-Caveat Lector- www.ctrl.org DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- Begin Message ---
-Caveat Lector-

* * * * * * * * * * * * REMINDER * * * * * * * * * * * * *

On the days that I don't publish, like today, you will
receive Bill Bonner's DAILY RECKONING. This will help you
to keep pace with the changes in the markets.  Bonner and
I agree on most things in the field of economics, so the
two letters will reinforce each other.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Let Them Eat Cake

The Daily Reckoning

Charlottesville, Virginia

Monday, 2 August 2004

                 ---------------------

*** Consumer spending, growth, down... inflation up...

*** Two-pronged Terrorism: al-Qaeda and sell orders...

*** Should Jules go to college? What Bill had to say...

                 ---------------------

While the lumpeninvestoriat eagerly opens its brokerage
statements, the world's Big Money peaks at its own balance
sheet with dread and horror. Consumer spending and growth
are both in the doldrums while inflation thrives, said The
Commerce Department on Friday.

The U.S. dollar, in which it put so much money and faith,
must soon resume its crumble. It has already lost a third of
its value against the euro. By one tally, foreigners hold
nearly $9 trillion in U.S. dollar assets. Depending on how
they keep score, they've lost as much as $3 trillion.

One of the remarkable things about the last few years has
been the lack of panic. American investors stood their
ground as trillions were taken out of the stock
market... largely because they didn't know any better. But
what about foreign dollar holders? Will they hold their
positions despite titanic losses? Or will they suddenly
panic?

We will see... .

Eric... ?

                 ---------------------

Eric Fry, in New York...

- Al-Qaeda is back... or at least the fear of a terrorist
attack by al-Qaeda is back. The U.S. Department of Homeland
Security - citing recent intelligence reports - warns that
terrorists may be planning to blow up iconic U.S. financial
structures like the Citicorp Center here in Manhattan, or
even the New York Stock Exchange. The warning from Tom Ridge
& Co. sparked a sharp rally in gold during last night's
trading in Asia and Europe, while also triggering a sell off
in the U.S. dollar and in most overseas stock markets.

- Clearly, the bad boys at al-Qaeda could strike at any
time... or not. But the mere threat of terrorism is already
terrorizing global stock markets today. Of course, even
before the renewed specter of dastardly deeds by al-Qaeda,
the U.S. stock market had been victimized by a homegrown
terrorism - the insidious, but potent attack of the "sell"
order. U.S. stocks, as measured by the S&P 500, fell more
than 3% in July, while the Nasdaq tumbled nearly 8%. That,
dear reader, is terrifying for most investors... and it seems
that the brand new month of August will pick up where July
left off.

- The biggest problem for the bulls is that stock buying
seems something of a luxury. U.S. stocks aren't cheap, oil
is becoming ever more expensive and the economy seems to be
slowing somewhat... So where's the urgency to buy? On a
somewhat related note, when, we wonder, might the urgency to
buy real estate - any real estate - also subside? What if
the "sell" order should begin to infiltrate the housing
market? The mere thought of it sends a shiver down our red,
white and blue spines.

- "Let's face facts, dear reader," Tom Dyson observed last
Friday, "neither this [stock market] bounce nor this housing
bubble is sustainable. The outlook for over-
geared investors everywhere... whether in stocks or
housing... is grim. In the U.K., the authorities are trying
to gently prick a record housing bubble; so far, they've
failed. In the U.S., on the other hand, the authorities are
still pandering to it. Neither set of policy wonks will get
what they want. Both will get what's coming. Sell early to
avoid the rush."

- Is the congenitally cheery Mr. Dyson too downbeat in this
instance? Is his dim view of the housing market justified?
We do not know, dear reader... but we too find it difficult
to extend our congenital optimism into an upbeat outlook for
U.S. home prices. As landed investors ourselves, we are
delighted that home prices continue rising and we would
prefer to gaze as kindly and lovingly upon the housing
market as we would a newborn child.

- But we fear that the wonderful little bundle of joy that
we behold may be a kind of changeling, apt to misbehave at
any moment. The main risk, dear reader, resides in the fact
that many homebuyers are as stretched as the Lycra pants
around an NFL lineman. The principal related risk is that
most of the nation's least capable home-buyers have assumed
the nation's most dangerous mortgages, the sort of mortgages
that become more expensive to maintain as interest rates
rise.

- Across this great country of ours, banks have been
providing the most exotic - and dangerous - mortgages to the
minority of homebuyers least able to withstand any sort of
financial stress, especially the stress of rising rates. The
exotica promoted by the nation's mortgage lenders vary
greatly in the details, but not in the net effect. The most
dangerous loans rely on some combination of adjustable-rate
financing and little to no principal re-payment.

- A brief stroll through the modern mortgage market finds
freakish offerings like the Flex-ARM Mortgage. "Each month,"
the Wall Street Journal explains, "the lender sends the
borrower a payment coupon that calculates four payment
options: negative amortization, interest only, 30-year fixed
and 20-year fixed. The homeowner decides how much to pay.
Pros: The bank does all the thinking. Each month it
recalculates the balance and tells the borrower how much he
or she would owe under different scenarios."

- Cons: the borrower may not be thinking at all.

- Another novelty offered by the nation's lenders is the
"Negative Amortization Mortgage," an interest-only loan that
allows buyers to pay LESS than the full amount of interest
necessary to cover the costs of the mortgage. The difference
between the full amount and the amount paid each month is
added to the balance of the loan. In other words, the
homeowner may skip paying part of the interest owed, as well
as any of the principal owed. "This loan is best for
borrowers with large cash reserves who want the flexibility
of lower payments during certain parts of the year but plan
to pay off loans in large chunks during other parts," the
Journal helpfully explains.

- We would point out, however, that these loans are also
ideal for borrowers who are in debt way over their heads and
who have no prayer of repaying their mortgages. Our personal
favorites here at the Daily Reckoning are the so-called 103s
and 107s. These loans require no down payment and allow
people to borrow 3% to 7% more than their house is worth.
"They are best for people with large cash reserves who
prefer to invest in, say, the stock market rather than tying
up assets in real estate," the Journal confidently surmises.

- Ahhh... right.

[Ed. Note: Your editors are cropping up all over the media
these days... Eric Fry can be seen on the television at CNNfn
on Wednesday August 4 between 9.15 and 9.45 a.m. E.T. Bill
Bonner's essay, "Indebted spendthrifts," was the best-read
essay at Lew Rockwell.com over the entire month of July and
Addison Wiggin's dulcet tones can be heard on the wireless.
Here are two of his interviews (please note, scroll down for
the second interview with Michael Campbell):

http://www.howestreet.com/ ]

                 ---------------------

Bill Bonner, back in Charlottesville...

*** "They seemed like they were a bit too countrified... you
know... they hadn't really been anywhere." Jules had been
asked what he thought of the University of Virginia after
attending an introductory session. He was describing the
students, from a teenage euro-snob perspective.

"They just didn't seem as lively as they were in New York or
Boston. They seemed more like cheerleaders and football
players."

We have been accompanying the 16-year-old on his college
tours. The effect of the visits has been to make both father
and son wonder whether Jules should bother going to college
at all. Several of the students leading the tours seemed to
be almost illiterate. Some couldn't form a complete
sentence; the predicate kept getting separated from the
subject and verb by a 'like' or a 'you know.' Others seemed
stupid. And these, we presumed, were the students the
schools were proud of.

We will give you an example: a woman leading a group of
prospective students around a New England college pointed
out that the school had 'rescued' a neighboring piece of
property 'from capitalism.' What she meant by that we don't
know... but no one bothered to ask; somehow we knew it would
be a waste of time.

The average American college student - as near as we can
tell - is about as well educated as a person with an 8th
grade education 100 years ago. Some explain this as a kind
of inflation of the education system. A dollar is worth
about 5% of what it was worth 100 years ago, so is a college
degree.

But after looking at college course offerings for the last
few weeks, we have another explanation: much of the time
spent at the modern university is not merely a waste a time,
but an absolute negative; many courses do not add
educational value; they subtract it.

Imagine, for example, an economist trained in Marxist
theory. His 'labor theory of value' is not merely wrong, it
is anti-learning, worse than no learning at all, because it
leaves its holder with the mistaken impression that he knows
something. Not only does he know nothing... but less than
nothing. If he is lucky, gradually he'll get the dumb ideas
knocked out of him by real life... and finally - after years
of re-education - he'll get back to zero.

Only then will he be able to begin learning again.
Otherwise, it will be as if he had been eating a meal of
ground glass and tried to finish it off with a big plate of
apple cobbler. The result would still be indigestible...

Judging form the course catalogs, the average student at the
average institution of higher learning will be lucky to come
out with as much knowledge as he went in with. To do so, he
will have to dodge dopey professors of economics, race
relations, gender studies, government, sociology, history,
political science, psychology and environment. For some
unknown reason, environmental science seems to have the same
effect on students' minds as the Amazon river on an iceberg.
All their good sense melts away in minutes.
All of a sudden they come to believe the most remarkable
things. The earth is getting too hot... there are too many
people and not enough parking places... there's something
practically divine about public transportation... and oil is
Liquid Sin.

*** "It's not exactly like other areas of the U.S. This real
estate market is very special. But the effect has been about
the same - prices are way up."

We are still on the East Coast. And still in the midst of a
real estate boom. It is a major subject of conversation
wherever we go - that, and college tuition.

"People from New York are coming down here and buying up the
farms," continued our source. "Local people can't afford
them anymore."

Charlottesville was declared the best places to live in
America by one rating service. It is near the top in nearly
everyone's book. Dominated by the University of Virginia,
which was founded and designed by Thomas Jefferson, it is a
pretty place, with quaint houses, big trees, grand brick
buildings in the Georgian/Palladian style and a friendly,
small-town atmosphere.

"The Charlottesville area is not attracting many people
looking for jobs," our friend went on. "People don't come
here looking for jobs - except at the university. Because
there aren't many jobs. So, we're not getting that middle-
class sprawl that you have around most cities.

"But it's a beautiful and great place to live. So it's
attracting rich people from all over the country who
appreciate the lifestyle and the beauty of the place. These
people have been coming in for a long time. But in the last
three years prices have doubled. I don't know where the
money is coming from... but there's a lot of it. For example,
there's a 1500-acre farm with a Federal-period house on it
with some historical importance. It's in Keswick, which is
one of the best areas around. And they're asking $24 million
for the place."

This comes as bad news for the Bonner household.

"We should have bought something a few years ago," said
Elizabeth.

With relatives in the area, we had planned to retire here
when we came back from Europe. Now, we won't be able to
afford the lifestyle to which we hoped to become accustomed.
Unless prices fall.

*** Poor Mike Tyson. The prizefighter, once among the
world's richest men, is now among its poorest. "Mike Tyson
filed for bankruptcy in August last year," reports our
summer intern Holly Hickling. "Right now he's trying to make
a comeback in boxing to pay off some of his
debt. And he's trying to be respectable - no hyped-up pre-
match insults, etc."

His profligacy has forced him into indentured servitude.
Tyson earned an estimated $400 million during his glory
days. But he spent it on mansions, cars, women, and jewelry.
The rest he wasted.

But when his earnings fell - he brought in only 24 dollars
in February, according to court documents - his spending
didn't. So now he's working as slave to the U.S. government
- indentured to do the world's most dangerous work until he
pays off his nearly $20 million tax bill.

                 --- Advertisement ---

The 43-Year-Old Gambling Secret That Could Triple Your Money
on Wall Street!

Tip Wall Street's odds in your favor! For decades smart gamblers
have used a special technique to break the bank in Las Vegas. Now
you can use a similar trick on Wall Street -- with less risk and
a chance for even bigger profits. Last year this system produced
an incredible 72% win rate. Discover how you could turn a proven
gambling secret into reliable investment profits!

http://www.agora-inc.com/reports/PNY/gamble740/

                 ---------------------

The Daily Reckoning PRESENTS: 'Need' now means wanting
someone else's money. 'Greed' is wanting to keep your own
money. And 'Compassion' is when a politician arranges the
transfer." The MoGu elaborates...


LET THEM EAT CAKE
by The Mogambo Guru

"Workers' Lack of Skills Lowers Wages," says Greenspan. I
quote this from a headline in the Washington Post.

What a clueless putz!

First, off, very few nominal wages, of anybody, have been
lowered. In fact, wages are "sticky downward," meaning they
don't have a tendency to fall. If you are in Washington DC
and you happen to run into this Greenspan idiot, please tell
him that he is stimulating a vicious monetary inflation and
that it's making the prices of everything go up, which has
the same effect as a wage cut; the amount of money that you
make is insufficient to buy the things you need. Skills and
education have absolutely nothing to do with it.

I am here to tell you that there are plenty of people in
this country who were not born with stratospheric IQ's,
myself included, and that we are not going to benefit from
more education. And even if we do somehow manage to acquire
this vaunted education, the ugly fact remains that there are
lots and lots of mundane, non-thinking jobs that have to be
done, and most of them only require the ability to read and
follow directions, and many of them require no education at
all. And in fact, there are very few jobs in the United
States that require any real education other than the
ability to read at a fourth-grade level, as employees are
merely handed a set of instructions ("company policy" and
"job description"), and it is your job to perform them by
rote.

The problem facing American workers and their wages is that
the damn Federal Reserve has created so much money and
credit that it has destroyed the value of the dollar, so
that it takes more and more of these devalued dollars to buy
food and rent, and wages are not rising as fast as prices.
It's as simple as that. And it has nothing at all to do with
education, except for the woeful lack of education and
smarts evidenced by the Fed, the press - who let them get
away with it because the term "journalist" is now just a
euphemism for "parroting idiot," - and the brain-dead
education establishment that indoctrinates American children
to trust the government and the press.

To save myself from getting hoarse in another of my patented
screaming hissy-fits, I will merely point to the handy chart
that reveals that the minimum wage was last increased seven
short years ago, and prices have risen 17% in that time. (To
save you the time and trouble, this works out to be only
2.3% per year, compounded). And inflation was very low
during this time, as foreign producers kept flooding us with
low-cost consumables.

Those days are over, and inflation is now double that, and
heading higher still. So even if the jerks that infest
government offices actually do pass legislation mandating a
higher minimum wage, the poor and the low-wage worker will
be right back in the same fix in only another three years.
Or less. And it will worse.

Maybe that explains why the government is trying to get more
money into the hands of the low-wage worker and the poor. It
needs their votes, yet it needs to keep screwing them with
inflation to stop the whole house collapsing. Examples of
this are the Earned Income Credit section of the 1040 tax
return, where the government actually gives money to the
low-income worker. Other examples are, of course, welfare
and Medicare and the various housing subsidies, which
provide free food, free shelter and free medical care.

For years, the poor have had access to a free phone service.
But the latest wrinkle, around these parts, is to expand the
eligibility, so that even MORE people can get a cheap phone
service! The headline in the St. Pete Times claimed "PSC
Votes to Help Poor Pay for Phone Service." PSC, in case you
were wondering, is the acronym for Public Service
Commission, which is a Florida government commission that
regulates various phone companies and utilities. I'm sure
that you have something similar where you live.

Who are these new "poor?" Well, according to the rules, if
your kid participates in the National School Lunch program,
where the kid gets free lunches (and often breakfasts, too),
then the whole family is automatically qualified to get
cheap phone service! Otherwise, you gotta earn less than
135% of the of federal poverty guidelines.

Now I would be a real hard-hearted person to deny the poor
the chance to phone out for pizza or call up their friends
to spread vicious gossip about me and say nasty things,
which are mostly lies or exaggerations, but the part that
really tickles the hell out of me is that the phone
companies, and I gotta use an exact quote here so that you
can get the full impact of the humor, "vowed to expand the
income-based eligibility requirement when concerns were
raised about their applications last year for record-high
increases in basic phone rates."

So, to paraphrase, the phone companies decided they wanted
to increase their rates because they are a greedy bunch of
overpaid jerks who excel in mismanagement and they were all
about to be fired. Ergo, the application to the PSC for a
gigantic increase in phone rates.

But since that would obviously be a hardship on the poor,
they "vowed to expand the income-based eligibility
requirement" so that they could saddle the customers who are
not poor with BOTH higher rates AND an extra charge to
insinuate more blatant communism into the phone service
industry! Because, and you can quote me on this, every dime
of that cost is added to my bill in the form of higher
rates, particularly in an add-on called the "Universal
Service Fund" which I see on the phone bill every damn
month.

Now, after I have been calmed down with massive amounts of
intravenous medications, I can thus show 1) how the French
Revolution could have been prevented and 2) how the
communists won the Cold War. All that was needed was a
system whereby every pseudo-wealthy consumer of utilities
has extra taxes piled onto the their monthly bills, while
the State provides the poor with free goods and services,
just like we are doing. Then, Marie Antoinette would never
have said "Let them eat cake" when informed that the French
peasants were starving for lack of bread. This is because
the government would have just added a charge to my bread
bill, and then used the money to buy the poor all the bread
they could eat!

Ergo, today's poor are not poor. They are only considered
poor because they do not earn money to buy the things that
they consume, because they get it all for free. They receive
free food, free housing, free medical care, free monthly
stipends, and, of course, free phones! And computers are
installed at the free libraries, so that the poor can go on-
line, for free, and do whatever it is that the poor do when
they are on-line, which baffles the hell out of me, since
most of them are functionally illiterate, and the ones that
are not completely illiterate don't like to read, so they
don't. So why in the hell they would want to go on-line is
beyond me and my limited intellectual capacity.

The reality is that the poor are actually very rich; they
have everything that they need to live comfortably, and they
have nothing but free time to enjoy it, and of course, whine
about how they want more and more, and how the government
ought to wrest money from everybody and give it to them,
which is, of course, the entire philosophy of the entire
loathsome Democrat Party.

Gary M. Galles is a professor of economics at Pepperdine
University. He wrote an essay on the Mises.org site entitled
"A Screed on Need and Greed" that I think underscores this
point. He writes, "As Joseph Sobran put it, 'Need' now means
wanting someone else's money. 'Greed' means wanting to keep
your own. And 'Compassion' is when a politician arranges the
transfer."

He follows that up with a warning from Thomas Paine, "Beware
the greedy hand of government, thrusting itself into every
corner and crevice."

Regards,


The Mogambo Guru
for The Daily Reckoning

*** The Mogambo Sez: Bill Clinton recently stated that he
considered FDR to be the greatest president of the last
century. He was not. FDR was the worst president we ever
had, as he started us down that long, lonely path to our
current socialist and communist proclivities, which are
destined to bankrupt the United States.

Editor's note: Richard Daughty is general partner and C.O.O.
for Smith Consultant Group, serving the financial and
medical communities, and the editor of the Mogambo Guru
economic newsletter, an avocational exercise the better to
heap disrespect on those who desperately deserve it.

The Mogambo Guru is quoted frequently in Barron's, The Daily
Reckoning, and other fine publications. If you're inclined
to read more, you'll find the whole Mogambo here:

Let Them Eat Cake
http://www.dailyreckoning.com/body_headline.cfm?id=4045

                 --- Advertisement ---

Twelve Chances at 100% Gains or Your Money Back!

Are you the type of investor who likes to pocket huge gains of
100%, 175%, 277% or 378%? If so, you'll be interested in what one
options expert has to say. Since 2000 he's been
able to bring his subscribers at least 12 recommendations per
year that have reached gains or 100% or more!   And we're so
convinced that he'll do the same over the next twelve months
that we are guaranteeing that you'll see at least 12 chances at
triple-digit gains -- or your money back. Learn more about this
unbelievable guarantee.

http://www.agora-inc.com/reports/OHL/WOHLE701/

----------------------------------------------------

MAKE YOUR OPINIONS COUNT! Visit our Discussion Board:

http://www.agora-inc.com/forums/index.cfm?cfapp=3

------------------------------------------------------
If you'd like, please e-mail this issue of the Daily
Reckoning to a friend:

http://www.dailyreckoning.com/emailfriend.cfm?id=9835
------------------------------------------------------

Are you having trouble receiving your Daily Reckoning?
You can ensure its arrival in your mailbox here:

http://www.dailyreckoning.com/whitelist.cfm

------------------------------------------------------
ADDRESS CHANGE? WISH TO CANCEL? You can administer your
account online. Simply go to Subscriber Services at:

http://www.dailyreckoning.com/subsvcs.cfm

Our writers and contributors also welcome your questions
and comments. Simply reply to this e-mail with the word
'Question' or 'Comment' in the Subject of your reply.


*******
Please note: We sent this e-mail to:
    RA Millegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
because you or someone using your e-mail address subscribed to this service.

*******
To manage your e-mail subscription, use our web interface at:
    http://www.agoramail.net/Home.cfm?List=RealityC
To cancel or for any other subscription issues, write us at:
    Order Processing Center
    Attn: Customer Service
    P.O. Box 925
    Frederick, MD 21705 USA

*******
Nothing in this e-mail should be considered personalized investment advice.
Although our employees may answer your general customer service questions,
they are not licensed under securities laws to address your particular
investment situation.  No communication by our employees to you should be
deemed as personalized investment advice.

We expressly forbid our writers from having a financial interest in any
security recommended to our readers. All of our employees and agents must
wait 24 hours after on-line publication or 72 hours after the mailing of
printed-only publication prior to following an initial recommendation.
Any investments recommended in this letter should be made only after
consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the
prospectus or financial statements of the company.

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to