forwarded message


A BuzzFlash Editorial Commentary
October 28, 2001
http://www.buzzflash.com/BuzzScripts/Buzz.dll/Content

Take the issue of Cipro, the preferred Antibiotic that fights Anthrax. Bayer owns the 
patent. Should a major Anthrax attack be launched over our cities, millions upon 
millions of dosages would be needed. Instead of temporarily revoking Bayer's patent, 
which would upset the pharmaceutical companies, who donate large amounts of money to 
the Republicans, Tommy Thompson was finally forced to negotiate a discounted rate for 
Cipro purchased by the government. This is a totally inadequate "solution" for several 
reasons:

--Bayer, even with increased production, will not be able to produce a large enough 
supply to deal with a massive airborne anthrax attack in the foreseeable future. By 
allowing other companies to produce generic versions of Cipro, we would have had more 
of it produced in a shorter period of time, thus increasing our nation's stockpile at 
a faster rate.
--Bayer lowered its price to the government, but not to the public market. This, of 
course, means that Bayer will be able to reap huge profits at the expense of the 
average American. In fact, some experts say that Bayer will probably even make a small 
profit over the discounted rate to the government.
--Other drug companies were willing to provide generic Cipro, or Cipro-like 
antibiotics free, in exchange for approval to produce the drugs. Thompson did not take 
advantage of any of these offers. Beyond the fact that they would have saved the 
American taxpayer money, the offers, if accepted, would have increased our stockpile 
to more widely cover the devastating impact of mutliple airborne attacks. (see 
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/10/26/business/26CIPR.html?ex=1005068556&ei=1&en=d "Bayer 
Halves Price for Cipro, but Rivals Offer Drugs Free")

Most importantly, it is worth repeating that Tommy Thompson's action to protect the 
patent rights of pharmaceutical companies, even when millions of American lives may be 
at stake, is inexcusable. Read this excerpt from the New York Times article cited 
above:

"With the Bayer deal, the nation will have 120 million Cipro pills in government 
stockpiles by the end of the year. Mr. Thompson said this is enough for 12 million 
Americans, but this is true only if each person takes the medicine for only five days. 
If doses were ever needed for 60 days, or 120 tablets a person, then the stockpile 
would be adequate for only a million people."

If a terrorist were to release a bucket of "weapons grade" anthrax from the top of a 
building in a major American city, given the right wind conditions, millions of people 
might potentially need to take Cipro (which is considered the most all-around 
effective antibiotic against Anthrax). Other Tommy Thompson, no doubt at the behest of 
the White House, has struck a "deal" that puts Americans at grave risk.

Again from the New York Times article:

"The Bayer deal on Wednesday included the donation of two million tablets beginning 
next week. But that offer has been quickly upstaged. Johnson & Johnson (news/quote) 
announced late on Wednesday that it would provide up to 100 million tablets of its 
Levaquin free if the F.D.A. approved its use for anthrax. Bristol-Myers Squibb 
(news/quote) said today that it would provide free Tequin to anyone exposed to anthrax 
if the F.D.A. approved it for anthrax.

Dr. Sandro K. Cinti, a specialist in infectious diseases at the University of Michigan 
and a member of Michigan's bioterrorism task force, said that Tequin and Levaquin were 
chemically very similar to Cipro and were considerably newer than Cipro. "They would 
be at least as effective and possibly more effective," than Cipro, he said."

It would be easy for the White House to take an action to protect the American public 
instead of taking one to protect the patent rights of a pharmaceutical company.

A BuzzFlash Editorial Commentary




_______________________________________________________________________
Powered by List Builder
To unsubscribe follow the link:
http://lb.bcentral.com/ex/manage/subscriberprefs?customerid=9353&subid=013E5377CD276CA4&msgnum=541


Reply via email to