-Caveat Lector-

from http://www.phillynews.com/daily_news/99/Jan/22/national/hill22.htm

Is Hillary in a New York State of mind?

by William Bunch
Daily News Staff Writer


Will the moving vans pull up to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue some fall day in
2000, destined for a one-bedroom apartment on Manhattan's Upper West Side with
a view of the park?

Does she have more political cojones than New York City's ever-cranky,
tough-on-criminals-and-squeegie-men mayor, Rudy Giuliani?

Or, in the end, will 200-point headlines in the New York Post doom Hillary
Rodham Clinton?

It's America's hottest political rumor of 1999: That not long after her
husband is -- presumedly -- cleared in his impeachment trial, the first lady
will board the Metroliner for New York State, to run for the seat of retiring
U.S. Sen. Daniel Patrick Moynihan.

It seemed far-fetched when New Jersey Sen. Robert Torricelli first let the
idea slip out a couple of weeks ago. But fawning talk from Democratic Party
leaders in New York and a surprisingly weak denial from Clinton's press office
have fueled the rumors.

So did the surprising early withdrawals of two potential strong rivals, U.S.
Housing Secretary Andrew Cuomo and state Comptroller Carl McCall, New York's
highest-ranking black official.

Will it really happen?

Cindy Adams, the New York Post gossip columnist who's been known to lunch with
the first lady on occasion, this week quoted a reliable source, a major
political fund-raiser, as "99.9 percent certain" that she will jump into the
race.

But one of the Beltway's top pundits, political scientist and CNN commentator
William Schneider, is dubious.

"Does she really want to stay in Washington?" asked Schneider, referring to
the nightmare of prosecutor Kenneth Starr's seemingly endless investigations
of her and her husband and the president's impeachment. "Does she really want
to be part of the Senate? After eight years of this, she'll decide that enough
is enough."

Still, Schneider and others say they can understand why Hillary Clinton
doesn't want to spike the rumor just yet -- because it encourages talk of the
politically popular first lady as an independent, ideas-oriented leader, and
not as a victimized wife.

"She's probably flattered to some degree," agreed Neil Oxman, the
Philadelphia-based Democratic political consultant. "But I don't think it's
something that's going to happen."

Oxman agreed with what some of the first lady's close friends were saying
anonymously last week: That while her future probably is in public life, she
would be much happier and better suited to serve in a less partisan post, as a
college president or ambassador to the United Nations.

"She'd be a great U.N. ambassador, like Eleanor Roosevelt and the work that
she did for the United Nations," Oxman said.

Clinton's spokeswoman said only that she "has no plans to run for elective
office" -- a statement many interpreted as a non-denial denial.

Some have also suggested that the first lady might someday run for the Senate
from Illinois, the state where she was born and raised, or from California,
another state where she and her husband have proved popular.

But the political planets will never line up again like they have in New York
in 2000 -- the state's first Senate race without an incumbent since the 1950s.


Most states have strict residency requirements for candidates and, more
importantly, political taboos against outside candidates (the latter are
instantly labeled "carpetbaggers"). But not New York. The law says candidates
need only rent an apartment in the state by Election Day.

Indeed, the very slot that four-term incumbent Moynihan is sacrificing in 2000
has a long history of successful candidates with only the loosest of ties to
the Empire State.

The tradition started in 1964 when Robert Kennedy -- long registered in his
native Massachusetts -- ousted a Republican incumbent, at a time when the
nation was still awash in grief for his brother John F. Kennedy, assassinated
12 months earlier.

In 1970, after Robert Kennedy himself was slain, the seat was won by
conservative James Buckley -- the brother of right-wing columnist William F.
Buckley and a Connecticut resident before the election. While Moynihan, who
defeated Buckley in 1976, was a native of Manhattan's Hells Kitchen, he had
lived most of his adult life away, as a Harvard professor and Washington
bureaucrat.

James Hilty, the Temple University professor who recently penned a biography
of Robert Kennedy, "Brother Protector," noted that despite the Kennedy
charisma, RFK won New York narrowly in 1964.

"Hillary Clinton -- I don't know if she has the same sort of magnetism," Hilty
said.

Most experts agree that in the unlikely event that Hillary Clinton did decide
to run, she'd face a much larger obstacle than residency.

That would be New York's tough-on-crime and popular mayor, Rudolph Giuliani.

Forced to leave office by the end of 2001 by a new term-limits law, and with
Republican governor George Pataki unlikely to vacate Albany anytime soon,
Giuliani is rated by many experts a likely 2000 GOP Senate candidate.

Giuliani could combine his popularity in the city, normally a Democratic
bastion, with traditional GOP strength in the suburbs and mostly rural
upstate.

What's more, Hillary Clinton wouldn't even be guaranteed the Democratic
nomination. Maurice Carroll, the longtime New York City political journalist
who now runs polling for Quinnipiac College, noted that the three native New
Yorkers getting the most hype are three congresswomen.

Nevertheless, Carroll -- who is hoping to poll the first lady's popularity in
New York later this year -- thinks she would be a formidable candidate, in
part because of her husband's appeal.

"Bill Clinton's job performance is rated very high in New York, and it hasn't
gone down," Carroll said.

"If she chose to run, it would be fantastic -- but in no way are we depending
or counting on it," said Matthew Hiltzik, the spokesman for the New York State
Democratic Party.

But the biggest reason the rumor has inspired so much speculation is that it
would require Hillary Clinton to foresake the White House months before her
husband's term is slated to finish -- assuming he isn't convicted.

Bill Clinton's long history of philandering, culminating in the Monica
Lewinsky affair while the couple was in the White House, has not surprisingly
caused many people to think Hillary Clinton will want to divorce her husband
at the first expedient opportunity.

That theory, however, contradicts the public tendency to Hillary Clinton to
stand with her husband during his darkest hours.

"The whole thing is just filled with awkwardness," said Schneider, in seeking
to throw some cold water on the rumor. At the same time, Schneider says he
understands why the story is flourishing.

"It means people are taking her seriously," he said. "She's got an image right
now that isn't the image she wants ... She does not want to be the poster
child for the scorned wife."



Send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

©1998 Philadelphia Newspapers Inc.




=================================
Robert F. Tatman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remove "nospam" from the address to reply.

NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed 
without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included 
information for research and educational purposes. For
more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

POSTING THIS MESSAGE TO THE INTERNET DOES NOT IMPLY PERMISSION TO SEND UNSOLICITED 
COMMERCIAL E-MAIL (SPAM) TO THIS OR ANY OTHER INTERNET ADDRESS. RECEIPT OF SPAM WILL 
RESULT IN IMMEDIATE NOTIFICATION OF THE SENDER'S ISP.

____________________________________________________________________
More than just email--Get your FREE Netscape WebMail account today at 
http://home.netscape.com/netcenter/mail

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to