Seems that everything posted to CIA-Drugs last year on Mitre Corp.'s connection to September 11 has been deleted from the archives. I commented on this and the distrust it inspires in me but I also said it could be Yahoo's admin policy, with their partnerships with Booz, Allen, and Hamilton, in my discussions at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and now Mike Ruppert, the man who hounded my postings at CIA-Drugs and has hounded my postings at the 911truthalliance list, is now threatening me with legal action if I don't quit claiming HE censored those posts, which of course, I never stated. However, I SURE AM BEGINNING to feel attacked for merely putting the Mitre info out there. I intend to archive everything, from now on, as far as what SEEMS TO ME to be the stifling of the Mitre information so that any legal actions will have actual internet archives to refer to. Let me be clear: if Mike Rupper t is not trying to deliberately stifle this research then he is doing so without realizing it. This I have explained in various ways already but let this be legal record.
Eric Stewart.
~
HAS ANYONE REALLY FLESHED OUT THIS INFO?
If so, I would love a point by point response from SOMEONE - ANYONE (I'm betting it doesn't happen).
I have comments below, and research. If you do not get this email in HTML form, with pictures, email me and I will send you a copy direct.
General L. Limnitzer in 1962: "We could blow up a drone...Casualty lists in US newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation...We could develop a Communist Cuba terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Flordia cities and even in Washington...aircraft at Eglin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CIA proprietary organization in the Miami area....." http://memes.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=1655
----- Original Message -----
From: cristian-militant dolphin pacifist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 15:36:15 -00700 (PDT)
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [911truthalliance] Agree
> i, for one, would like to request that if this is going to elevate to a
> flame war, email eachother privately.
>
> personally ive seen this video
> evidence and its so difficult to discern for sure that it becomes
> the black hole discussion...
http://www.msnbc.com/news/720851.asp?cp1=1 will take you to a site showing DOD-released stills that have been strung together in an animated gif. Just above the white pillar on the right, before clicking on 'play,' can be seen the plane before it hits the Pentagon. Here is a still:
Compare the plane with the image here:
> hijacker/cia connections,
August 8, 2001: Booz, Allen, & Hamilton employee named head of NIMA (the National Imagery and Mapping Agency - the 'eyes of America') http://cartome.org/new-nima.htm
From Biographies: Federal Government: Civilian and Military http://officialnoticesonline.com/bios.html
James R. Clapper named Director of National Imagery and Mapping Agency. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld and Director of Central Intelligence George J. Tenet jointly announced the appointment of James R. Clapper Jr. as the new director of the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) on August 8, 2001. Clapper, who will become the first civilian head of the agency, succeeds Army Lt. Gen. James C. King who has headed NIMA since March 1998 and will be retiring from the Army later this year. Clapper was chosen for the position owing to his grasp of intelligence matters and his knowledge of the needs of NIMA's principal users, the combat commanders. The director has more than 37 years experience in intelligence, working at all levels and phases of the field. He retired from the Air Force in September 1995 as a lieutenant general after a four-year tour as the director of the Defense Intelligence Agency. Since his retirement, he has served success ively as executive vice president of Vredenburg, a systems acquisition services company headquartered in Reston, Va.; executive director, military intelligence for Booz, Allen & Hamilton, McLean, Va.; and recently as vice president, director of intelligence programs for SRA, International, Fairfax, Va. He was a senior member of the Downing Assessment Task Force, which investigated the terrorist bombing of Khobar Towers in June 1996. NIMA, established in October 1996, is responsible for the collection of imagery through the use of both national and commercial assets. It advises others responsible for collecting imagery using theater and tactical reconnaissance assets. NIMA produces timely imagery, imagery intelligence, and geospatial information in support of the nation's military forces, policymakers, and civil customers.
~
~
From: 9-11: Mitre Corp., Warren Buffet, Global Hawk, and September 11, 2001
Posted by: souljah on Jan 16, 2003 - 06:14 PM
The NRO (National Reconnaissance Office) demonstrated its new satellite capabilities (NRO payload launched into space on September 8, 2001) and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA - "the eyes of America") gained a new director one month prior to that fateful day. Considering all of this, one gets a pretty clear picture of where all those 'Star Wars' dollars went. James R. Clapper is the man named to head NIMA and he comes from Booz, Allen, & Hamilton which is a client for Blessed Relief, the charity said to be a front for Osama Bin Laden. Booz, Allen, & Hamilton also works closely with DARPA. DARPA is, of course, closely aligned with John Poindexter, head of Total Information Awareness and the guy that called the shots in Iran-Contra.
~
Hyperlinks considered, this piece pretty much sums up what really went down on September 11, 2001.
Mitre Corp., Warren Buffet, Global Hawk, and September 11, 2001
Carl Hammond, 37, was a passenger on board the hijacked United Airlines Flight 175 that crashed into the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. He also was a physicist for Mitre Corporation, a company that peddles Global Hawk (remote piloting) technology. The strongest case has been made that Global Hawk was employed in electronically hijacking the planes in question regarding September 11. Warren Buffet heads Mitre Corp. as well as Berkshire-Hathaway, another CIA front for the sale of remotely controlled pseudo-terrorism.
As well, Mitre Corp. has been working with Lincoln Laboratories (at the Massachusettes Institute of Technology - MIT) on many pursuits deemed necessary to the accomplishment of the human-machine interface. Recently, NASA's Ames Research Center web site reported, scientists were able to land a Boeing 757 by nerve impulses alone - by thinking about it.
Buffet's other company, Berkshire-Hathaway, makes Biz Jets, which CEO's all over the world are buying up as the latest fad. Of course, this means that Warren Buffet, consumate money launderer and second in wealth in the US only to Mr. William Gates, the very man that may have been at the heart of the play calling on September 11 (he was at least playing along), makes the machines the powerful fly in. Fear of death always works, doesn't it?
During his career, Carl Hammond worked at MIT, the institute mentioned above that is seeking total cyborg awareness. Carl Hammond ALSO worked on Global Hawk technologies, it is safe to presume, when he worked at Georgia Tech, home to DARPA's UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle) program.
The NRO (National Reconnaissance Office) demonstrated its new satellite capabilities (NRO payload launched into space on September 8, 2001) and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA - "the eyes of America") gained a new director one month prior to that fateful day. Considering all of this, one gets a pretty clear picture of where
all those 'Star Wars' dollars went. James R. Clapper is the man named to head NIMA and he comes from Booz, Allen, & Hamilton which is a client for Blessed Relief, the charity said to be a front for Osama Bin Laden. Booz, Allen, & Hamilton also works closely with DARPA. DARPA is, of course, closely aligned with John Poindexter, head of Total Information Awareness and the guy that called the shots in Iran-Contra.
My question is no longer, "Who pulled it off?" My question is, "Were these people killed for knowing too much or were they witness protected."
~
| Re: suspicious deaths.. (Score: 0) by Anonymeme on Jan 16, 2003 - 11:54 PM |
| I noticed some times ago that the company Booz had lost 3 employees in the Pentagon : Gerald Fisher, Terence Lynch, and Ernest Willcher. They had apparently to work for the government on Trailblazer 1, a system required to spy communications.. Scott Powell and Edmond Young, members of BTG Inc, died in Pentagon too. RPI, acquired by BTG Inc in april 2001, awarded $11.2 Million Contract by Department of Justice : under the contract, RPI will support exercises to help prepare state and lo cal officials to respond to possible chemical or biological terrorist attacks... They did the job so good that BTG Inc was acquired by Titan Corp on september 20, 2001, a probable coincidence.. Did these employees know too much ? Anyway.. these deaths seem bizarre if we consider that the touched part of the Pentagon had just been renovated, and offices were not yet completed.. bischar |
~
The following is snipped from http://xymphora.blogspot.com/2002_06_09_xymphora_archive.html
A number (it hasn't been reported exactly how many but it was called 'a small group of business leaders') of CEO's from New York, including at least one from the WTC, were attending a breakfast meeting at Offutt Air Force Base in Omaha, Nebraska on the morning of September 11, guests of Warren Buffett (isn't he the same guy who has guaranteed that the United States will suffer a nuclear attack by terrorists?). Offutt Air Force Base is the base that Bush flew to on September 11, supposedly becau
se it is the headquarters of the E-4B, the aircraft which is the "command, control and communications center to direct U.S. forces, execute emergency war orders and coordinate actions by civil authorities". He wanted to be on the scene in person, particularly as there was fear that the terrorists were in possession of the secret codes by which they could electronically impersonate Bush in giving military commands (interesting how we have heard nothing more of that story). So how much of a coincidence is it that this meeting with Warren Buffett was at the same air force base that Bush flew to (apparently Bush intended to fly directly to Offutt, but had to stop for refuelling in Louisiana)? Is it possible that Buffett's invitation to a bunch of 'important' New York City executives for a breakfast meeting at an air force base in Nebraska (just think about how weird that is!) was an attempt to save the lives
of the invitees?
The following is snipped from http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=%22warren+buffett%22%2C%22Offutt+Air+Force%22
MITRE Globetrotter in Omaha, Nebraska
... United States Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM for short) Headquarters on Offutt Air
Force Base ... Warren Buffett, the second richest man in the country (next to Bill ...
www.mitre.org/news/gt/omaha/omahaltr.shtml - 12k - Cached - Similar pages
The following is sni
pped from http://www.mitre.org/
MITRE is a not-for-profit national resource that provides systems engineering, research and development, and information technology support to the government. It operates federally funded research and development centers for the DOD, the FAA, and the IRS, with principal locations in Bedford, Massachusetts, and Northern Virginia.
The following is snipped from http://www.mitre.org/technology/mtp01/sensors.shtml
MITRE is supporting DARPA and the Air Force Research Laboratory’s Information Directorate (program agent) on the Affordable Moving Surface Target Engagement (AMSTE). The AMSTE program is developing technologies to affordably engage moving surface targets such as tanks, tactical ballistic missile transporters, and small boats from long ranges and in all weather conditions.
~snip~
MITRE is experimenting with the integration of advanced Internet technologies into the ISR sensor ground station. The ISR Information Service (ISRIS) Mission Oriented Investigation and Experimentation (MOIE) will develop a prototype information portal that provides ISR sensor data and ground station service accessibility to the battlespace internets: the Intelinks, the Air Force Joint Battl
espace Infosphere (JBI), the Navy Network Centric Warfare, and the Army First Digital Division. In FY01, the project will demonstrate the ISRIS concept using the Global Hawk UAV platform. Global Hawk is an excellent platform for this pathfinding research since it has no established TPED support systems today, and it's multiple sensor data types Electro-Optic (EO), Infra-Red (IR), Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), and Ground Moving Target Indicator (GMTI) make it an especially rich information source.
~
Total Mitre Corp. Awareness http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ctrl/message/23439
~
"The company was working on the developement of remote control aircraft and on Sept 6th I recieved word that some of my people may have been released from China to work on a change over of ATC Radar. I was told they had been contacted to be in a work detail in the WTC which was being renovated." http://memes.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=1593&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0
~
Boeing has established a new division to expand the "unmanned systems" market and speed development of pilotless combat aircraft. The immediate focus is on the USAF X-45 UCAV. Once this aircraft has been proved to a sufficient degree, the division plans to develop prototypes for gathering intelligence, area surveillance and combat reconnaissance. The X-45A is undergoing taxi testing in preparation for its first flight during the first half of next year. Initial low speed taxi testing confirmed the autonomous operation of the vehicle as well as its responsiveness to controller commands. The X-45A demonstrator system consists of an air vehicle, mission control system and a storage container. The air vehicle has a stealthy, tailless, 27-foot long airframe with a 34-foot wingspan. It can carry a variety of precision strike munitions.
http://www.beyond2000.com/news/Nov_01/story_1302.html
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/uav-01n.html
~
Utilizing Artificial Intelligence to Achieve Dominant Battlespace Awareness/Knowledge
http://carlisle-www.army.mil/usacsl/divisions/std/branches/keg/98TermII/maai1.htm
From which the following is snipped (from the section of the document on Key Technologies):
The Tier II-plus High Altitude Endurance Unmanned Aerial Vehicles(HAE UAV) are Global Hawk and Dark Star. These systems will provide broad-area, all weather, day-night identification of both fixed and mobile targets on land, air and sea. Precise coordinates will be developed utilizing on-board Global Positioning System(GPS). Communication relays on board will provide 200 mile radius line of sight communication, from the 45-60,000 foot altitude ranges where these UAVs operate [3].
~
the following is snipped from Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle Technology
After September eleventh, UCAV technology took a big step. Although not confirmed by the Pentagon, it is reported that an RQ-1 Predator spy plane equipped with hellfire missiles flew over Afghanistan and conducted the first successful remote-controlled bombing raids in history (Bowmaster). The operators remained safely on the ground out of harms way.
~snip~
Boeing, with backing from DARPA, is on the cutting edge with the development of the X-45, which is scheduled for flight test in early 2002. With an estimated range of 500 to 1,000 miles and a payload of 1,000 to 3,000 pounds, Boeing intends to increase effectiveness and survivability of manned combat
aircraft by sending their UCAV in first to clear out radar, antiaircraft sights, and surface to air missile (SAM) sights. With two prototypes already complete, they are moving forward with their vision of air combat tomorrow.
~
the following is snipped from http://diescon2.syncorp.com/diescon/OrderGuide/Teammates/capabilities.asp?CODE=HAI
Houston Associates, Inc., located in most large Federal government engineering centers, is a leading edge engineering technologies company, that has been involved with a wide variety of DoD Information Technologies requirements for more than 15 years. HAI has provided outstanding engineering capabilities and transitional development services to a wide range of clients.
Among our Federal client base are DARPA, DISA, DIA, DSWA, USAF, US Army, several CINCs, and Federal Agencies. Each is supported with engineering capabilities from Network (MAN&WAN), ATM requirements (Red and Black systems), Mission Control Support Element Engineering Services employing leading edge Information Technologies for the UAV-Predator, UAV-Global Hawk, and other relate systems. HAI supports and is under contract to provide engineering services to the NASA Manned Space Flight Program at Marshall and Johnson Space Flight Centers. HAI is also doing network site work at Birk Test Center, Edward AFB, California. Our commercial client base included Raytheon, Sprint, Lockheed Space, an Lockheed SkunkWorks, to name a few.
~
Global Hawk, Artificial Intelligence, Boeing, DARPA, and September 11 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/psy-op/message/12427
~
The following is snipped from http://groups.yahoo.com/group/psy-op/message/10954
Agent Smiley, Dick I have more on the 757 order to China. The reason 757 were ordered was because China wanted 747s but the Boeing could not ramp up in time to meet the order. Since 757 would be the predominant plane used at all Chinese airports using remote and ROTHR they would become the standard in the industry along with Raytheon.
Soon after September 11, 2001, China was admitted into the World Trade Organization. They had apparently fulfilled their end of the bargain. Brzezinski's plan to include China and therefore blunt its sharpness in its ambitions globally was not going to be implemented without a little token from them.
"The company was working on the developement of remote control aircraft and on Sept 6th I recieved word that some of my people may have been released from China to work on a change over of ATC Radar. I was told they had been contacted to be in a work detail in the WTC which was being renovated."
I think they were fitting it with a beacon. In a few days, a lot would be at stake for a lot of powerful interests.
~
Despite the U.S. spending millions to defend satellites from its own high-powered laser weapons, many of these computers in orbit still obey commands without authenticating their source. Remember, US space stations experienced disruption of their satellite communications on that day. SOMEONE had access to highly sensitive frequencies of transmission. http://memes.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=1621
~
A military jet hit the Pentagon. If you go to the video released by the department of defense, currently hosted by MSNBC you can watch the last fraction of a second before the plane hits the pentagon. Just look carefully at the silhouette (just above the concrete object on the right) Anyone who has seen a 757 and I am sure most of you have seen a picture somewhere of an F-16, can tell this is no passenger plane. Here, you'll read something from someone who says, "I know what happened to flight 77." http://memes.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=1640
~
Eyewitness Accounts Examined http://hamilton.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=1786&group=webcast
~
http://www.humanunderground.com/11september/pent.html
Independent Flight 77 - Pentagon Event Investigation
This is a work in progress
EXPECT CHANGES AND ADDITIONS
"And these blast points, too accurate for Sandpeople. Only Imperial stormtroopers are so precise."
Brief Statement
I hope it is understood that I mean no disrespect to the grieving loved ones of those lost on Flight 77 and at the Pentagon on S11. I respect your hardships fully. I feel that I should make a small statement here since this is getting some rather heavy traffic. I began this project in response to the Hunt the Boeing site, a French research effort into curiosities regarding the Pentagon crash site and the 'official line'. I was intrigued, but offended by the hostile tone of the presentation. I felt I had some more benign theories to answer complicated questions of my own. I began discussing them on the American Patriot Friends Network since that's where I learned of the French site. It's been non-stop since that moment. The suspicious timing of the Pentagon data release, within just hours of the developing dis cussions on APFN is rather curious.
It has occurred to me that the theory has taken a turn toward the 'extreme.' This was not intentional. I merely started out to debunk the French site, a seemingly simple task with the data available. I rejected most of the 'radical' theories out-right, but research has compelled me to look at some very disturbing circumstantial evidence. I still hold a more pro-American viewpoint and at the same time realize the extreme nature of the situation I propose requires the most extreme of measures to be taken only in an emergency as grave as war. This is wartime thinking. This is only a theory.
The Theory
In a nutshell... I assume American Airlines Flight 77 was hijacked by terrorists as reported. What I question is the evidence linking Flight 77 to the event at the Pentagon. Specifically, if Flight 77's transponder was off, radar and radio contact also lost, then what evidence do we have that it was in fact Flight 77 that caused the Pentagon event?
We've learned that there exists technology to control and recover a hijacked airliner, even prevent the hijacking all together. We propose that American Airlines Flight 77 was remotely recovered. It was never near the Pentagon. The terrorists were captured by a waiting hostage rescue team and the passengers are safely sequestered away as special guests of the USG, probably participating in a federal witness security program. This would explain the U.S. reluctance to elaborate on the evidence and methods to link bin Laden. The U.S. has the terrorists captured and no one will know about the remote recovery. The civilians would naturally comply; they would not want to seem unpatriotic by messing with a very important investigation while the country is at war.
In an effort to conceal the recovery, a suitable distraction needed to be created... We suggest the Pentagon was deliberately struck by an unmanned, drone aircraft to conceal the details and evidence of Flight 77's recovery, an operation of strategic deception. The "planners" targetted the Pentagon specifically to LIMIT casualties. It was a section under renovation without the full compliment of employees; they were mostly military, expected to die for their country and so they did... (Realize: specific aim points calculated for specific damage patterns routinely selected and commented on during Gulf War 2 - They are not stupid.) What is implied is that opportunities for deception will be seized if it serves a purpose. The purpose, to hide a recovered airliner with hijacking terrorists on board.
Revisions and Clarifications
Due to overwhelming confusion and misinterpretation I will be removing extraneous data points and early observations from the presentation. Recent optical analysis and accounting of 5 disturbed street-light poles clearly establish a corrected trajectory. Studying the analysis more closely leaves me with the impression that the alternate impact point, which I spent so much time pointing out, could be damage resulting from the impact of the engine under the RIGHT wing. (1) (2) (3)
In response to the recent 'Fescado-Bosankoe' "evidence" I have this to say... I never had it set in stone that I was committed to a smaller aircraft, that's why I removed the F16 comparison in the first place . After Dave began promoting his math and referencing my initial observation, I put the image back up as a matter of research record (et3 and et4). My estimations were very clumsy without taking into account foreshortening of the attack object as imaged caused by the angle of approach (approx 30 deg.) and the angle of the imaging lens. I'm using an unmanned 757 as my primary drone in the equation because we can establish the automated flight control systems on board and the ease with which it would convince observers of an American Airlines Flight 77. I am open to solutions - my investigation will continue to reflect the critical thinking and emerging theories as they present themselves.
If you haven't noticed, this whole thing, (S11) opened the public debate on and demonstration of unmanned aircraft from the start of the Afghan campaign with the Predator, then Global Hawk, and now discussion of the Unmanned Aerial Combat Vehicle, or some order of those words. I expect the risk of hijack will be enough to push for unmanned civil air piloting. The technology is there; the tests were completed. From NASA: "The team tested several prototype GPS Landing System concepts using NASA 557 during 226 automatic approaches and landings." From Boeing: "The precision of global positioning satellite system (GPS) navigation, automated air traffic control functions, and advanced guidance and communications features are now available as part of the new Future Air Navigation System (FANS) flight management computer. [757-200]" They can't admit to it now - for why did they not use this technology to save the day on S11? If you answer that - you will see hist ory doesn't happen by accident.
Political and Technical Feasibility
The Things You Need To Know
Evidence and Witness
Witness observation and available data support the drone argument presenting challenge to the official story
The Hijackers of Flight 77
Who's dead? Who's alive? Who even exists?
Other Investigations
Selected Comments
Regarding the Theory-Mason, I mean Thierry Meyssan...
911 The Big Lie
by Thierry Meyssan
We'll get there soon enough - STAY TUNED
[021104]
CIA Drone Aircraft Attacks AlQaeda in Yemen: 1 US Citizen Killed
=============
CRISIS UPDATE
============================================
INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
============================================
-----------------------------------------------
"Independent Analysis for the Promotion
of Human Rights, Justice and Peaace"
-----------------------------------------------
26th June 2002
SEPTEMBER 11th AND U.S. POLICY
THE NECESSITY OF AN INDEPENDENT INQUIRY
Dear Friends,
Acceptance of the official narrative of what happened on September 11, 2001 has become widespread on both ends of the political spectrum, right and left. But is the official version of those unprecedented events tenable? Mainstream right-wing commentators, of course, support the stance of the Bush administration and insist that any attempt to question or doubt the official version is tantamount to "conspiracy mongering". Recently, many respected progressive comment ators have come to essentially the same conclusion. All of them are united in the view that questioning the U.S government-endorsed narrative of 9/11 is illegitimate.
In a thoroughly documented paper, Institute Executive Director Nafeez M. Ahmed suggests otherwise, confronting the writings of several leading commentators who forcefully argue firstly that acceptance of the official version of 9/11 is justified, and secondly that an independent inquiry into anomalies and inconsistencies in the official version is unnecessary. The paper is a comprehensive rebuttal of the irrational assumptions and arguments underlying such commentary, focusing specifically on writings available online at the social justice website, ZNet ( www.zmag.org ).
In reviewing the work ofĘthese commentators on 9/11, Ahmed also analyses in detail the failure of the U.S. intelligence community in preventing the Al-Qaeda terrorist attacks; the c asual repression and/or misrepresentation of facts related to 9/11; the failure of U.S. defence measures on 9/11; the historic and institutional basis for skepticism about the official narrative; and some salient facts which illustrate the need for proper research into the linkages between U.S. government, military, intelligence, and corporate policy, and the ease with which the September 11 terrorist attacks went ahead.
On this basis, this IPRD paper concludes that the documented facts pose a considerable challenge to the conventional wisdom about the 9/11 attacks, exposing glaring anomalies that need to be addressed. These anomalies in the mainstream version of events suggest a much wider picture of long-standing institutional corruption, involving the intertwined relationship between the interests of the U.S. military-corporate complex and the operation of international terrorism
This paper has been endorsed by "UnAnswered Questions" ( http://www.UnAnsweredQuestions.org ), the coalition of concerned American citizens and families calling for an independent inquiry into the 9/11 attacks.
See "9/11 'CONSPIRACIES' AND THE DEFACTUALISATION OF ANALYSIS: HOW IDEOLOGUES ON THE LEFT AND RIGHT THEORISE VACUOUSLY TO SUPPORT BASELESS SUPPOSITION - A Reply to ZNet",
http://www.globalresearch.org/view_article.php?aid=342536303
Information in this paper is based on Ahmed's extensive research on the 9/11 attacks from his internationally acclaimed new 400-page study, "THE WAR ON FREEDOM: HOW AND WHY AMERICA WAS ATTACKED, SEPTEMBER 11, 2001", http://www.TheWaronFreedom.com
Please use this information as best you can in the struggle against injustice worldwide. We would appreciate it if you forwarded this m aterial to your friends, family and colleagues, in an effort to generate public awareness.
Warm regards,
Institute for Policy Research & Development
Suite 414, 91 Western Road, Brighton,
East Sussex, BN1 2NW, United Kingdom.
Tel: +44(0)1273 32 95 30
Fax: +44(0)1273 70 60 30
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.globalresearch.org
_______________________________________________
Check out the latest SMS services @ www.linuxmail.org
This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
