The full piece by Alex Constantine is listed at the bottom for your viewing. I only choose to respond to a particular part dealing with me. <<> Ramsey's support of Kasten largely depended upon a reference from Robert Sterling, editor of The Konformist newsletter. In a January 20, 1999 telephone conversation with Sterling, he informed me that he had "lied" to Ramsey about Kasten, that he, in fact, has no confidence in her credibility, and that she was quite probably planted among the victims of mind control experimentation to provoke conflicts. Sterling had "lied," he explained, because he did not want his valid criticisms of her to haunt him in the future. That is, he fears a backlash from Ms. Kasten and so failed to speak his mind.>> First, let me explain that I would rather not be writing this, but clearly I am left with no option. Otherwise, opinions will be attributed to me that I do not have, either personally or publicly. Though I think Alex honestly was trying to convey what he heard, clearly the message that was transmitted does not accurately reflect my own personal opinions. I take full responsibility for my inability to state what I wanted to. The truth is, I called Alex Constantine that night to clarify certain things in his earlier draft sent to Kenn Thomas, as well as to help clear the air between Alex and Kenn (since Kenn, like myself, really respects and admires Alex's work.) Needless to say, this was a big fucking mistake. I have only muddied the waters, and I realize I have NO business getting involved in this thing further. And it seems wherever I have tried to help this situation, I only make it worse. Therefore, I'm outta here. He who runs away today can walk away tomorrow. Before I run away, though, let me clarify what I believe was said: to begin with, I thought I had made it clear that anything I did say in our conversation was between me and him. He insists I didn't make that clear, which is why he has included statements he attributes to me. Further, I do not believe I said I "lied" to Robin Ramsey. Alex insists that is a direct quote. I will not argue with him on this, but if I did say that, it was a terrible choice of words, since I did not lie to Robin at all. What I was trying to say is I kept my private opinions to myself, which is something that I do quite regularly. I also do not think that Kathy Kasten is a plant, though I did state, after he listed some claims of others and reasons why he believes she is, that he made some good points, and I respected his opinion. Quite the opposite, personally I think she is working on her own on her independent crusade, right or wrong. As for my personal opinions of Kathy's story, well, I do have doubts on her story, doubts that are based on questions that I feel unneccesary to point out. I have told her many of my objections, and that is between me and her. But where I agree or disagree with her opinions is unimportant, just as my own private disagreements with Kenn, Robin, and Alex (or anyone else) are unimportant, unless I choose to make them public. The fact is, whether I agree or disagree on certain things she writes, I found "Voices In My Head" to be something that was thought-provoking enough to print in The Konformist. Apparentally, many agree, as it has been one of the more popular pieces on the site. Again, let me add that I do not mean by my objections here to state Alex is false in the above: however, I know that how he presents my statements would not fairly characterize my views. However, let me add one more thing: I have now informed Alex Constantine that anything that I did say to him was private, and I want it to remain private. I don't need anyone telling people what my opinions are: I can do that fine by myself, thank you very much, and apparently do a much better job at it than he does. I imagine that Alex will show enough wisdom to respect my requests. However, hypothetically speaking, if he were to continue attributing statements to me, I would not respond to them. Let me just state here what my blanket statement would be if he hypothetically continued to attribute quotes to me: either what he is saying is false, in which case he is a liar, or it is true, in which case he is a back-stabbing fink. Neither is a particularly virtous attribute. I say hypothetically here, however, because I am convinced Alex is a better man than that, and would show much greater wisdom. I have trouble imaging him doing something so inherently foolish, reckless, and self-destructive. I suppose, however, I could be wrong. Robert Sterling Editor, The Konformist http://www.konformist.com Subject: Response to Robin Ramsey From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Constantine) Date: 1/21/1999 3:43 PM Eastern Standard Time Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Note: The Steamshovel Web site recently featured an article on mind control written by Robin Ramsey, in which I am taken to task for finding the CIA complicit in ritual abuse (perhaps he has never heard tell of The Finders, the most widely-publicized instance of RA committed by CIA mind control operatives?= ) and "alien" abduction (he missed The Controllers?). The following is my response to Ramsey's nonsensical remarks. =8B Alex Constantine > Editor: > > Does Robin Ramsay honestly believe that I implicate the CIA in ritual abuse and "alien" abduction by "ignoring the evidence?" Curious statement. Virtual Government, published by Feral House in 1997, offers over 300 pages of documented evidence that the CIA is deeply involved in illicit human experimentation and the trauma-based programming of children. Most reviewers have commented on the wealth of evidence I provide; some have found it "difficult to refute." Steamshovel editor Kenn Thomas found the book informative and engaging. How is it that Ramsay comes to make such an obvious error? > Curious, also, that Ramsay's post to the Steamshovel site does not associate the mind control devices described therein with any particular federal agency. Who, exactly, makes use of mind control implants? The Office of Management and Budget? Ramsay has already ruled out the CIA in the first paragraph, so he daren't go there... > In his pretence of knowing something about mind control, he makes much of the implants. Ramsey provides us with impressive technical and patent information (dowloaded from the newsgroups, where it is available to all?), oblivious to the fact that, these days, implants are being supplanted by frequency allocation registration. As I wrote in Psychic Dictatorship (1995), "the current state of the art in Radio-Hypnotic Intracerebral Control (RHIC) depends upon 'Personal Radio and Electromagnetic Allocation,' or PREMA." Once the subject's frequency registration is determined, "the brain becomes a link in a cybernetic system, and the subject (or group) can be surveilled, guided, manipulated, harassed or controlled from afar" (p. 44). In other words, implants are not necessary. > Mr. Ramsay takes a swipe at me with a demonstrable lie, then promotes Kathy Kasten =8B a mole, as a number of victims who have had the misfortu= ne to deal with her will attest. She has claimed that "aliens" stole her child. Kathy, there are no "aliens." She is prone to raging, four-letter hysterics. Having been the target of her irrational fits of bile, I know this first-hand.. Kasten often accuses legitimate victims of harboring intelligence connections, casting suspicion on them unjustly with a McCarthyite flourish. I have seen her turn Internet MC victim subscription lists upside down with her antics. I can tell you stories ... For instance: When the CIA's Ed Dames first stepped from the black ops closet, he found an avid supporter in UCLA's Ms. Kasten. In fact, Kasten =8B who, like Dames, also claims to have been trained in "remote viewing" by the CIA =8B was so enamored with the spook that she sent a letter of support t= o every mind control victim on her mailing list. She praised him mightily, and implored all victims to give Dames $4,000 for lessons in "remote viewing." Horrified that she would exploit victims this way, I circulated a bio of Ed Dames to her mailing list. Kasten exploded in an e-mail to her list, claiming "Alex Constantine abuses women and hates victims." Excuse me? I do neither. What was the reason for this defamatory rant? What was my offense? I had circulated facts concerning the dark side of her friend Ed Dames. I happened to mention that he is an active mind control operative. I have since received verification from associates of Dames that he is, indeed, a CIA mind control operative. And his actions, particularly his promotion of the "alien" cover story, speak volumes. Ramsey and Kasten may believe that Dames can "remote-view Satan," but I call this grist for the brainwashed minions of Art Bell. > Ramsey's support of Kasten largely depended upon a reference from Robert Sterling, editor of The Konformist newsletter. In a January 20, 1999 telephone conversation with Sterling, he informed me that he had "lied" to Ramsey about Kasten, that he, in fact, has no confidence in her credibility, and that she was quite probably planted among the victims of mind control experimentation to provoke conflicts. Sterling had "lied," he explained, because he did not want his valid criticisms of her to haunt him in the future. That is, he fears a backlash from Ms. Kasten and so failed to speak his mind. Ramsey himself, as editor of Lobster, rejected an article submitted by Kathey Kasten because he found it "too weird." > BTW, since when is Mr. Ramsay an authority on mind control? A Northern Light search produced no listing by Ramsay on the subject. He has written no books on mind control. No articles. Yet he attempts to pass himself off as an authority. If he was, I suppose he'd already know that ritual abuse and "alien" abductions are indeed covert operations, and, yes, the CIA is in this particular business. His denial of the reams of evidence I've gathered is irrelevant and, to anyone who knows the ropes, signally careless. > >=8B Alex Constantine
