-Caveat Lector- www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-

http://www.democraticunderground.com/articles/04/11/20_frat.html

Frat Spankings and Bush Followers:
The Theory of "Cognitive Dissonance"

Or why Bush backers keep saying,
"thank you, sir, may I have another?"

November 20, 2004
By Brad Radcliffe 

To those of us schooled in the humanistic tradition of the scientific
method, George W.'s continued popularity, although at an all-time low,
continues to mystify. His lies, venality, hypocrisy, and incompetence are so
manifest, we cry, that even mouth-breathing Limbaugh listeners must
recognize them. 

Not necessarily. Over 59 million voters trooped to the polls a few weeks
ago, and asked like a plebe in an old-school frat house for the current
administration to continue whacking them with a paddle for four more years.

That W.'s presidency is bad is self-evident. He and his administration
ignored for nine months the terrorist threat that resulted in an attack on
American soil worse than Pearl Harbor. Then he saw (or pretended to see) a
military threat in Iraq that turned out to be non-existent, sparking a war
that has killed 1200 American soldiers and some hundred thousand Iraqi
civilians. His crony capitalism has decimated equity markets. His tax breaks
for the rich, not only did not stimulate the economy, but has sent job
creation to historic lows and federal deficits to astronomical highs. The
party of "fiscal restraint" is presently attempting to raise the debt
ceiling of 7 trillion dollars just so they can keep the government running.
His administration detains innocent Americans under the Patriot Act while
they let criminals like the anthrax killers and Valerie Plame blackmailers
run free. 

Jonathon Chait summed it up wonderfully when he wrote, "I used to think U.S.
history had many bad presidents. Now, my 'bad' category consists entirely of
George W. Bush, with every previous president redefined as 'good.'"

But the question remains, why do only half the voters see W. for what he
is-the biggest disgrace that ever occupied the oval office? After all,
doesn't B. F. Skinner believe that people change their behavior to minimize
negative reinforcement (i.e., pain) and maximize positive? Doesn't classic
capitalism preach that people make decisions based on their own best
interests? 

The answer may lie in the psychological theory of "cognitive dissonance."
This idea grew from the experience of two researchers exploring motivation
and reactions of cult members in the 50's. They watched firsthand as a cult
leader assembled her flock together to escape the end of the world in
another Noah's flood. She "knew" of the flood because she had been warned by
interplanetary beings who were to rescue the cult followers and save them
from drowning in a flying saucer. When the appointed time of the apocalypse
arrived and nothing happened, the leader absented herself for a short time
from the expectant group to confer with the aliens. The message was revealed
to the leader that the faithfulness of the cult members themselves had
changed God's mind, and thus because of their virtue, the Earth was spared.

The researchers concluded that because the cult members had invested so much
time, energy and money into their beliefs (some people literally sold all
they had for the cult), the simple fact showing their beliefs wrong (that no
flood occurred) caused intense cognitive dissonance. They of course had the
option of admitting they were wrong-in other words, that they were stupid
and easily manipulated. But that too would cause intense dissonance. Or they
could minimize the dissonance by reaffirming their original beliefs even
more strongly-that they had saved the entire world! This choice, although
irrational, is much more attractive because it not only spares cult members
from admitting how wrong they were, but it gives them an option that shows
them to be actually "smarter" (in possession of secret knowledge) than
others and more virtuous because they follow the road less traveled by.

What we've seen in the last four years is Team Bush skillfully manipulating
perceptions using the theory of cognitive dissonance. After the 9-11 terror
attacks, when we invaded Iraq and killed hundreds of thousands of innocent
civilians, we as a nation had the option of 1. recognizing that our
government is hardly better than the terrorists we condemn because we too
kill civilians for political ends or 2. buying our cult leaders' patently
obvious lie that "freedom is on the march." Which one do most people find
more comfortable to believe? Which one rewards the believers with a sense of
doing the right thing and which one punishes them with the sense that they,
even they, are part of a horrible evil?

This is why military families as a group continue to support Bush's war of
aggression in Iraq. They can say 1. the war is a ridiculous fraud and our
children/spouses are putting themselves in danger in an enterprise that
makes America more (not less) likely to be attacked or 2. this is a heroic
sacrifice that our children/spouses are willing to pay to depose a
threatening tyrant and establish freedom around the world. Accepting the
truth that one's own child died a preventable death for absolutely nothing
requires the kind stoic realism that few people possess. It sends Americans
into a confusing twilight zone of questioning everything they have been so
painstakingly taught-that our war-time leaders really care about our
soldiers, that they act in the best interest of the country, that when the
chips are down and it really matters, our leaders are good and true, that if
America decides to go to war, we must be in the right. It threatens to
unhinge us from a belief system we have relied on our entire lives.

The alternative, that our president would knowingly mislead the public to
take control of oilfields, sacrifice soldiers' lives to enrich his business
cronies, and kill Iraqi children to make countries like Saudi Arabia toe the
American line, is just too agonizing a thought to be dreamt of for most
Americans. 

Ironically, "cognitive dissonance" theory suggests that the more egregious
the sacrifice or punishment, the more valued the experience or knowledge
gained. This is why your dad always said that you'll appreciate something
more if you pay for it yourself (beside the fact he's a tightwad), why
fraternities put their pledges through otherwise pointless hazing rituals
(beside the fact they're sadists), and why potential dating partners will
never call you back right away (beside the sense of superiority it gives
them). "I wouldn't be subjecting myself to all this," we rationalize to
ourselves, "if the end result weren't worth it," and the more discomfort and
embarrassment we are subjected to, the more the end result grows in our
perception to meet that sacrifice.

A lot of Americans who lean conservative will react to Bush's bad economy,
his humiliating gaffes, his blatant contradictions, and his obvious
failures, by supporting him even more. To turn against him now is to reveal
a truth too painful to be considered-that they were stupid and easily
manipulated before. Like cult members who are too emotionally invested to
see reality, every insult to their rationality must be turned into a
triumph, every injury to their pocketbook and well-being must be transformed
into another righteous example of how "freedom isn't free."

9-11 must be trumpeted as a "triumph of the human spirit" instead of what
Bill Maher called "a f*** up by a guy on vacation." It's four more years of
floggings, folks-get used to hearing the whipping boys screaming not for
mercy but for more strokes of the bloody scourge against their own flesh.
Get used to the Bush backers waving their flags even more frenetically,
their robotic smiles pasted on with even more fervor, their gas-guzzling
SUV's covered with even more yellow ribbon stickers, their self-assurance
even more self-assured.

It's a lot easier than thinking.
 Print this article (printer-friendly version)
 Tell a friend about this article
 Jump to Editorials and Other Articles forum
     
Support DU
Click here to donate
Democratic Underground is a totally independent website, funded almost
entirely by member donations. Thank you for your support!   
Campaign Underground
    
DU Store
Visit the DU Store 
We've got sweatshirts, mugs, mousepads, and much more...  
The Usual Suspects 
The Top 10 Conservative Idiots
November 1
The Plaid Adder
November 17
Ask Auntie Pinko
November 18
DU Comix
November 13
Equal Time with Bob Boudelang
November 13

    Hate Mailbag
July 23
DU Recommends
Click here to buy from Amazon.com, and DU gets a share of your purchase!

 


 

 
DU Home | Forums | Articles | Campaign Underground | Links Directory | Store
| Donate 

About DU | Write for DU | Privacy Policy | Contact Us

© 2001 - 2004 Democratic Underground, LLC




www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/ctrl@listserv.aol.com/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to