-Caveat Lector- www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-

http://www.gothamgazette.com
http://www.gothamgazette.com/article/arts/20040105/1/820

Gotham Gazette 1/5/04

Artists' Fight To Sell On The Sidewalk
by Martha Hostetter
January, 2004

Ever since the founding of New Amsterdam, there have been battles over the
right to control the public marketplace. The citys well-traveled sidewalks
and parks offer enticing places to set up shop, whether youre selling books,
art, knockoff purses, or hot dogs.

The most recent battle has been simmering since last March, when a 1991 New
York State law that regulated vending expired. Since then, vendors have been
proliferating in Times Square, Canal Street, Battery Park, and Fifth Avenue,
with their numbers peaking during the holiday season. In October, the Times
Square B.I.D. counted 208 vendors in the area, 66 more than in March. Mayor
Michael Bloomberg argues that the resulting sidewalk congestion creates a
public safety issue, forcing pedestrians to spill out on to the street. This
month, the State Assembly is likely to vote on legislation that would revise
the old regulations and also place new restrictions on vending. Advocates
for artist vendors say the proposed law infringes on their First Amendment
rights and threatens their livelihood, and they have sworn to fight it.

Through odd legal quirks, the fate of artist vendors is tied to that of
veterans. The old law limited the number of disabled veterans allowed to
sell on city streets. Once it expired, veterans could sell anywhere and
street artists could follow, thanks to a Department of Consumer Affairs
policy that states once a disabled veteran sets up shop on an otherwise
restricted street, artists can also set up there legally.

The proposed legislation [see below], which passed in the State Senate in
June, would clarify regulations on veteran vendors, allow for fingerprinting
of any vendor arrested for vending without a license, and prohibit vending
altogether for several blocks around Ground Zero. The bill stalled when
Democrats rejected the fingerprinting requirement, which they viewed as a
threat to immigrant and minority rights (vendors would get permanent
criminal records, even if their license had only recently expired). To its
supporters, fingerprinting would be a security measure and a way to deter
those without permits from selling. A related bill before the City Council
proposes to create a permit system for vendors of written matter in all city
parks, even though such a system was found to be unconstitutional in the
past.

Like immigrants, minorities, and disabled veterans, artist vendors tend to
live near the poverty level and make their primary income on the street.
While many hawk mass-produced prints of celebrities or landmarks, others
sell original art that has not made it into museums or galleries. In the
early 1990s, the city began requiring that artist vendors hold licenses,
even though vendors of written matter did not need to do so. To protest
this, a coalition of vendors formed A.R.T.I.S.T. (Artists' Response To
Illegal State Tactics) and filed suit against the city. From 1996 to 2001,
the group won a series of cases, including one that the city appealed all
the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. The courts found that vendors of
paintings, sculpture, prints, and photographs have the same First Amendment
rights to free _expression as those who sell written matter. A 1996 ruling
by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit found that visual
artwork is as wide ranging in its depiction of ideas, concepts, and emotions
as any book, treatise, pamphlet or other writing, and is similarly entitled
to full First Amendment protection. . . . The sale of protected materials is
also protected. . . . Furthermore, street marketing is in fact a part of the
message of appellants art. Anyone, not just the wealthy, should be able to
view it and to buy it. The courts did not extend First Amendment protections
to vendors of crafts, such as jewelry and pottery, though this exemption is
now facing legal challenges.

Today, A.R.T.I.S.T. has 1,000 members. The groups president, the painter
Robert Lederman, says that the push to control vending is being led by
Business Improvement Districts, which, he believes, want to protect
established business interests and clear sidewalks for their own use. He
claims that the B.I.D.s want to take out franchises on street furniture,
such as planters and garbage cans, on which to sell advertising. Theres been
a history of conflict between business interests and vendors, Lederman says.
In the early part of the 20th century, the Fifth Avenue Association tried to
remove Jewish vendors in front of stores. And in the 40s Mayor LaGuardia
tried to ban vending at a time when there were more vendors than stores,
when almost anything could be bought on the streets.

Some store owners have complained that vending takes business away from
rent-paying stores. But there is also evidence that shoppers prefer areas
where street life is bustling; one study found that businesses in the
Caribbean neighborhood along Flatbush Avenue suffered after unlicensed
street vending was shut down.

Lederman and other arts advocates argue that the city currently has enough
tools to control vending, including regulations on how and where vendors can
sell (20 feet from any storefront and 10 feet from a corner or subway
entrance). In addition, the police can close any vending stand under exigent
circumstances, including sidewalk congestion. According to a report by the
Urban Justice Center, the Peddler Squad has become much more aggressive in
giving out fines, closing down vendors, and confiscating goods for minor
violations.

Jack Nesbitt, who has been selling his paintings on city sidewalks for seven
years, was arrested twice last year. The second time, police brought him in
for not having a permit (which he didnt need), and then charged him with
other violations, including being too close to a storefront. They didnt even
pull out a tape measure when they arrested me. I had to take my own time to
go to criminal court, where the sentences were dismissed, Nesbitt says. Free
enterprise needs to start somewhere, and vendors are often the seeds.

Martha Hostetter has written about the arts for the Village Voice, American
Theater and Empire New York.

http://www.assembly.state.ny.us/leg/?bn=A09054
Bill Summary   -   A09054
Back | New York State Bill Search | Assembly Home
See Bill Text


A09054 Summary:
SAME AS    No same as

SPONSOR    RULES COM Sanders

COSPNSR    Tocci

MLTSPNSR

Amd S35-a, Gen Bus L; amd SS17-315, 17-321, 20-465, 20-468 & 20-473, NYC Ad
Cd;
amd S160.10, CP L; amd S3, Chap 227 of 1998
Relates to veteran vendors by subjecting specialized vending license holders
to
certain ten foot curb restrictions in cities having a population of one
million
or more; prohibits general vendors in NYC from vending on certain streets
and
further makes permanent the provisions of chapter 227 of the laws of 1998;
further provides for fingerprinting for general vending without a license.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

A09054 Actions:
06/16/2003 referred to cities
06/18/2003 reported referred to codes
06/19/2003 reported referred to rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

A09054 Votes:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

A09054 Memo:
 TITLE OF BILL :  An act to amend the general business law, in
relation to veteran vendors in cities having a population of one
million or more; to amend the administrative code of the city of New
York, in relation to prohibiting general vendors from vending on
certain streets; to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to
providing for fingerprinting for general vending without a license;
and to amend chapter 227 of the laws of 1998 amending the general
business law relating to veterans of the armed forces who vend in
cities having a population of one million or more, in relation to
making permanent the provisions of such chapter

 PURPOSE OR GENERAL IDEA OF BILL : The purpose of this bill is to
extend and modify provisions of law related to a system for vending in
the city of New York for veterans who have physical disabilities.

 SUMMARY OF SPECIFIC PROVISIONS : This bill would extend Chapter 227
of the laws of 1998 related to disabled veteran vendors in the City of
New York, and also amends certain provisions of S35-a of the general
business law. The bill would do the following:

* Add forty specialized vending licenses (those held by disabled
veteran vendors) for combat wounded veterans, and clarify that
specialized license holders may vend outside the Midtown restricted
core;

* Require specialized license holders to vend in as close adherence as
possible to provisions restricting vendors from vending within 10 feet
of a corner when the placement of an obstruction causes noncompliance
with such restriction;

* Increase from one to two the number of disabled veterans authorized
to vend on a block face in areas where the City otherwise prohibits
general vending, and amend the pedestrian path width to ten feet to
conform with similar provisions in the bill;

* Allow disabled veteran vendors to have up to three sales assistants
for the purposes of handling merchandise, but who would be prohibited
from handling money;

* Allow only an officer of the NYC Police Department to order a
disabled veteran vendor to move from his or her vending spot under
exigent circumstances.

* Provide for a one-time transfer of a specialized vending license to
a spouse, an adult child, or to the guardian of a dependent child if
the veteran becomes totally disabled and the license is needed to
continue to provide for the veteran or the dependent child;

* Require the NYC Department of Consumer Affairs to publish
educational materials describing the state and local laws governing
disabled veteran vending in New York City and enforcement thereof;

* Allow for the fingerprinting of any vendor arrested for vending
without a license;

* Remove restrictions on specialized vending licenses in the event
that NYC lifts restrictions on general vendors as to time, place or
number of vendors; and

* Make permanent the provisions of S35-a of the General Business Law,
as amended by this bill.

In addition to the above provisions, this bill would prohibit all
vending in the area surrounded on the west by West Street, on the
north by Vesey Street, on the east by Broadway and on the south by
Liberty Street. In addition, all general vending would be prohibited
on Broadway extending north to Murray Street and south to Battery
Place and on Park Row from Ann Street to Spruce Street.

 JUSTIFICATION : Chapter 227 of the laws of 1998 expired on March 1,
2003. This legislation would provide the City of New York limited
authority to regulate vending in order to facilitate public safety in
specific congested areas of the City.

 PRIOR LEGISLATIVE HISTORY : 1998: A.9873 - Chapter 227 of the Laws of
1998

 FISCAL IMPLICATIONS : None to the state.

 EFFECTIVE DATE : Immediately.
----------------------------------------

INTRO # 160
The full text of the bill is at:
http://www.council.nyc.ny.us/textfiles/Int%200160-2002.htm
Int. No. 160 proposed in 2002

By Council Members Addabbo, Comrie, Diaz, Foster, Perkins and Golden (by
request of the Mayor)
..Title

A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the city of New York, in
order to clarify the express  authority  of the commissioner of parks and
recreation to regulate the vending of written matter within the geographical
areas under the jurisdiction of parks and recreation.

For info on this issue contact:
Robert Lederman, President of A.R.T.I.S.T. (Artists' Response To Illegal
State Tactics)
(201) 896-1686 (if busy call) cellphone 201 952-2127
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
websites:
[Recent news. See links page for entire vending law, legal rulings etc.]
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NYCStreetArtists/
[Earlier vending articles, news, rulings]
http://www.openair.org/alerts/artist/nyc.html

ALSO see:
Gotham Gazette 1/5/04 Artists' Fight To Sell On The Sidewalk
NY Times Editorial page 1/4/04 OP-ED Let New York's Veterans Vend
NY Post Editorial 1/2/04 SILVER FOR UNSAFE STREETS
NY Post BLAME ALBANY GRIDLOCK FOR NIGHTMARE CONGESTION
NY Post 12/31/03 NYERS GET FED UP WITH HAWKER CLOG
NY Post 12/31/03 BIZARRE BAZAAR HURTING CITY'S P.R.
NY Press 12/30/03 Scrubbing First Amendment Ave. Who's behind the war
against the vendors?
by Robert Lederman
NY Times City Section 12/21/03 Ye Olde Coniferous Tree Exception
Daily News 12/19/03 City lets foul food carts stew
NY Post 12/19/03 NEW YUCK CITY FOOD VENDORS
NY Post 12/19/03 KNOCKOFF SALES SACK CITY PURSE
NY Times 12/19/03 Comptroller Urges Crackdown on Pushcart Food Monitoring
AM-NY Editorial 12/9/03 Street Vendors Are Worse Than Presidential Gridlock
NY Post Editorial 12/8/03 VENDOR VILLAINY
Daily News 12/7/03 Home front battle lines
Daily News 12/7/03 by Johnathan Capehart Clear sidewalks of New York
12/6/03 Daily News editorial Blame Silver & Bruno
Daily News 12/3/03 Mike tags vendors as dangerous
NY Post 12/3/03 BLOOMY TRIES TO SELL ALBANY ON VENDOR LAW
NY Times 12/5/03 Albany Fails to Pass a Bill to Regulate New York City's
Vendors
NY Post 12/05/03 POLS SURRENDER TO THE VENDORS
Daily News 12/5/03 City shopping for help with vendor rules
NY Times editorial 12/4/03 FIXING ALBANY How Hard Is It to Control the
Vendors?
NY Times 12/2/03 At Crossroads of World, Gridlock on the Sidewalks
Daily News lead editorial 11/29/03 Sweep the peddlers off the streets
Daily News 12/2/03 Canny ad plan City trashes sponsors - for a fee (BIDs
install 400 ad-covered trash cans in Times Sq]
CRAINS NY BUSINESS 11/24/03 Street vendors raise ruckus, add to the holiday
crush; Businesses calling for restrictions; First Amendment issue
Daily News 11/10/03 New York or Bangkok? Army of street vendors gives city
Third World feel
Daily News editorial 11/10/03 They're sidewalks, not bazaars
New York Post 6/18/03 VENDING HAGGLE
NY Times 7/10/03 Veterans, Vendors and Beaten Paths
The Villager 7/24/03 Artists and city view permits ruling differently
Daily News 5/10/03 City gags on vendor tax bills
NY Post 5/10/03 'DEADBEAT' PRETZEL TWIST
NY Times 9/4/02 Commerce Rushes in Where Art Once Ruled
Newsday 5/20/02 Street Artists Refuse to Be Curbed
NY Sun 1/8/03 To Vend Or Not To Vend
NY Sun 12/24/02 City Is Planning New Rules For Vendors
NY Sun Editorial 8/15/02Paranoid Protesting
NY Sun 8/14/02 Parks Commissioner Planning a Crackdown On Venders of Artwork
NY Times 8/11/01 Judge Bars Permit Requirement for Art Vendors
NY Post 8/11/2001Court: Permit Art Without Permit
Newsday 8/11/2001 Judge: Street artists no longer have to buy vendor permits
Newsday 1/28/03 Selling Art In Parks At Issue
OUR TOWN 2/13/03 City May Subject Park Artists to Permit System, Many cite
First Amendment violations
NY Sun 1/28/03 Venders Protest City Plan To Require Park Permits
Newsday 1/22/03 Putting Burgers Before Art Parks Commissioner Wants Artists
Out, Fast Food In
NY Newsday Jan 20, 2003 Wendy's Plan Makes Park A Garden of Eatin'; Fast
food on public property
New York Sun 9/24/02 ARTISTS GAIN STRENGTH IN FIGHT WITH MAYOR


www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to