-Caveat Lector-

..............................................................

>From the New Paradigms Project [Not Necessarily Endorsed]
Note:  We store 100's of related "New Paradigms Posts" at:
http://www.msen.com/~lloyd/oldprojects/recentmail.html

-Caveat Lector- <http://www.antiwar.com/justin/justincol.html>

Subject:  Israeli spies cheer as WTC burns - not that there's anything wrong with 
that, says Barbara Walters

June 24, 2002

BABA WAWA'S WHITEWASH
Israeli spies cheer as WTC burns – not that there's anything wrong with that, says 
Barbara Walters

It was eerie to actually see the scene of a story I have written 
<http://www.google.com/search?as_q=&num=10&hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&btnG=Google+Search&as_epq=Urban+Moving+Systems&as_oq=&as_eq=&lr=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=antiwar.com&safe=images>
 about on more <http://www.antiwar.com/justin/j031502.html> than one 
<http://www.antiwar.com/justin/j031302.html> occasion, to see and hear the people I 
had only read about and, vaguely, imagined. On Friday night, the ABC News program 
20/20 broadcast "The White Van 
<http://abcnews.go.com/sections/2020/DailyNews/2020_whitevan_020621.html>," which told 
the story of 5 young Israeli men apprehended in New Jersey hours after the World Trade 
Center was hit. They had been observed on 9/11 watching the burning of the World Trade 
Center from their vantage point in Liberty State Park, New Jersey, photographing each 
other as they rejoiced against the backdrop of the WTC aflame in the distance. Writing 
on Mar!
 ch 15, I envisioned the scene, described in news stories 
<http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/forget.html> and conjured in my mind's eye:

"As smoke billowed up into the pellucid sky, obscuring the sun, they laughed and joked 
and took pictures of each other against a backdrop of unspeakable horror. Outraged 
witnesses called the cops, who swooped down and picked them up. These Middle 
Eastern-looking men,' as witnesses described them, turned out to be Israelis: they 
were found with box cutters in their van, $4,000 in cash, and multiple passports. The 
van was registered as the property of 'Urban Moving Systems.' Police interrogated them 
for hours, and transferred them to a maximum security facility. A raid on the Urban 
Moving Systems warehouse (whose owner, Dominik Suter, has since fled to Israel) 
yielded computers, documents, and other evidence – of what?"

That's why a shiver of deja-vu passed through me as I watched the 20/20 news report. 
Listening to the New Jersey housewife who spotted the cheering Israelis from her 
highrise apartment, watching the baffled look on her face as she described the young 
Israelis:

"They were like happy, you know … They didn't look shocked to me. I thought it was 
very strange,"

It was like seeing a made-for-tv movie adaptation of a novel I'd read many times. 
Familiar but strangely truncated in certain key areas, abbreviated to conform to the 
supposedly short attention span of its audience, and, in true Hollywood style, not 
only bowdlerized but completely vulgarized. The result is a fairly interesting story 
studded with nuggets of new information, and saddled with a tacked-on – indeed, 
downright counterintuitive – moral at the end, as intoned by BaBa WaWa 
<http://snl.jt.org/char/char.php?c=GiRa&n=Baba%20Wawa>:

"I hope we've put all these woomers to west."

Much of the ABC report confirms my basic contention, and the contention of many 
others, that there was indeed, as Fox News reporter Carl Cameron puts it, a "vast 
Israeli spy operation" in the US in full operational mode prior to 9/11, engaged in 
watching the pro-Arab support network that operates in many major American cities.

What the 20/20 report amounts to is the Israelis' second line of defense, which 
basically boils down to this: well, yeah, they were Israeli spies, but they were just 
here defending Israel's interests and had no pre-knowledge of 9/11. In the process of 
spinning this new rationale, however, we have a series of damning admissions, as spun 
by ABC terrorism "expert" Vince Cannistraro, a "former chief of operations for 
counterterrorism with the CIA."

The arrested men's names were found in a search of a national intelligence database. 
We are also told by Cannistraro – as if we don't already know – that Urban Moving 
Systems was probably a Mossad front. Duh-uh! Gee, I guess that's why, shortly after 
the cops raided their New Jersey office 
<http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/news/WABC_091401_airports.html>, the Urban Movers got a 
move on, with owner Dominick Suter fleeing the country. The purpose of this spy nest, 
we are told in a reassuring tone, was

"Launching an intelligence operation against radical Islamists in the area, 
particularly in the New Jersey-New York area."

20/20 runs this "sure they were spies, but…" explanation up the flagpole in the hope 
that, awed by Cannistraro's "expertise" and connections, everyone will salute:

"Under this scenario, the alleged spying operation was not aimed against the United 
States, but at penetrating or monitoring radical fund-raising and support networks in 
Muslim communities like Paterson, N.J., which was one of the places where several of 
the hijackers lived in the months prior to Sept. 11."

The problem with this fallback story is that penetrating or monitoring New Jersey 
Muslims and having foreknowledge of 9/11 are not mutually exclusive. Indeed, such 
surveillance – to the degree it was successful – would have increased the likelihood 
that the Israelis would gain some knowledge of the 9/11 plot. If not all the details, 
at least a strong indication that 9/11 was bound to be a special day – one they would 
celebrate, shamelessly and carelessly, in full sight of others, unable to restrain 
their joy at the sight of the WTC emitting a black cloud over Manhattan.

A September 14 New York Times round-up 
<http://216.239.33.100/search?q=cache:eh58jYi2l24C:www.crimelynx.com/identhij.html+%22Dominik+suter%22&hl=en&ie=UTF-8>
 of the nationwide investigation into the terrorist attacks seemed to imply not just 
foreknowledge, in the case of the 5 Israelis, but some form of collaboration:

"In New Jersey, where officials believe that the hijackers received assistance from 
accomplices, Sherri Evanina, a spokeswoman for the FBI. in Newark, said that five men 
were detained late Tuesday after the van in which they were driving was stopped on 
Route 3 in East Rutherford. She said witnesses had reported seeing the men celebrating 
the attack on the World Trade Center earlier in the day in Union City. 'They were seen 
leaving the location after they were celebrating,' Agent Evanina said. 'They were 
watching the entire event from their location.'"

If the best comedy is unintentional, then "The White Van" is chock full of yucks. The 
following had me rolling on the floor:

"For the FBI, deciphering the truth from the five Israelis proved to be difficult. One 
of them, Paul Kurzberg, refused to take a lie-detector test for 10 weeks — then failed 
it, according to his awyer. Another of his lawyers told us Kurzberg had been reluctant 
to take the test because he had once worked for Israeli intelligence in another 
country."

For the FBI, it seems, deciphering anything that isn't completely spelled out for them 
is well nigh impossible. So he wouldn't take the test for weeks, then took it and 
failed and then denied working for the Mossad – in this country, at any rate. As John 
Stossel, Barbara Walters' 20/20 colleague, ceaselessly reiterates: "Gimme a break!"

Why, in this case, is it so hard for the FBI to discover the truth – when they're 
being practically hit over the head with it? It's pathetic, really, to contemplate the 
utter cluelessness of our chief federal law enforcement agency, and the reporters who 
take their denials seriously. As 20/20 reports:

"Despite the denials, sources tell ABC News there is still debate within the FBI over 
whether or not the young men were spies."

No wonder Mohamed Atta and his fellow ghouls managed to sidestep our Keystone Kops so 
easily. If these jokers are still "debating" the obvious, then our government 
officials are right when they tell us that another massive terrorist attack is 
"inevitable." With these retards on guard duty, I'm surprised it hasn't happened 
already.

Our tone-deaf 20/20 reporter, John Miller, blathers on, oddly oblivious to the jarring 
effect of a conclusion that seems to contradict much of what came before. Okay, so 
"many U.S. government officials" concede the Urban Movers were Mossad spies, in the 
area on a specific mission, but don't worry, folks, because the FBI is telling us "To 
date, this investigation has not identified anybody who in this country had 
pre-knowledge of the events of 9/11." Note the curiously tentative nature of this 
disclaimer: to date, indeed….

The 20/20 technique is merely to drag Cannistraro out, who references mysterious 
"sources" to conclude that those lost little Israelis were just having some good clean 
fun that day, protecting Israel against terrorism (in New Jersey!):

"The investigation, at the end of the day, after all the polygraphs, all of the field 
work, all the cross-checking, the intelligence work, concluded that they probably did 
not have advance knowledge of 9/11."

Move along. Nothing to see here. Take it from me, the Expert. After all, would I lie 
to you?

The tale of the White Van, as told by 20/20, raises more questions than it settles. 
For what about those polygraphs? We are told that some of the Israeli detainees "were 
given as many as seven lie-detector tests." Why so many? The five were detained for 
over two months, 40 days of it in solitary confinement, time and opportunity enough 
for an awful lot of questions. Perhaps some of the answers contain a clue to help 
unravel the central unsolved mystery of 9/11, which is this:

How in Gehenna did a rag-tag bunch of Islamist nutballs, who were hoping to finance 
their terrorist plot with a US government loan 
<http://abcnews.go.com/sections/wnt/DailyNews/ross_bryant020606.html>, manage to pull 
off the biggest, deadliest, most spectacularly coordinated act of super-sabotage in 
modern history – without state support, all on their own?

The recent revelations 
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7829-2002Jun18.html> by ex-FBI wiretap 
translator Sibel Edmonds of an unnamed "Middle Eastern country" with agents inside the 
FBI obstructing, mistranslating, and misdirecting official investigations make the 
question of "foreknowledge," "pre-knowledge," or whatever you want to call it moot. As 
I pointed out in my last column <http://www.antiwar.com/justin/j062102.html>, the 
Edmonds allegations raise the ante considerably, from passive foreknowledge of 9/11 to 
the sinister possibility of Israel's active facilitation. As Edmonds wrote in a March 
letter to the inspector general's office:

"Investigations are being compromised. Incorrect or misleading translations are being 
sent to agents in the field. Translations are being blocked and circumvented."

It will take more than BaBa WaWa <http://www.salon.com/media/log/1999/10/19/walters/> 
and her babbling yes-man to circumvent the facts and "spin" the Israelis out of this 
one. For what 20/20 conveniently left out was the entire context of the larger Israeli 
spy story <http://antiwar.com/israelfiles2.html>, as uncovered by Carl Cameron in his 
4-part series <http://www.firefox.1accesshost.com/cameron.html> on Fox News, and since 
widely discussed both here and abroad.

We are supposed to look at five guys in a van, dancing for joy in the shadow of the 
burning WTC, in isolation, apart from the hundreds of Israeli "art students" who took 
such an ardent interest in entering government buildings in the months and weeks prior 
to 9/11.

Most absurdly, we are supposed to ignore a Federal Bureau of Investigation riddled 
with spies who owe their allegiance to a certain "Middle Eastern" country with an 
interest in compromising investigations, circulating misleading translations of 
wiretaps, and blocking what can't be botched. If all that is true today, then it was 
even truer prior to 9/11 – and now are you beginning to solve the central mystery of 
9/11?

The intrepid reporters over at 20/20 look like they went to a lot of trouble to check 
out this story. They tracked down one of the original witnesses, went all the way to 
Israel to hear the young Israelis’ denials, and hauled out ABC’s highly-paid pet 
"expert" to spin away the obvious. But, somehow, they failed to do the elementary sort 
of research that would’ve mandated only a trip to their local library. There they 
might have read this astonishing story <http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/forget.html> 
that appeared in the [September 12, 2001] Bergen Record, which describes the 5 Israeli 
detainees picked up 8 hours after the WTC attack as "carrying maps linking them to the 
blasts":

"[S]ources close to the investigation said they found other evidence linking the men 
to the bombing plot. 'There are maps of the city in the car with certain places 
highlighted,' the source said. ‘It looked like they're hooked in with this. It looked 
like they knew what was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park.’"

BaBa WaWa’s whitewash won’t wash. Those "woomers" are still circulating – and with 
good reason. We won’t know what really happened that fateful day until and unless 
Congress takes seriously its responsibility to investigate. For starters, let’s take a 
look at those highlighted maps – and then drag the rest of Israel’s spy operation out 
into the full light of day. Then and only then can we answer an increasingly important 
question about the background to 9/11: What did the Israelis know – and how did they 
know it?

Forwarded for info and discussion from the New Paradigms Discussion List,
not necessarily endorsed by:
***********************************

Lloyd Miller, Research Director for A-albionic Research a ruling
class/conspiracy research resource for the entire political-ideological
spectrum. **FREE RARE BOOK SEARCH: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> **
   Explore Our Archive:  <http://a-albionic.com/a-albionic.html>

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to