-Caveat Lector-

The remainder & complete study can be found @
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/321/7276/1547

and an analytical article is @
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/jan2001/pov-j29.shtml

}}>Begin extract
Objectives: To compare the extent to which late 20th century patterns of mortality
in London are predicted by contemporary patterns of poverty and by late 19th century
patterns of poverty. To test the hypothesis that the pattern of mortality from
causes known to be related to deprivation in early life can be better predicted by
the distribution of poverty in the late 19th century than by that in the late 20th
century.
Design: Data from Charles Booth's survey of inner London in 1896 were digitised and
matched to contemporary local government wards. Ward level indices of relative
poverty were derived from Booth's survey and the 1991 UK census of population. All
deaths which took place within the surveyed area between 1991 and 1995 were
identified and assigned to contemporary local government wards. Standardised
mortality ratios for various causes of death were calculated for each ward for all
ages, under age 65, and over age 65. Simple correlation and partial correlation
analysis were used to estimate the contribution of the indices of poverty from
1896 and 1991 in predicting ward level mortality ratios in the early 1990s.
Setting: Inner London.
Results: For many causes of death in London, measures of deprivation made around
1896 and 1991 both contributed strongly to predicting the current spatial
distribution. Contemporary mortality from diseases which are known to be related to
deprivation in early life (stomach cancer, stroke, lung cancer) is predicted more
strongly by the distribution of poverty in 1896 than that in 1991. In addition, all
cause mortality among people aged over 65 was slightly more strongly related to the
geography of poverty in the late 19th century than to its contemporary distribution.

Conclusions: Contemporary patterns of some diseases have their roots in the past.
The fundamental relation between spatial patterns of social deprivation and spatial
patterns of mortality is so robust that a century of change in inner London has
failed to disrupt it.

End extract<{{
A<>E<>R
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Integrity has no need of rules. -Albert Camus (1913-1960)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The libertarian therefore considers one of his prime educational
tasks is to spread the demystification and desanctification of the
State among its hapless subjects.  His task is to demonstrate
repeatedly and in depth that not only the emperor but even the
"democratic" State has no clothes; that all governments subsist
by exploitive rule over the public; and that such rule is the reverse
of objective necessity.  He strives to show that the existence of
taxation and the State necessarily sets up a class division between
the exploiting rulers and the exploited ruled.  He seeks to show that
the task of the court intellectuals who have always supported the State
has ever been to weave mystification in order to induce the public to
accept State rule and that these intellectuals obtain, in return, a
share in the power and pelf extracted by the rulers from their deluded
subjects.
[[For a New Liberty:  The Libertarian Manifesto, Murray N. Rothbard,
Fox & Wilkes, 1973, 1978, p. 25]]

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to