of thing that makes intelligence officials potentially vulnerable to blackmail by a hostile spy service?
*http://harpers.org/archive/2007/04/sb-sex-and-the-cia

In addition to stories in Hettena's new book, I've previously reported that Foggo had behaved very badly while based in Honduras in the early-1980s, when the CIA was using the country as a base for covert programs in Central America. He was said to be a regular at a Tegucigalpa bar named Gloria's and at a casino at the Maya Hotel, both places known at the time as hooker hotbeds. Whether Foggo had official dealings with prostitutes in Honduras or not, this was clearly a big problem. “Dusty would have been the perfect target of a counter-intelligence operation,” said one official who worked in Honduras at the time. “He had access and knowledge, and was reckless and visible. You're only vulnerable if you make yourself vulnerable, and that's what Dusty did.”

This person, and several others, have told me that Foggo continued to display poor judgment throughout his career and had been reprimanded over his personal conduct -- and that all of this was well known to Goss before he installed Foggo as executive director. “When we heard Dusty had been picked, we figured we were doomed,” he said. “And we were right.”

All of which leads to one of the great, unanswered questions surrounding Foggo: why would Goss possibly have picked him for such a senior position at the agency?

I asked the CIA press office if Foggo's personal conduct had ever raised red flags at the agency. Spokesman Mark Mansfield replied by email, saying, “Given that legal proceedings are underway, it would not be appropriate to comment, other than to point out that Mr. Foggo left the CIA last year and the position he held, Executive Director, doesn't exist any more.”




See what's free at AOL.com.

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to