SPOTLIGHT EMAIL NEWSLETTER #30 Please visit the NEW and controverial LIBERTY LIBRARY BOOKSTORE ONLINE! The store now has the full Liberty Library catalog and a shopping cart system! http://www.spotlight.org/store/commerce.cgi? In This Issue: Bilderberg Fact-Finding Australian Gun Conrol Bilderberg Concerned About Opposition Visit Our site for a great new story on the Chinese Weapons scandal. www.spotlight.org. Bilderberg Fact-Finding A reporter relates his first-hand experiences prowling around the Library of Congress in an effort to find out just what was going on with the Bilderberg steering committee meeting. EXCLUSIVE TO THE SPOTLIGHT By James P. Tucker “Good evening,” I said, shaking hands with a smiling David Rockefeller as Bilderberg luminaries gathered for food and drink inside the Great Hall of the Library of Congress’ Thomas Jefferson Building in Washington. Rockefeller’s smile froze and his eyeballs were spinning. We have been eyeball-to-eyeball over Bilderberg many times over the last 20 years and he doesn’t like me. I would be embarrassed if he did. It was only after we shook hands that David realized who I was. I had just failed in an attempt to obtain Bilderberg’s agenda and list of participants. It was late in the afternoon and a few tourists and researchers were still inside the Library of Congress, even as the Bilderberg set was beginning to arrive. But after David and his entourage recognized me, my fate was sealed. The cops threw me out. I guess that was inevitable. Earlier in the day, I had been scouting around the Library of Congress building as Bilderberg’s advance staff made preparations. At 7 p.m., I was stationed outside at the building’s main entrance as long black limos began to roll up. As one luminary stepped out, I smiled and said, “You are here for Bil derberg, too.” “Yes,” he said with a smile and we entered together as I was telling him that “Bilderberg does good work.” (Forgive me, oh dear Lord.) For Bilderberg luminaries, there is no normal security: briefcases don’t go on conveyor belts and you don’t walk through airport-style metal detectors. “Security” is defined as keeping outsiders outside. Once inside, I trotted upstairs to the meeting room and again asked for a list of participants and the agenda. “First you have to have your name tag,” another woman explained, directing me to the line downstairs that I had just left. It was there that Rockefeller chanced to arrive for our gracious confrontation. As I reached for the documents, a guard grabbed my arm and said: “You don’t belong here.” As he escorted me out, I explained that “I do, too, belong here because I am a taxpayer and they are conducting public business in secret.” “I have my orders, Mr. Tucker,” said the guard in a gentle voice. The following day, during public visiting hours, I was honored with guards all day long. One would relieve the other. I observed Bilderberg people moving out of the room where they had been meeting and marching to another room at the opposite end of the building, down another long corridor. I followed at the end of the line until the guard stopped me. But I was able, for future reference, to know which room they were using. I returned two hours later when I judged that the session was over. I roamed around the room where the morning session had been held, picking up a book called New World Coming: American Security in the 21st Century prepared by the United States Commission on National Security/21st Century. Each Bilderberg participant was given this assigned reading. The room had seats for 48 participants and a podium for the speakers. I also obtained the text of a speech by Samuel Berger, President Clinton’s national security advisor and a Bilderberg regular. It was these documents, and contributions from collaborator Michael Col lins Piper, plus interviews with a high State Department official and an international entrepreneur who personally deals with several Bilderberg regulars that provided the information about what transpired during the secret meetings. Australian Gun Control Australians have found that controlling the private ownership of firearms doesn’t control crime, despite what the gun grabbers advocate in the United States. Exclusive To The SPOTLIGHT By Mike Blair A $500 million program to force 18.5 million Australians to hand in virtually all of their firearms last year resulted in burgeoning crime and chaos. Australians were forced to surrender 640,381 personal firearms, including semi-automatic .22 rifles and shotguns. According to the latest statistics in Australia, homicides are up by 3.2 percent, assaults are up 8.6 percent and armed robberies have increased by a whopping 44 percent. The rise in crime in Australia proves that controlling the private ownership of firearms is a failure. And yet what has happened in Australia is ignored by Handgun Control Inc. (HCI) and other anti-Second Amendment organizations in the United States, as well as the Clinton administration and Capitol Hill’s most rabid gun grabbers, such as Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.). The Australian statistics are frightening and should move those in the U.S. government interested in further curbing the right of Americans to keep and bear arms to take a second look at the issue. In the Australian state of Victoria, for example, homicides with firearms are up 300 percent, proving the old American adage: “When guns are banned only criminals will have guns.” DRAMATIC CHANGE The statistics in Australia over the last 25 years indicate a steady decrease in homicides with firearms, a fact which changed dramatically in just a year. In addition, statistics over the previous quarter of a century indicate a steady decrease in armed robbery with firearms, which also changed dramatically with the disarming of the Australian public last year. Nevertheless, Clinton, Schumer and HCI are pushing forward for more stringent gun legislation, ignoring the self defense needs of Americans, the constitutional arguments about the rights guaranteed by the Second Amendment and, of course, the example of Australia. Bilderberg Concerned About Opposition A major focus of the recent Bilderberg gathering in the nation’s capital was the rise of a solid America First bloc that threatens Bilderberg’s plans for increased, forced globalization of America’s resources. EXCLUSIVE TO THE SPOTLIGHT By James P. Tucker Jr. Bilderberg devoted much of a day-long meeting of its steering committee in Washington to expressing fears over growing “isolationism,” which it blames on growing populist and nationalist sentiment (long cultivated by Liberty Lobby and The SPOTLIGHT) and which is being successfully harvested by Pat Buchanan’s burgeoning Reform Party presidential candidacy. Bilderberg’s committee gathered for dinner on the evening of Nov. 4 and worked all day Nov. 5. The dinner and meetings were held in sealed-off, guarded areas of the Thomas Jefferson Building of the Library of Congress. In addition to the regulars—David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Vernon Jordan and Sen. Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.)—former Sen. Gary Hart (D-Colo.), Energy Secretary Bill Richardson, Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-Tex.) and National Security Advisor Sandy Berger also attended. The steering committee always gathers months in advance of the full membership meeting of Bilderberg for routine housekeeping, such as approving the location of their next hiding place, preparing an agenda and giving another shove to its long-term goal of world government. What was unusual this year was giving so much attention to its concern about growing “isolationism” in the United States. In a speech by Samuel Berger, President Clinton’s national security advisor, and in a book entitled New World Coming: American Security in the 21st Century, which was assigned to each participant, fears of “isolationism” and “nationalism” were expressed repeatedly. SANDY SAYS . . . The text of Berger’s speech and a copy of the book were obtained by The SPOTLIGHT on site at the Library of Congress, although the White House actually posted Berger’s published remarks on its own Internet web site [www.whitehouse.gov]. “After 50 years of building alliances for collective security, common prosperity and wider freedom, we now have an unparalleled opportunity to shape, with others, a better, safer more democratic world,” Berger told his Bilderberg colleagues. Berger objected to “isolationism” among Republicans and Democrats that “isolates” America. “Over the last six and a half years, the administration has worked with Republicans and Democrats in Congress to enlarge NATO and bolster “democracy” in Central Europe, to ex tend NAFTA to Mexico and create the World Trade Organization, to ratify START II and the Chemical Weapons Convention, to support our troops in en gagements from the Balkans to the Persian Gulf and to launch a host of other international initiatives,” Berger boasted. He blamed isolationists for the rejection of the test ban treaty in the Senate. “That same small but increasingly powerful group is responsible for the steady decline in our international affairs budget—to the point where the gulf between America’s aspirations in the world and our ability to realize them is growing,” Berger said. He complained about congressional cutbacks to the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund—the two major conduits for shipping American tax dollars overseas—and cutting the request for United Na tions “peacekeeping” funds by 60 percent. “These congressional actions do not result from simple differences over policy or from partisanship,” Berger said. “They reflect the coherent philosophy of a dominant minority, which sees international spending as inherently op posed to America’s interests,” Berger said. “It is urgent that internationalists find common ground around a common agenda of our own,” Berger said. “We must learn to recognize when our beliefs are being threatened. And we must defend them together.” Bilderberg participants expressed concern over institutions such as Liberty Lobby promoting “isolationism”—a Bilderberg synonym for a policy of non-intervention—and fear that Buchanan may be nominated by the Reform Party, picking up $11 million in campaign cash, making the ballot in all 50 states and participating in a three-way debate among presidential nominees in the fall of 2000. In such a debate, most agreed, Buchanan would mop up the Republican and Democratic nominees, whether their names are George W. Bush, John McCain, Al Gore or Bill Bradley. For Buchanan to have the opportunity to educate millions of Americans, who watch TV but rarely read, strikes fear in Bilderberg hearts. RISING TIDE OF PATRIOTISM The book assigned to Bilderberg participants to read was prepared by the United States Commission on National Security/21st Century, headed by Hart and former Sen. Warren Rudman. It reflects much of the Bilderberger concerns about a rising tide of patriotism in America. The book worried that isolationists “sense conspiracy” and make it difficult to “stand together in an era of dissolving borders,” warning that, as a result, “further global economic integration is not a certainty.” There is “nothing immutable about the present arrangements wherein certain peoples are ruled within certain fixed territorial units . . . the changes ahead have the potential to undermine the authority of states, and the political identities and loyalties of citizens” will be in doubt, the book says. “The principle of state sovereignty and of the state system is wasting away.” It says “globalization is basically good . . . because it may be a vehicle to transcend the system of state sovereignty.” But it warned of isolationists who argue that “globalization is being used by the corporate rich to grow still richer at nearly everyone else’s ex pense.” The “ideal of universal human rights will also challenge the traditional concept of state sovereignty,” it says, citing the case of Augusto Pinochet as illustrating “the evolution of international law toward views that undermine sovereignty.” It also cited the invasion of Yugoslavia as another giant leap toward the end of nationhood. “The campaign in Kosovo was the clearest example in modern times of a major power or alliance intervening militarily in the internal affairs of another sovereign state avowedly on behalf of minority rights,” the book approvingly says. Leaders “applaud the erosion of sovereignty over such questions, as well as others.” GLOBAL GOVERNMENT The book also follows the Bilderberg program for global government by dividing the world into three great regions for the administrative convenience of the UN, which is to emerge as a de jure, as well as de facto, world government. Each region—the European Union, the American Union and the Asian-Pacific Union—is to evolve into a single state with a common currency. The book reports with approval the giant steps taken toward each of the goals of regionalization and celebrates the “dollarization” of the Western Hemisphere, which Bilderberg called for at its meeting in Sintra, Portugal, last June. “In addition to trade integration, the Americas will experience greater monetary integration,” the book said. “Proposals for dollarization are being debated by the public and/or private sectors in Argentina, Mexico and El Salvador. Currently, Latin Americans hold a majority of their savings in dollars and 70 percent of banking assets and liabilities are dollar-denominated in Argentina, Bolivia, Peru and Uruguay.” Global trends “indicate that a regional currency bloc is a strong possibility,” the book concludes. **************************************************************************** Subscribe to THE SPOTLIGHT! Only $59.00 for 1 year or $99.00 for 2 years. Every week, get the important stories that the popular media either miss... or ignore. For around $1.00 per issue, THE SPOTLIGHT is a steal! Don't wait any longer. Make sure that you never miss another issue. Subscribe now! To subscribe online, visit our SECURE server at www.spotlight.org. You can also mail your subscription to THE SPOTLIGHT, 300 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20003. OR CALL 1-800-522-6292 **************************************************************************** If you wish to unsubscribe from this newsletter, send an email to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" (without the quotes) and type in the body of the email "unsubscribe spotlist" (also without the quotes).
