-Caveat Lector-

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=29232

COMING TO AMERICA
Immigration driving higher energy use
Thursday, October 10, 2002

Report says flow of humanity must be curbed to meet air-quality goals

By Jon Dougherty
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
© 2002 WorldNetDaily.com
A new study by an immigration-reform group says sustained high levels of
immigration have caused one-third of the increase in energy usage in the
U.S. over the past 25 years, making it harder to combat energy shortages
and meet emissions-reduction goals.

The report, "Running in Place: Immigration and U.S. Energy Usage," was
published this month by the Federation for American Immigration Reform, or
FAIR. Authored by Dr. Donald F. Anthrop, professor of environmental studies
at San Jose State University and a former consultant to the California
Energy Commission on energy conservation standards, the study concludes
that potentially harmful energy emissions will remain high as long as
immigration goes unchecked.

"If immigration levels continue at current rates, meeting the Kyoto
Protocol emissions-reductions goals would require that per capita energy
consumption in the year 2012 . be reduced by 28 percent from the 2000
level," Anthrop said.

Such a dramatic change would require "major lifestyle changes for
Americans" and cause "serious economic dislocations," he added.

Also, the report noted that U.S. emission-reduction goals cannot be met
unless "immigration-driven population growth" is curbed.

In his study, Anthrop says Europe's exuberance for the Kyoto
emissions-reduction goals "stems partly from the fact that the nations in
Western Europe have an essentially stable population and will therefore be
able to meet restrictions on carbon dioxide emissions much more easily than
the U.S.," giving European industry "a competitive advantage" over American
competitors.

With that in mind, he said, "it is important to note that immigration is
the principal reason the natural rate of increase of population is so much
higher in the U.S. than in Europe."

"The data show quite clearly that the United States will not be able to
achieve any meaningful reductions in carbon dioxide emissions without
serious economic and social consequences for American citizens, unless
immigration is sharply curtailed," Anthrop said. "Failure to address the
immigration issue is only rendering the energy problem more intractable."

"If the U.S. is forced to curtail carbon dioxide emissions, and I think we
will ultimately be forced to take some steps in that direction, then unless
immigration is curbed, I believe the average American citizen can look
forward to a constantly declining standard of living," he added.

Uncontrolled immigration has exacerbated the problem and will continue to
make it worse, said Dan Stein, head of FAIR.

"If the U.S. is serious about reducing our dependence on foreign oil and
protecting our environment, we must curtail the demand increase being
produced by mass immigration," Stein said.

Between 1974 and 2000, total legal immigration was 19.3 million. Since the
U.S. population increase was 68.6 million during that same period, the
report said, direct legal immigration accounted for 28.1 percent of that
population increase.

In 2000, the U.S. Census Bureau estimated that 8.7 million people were in
the United States illegally. "Thus," the report said, "legal and illegal
immigration together directly accounted for about 40 percent of population
growth during this period."

"By 2012 the U.S. population will have increased by 34.2 million residents,
of whom 31 percent will be immigrants. How can any conceivable change in
energy consumption rates compensate for such relentless population growth?"
said the report.

Related stories:

Immigration fraud 'out of control'

Immigration aiding, abetting terrorism?

Critics: U.S. borders still porous as sieves

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to