-Caveat Lector-
To Contact Charles A. Schlund
Charles A. Schlund
8520 N. 54th Drive
Glendale, AZ 85302
(623) 931-5963
(623) 931-6420
(602) 670-2017
+++++
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
CHARLES AUGUST SCHLUND, III, an individual,
Plaintiff,
v.
GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, a sovereign
nation; GEORGE W. BUSH, an individual; DOES 1-10, individuals; DOES
11-20, entities,
Defendants.
No. CV03-1590 PHX VAM
NOTICE AND MOTION FOR ORDER FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF FROM TORTURE AND
INTERFERENCE WITH FREEDOM OF SPEECH TO STOP IRREPARABLE HARM; MEMORANDUM
OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES AND AFFIDAVIT OF PLAINTIFF SCHLUND IN SUPPORT
THEREOF AND ORDER THEREON;
Charles August Schlund, III, (“Plaintiff Schlund”) respectfully moves
the Court for an Order for Injunctive Relief to terminate the continuous
irreparable harm caused by the Defendants, the Government, including
Does 1-10, individuals and Does 1-20, entities, (collectively referred
to as “Government”) use of electronic torture activities of using
various electronic methods to egregiously cause irreparable torture to
Plaintiff and cause injuries and damages to Plaintiff. The electronic
based torture methods and activities result in the use of sound,
vibration, heat, electric and other kinds of or energies and radiations
which effect and interfere with Plaintiff’s normal life activities and
cause extreme pain and suffering (TORTURE) of Plaintiff Schlund.
If the court needs evidence that torture is possible and factual,
Plaintiff is prepared under the court’s rulings in Siderman DeBlake v.
Republic of Argentina, 865 F. 2d 699 (9th Cir. 1992) and Doran v.
McGuinness 158 F.R.D. 383 (1994) to demonstrate such methods and
torture. Plaintiff requests the court to order an evidentiary hearing
under Doran v. McGuinness, 158 F.R.D. 383 (1994) to demonstrate
precisely how various methods and techniques of remote electronic based
torture and other methods of it are used on Plaintiff Schlund, as a
political witness, his witnesses, family and associates, in violation of
their constitutional rights and international law.
DATED this _____ day of August, 2003
By: ______________________________
Charles August Schlund, III
Plaintiff in Pro persona
I. PROCEDURAL STATUS OF CASE
Plaintiff Schlund has properly filed his Complaint on August 15, 2003
and served it on all Defendants on August 18, 2003.
II. STATEMENT OF FACTS
Prefatory Statement.
Plaintiff Schlund incorporates by this reference his Verified Complaint
filed August 15, 2003. No legitimate American Court would refuse to
hear a Motion to Terminate the Torture of an American citizen. Siderman
DeBlake v. Republic of Argentina, 865 F. 2d 699 (9th Cir. 1992) at p.
20, infra.
Plaintiff’s case and related issues of electronic invasion of privacy
and electronic and other forms of torture are NOT of first impression
before the Court, infra. There are similar types of torture, illegal
surveillance and invasion of privacy decisions which are consistent in
the various circuits of the United States, especially the 9th Circuit
Court of Appeal rendering both relief and damages. Plaintiff’s case is
unique, raising the collective issues of torture by electronic force,
and improper installation of electronic devices in Plaintiff’s body,
resulting in life threatening, civil rights violations, personal
injuries, invasion of privacy, sleep deprivation and deprivation of
freedom of speech, right to vote, freedom of religion and other human
and civil rights and international law violations. This includes
violations of the Protection Against Torture Act.
The Government has taken the position that any victim of government
electronic torture who complains of such torture is accused of trying to
evade the Government’s investigation of them by asserting they are being
tortured. Plaintiff Schlund asserts he has not attempted in any manner
whatsoever to avoid any investigation by the government. In fact,
Plaintiff Schlund requests the court to order the following in an effort
to terminate the ongoing fabricated investigation and order a real
investigation subject to the following conditions:
1. Order the amount of $50 million a year to start a new investigation
by the U.S. Government to insure a successful conclusion of the
investigation of Plaintiff Schlund.
2. Order not less than 50 new agents be assigned to the new court
ordered investigation as set forth in No. 1 above.
3. Order Plaintiff Schlund to fully cooperate with the 50 newly
assigned agents and the newly ordered legitimate investigation ordered
by the court. And, Plaintiff agrees to waive any rights that the court
requests of him that the court feels is necessary to successfully find
the truth.
4. The court is to ensure that the agents involved in this investigation
are not politically motivated to frame Plaintiff Schlund. The agents should be
picked by a lottery or computer program to ensure that they are not picked as
political thugs to frame Plaintiff Schlund.
As stated herein, the highest federal courts have acknowledged that
torture by Government officials or agents is not new but a very well
known fact. Also, a well known fact is that its known sources and the
torture is never admitted by governments. Siderman v. DeBlake, infra.
This is the case here.
The Government’s motive is discrimination and retaliation on grounds
Plaintiff is branded as a “political witness”/”whistle blower” against
powerful and political people in the Government. Plaintiff Schlund is a
“political witness” whose whistle blowing activities of Government
corruption based on Plaintiff Schlund’s personal knowledge involving
persons in the Department of Justice (“DOJ”), the Drug Enforcement
Administration (“DEA”), Department of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms
(“ATF”), the State of Arizona and other federal, state and local law
enforcement agencies, also collectively referred to as “Government”, is
a factual reality of said known sources as more fully expressed below.
Plaintiff Schlund was working with the FBI when he was physically
gassed in his sleep and physically attacked and restrained forcibly
against his will, injected with CIA designed electronic “subcutaneous
implants” used by both the CIA and DEA and others. These multipurpose
implants are used to severely physiologically inflict punishment and
psychologically torture and disable Plaintiff Schlund with cruel and
unusual punishment (TORTURE) in blatant violation of his constitutional
rights.
Plaintiff is an ex-Vietnam veteran who, upon discharge from the United
States Marine Corp., was solicited by Drug Cartel members for the
Central Intelligence Agency (1968) (later, the Drug Enforcement
Administration – “DEA”) (1977) to carry out their agenda. Due to the
corruption activities of the CIA and DEA agenda, Plaintiff, after
acquiring personal knowledge of the reality of such agenda, rejected and
refused to work for them. Plaintiff was offered money and power
including the ability to gas and torture and/or rape any girl that
turned Plaintiff down for sex. All of this was offered under the color
of law using warrants in drug investigations issued by the Surveillance
Court and other courts.
Upon Plaintiff Schlund’s refusal, Plaintiff was targeted and placed
under constant surveillance and repeatedly set-up by the corrupt
Government person(s) to torture Plaintiff and to control the information
substantiating the serious Government corruption which he knew about and
possessed information on.
Plaintiff was then forced by the Government to become a whistle blower
due to the Government’s attacks against him (“whistle blower
activities”). As he began his whistle-blower efforts pertaining to the
corrupt governmental activities of the CIA, and DEA, law enforcement and
others, he found himself suddenly framed as being an alleged drug
dealer, murderer, gun runner, smuggler and thief and placed under
intense investigations (as the Government made it obvious he was being
selectively targeted).
The Government then fabricated evidence, and then arrested and charged
Plaintiff for alleged conspiracy to manufacture illegal drugs. The
federal prosecution of Plaintiff Schlund was extraordinarily aggressive.
Its key witness was the DEA’s own agent/informant/drug chemist and
manufacturer, Carl Altz a.k.a. John Green.
The Honorable Judge Lacey, who was a visiting judge to the United
States District Court of the District of Arizona was assigned to the
trial of Plaintiff. The Honorable Judge Lacey found that the DEA had
committed perjury and obstructed justice and framed Plaintiff Schlund
and demanded their arrest after acquitting Defendant Schlund. Judge
Lacey called the DEA’s conduct “outrageous conduct” of the United States
– Plaintiff was “acquitted” on all counts. The acquittal judgment was
upheld on appeal.
The Government’s surveillance, torture and other violations of
Plaintiff Schlund’s constitutional rights is in retaliation for
Plaintiff Schlund’s refusal to join the Government’s corruption, has
continued for twenty-five (25) years resulting in electronic monitoring
and torture of Plaintiff Schlund. It has been continuous and ongoing by
electronic force and other electronic systems and methods to monitor
Plaintiff Schlund’s daily activities, invading his and those he
communicates with privately, especially where there exists normal and
legally expected zones and orbits of privacy, and to harass, retaliate,
torture, deprive of sleep and attempt to discredit Plaintiff as a
political witness for his whistle-blowing activity of exposing the
Government’s corruption based on his personal knowledge and from what
Plaintiff read in the CIA, DEA and other files he has always called the
“Don Bolles Papers.”
Statements from Charles A. Schlund to the Federal Courts.
The Court should first understand that Plaintiff has been under constant
torture and surveillance and under many different investigations since
reading the CIA and other files that Plaintiff has always called the
“Don Bolles Papers”. Plaintiff read these government files in 1977. The
Bolles Papers were all the papers that George Bush Sr. had removed from
the Government when Jimmy Carter was elected to the presidency. These
papers were removed to stop President Jimmy Carter and those he would
appoint from obtaining the contained information on Government
corruption. The director of the CIA George Bush Sr. removed these
documents from the government in 1976. Plaintiff has been under constant
surveillance, not to collect information for the prosecution of him for
some crime he purported has committed, but to authorize the use of
torture and collect information to be used to discredit Plaintiff as a
political witness due to his political witness status and activities.
The Government has no intent on ever arresting Plaintiff Schlund.
A very small portion of the information collected on Plaintiff Schlund
is real and most of the statements or recordings taken from him were
made under torture by the Government. The torture was done to force him
to make the statements to the Government that it desired after he had
been tortured close to death by the Justice Department and/or others.
Most of these conversations were taken from Plaintiff Schlund under
torture and agreed to by Plaintiff as a condition in exchange for relief
from the torture or in exchange for sleep. These conversations were then
submitted to the courts by the Government under perjury or falsely or
out of context to reality by the DOJ, DEA and others. Many of these
conversations were recorded while Plaintiff was working with the FBI
setting up corrupt agents in the DEA and other federal and state
departments and/or agencies and the courts.
Many of these conversations were taken after depriving Plaintiff of
sleep for years with the Government only allowing Plaintiff a few hours
of sleep a week. As an aside, if the Government denies any of this,
Plaintiff demands to be allowed to prove that such electronic force and
technology for the use of torture is not only possible but can be
demonstrated to the court. Plaintiff Schlund, by way of example, would
need a human subject to demonstrate these kinds of torture on and
recommends Robert C. Broomfield be one of the people used for these
demonstrations. Broomfield was one of the corrupt judges that Plaintiff
had been secretly supplying criminal information on to the FBI many
years before he refused to recuse himself from Plaintiff’s lawsuits upon
challenge by recusal motions. Broomfield then decided Plaintiff’s
lawsuit and motions knowing that Plaintiff was a witness against him and
ruled on the lawsuits using made up facts and statements that were never
pled in any of Plaintiff’s lawsuits or motions.
In violation of F.R.C.P 52, Broomfield failed and refused to make
findings of fact and conclusions of law as Plaintiff continuously
requested in [all] of his pleadings, motions and responses. He did this
to further cover-up his criminal acts as asserted by Plaintiff. These
rulings were done using a federal rules decision case out of
jurisdiction and off point; the case law of Doran v. McGuiness, 158
F.R.D. 383 (1994). Plaintiff Schlund now wishes to use the Doran case
law to prove his case. The court is requested to authorize Plaintiff to
conduct the medical procedures on Broomfield for the electronic torture
demonstrations (pursuant to the Doran decision to prove electronic
torture is an electronic engineering reality) as the Court has
authorized similar procedures on Plaintiff’s witnesses, family, friends,
associates and Plaintiff. In fact, no technology is required to torture
or murder people being placed under investigations. All that is required
is the court’s authorization to perform secret procedures on these
sleeping people after placing them in a state they can not wake from
while authorizing these crimes by the Government under real or created
investigations.
The corrupt judges of the court then only need to stop any legal proceedings
from those they are torturing and pretend that they are guilty of some crime
which authorized the court to secretly commit these secret medical procedures
on them. The corrupt judges of the court and the corrupt agents can then continue
to violate a person’s Constitutional rights and cover up their illegal corruption and
crimes. In the Justice Department, Surveillance Court, DEA, CIA, FBI and other
files Plaintiff read were authorizations and legal opinions on the injections and/or
implantation with implants of many famous and important people.
Plaintiff believes that Broomfield as a judicial representative of the
court committed deceit while using the ruling of Doran v. McGuiness, 158
F.R.D. 383 (1994) in Plaintiff’s case. [Doran claimed he heard voices
through “mental telepathy” connected to claims of electronic implants.]
This ruling gives the impression Plaintiff Schlund agrees that mental
telepathy is possible, which he does not. Let this court fully
understand that Plaintiff Schlund has never asserted mental telepathy
and does not believe mental telepathy is possible. Plaintiff Schlund
factually knows from information supplied by the Government itself that
the Government uses electronic methods and instruments, including
electronic devices to conduct surveillance and other methods to conduct
such information gathering, to transfer their voices, sounds and force
to torture a person using such electronic system(s). The Government
always asserts against such targeted persons that he/she may be a
lunatic asserting “surreal and fantastic” claims, despite the claims are
mathematically easy to factually prove against the individuals
conducting the illegal intrusions using electronic mediums to piggyback
off existing established platforms and instruments owned and paid for by
others (factually proven in Koyomejian v. United States). Since the
Koyomejian decision and others, the DOJ and DEA have intensely attempted
to guard their electronic systems’ capabilities and activities from the
public while violating the rights of individuals and entities in Arizona
and elsewhere in the United States. The covert nature of this fact is
to mislead the public and suppress knowledge to the public and prevent
individual liability to said persons who utilize the technologies for
surveillance and torture activities which violates Plaintiff Schlund’s
and others’ constitutional rights.
The Defendants know that the use of implants to remove political
witnesses is the perfect crime. It can be denied under the cover of law
to protect fabricated or real investigations and the technology used
cannot be reverse engineered by anyone other then governments or the
corporations that secretly work with or for them. Plaintiff Schlund
does not have access to super conductors or secret power sources like
plutonium or other types of secret power supplies or batteries but
Plaintiff can easily prove that the technology exists and can make a
paper airplane to show jets can fly. Expert witnesses, eye witnesses,
testimony and demonstrations are all that is required to prove that the
electronic basics exist, and are being used by the Government and that
the torture is real and conducted and controlled by the Government to
attempt to cover-up their crimes not the crimes of Plaintiff Schlund,
but their crimes and electronic gamesmanship that hurts others, as well
as Plaintiff Schlund.
Plaintiff Schlund reminds the Defendants and the courts that when the
Nazis under Hitler injected the Jews in their necks after taking them
into custody, that the Nuremberg trials convicted these criminals for
Crimes Against Humanity. It was never determined what they injected but
only that the injections were done under the cover of law against the
will of those being injected and that the injections made them sick or
resulted in their torture or suffering at the hand of the government.
This is what happened to Plaintiff Schlund and the same words can be
used that convicted the Nazis of similar crimes. Plaintiff Schlund
understands that laws are only used against the enemies of the
government and never against those protected by the government. In other
words, if Plaintiff Schlund was to commit this same crime, he would be
prosecuted and imprisoned but the government employees are above any
laws because they commit their crimes under the authority of a warrant.
The Government’s employees are protected and are above any laws as they
offered Plaintiff Schlund if he joined them.
Let this court and the Defendants fully understand that Plaintiff
Schlund read the Nazi research from the concentration camps using sounds
to torture, this was in the CIA files in the Don Bolles Papers and
Plaintiff understands how and why the government designed these
torture devices to destroy the lives of innocent whistle blowers
and political witnesses like Plaintiff. Plaintiff Schlund had
all the research and the designing and manufacturing files from the CIA,
DEA and NSA and all the files from the Surveillance Court, Justice
Department and others on the use of these weapons under the cover of law
against innocent Americans.
All of this is provable in a trial but not before a corrupt judge who is
being paid to stop a trial or any other legal proceedings to protect the
corrupt judges and agents and those they work for, like George W. Bush.
In a fair trial before a non-corrupt judge, the government would have no
chance of disproving assertions made by Plaintiff.
>From what Plaintiff Schlund has learned and understands, he was, and
continues to be, under a fabricated investigation for alleged drug
manufacturing, drug smuggling, drug dealing, mass murder, gun running,
thievery and for other crimes. In truth, Plaintiff Schlund has never
made any drugs nor has he ever smuggled any drugs or chemicals into the
United States. Plaintiff Schlund is not a drug dealer and has never
killed anyone. He has never run any guns or sold any guns that were, to
Plaintiff’s knowledge, to be used or sold illegally to anyone.
Plaintiff Schlund does not steal and is as good of a citizen as he can
possibly be while he is under torture by the corrupt judges and corrupt
agents of the federal and state government.
Let the court fully understand that Plaintiff Schlund does not possess
the knowledge to make any drugs and never has and only knows what the
DEA had Carl Altz/John Green who worked for them tell Plaintiff.
Plaintiff Schlund has been framed and already tried in a federal trial
with the federal court acquitting him and the Judge calling the
government’s activities of framing him outrageous conduct of the United
States. The federal court demanded the arrest of the agents involved in
Plaintiff Schlund’s arrest and prosecution for obstruction of justice
and perjury in the framing of Plaintiff to remove him as a political
witness.
In Plaintiff Schlund’s 1978 trial, the DEA and Sheriff’s Office did
threaten to murder the children and wife of Plaintiff’s first witness,
Bob Snow, if he dared to testify for Plaintiff and had also threatened
Plaintiff’s second witness, William Schlund with prosecution if he dared
to testify. These threats against Plaintiff Schlund’s witnesses continue
to present with the courts and government agents continuously making
threats by various means, including the use of electronic force for the
intended purpose of selectively targeting such witnesses, including
continuous threats against Plaintiff and his witnesses and their
children.
Plaintiff Schlund’s witnesses and their children have been
electronically monitored and physically trespassed upon, threatened and
tortured through electronic and other used technologies designed for
this and other purposes. These corrupt agents threaten such witnesses
and Plaintiff Schlund by using electronic implants and torture.
Other witnesses of Plaintiff Schlund have been assassinated. Only a Nazi
court could allow this kind of Obstruction of Justice and Witness
Tampering under the cover of law. Many of Plaintiff Schlund’s witnesses
are now in fear for their lives or their wife’s and children’s life and
the government continues to harass witnesses and dissidents that are
threatening to them to protect the Bush family and others as they
plunder the treasury of the United States and use the Justice Department
to remove the political witnesses and dissidents, as set forth in the
Bolles Papers.
The court should further understand that others, including the DEA, have
repeatedly threatened to murder Plaintiff Schlund if he dares continue
these lawsuits and have tortured him continually for the past 25 years
since Plaintiff refused to join the DEA and help in the many political
assassinations and the running of the drugs and the fixing of elections.
The DEA solicited Plaintiff Schlund to kill some young girls they had
been providing to Federal Judge William P. Copple for sex. This was in
1977, after the DEA had offered Plaintiff Schlund a position in the DEA.
When Plaintiff refused, the government targeted and tortured him.
After Plaintiff Schlund’s arrest, Judge Copple was assigned to
Plaintiff’s trial. Judge Copple then removed himself the day before
Plaintiff was to file the recusal against him for being a corrupt judge
detailing what Plaintiff had read in Judge Copple’s CIA file in the
files Plaintiff has always called the Don Bolles Papers.
Let the Defendants fully understand that Plaintiff Schlund was briefing
the FBI on the CIA and DEA plans to fix the presidential elections of
the United States when Plaintiff was injected with CIA designed implants
to torture him. The surveillance court and other courts refer to these
devices as monitoring devices and pretends they are using these devices
in real investigations. Any witness complaining of torture is
discredited and the Government claims that their claims of torture are
only their attempts at escaping the Government’s investigation.
If the court chooses to deny this, Plaintiff Schlund demands under the ruling
of Doran v. McGuiness, supra, to be allowed to remove two of the devices
in trial or under the supervision of the Court and videotape the removal
to prove that the devices are real. Plaintiff Schlund does not know the
location of other devices that were also installed in Plaintiff by the
government. The removal of only two devices will not stop all of
Plaintiff’s torture and other devices were also installed and if
Plaintiff removes the devices that he knows of, others will be injected
under the protection of corrupt judges of the court. The court can
subpoena the DEA and person(s), including Agent John Albano, into court
to testify to their injection of Plaintiff Schlund and can subpoena the
FBI, including Agent Adam S., into court to testify to the devices being
CIA devices.
Plaintiff Schlund has found that the court always runs from the truth
and never looks for the truth and always just tries to make the person
being tortured look like they are crazy or involved in some crime.
Justice and the truth are easy to find. It is easy for the court to
subpoena the government agencies into court to document the truth. The
court can also just call George W. Bush’s corrupt appointees into court
to do the cover up.
Further, Defendants and the courts are on notice to understand that many
records held by the DEA and others are not real and do not represent the
truth and were obtained by the DEA committing perjury to the court to
obtain the warrants. Plaintiff Schlund believes the same to be true
with regard to the ATF and other files. Plaintiff Schlund believes that
the ATF files were generated to protect the DEA and cover up the DEA’s
taking of Plaintiff’s guns while Plaintiff was working with the FBI and
the guns were then used in assassination attempts against Plaintiff and
were to be used as “throw down” weapons after Plaintiffs assassination
by the government.
When Plaintiff called the police to report these guns missing, the Phoenix police
called the FBI and then called back Plaintiff and told Plaintiff that they could not
take a police report because the guns were taken by federal agents of the DEA and
that they were above the authority of local police and that this was a federal
matter that the FBI was aware of. The FBI could not act on these crimes
because Janet Reno was secretly working for the Bush family and
protected the DEA as John Ashcroft now does. The FBI, IRS and the other
agencies stopped all of the assassination attempts against Plaintiff but
the torture of Plaintiff continues because the torture is done under the
cover of law in surreal and fantastic investigations authorized under
perjury and conversations obtained from Plaintiff while being tortured
for the conversations or in exchange for relief from torture. These
conversations were then submitted to the court under perjury.
While Plaintiff Schlund’s family was asleep in their home and also while
in Mexico on fishing trips, the DEA used a gas on Plaintiff and his
family to place them in a state that they could not wake up from. This
gas was used on the small children of Plaintiff and others which
resulted in placing them in a state where they were unable to resist or
awaken that allowed the government to violate them as they pleased.
The DEA would then inject drugs into the bodies of Plaintiff’s family
and him. These drugs kept them in a drugged state where the government
could hypnotize Plaintiff and his family and others and then make them
perform certain tasks for the government to take photos of them so the
government could generate fabricated and false evidence against them to
discredit them to cover-up the crimes committed by the government. This
was done to cover-up crimes that Plaintiff Schlund and his wife had
witnessed or had personal knowledge of. These crimes were committed by
the government.
Sometimes Plaintiff and his family would be kidnapped by force from
their home and would be drugged and kept in a drugged state by the DEA
for up to three days at a time. During these kidnappings the government
would repeatedly and continually work on them with drugs and hypnotize
them to make them perform acts for the government as needed to force
them to do things so the government could take photos and films of them
to discredit them and remove them as credible witnesses against the Bush
family and those that worked under the Bush family doing political
assassinations, running drugs, money laundering and fixing public
elections.
After these photo and film sessions Plaintiff and his family would be
returned to their home and would wake up in their beds like nothing had
happened. Sometimes, upon waking up, Plaintiff would still have the
cotton ball on his arm where the IV had been removed from his arm.
Other times, he would be injected in his foot with the antidote to the
drugs that he was kept on during these drugged interrogation and/or
filmed sessions.
Plaintiff’s innocent children would miss school and he would miss work
during these political kidnappings and they would all wake up at the
same time. Sometimes they would wake up in the morning and other times
they would all wake up at 6:00 p.m. or 9:00 p.m. with up to three (3)
days having expired while they were in this drugged state held by the
government.
In Mexico, Plaintiff and family did wake up on the beach at 1:00 p.m. on
an August day with the temperature around 120 degrees. They would be
suffering from dehydration and unable to account for any of the missed
and elapsed time. Friends that were on the fishing trip with them would
also wake up at the same time and ask what happened. We were all gassed
that night by the DEA. All of their personal items and things would be
gone and they would later receive them back in the mail after returning
to the United States.
During these drugged programmings and interrogations by the government,
Plaintiff would be hypnotized and directed to make a statement when a
key word was later spoken. This allowed the government to record these
statements to attempt to prove he was guilty of things which in truth he
had no knowledge of or part in.
If the court claims such procedures are impossible, Plaintiff would be
happy to demonstrate these procedures and gas, drug and hypnotize
someone for the court and have them make a conversation for the Court.
The ruling of Doran v. McGuiness, supra, gives Plaintiff the right to do
such demonstrations. Plaintiff does not claim that such procedures are
safe or legal but they are possible especially when they are done by the
government with the power of the Justice Department behind them and the
cover of law to stop any lawsuits if the people die or are injured
during these Nazi like procedures. In the CIA files we had in the Don
Bolles Papers many people had died during these procedures and were
continuing to die under the protection of corrupt judges of the court.
The kidnapping of Plaintiff’s family and Plaintiff stopped in 1991 after
Plaintiff went to the FBI and asked them to monitor him. At the same
time, Plaintiff gave the FBI permission to monitor him without a
warrant. Plaintiff found this necessary after the Glendale Police
Department and Phoenix Police Department refused to accept murder
reports from Plaintiff after the government had people murdered in
Plaintiff home to threaten his wife if she continues to try to help
Plaintiff.
These murders were done under the surveillance and direction
of the government. The DEA and others still would gas Plaintiff and his
family and friends for implant injections but he would no longer be
removed from his home for photo sessions. In the 1990’s, the use of
torture replaced the programming and instead of programming Plaintiff to
make conversations for the DEA or police, they would torture him to
force him under torture to do similar conversations. All of Plaintiff
witnesses and family and friends were also injected and some were
threatened, stimulated, manipulated or tortured so the government could
cover-up it’s Nazi like crimes.
During the 1990’s, Plaintiff telephoned the DEA over one thousand
(1,000) times and wrote them many letters, complaining of the torture of
his witnesses and himself. During these telephone calls, the DEA agents
fully admitted injecting Plaintiff. Agent John Albano of the DEA even
gave Plaintiff permission to remove the implants to stop his torture but
his authorization was overruled by higher-ups in the chain of command in
the DEA and Plaintiff was not allowed to remove the implants.
During this same time, the FBI called Plaintiff Schlund and informed him
that the implants torturing him were CIA implants. The Court can
contact the Phoenix office of the FBI and demand to have Agent Adam S.
appear before the Court to testify that the implants are CIA designed
torture devices for the removal of political witnesses and political
prisoners of the United States.
Plaintiff Schlund began to file medical, electrical and engineering
patents and evidence into the Arizona District Court of scientific proof
and data confirming these high tech CIA designed and DEA used electronic
implants. The government fabricated evidence and moved for summary
judgment and increased the torture.
Plaintiff Schlund filed with the District Court undisputed evidence of
“implant” electronic technology now commonly used for medical and other
purposes. Also filed was electronic technology used for the purpose of
tracking almost every kind of animal life form roaming the globe.
Specifically, he submitted information as an example of wireless
technology devices embedded in the collar worn by a hunting dog which
roams freely while hunting mountain lions. When the dog’s owner wishes
the dog to return to base camp, he presses a button on his transmitter
which sends a shock signal to the dog, compelling it to immediately
return to the base camp. If the dog does not respond, a longer shock
signal is transmitted to the dog collar, resulting in a harsher and more
punishing shock stimulus to the physical body of the dog in the form of
physical punishment. The shock punishment is a form of operant
conditioning which the dog learns that in order to eliminate the shock,
he must immediately return to the base camp when commanded to do so by
the person who holds the shock transmitter and is inflicting the
punishment. Because the technology is wireless in nature, the dog owner
can be at any remote location and inflict the punishment on the dog.
If the collared receiver was embedded subcutaneously under the dog’s skin,
you would not see it. If you did not know the dog was embedded with the
“implant” and suddenly the implant received a transmitted shock signal
inflicting the punishment on the dog, you would see the outward
manifestations of the punishment in the dog’s eyes and his physical
reactions to it while not knowing what’s causing it. You would
erroneously conclude the dog is crazy or perhaps has some mental illness
when the reality is; the animal is being tortured through means of
wireless electronic force technology, in a covert manner from many miles
away. Plaintiff Schlund set forth the various types of wireless
integrated technologies which can be used for such purpose, all of which
are scientifically accepted in the electrical and biomedical engineering
community. He never mentioned the word of “mental telepathy,” which has
no scientific basis at all.
Plaintiff Schlund also pled, in great detail a specific itemization of
his injury and damages, supporting the irreparable harm to him
personally and economically. He pled the government’s conduct has
resulted in creating life-threatening injuries, including, however not
limited to, sleep deprivation, electric shocks, torture with unnatural
horrible, extremely loud sounds, loss of a thumb, extreme and crippling
pain in his head and on or about his body, types of caustic burn from
the heat or radiation generated from the electronic and other forces on
impact. And during the duration of time of exposure, loss of earning
capacity, Plaintiff became diabetic from being deprived of thousands of
nights of sleep year after year, loss of earning ability, destruction of
his peace of mind, harmony and the right to be left alone, a burgeoning
lack of trust in the government and the judicial system, loss of
consortium, injury to his children, incurred medical and other personal
and business expenses, and continues to experience pain and suffering
(TORTURE) and will continue to suffer physically, psychologically and
emotionally, resulting in irreparable permanent harm from the torture
which detrimentally affects his freedom of speech, privacy and other
civil rights. Injuries suffered from the torture of Plaintiff Schlund
are to date great enough that Plaintiff will die from these injuries.
During one of Plaintiff Schlund’s doctor’s visits, his blood pressure
was 223 over 121. Let the court fully understand that Plaintiff
Schlund’s blood pressure was normal when he was injected with the
implants.
Plaintiff Schlund’s extraordinarily high blood pressure, while on
massive doses of blood pressure control medication, has damaged
Plaintiff’s internal organs. This degree of torture is an act of
terrorism. Any time Plaintiff Schlund says anything the government
doesn’t like, Plaintiff is tortured resulting in extreme pain and his
high blood pressure and further damage to his body.
Let the court fully understand that Plaintiff Schlund’s blood pressure
returns to normal during the time the government reduces its torture of
him. This type of terrorism is more than just outrageous conduct of the
United States; it is murder and cruel and unusual punishment.
III. LEGAL DISCUSSION
A. Injunctive Relief is required to terminate the government’s
torture, intrusion and violation of Plaintiff by the use of electronic
forces that violate Plaintiff’s Constitutional Rights.
1. Torture
No government activity justifies implants and torture to succeed. It
has been proven in Plaintiff Schlund’s case that such use of torture and
implants has stopped any chance of the government successfully
concluding their fabricated investigation.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, as Plaintiff Schlund has reminded
it, issued harsh warnings and deeply rooted concerns that the present
status of sophisticated scientific and technologically advanced devices
used by the government under color of authority, such electronic force
excessively intrudes and trespasses to grossly violate rights to
privacy, especially as to other person(s) coming in contact with the
subject target of the surveillance/torture activity – U.S. v.
Koyomejian, 97 F 2d 536 (9th Cir. en banc), cert. denied, 946 F. 2d
1450 (1991) [Koyomejian prevailed in the criminal context as well.].
In Plaintiff Schlund’s case, privacy means nothing because torture has
overcome all other concerns despite federal law protects against both.
The United States Supreme Court itself acknowledges the fact that any
individual can be placed under 24-hour surveillance anywhere in this
country, without judicial knowledge, supervision, or consent (search
warrants); it does not necessarily suggest abuse by the government,
citing its decision in Zurcher v. Stanford Daily, 436 U.S. 547, 566
(1978).
The same Supreme Court issued its confirmation of the
sophisticated electronic abilities over 25 years ago (1978-2003). In
the same breath, the Supreme Court responsibly tells the government
through its decision that “If such dragnet-type law enforcement
practices has responded and visions should eventually occur, there will
be time enough then to determine whether different constitutional
principals may be applicable.” (Ibid.) Plaintiff Schlund was acquitted
because of just the exact type of “dragnet-type law enforcement
practices” referenced by this honorable Supreme Court as “being without
judicial knowledge of supervision” United States v. Knotts, 460 U.S. 276
(1983). Moreover, this Court stated that such sophisticated signs and
technologically advanced devices used by the government under color of
authority for the purpose of intrusion/trespass have been dealt with on
a limited basis in the case United States v. Lee, 274 U.S. 559 (1927),
as cited in the Knotts case.
It also cited its Zurcher v. Stanford Daily, 436 U.S. 547, 566 (1978) conclusion
as such enhanced surveillance succeeds fortuitously and unreasonably into the
private sphere protected by the Fourth Amendment without control, at 662 F 2d at
p. 518. Despite these Supreme Court decisions, and the Ninth Circuit Court of
Appeals’ own decisions, the advanced and sophisticated level of the technology,
which is wireless in nature, is used to systematically and covertly
retaliate and torture a person, especially when motivated by vengeance
or even pure delight of having the power to do so – believing that they
are protected by the courts under the law. And if caught, as
acknowledged by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, the Government
always denies it intentionally tortured its own citizenry.
See, Siderman DeBlake v. Republic of Argentina. 965 F 2d 699 (9th Cir. 1992)
[The court acknowledged, no doubt, with the onslaught of advances in
technology, new devices will be created which the government will use as
well for less than honorable purposes.] The old cliché, “Where there’s
a will there’s a way.” or whatever the government’s justification is for
the need and use of electronic force technology to torture a person, is
in existence today and is widely used to torture political witnesses,
such as Plaintiff Schlund. The Appellate Court also took notice that
devices of torture are already in existence for some beneficial purpose
and then converted to a torturing device (i.e., cattle prodder). The
same is true with these implants.
There is no dispute that electronic force is destructive, especially
when used in a manner to inflict serious physical and psychological
harm, as revealed in detail by Plaintiff Schlund. “Electronic force” is
a general means of power, strength, impetus, intense effort, an
artificially enhanced increase in strength, power, or influence, causing
a change in the motion, body, object, or substance of intensity of
energy in the make (a way) by force to penetrate, join, separate, or
integrate with, to add or extract something from the original source,
cause, produce, or obtain by effort, seek quick results from voluntarily
or involuntarily, accelerate (energy), etc. (Oxford Dictionary of
current English, 1998).
www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
