Those with deep faith in authority claim that there can't be large government conspiracies, since someone would come forward to blow the whistle, which would topple the cover- up and the whistleblower would become a rich & famous hero, only emphasizing why they would want to come forward. Well, as usual, faith in authority proves thicker than the facts. Lester Coleman was a Defense Intelligence Agent who blew the whistle on a U.S. government drug-running operation that bypassed normal airport security, which may have been the means by which the bomb was slipped on board. After Coleman blew the whistle and filed an affidavit in court, he was arrested and jailed for using false identity papers, which occurred as part of his job as a U.S. intelligence agent. In short, it's a myth that a large government conspiracy will be toppled even when someone comes forward to blow the whistle, and it's also a myth that there are no risks involved in whistleblowing or that the media would protect those who come forward and make them rich & famous covering their amazing revelations. In reality, a whistleblower can come forward, get arrested and rot in jail while the media reports only the government version of reality and most people go on thinking there is no coverup, obviously, since someone would come forward... Now another Flight-103 whistleblower has come forward with testimony that exactly corroborates Coleman's testimony (let's watch as the major media ignore or attack him): ===================================================================== http://www.sundayherald.com/news/newsi.hts?section=News&story_id=8212 ===================================================================== SUNDAY HERALD Issue 63, April 16th, 2000 Baggage handler says American agents used Pan Am to smuggle drugs THE Pan Am baggage handler who was in charge of loading luggage onto Flight 103 has admitted for the first time that he knew US intelligence agencies used the airline to smuggle drugs and that their covert operation could have been penetrated by terrorists who planted the bomb on board Flight 103. The claims made on the eve of the Lockerbie trial by Roland O'Neill, from Frankfurt, could throw allegations that Libya was behind the bombing into complete disarray. It would also seriously undermine the position of the Scottish prosecution team which is preparing the criminal case against Abdel Basset Ali Mohamed al-Megrahi and Lamen Khalifa Fhimah. Their trial will begin at Camp Zeist on May 3. O'Neill's admissions back up long held suspicions that Palestinian terrorists operating in Germany were behind the bombing. The extremists, it is claimed, penetrated the US drugs operation and swapped a bag containing drugs on the flight bound for America for a bag carrying Semtex. On the eve of the Lockerbie trial, O'Neill invited the Sunday Herald yesterday to his Frankfurt home because he wanted to explain how he has been tormented for the last 12 years by the fear that he could have unwittingly placed the explosives on board the aircraft. O'Neill was told for the first time yesterday by the Sunday Herald that he had failed four key questions during a lie detector test investigating his role in the Lockerbie bombing. The result of the test pointed towards O'Neill being the man who ordered that the bomb be placed on the plane. O'Neill insisted that he did not lie in the polygraph but he did admit that he knew the Drug Enforcement Agency - an arm of US intelligence - was using Frankfurt as a route to smuggle heroin into America as part of a secret plan to finance the freeing of US hostages in Beirut. O'Neill's polygraph showed that he lied when he said he did not know who ordered the switching of the cases and when he said he did not order the switching of the suitcases himself. O'Neill also allegedly lied in the test when he said he did not see the cases being switched and when he said he did not know what was in the switched suitcases. O'Neill was unaware that he had failed these four key questions in the polygraph test, the results of which were leaked to the Sunday Herald from sources close to the Lockerbie investigation in America. "I do recall about a year before the bombing that two suitcases filled with drugs, belonging to two women were ordered to go on board a Pan Am flight without being interfered with - opened or X-rayed. That was on the orders of US agents - either the DEA or the CIA. I can't remember which," said O'Neill. "I could have unwittingly been part of the this conspiracy. Security at Frankfurt airport was incredibly slack. It is entirely possible that a bag of drugs was switched for a bag containing Semtex. I often think to myself, 'my God, I could have picked up that bag and put it on board flight 103.' It terrifies me. "What I do think I remember about that night was that it was very hectic and I think some baggage loaders just picked cases from one aircraft, which was not a Pan Am plane, and left it at the side of Pan Am 103 so that it could be loaded on board. Maybe there is a chance that one of these was unchecked and unscreened. This could have been from any flight and from anywhere. "I did not order the cases to be switched. I did not see who switched the cases. I did not know what was in the case. I was asked if I wanted to take a lie detector test and I said, 'OK' as I had nothing to hide." He added: "I can't accept that Libya is responsible for this, you know. There has to be another reason behind this - quite possibly the activities of American intelligence agencies may be involved. Remember if you wanted to bring something - drugs or a bomb - into the airport it could be done. There was really no security. If anyone had a security badge, like I did, they could just walk through with a bomb, put a baggage tag on it and put it on a plane. And that would be it - boom." ===================================================================== http://www.sundayherald.com/news/newsi.hts?section=News&story_id=8212 ===================================================================== ARTICLES ON LESTER COLEMAN: http://www.copi.com/articles/lockerbie.html http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/5260/coleman.html http://wpni.com/wp-srv/inatl/longterm/panam103/stories/arrest110696.htm See March 20 show, starting around the last third of the show: http://broadcast.com/shows/endoftheline/00archives.html ============================================================ If the axiom "power corrupts" is a reliable axiom, then the Official Story must be suspect on its face. ------------------------------------------------------------ GODDARD'S JOURNAL: http://www.erols.com/igoddard/journal.htm ____________________________________________________________ Asking the "wrong questions," challenging the official story
