PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 23:56:38 EST
Reply-To: Conspiracy Theory Research List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Conspiracy Theory Research List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [CTRL] Hawk et al
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DECLARATION
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 1/9/99 7:31:57 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Hawk had nothing coming to him for defending his position in the debate. As
far as I could see, he received nothing he did not respond to honestly and
effectively. He also won the
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 1/9/99 6:11:47 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hawk really had what was coming to him. I also agree that William 'egged'
him
on
If any person disagrees with a defender of slavery, does that disagreement
constitute egging on?
8 Jan 1999 23:56:38 EST
Reply-To: Conspiracy Theory Research List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Conspiracy Theory Research List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [CTRL] Hawk et al
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DECLARATION DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a
At 11:56 PM 1/8/99 -0500, you wrote:
-Caveat Lector-
Howdy all,
I have just gone through a lengthy post from Hawk, using the bible to
justify
slavery and comments about how it really wasn't that bad and if ya
look at the
farm logs, some places only whipped their slaves 0.7 whippings
per year.
-Caveat Lector-
Howdy all,
I have just gone through a lengthy post from Hawk, using the bible to justify
slavery and comments about how it really wasn't that bad and if ya look at the
farm logs, some places only whipped their slaves "0.7 whippings per year".
Now I was raised in the south,
