Dear Otto Skinner,
In the freedom law movement, you are the main proponent of the
idea that the Income Tax is a tax on excises. The attached cases are about
unfortunate freedom lovers, who argued this argument and unfortunately the
courts shot them down and served prison time in Federal Camp. I happen to
like and agree with much of your conclusions, but the crooked, government
biased and government paid political lawyers (judges) have disagreed with
you and deliberately misstate U.S. Supreme Court decisions.
Since you are apparently the authority on this subject and I can
personally vouche for your intelligence ( I used to sell a of your books,
remeber?), perhaps you could enlighten us as to how these people could have
argued their cases differently so that they could have been free. This
message is CCd to over 1000 people on our private e-mail list and I am
confident that many of them are eagerly awaiting your response, as I am.
Yours in freedom and Justice,
Peymon, President
Freedom Law School
www.livefreenow.org (714)838-2896
>Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 20:56:46 -0500
>From: Larry Becraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win95; I)
>X-Accept-Language: en
>To: Bill Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Case rejecting excise argument
>
>Hey Bill,
Here is the Parker case where the excise tax argument was raised and
rejected. The file is in rich text.
The truth of the matter is that the courts have utterly failed to
determine the constitutional classification of the income tax, variously
declaring that it is a direct tax as well as indirect tax. The cases
which show this split in authority are discussed in this file:
http://home.HiWAAY.net/~becraft/UNCERTAIN.html
> Here is that Francisco case where the excise tax argument was raised
>and rejected. Feel free to pass this case around. The file is in rich
>text.
>
> Larry
>
>
Francisco Excise.rtf
