-Caveat Lector-
------- Start of forwarded message -------
http://www.mises.org/fullstory.asp?control=1050
Thoreau and "Resistance to Civil Government"
by Gary M. Galles
[Posted September 20, 2002]
Henry David Thoreau is best known for Walden, which chronicles his Image
experiment in simple, self-sufficient living. Less remembered, however,
is that while living at Walden Pond, he was imprisoned for refusing to pay
his poll tax as a statement of protest against slavery and what he saw as an
unjust war with Mexico.
After someone else paid his tax, he was released, but he gave an 1848
lecture on "Resistance to Civil Government"--since published as "Civil
Disobedience"--to explain his action.
While far less known than Walden, "Civil Disobedience" has arguably had much
farther reaching effects. It helped inspire the Danish resistance in World
War II, Gandhi in India, and tax resistors and civic protestors of all types
for many decades. And it still has much to say to us today, as illustrated
by the following excerpts:
I heartily accept the motto, "That government is best which governs
least"; and I should like to see it acted up to more rapidly and
systematically. Carried out, it finally amounts to this, which I also
believe--"that government is best which governs not at all"; and when men
are prepared for it, that is the kind of government which they will have.
Government is at best an expedient, but most governments are usually, and
all governments are sometimes, inexpedient.
The government itself, which is only the mode which the people have
chosen to execute their will, is equally liable to be abused and
perverted before the people can act through it.
Yet this government never of itself furthered any enterprise but by the
alacrity with which it got out of its way.
The character inherent in the American people has done all that has been
accomplished; and it would have done somewhat more, if the government had
not sometimes got in its way. Trade and commerce, if they were not made
of india-rubber, would never manage to bounce over obstacles which
legislators are continually putting in their way, and if one were to
judge these men wholly by the effects of their actions and not partly by
their intentions, they would deserve to be classed with those most
mischievous persons who put obstructions on the railroads.
After all, the practical reason why, when the power is once in the hands
of the people, a majority are permitted, and for a long time continue, to
rule is not because they are most likely to be in the right, nor because
this seems fairest to the minority, but because they are physically the
strongest.
But a government in which the majority rule in all cases can not be based
on justice . . . Can there not be a government in which the majorities do
not virtually decide right and wrong, but conscience?
Must the citizen ever for a moment, or in the least degree, resign his
conscience to the legislator? Why has every man a conscience then? I
think we should be men first, and subjects afterwards.
Law never made men a whit more just; and, by means of their respect for
it, even the well-disposed are daily made the agents of injustice.
. . . most legislators . . . as they rarely make any moral distinctions,
they are as likely to serve the devil, without intending it, as God.
How does it become a man to behave toward the American government
today? I answer, that he cannot without disgrace be associated with it.
All men recognize the right of revolution; that is, the right to refuse
allegiance to and to resist, the government, when its tyranny or its
inefficiency are great and unendurable.
But when...oppression and robbery are organized, I say, let us not have
such a machine [government] any longer.
Even voting for the right thing is doing nothing for it. It is only
expressing to men feebly your desire that it should prevail. A wise man
will not leave the right to the mercy of chance, nor wish it to prevail
through the power of the majority.
If I devote myself to other pursuits and contemplations, I must first
see, at least, that I do not pursue them sitting upon another man's
shoulders. I must get off him first, that he may pursue his
contemplations too.
Those who, while they disapprove of the character and measures of a
government, yield to it their allegiance and support are undoubtedly its
most conscientious supporters, and so frequently the most serious
obstacles to reform.
Unjust laws exist . . . Men, generally, under such a government as this,
think that they ought to wait until they have persuaded the majority to
alter them. They think that, if they should resist , the remedy would be
worse than the evil. But it is the fault of the government itself that
the remedy is worse than the evil. It makes it worse.
. . . If [government injustice] is of such a nature that it requires you
to be an agent of injustice to another, then, I say, break the law...What
I have to do myself is to see, at any rate, that I do not lend myself to
the wrong which I condemn.
A minority is powerless when it conforms to the majority.
. . . the freest of my neighbors . . . cannot spare the protection of the
existing government, and they dread the consequences to their property
and families of disobedience to it.
But, if I deny the authority of the state when it presents its tax bill,
it will soon take and waste my property and so harass me and my children
without end. This is hard. This makes it impossible for a man to live
honestly, and at the same time comfortably...
I saw that the State was half-witted . . . and I lost all my remaining
respect for it. . . .
. . . the state . . . is not armed with superior honesty, but with
superior physical strength.
I was not born to be forced . . .
Statesmen and legislators, standing so completely within the institution,
never distinctly and nakedly behold it . . . all their wit and usefulness
lie within certain not very wide limits.
Our legislators . . . have no genius or talent for comparatively humble
questions of taxation and finance, commerce and manufactures and
agriculture. If we were left solely to the wordy wit of legislators in
Congress for our guidance, uncorrected by the seasonable experience and
the effectual complaints of the people, America would not long retain her
rank among the nations.
The authority of government . . . to be strictly just, it must have the
sanction and consent of the governed. It can have no pure right over my
person and property but what I concede to it.
Is a democracy, such as we know it, the last possible improvement in
government? Is it not possible to take a step further towards recognizing
and organizing the rights of man? There will never be a really free and
enlightened State until the State comes to recognize the individual as a
higher and independent power, from which all its own power and authority
are derived, and treats him accordingly.
Modern Americans live lives considerably less simple than that of Thoreau on
Walden Pond. But his insights in "Civil Disobedience" are, if anything, more
important in our far more complex world, because that sheer complexity often
disguises the sorts of foundational questions he considered about the
defensible role for government in the lives and liberties of its citizens.
And with a government whose current ubiquity would amaze and appall him,
there is no doubt that Thoreau would find us further from his ideals today
than in the 1840s, when he wrote it.
Gary M. Galles is a professor of economics at Pepperdine University. Send
him MAIL, and see his Mises.org Daily Articles Archive.
Subscribe to Mises Email List Services
Join the Mises Institute Mises.org Financials
Home | About | Email List | Search | Contact Us | Periodicals | Articles |
Games & Fun
News | Resources | Catalog | Contributions | Freedom Calendar
You are subscribed as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, click here: http://mises.biglist.com/unsub.php/article/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
or e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------- End of forwarded message --------
From
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A<>E<>R
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; I don't believe everything I read or send
(but that doesn't stop me from considering it; obviously SOMEBODY thinks it's
important)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without
charge or
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of
information for
non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth
shut."
--- Ernest Hemingway
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
