-----Original Message-----
From: spiker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Recipient list suppressed <Recipient list suppressed>
Date: Monday, January 17, 2000 4:48 PM
Subject: Intel: Thugs in the Forest


>From: "J.J. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>http://www.jj-johnson.com/
>
>This article sent by the WAT (We at Them) news service. Note the healthy
>dump of "intel" on the other side on this one. Read this before you go on
>the next "wilderness adventure."- J.J.
>
>This and other excellent articles concerning land rights can be found at:
>
>http://www.landrightsletter.com/
>
>============================================
>http://www.landrightsletter.com/1299goodbye_old_smokey.htm
>
>Goodbye Old Smokey; you've been replaced by Rambo.
>
>J. Zane Walley,  The Paragon Foundation
>
>
>             On a recent family vacation to Big Bend National Park in
>Southwest Texas, my wife, son, and I were on private property that borders
>the park and belongs to retired Texas rancher, Rex Ivey.  I set my cameras
>on tripods and was waiting to photograph the sunset on the Chisos Mountains
>when I spied a white and green Park Service vehicle rapidly driving toward
me.
>
>             A U.S. Department of the Interior Park Ranger, David Yim,
>climbed out and began interrogating my son Martin and I on what we were
>doing, where we were from, what I did for a living, and how many in my
>party.  As I was replying to Officer Yim, he kept his hand on his sidearm
>and circled me like a gunfighter every time I shifted position.  After he
>completed questioning us; he went to my pickup truck and camper, peered
>through the windows and back door.  Finishing with my vehicle, he proceeded
>to inspect all other vehicles in the parking area as well as interrogate
>locals and other tourists who had arrived to watch the sunset.
>
>Ranger Yim was certainly well armed.  He was literally ready for war.  On
>his hip was a nine millimeter pistol, and his duty belt carried several
>thirteen round capacity magazines, Mace, handcuffs, and a large assortment
>of other black leather clad devices.  A 12 Gauge riot shotgun and a Colt
>assault rifle were between the bucket seats of his official vehicle.
>
>I took exception to Ranger Yim's SWAT team attire, interrogation, and
>arguable actions on private property.  After returning home to New Mexico,
>I conducted a telephone interview with his supervisor, Chief Ranger Bill
>Wright.  It was unpleasantly enlightening.
>
>Ranger Wright informed me that U.S. Department of the Interior Park Rangers
>have jurisdiction anywhere in the U.S., if they feel a crime has been
>committed on federal land.  "For instance," he said,  "if we believe
>someone from Maine took an archeological treasure from Big Bend.  We could
>conduct an investigation there although it is not on U.S. land.  We are
>federal officers!" he proudly concluded.  The Ranger also stated that his
>officers are engaged in drug and illegal alien interdiction and would and
>could pursue any law violators off public property if the crime was
>committed in the park.  "The rule of hot pursuit applies here." White
noted.
>
>For these reasons, White contended that Yim had the right to be questioning
>citizens and investigating their vehicles on private land.  He also
>defended his officers' heavy weaponry.  "We had a rape and a murder in our
>Park.
>Outside Magazine says it is one of the five most dangerous National Parks
>in America.  I want to make sure my officers are armed to respond to any
>situation."  White also admitted that they had not solved the rape or
>murder cases but had arrested a few thieves.  White stated that all U.S.
>Park Rangers in America are armed with, or have riot guns and assault
>rifles in their armory.
>
>It is depressing that the familiar, friendly park ranger has become a
>paramilitary soldier.  In speaking with Yim and White, it seems that the
>"federal officer" status has infused their thinking to the point that
>making big arrests and drug busts are of greater importance than merely
>informing and protecting the public.
>
>A sad Goodbye old Smokey.  You have been replaced by
>Rambo.
>



Reply via email to