-Caveat Lector-

"I pledge Allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and to
the REPUBLIC for which it stands,  one Nation under God,indivisible,with
liberty and justice for all."

 visit my web site at
http://www.voicenet.com/~wbacon My ICQ# is 79071904
for a precise list of the powers of the Federal Government linkto:
http://www.voicenet.com/~wbacon/Enumerated.html

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 07:34:20 -0700
From: Media Research Center <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: MRC Alert: NY Times, CBS and NBC Yearn for a Kerry-McCain 'Dream Team'

             ***Media Research Center CyberAlert***
     10:30am EDT, Monday May 17, 2004 (Vol. Nine; No. 83)
 The 1,720th CyberAlert. Tracking Liberal Media Bias Since 1996

> NY Times, CBS and NBC Yearn for a Kerry-McCain "Dream Team"
> Concern Kerry "Has Failed to Capitalize on Bush's Vulnerability"
> MSNBC Focuses on Iraqi-American "Offended" by President Bush
> Jennings Touts "Enormous Anti-American Demonstration" in Cuba
> U.S. Reporter Wants More Iraqis to Die So that Bush Will Lose
> Hail Historic Same-Sex Mass. Marriage, Worry Right "in Jeopardy"

    #### Distributed to more than 14,000 subscribers by the Media
Research Center, bringing political balance to the news media
since 1987. The MRC is the leader in documenting, exposing and
neutralizing liberal media bias. Visit the MRC on the Web:
http://www.mediaresearch.org. CyberAlerts from this year are at:
http://www.mediaresearch.org/archive/cyber/welcome.asp
For 2003: http://www.mediaresearch.org/archive/cyber/archive03.asp
    Subscribe/unsubscribe information, as well as a link to the
MRC's PayPal donation page, are at the end of this message.
    When posted, this CyberAlert will be readable at:
http://www.mediaresearch.org/cyberalerts/2004/cyb20040517.asp ####

1) Yearning for a Kerry-McCain "Dream Team." Picking up on a
Saturday front page New York Times story about how "some prominent
Democrats are angling for" John McCain "to run for Vice President
alongside Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts," the CBS Evening
News and NBC's Meet the Press promoted the idea which Kerry
backers see an beneficial to their candidate. CBS put "Dream
Team?" on screen as anchor Thalia Assuras asked, "Many of Kerry's
supporters believe the right running mate could give him an edge.
Their idea of a dream teammate: Republican John McCain." The next
morning on Meet the Press, after McCain told Tim Russert he has
"categorically" ruled out joining a ticket with Kerry, an
undeterred Russert pleaded: "As an American, you can stay a
Republican. You can be a loyal Republican. It would be a fusion or
a unity ticket. Would you contemplate it in any way, shape, or
form?"

2) When not promoting the idea of John McCain for John Kerry's VP,
network reporters express disappointment at how Kerry is failing
to capitalize on President Bush's troubles. Friday's Good Morning
America on ABC took up the concern and on Saturday's CBS Evening
News, anchor Thalia Assuras showed distress: "With the President
under fire because of the situation in Iraq, there are questions
about whether John Kerry has failed to capitalize on Mr. Bush's
vulnerability." Reporter Byron Pitts, noting that Kerry has
largely stuck to his weekly themes, such as health care, passed
along how "his cautious line, Democrats fear, will cost Kerry, a
missed opportunity to show the differences between himself and
President George W. Bush."

3) Though 70 percent in Warren County, Ohio voted for George W.
Bush in 2000, MSNBC on Friday afternoon focused on a "a single
voice," at a Bush rally, who "watched in silent opposition." That
voice belonged to an Iraqi woman, Yasmine Allen, set to vote in
the U.S. for the first time this year. MSNBC's Tom Llamas
explained that when she "saw photos of Iraqi prisoners reportedly
being mistreated by U.S. troops, this comment from the President
offended her." The Bush comment: "Because we acted, torture
chambers were closed." Allen charged: "That whole thing about, you
know, closing the chambers of torture. Has he even watched the
news the last few days? What is he talking about?" Llamas
helpfully added that "despite President Bush's insistence that the
war in Iraq will bring that same freedom to her former countrymen,
Yasmine says the war is the very reason she'll vote to remove him
from office."

4) Peter Jennings on Friday night claimed an anti-Bush march in
Cuba, led by Fidel Castro, was "a reminder today of other tension
in the world." Without any acknowledgment that participation was
not voluntary, Jennings touted how it was "an enormous anti-
American demonstration" with "a couple of hundred thousand people"
protesting "new restrictions imposed by the Bush administration on
money transfers and travel to Cuba." Jennings relayed how Castro
"criticized the war in Iraq and said that President Bush was
trying to impose what he, Mr. Castro, called 'world tyranny.'"

5) Pool-side at a Baghdad hotel recently, Toby Harnden of London's
Daily Telegraph recounted in the latest edition of The
Spectator magazine, "I was accosted by an American magazine
journalist of serious accomplishment and impeccable liberal
credentials." Harnden related how she told him that "not only had
she 'known' the Iraq war would fail but she considered it
essential that it did so because this would ensure that the 'evil'
George W. Bush would no longer be running her country. Her editors
back on the East Coast were giggling, she said, over what a
disaster Iraq had turned out to be. 'Lots of us talk about how
awful it would be if this worked out.' Startled by her candour, I
asked whether thousands more dead Iraqis would be a good thing.
She nodded and mumbled something about Bush needing to go."

6) Network anchors and reporters greeted Monday's legalization in
Massachusetts of same-sex marriage by hailing, in the words of
ABC's Elizabeth Vargas, how the state is "making history" with the
"cultural and political milestone." NBC's Rehema Ellis warned
Sunday night that the right to same-sex marriage "could be in
jeopardy" due to the threat of a constitutional amendment to it.
NBC anchor John Seigenthaler treated same-sex marriage as
equivalent with civil rights on race as he plugged an upcoming
story on the 50th anniversary of the school desegregation case:
"When we come back, another battle over equal rights in the
classroom half a century ago."


++ Correction: The May 14 CyberAlert pointed out how NBC's Matt
Lauer failed to raise with Senator Ted Kennedy how he had charged:
"We now learn that Saddam's torture chambers reopened under new
management -- U.S. management." CyberAlert stated that Kennedy
made the remark on Tuesday, May 11. In fact, Kennedy said it, on
the Senate floor, on Monday, May 10. (Update: Tim Russert, on
Sunday's Meet the Pres, asked Senator Joe Biden if Kennedy's
comment was appropriate.)


    > 1) Yearning for a Kerry-McCain "Dream Team." Picking up on a
Saturday front page story in the New York Times about how "some
prominent Democrats are angling for" Senator John McCain "to run
for Vice President alongside Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts,
creating a bipartisan ticket that they say would instantly
transform the presidential race," the CBS Evening News and NBC's
Meet the Press promoted the idea which Kerry backers see an
beneficial to their candidate.

    CBS put "Dream Team?" on screen next to head shots of John
Kerry and McCain as anchor Thalia Assuras asked, "Many of Kerry's
supporters believe the right running mate could give him an edge.
Their idea of a dream teammate: Republican John McCain. A
pipedream?"

    The next morning, on Sunday's Meet the Press, after McCain
told Tim Russert he has "categorically" ruled out joining a ticket
with Kerry, an undeterred Russert pleaded with him: "Senator
McCain, as an American, you can stay a Republican. You can be a
loyal Republican. It would be a fusion or a unity ticket. Would
you contemplate it in any way, shape, or form? Would you take
Senator Kerry's phone call if you knew he was calling about it?"

    Sunday's NBC Nightly News included a story about the Russert-
McCain exchange.

    Assuras introduced the May 15 CBS Evening News story: "Poll
numbers released today show President Bush neck and neck with
challenger Democratic Senator John Kerry. Now many of Kerry's
supporters believe the right running mate could give him an edge.
Their idea of a dream teammate: Republican John McCain. A
pipedream? Here's Kelly Cobiella."

    Cobiella began: "With the latest poll numbers showing Senator
John Kerry in a virtual tie with President Bush, both sides are
looking for an edge. Some in the Kerry camp are dreaming of a
split ticket with Republican Senator John McCain as their
candidate for Vice President."
    Craig Crawford, CBS News consultant: "A lot of swing votes
would be so impressed if either of the candidates find ways to
reach some bipartisan common ground."
    Cobiella: "The Vietnam veterans are reportedly close friends
and talk regularly."
    John Kerry on Wednesday: "John McCain and I worked very
closely together on a bunch of issues."
    Cobiella: "The Arizona Senator insists he's totally ruled out
the idea of teaming up with Kerry, but those who follow McCain
closely say the Senator is upset over the Bush administration's
handling of Iraq, and he is still smarting from the way the Bush
campaign handled him in the run for the Republican nomination in
2000. If he did team up with Kerry, many believe it would be on
condition they could agree to disagree."
    Michael Franc, "American Heritage Foundation" [really the
Heritage Foundation?]: "John McCain would have to make a judgment
call that it's okay to challenge his Commander-in-Chief during a
time of war."
    Cobiella: "But would core Democrats accept a candidate for
Vice President they see as an opponent of abortion rights and
affirmative action?"
    Whit Ayres, Republican pollster: "The Democratic base would be
apoplectic if a man with his social views were a heartbeat away
from the presidency in a Democratic administration."
    Cobiella concluded: "The McCain question could be settled by
June 9th. That's the deadline for the Senator to file reelection
paperwork for his Senate seat."

    The next day on NBC's Meet the Press, Russert raised the New
York Times article with his guests, McCain and Senator Joe Biden:
     "Senator McCain, it's the elephant in the room, the story
that will not die. This is the front page of the New York Times
yesterday. Headline: 'Undeterred by McCain Denials, Some See Him
as Kerry's No. 2. Despite weeks of steadfast rejections from
Senator John McCain, some prominent Democrats are angling for him
to run for vice president alongside Senator John Kerry, creating a
bipartisan ticket that they say would instantly transform the
presidential race. 'Senator McCain would not have to leave his
party,' [former Democratic Senator Bob] Kerrey said. 'He could
remain a Republican, would be given some authority for selection
of Cabinet people. The only thing he would have to do is say, 'I'm
not going to appoint any judges who would overturn Roe v. Wade,'
the Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion, which Mr.
McCain has said he opposes.'" What do you think of Senator
Kerrey's recommendation?"
    McCain: "I'd like to have the camera move over to a palm tree
to start with. With friends like Bob, who needs-"
    Biden: "I'm about to jump in, John, so hang on."
    McCain: "I've said categorically, categorically, I will not be
Vice President of the United States. I will not be a candidate.
And I mean that. I'm happy in the Senate. I'd like to maintain my
role. I am a loyal Republican. I am supporting President Bush's
re-election. I am campaigning for it. And I'd like to mention one
other thing. The bullet played in all these stories is John McCain
is angry at President Bush about 2000. Look, that was four years
ago. My constituents don't want me to look back in anger. They
want me to represent them. I work with President Bush on a lot of
issues and I want him re-elected and I'm not looking back in anger
at anything. That's not what my constituents deserve. So I'm
afraid this will not be the last conversation you and I have on
this issue and I categorically say no, but I can only hope."
    Russert: "Senator Biden, what do you think of John McCain as a
Democratic candidate for Vice President?"
    Biden: "I think John McCain would be a great candidate for
Vice President. I mean it. I know John doesn't like me saying it,
but the truth of the matter is, it is. We need to heal the red and
the blue here, man, the red states and the blue states...."
    Russert soon pleaded: "Senator McCain, as an American, you can
stay a Republican. You can be a loyal Republican. It would be a
fusion or a unity ticket. Would you contemplate it in any way,
shape, or form? Would you take Senator Kerry's phone call if you
knew he was calling about it?"
    McCain: "I will always take anyone's phone calls but I will
not, I categorically will not do it...."

    For the May 15 front page New York Times article, by Sheryl
Gay Stolberg and Jodi Wilgoren, see:
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/15/politics/campaign/15MCCA.html



    > 2) When not promoting the idea of John McCain for John
Kerry's VP, network reporters express disappointment at how Kerry
is failing to capitalize on President Bush's troubles. On Friday's
Good Morning America, Dan Harris painted Kerry as stuck in a bind:
"On the one hand, when he proceeds carefully and cautiously,
anxious Democrats sometimes accuse him of not showing leadership
and not being aggressive enough against the President. On the
other hand, when Kerry criticizes Mr. Bush for his handling of the
crisis, as he did on Fox News last night, Republicans pounce."

    On Saturday's CBS Evening News, anchor Thalia Assuras showed
distress: "With the President under fire because of the situation
in Iraq, there are questions about whether John Kerry has failed
to capitalize on Mr. Bush's vulnerability." Reporter Byron Pitts,
noting that Kerry has largely stuck to his weekly themes, such as
health care, passed along how "his cautious line, Democrats fear,
will cost Kerry, a missed opportunity to show the differences
between himself and President George W. Bush."

    He has the news media for that.

    Friday on GMA, the MRC's Jessica Anderson noticed, Charles
Gibson plugged an upcoming segment: "In politics this morning,
President Bush's approval ratings, as you may have read, dropping
to new lows. The question is, is John Kerry taking advantage of
that? We'll get into that story ahead."

    Dan Harris soon explained that since the release of the
prisoner-abuser photos, "the Kerry campaign has had to make daily
and delicate decisions. They are trying to strike a balance, they
say, between speaking out on a major issue and risking being
perceived as using that issue to their political advantage. The
late night comedians have been having a field day with President
Bush and the prisoner abuse scandal, but John Kerry certainly gets
roughed up, too."
    David Letterman: "The gas prices are up, the stock market is
down, Iraq is a mess, and John Kerry is saying to himself, 'How am
I going to beat this guy?'"
    Harris: "While the prison abuse scandal may be hurting the
President's poll numbers, it also puts John Kerry in a tricky
position. On the one hand, when he proceeds carefully and
cautiously, anxious Democrats sometimes accuse him of not showing
leadership and not being aggressive enough against the President.
On the other hand, when Kerry criticizes Mr. Bush for his handling
of the crisis, as he did on Fox News last night, Republicans
pounce."
    Sen. Kerry: "So I think that this administration has made a
grievous error in the laxity of command control and I am convinced
this didn't happen just because six or seven people decided to
make it happen in a prison. It happened as a matter of what was
going on in terms of interrogation and the laxity of command up
and down."
    Nicolle Devenish, Bush-Cheney campaign: "I think it's
exploitation when you so willingly denigrate the United States
military for the purposes of your own political gain."
    Harris: "On the floor of the Senate this week, Republicans
accused the Kerry campaign of using the prisoner abuse scandal to
raise money in an e-mail to supporters....The Kerry team says the
e-mail was not meant as a fundraising solicitation. They also
point out that the Bush campaign has used images from September
11th in its advertising.
    "While the headlines have been dominated by Iraq, Kerry has
spent much of his time focused on his designated issue of the week
-- this week, for example, it was health care. And while Kerry
doesn't often make the national news, it is important to note that
he does often get heavy coverage in the states where he's
campaigning, and Charlie, that coverage is often focused on his
issue of the week."



    > 3) Though 70 percent in Warren County, Ohio voted for George
W. Bush in 2000, MSNBC on Friday afternoon focused on a "a single
voice," at a Bush rally, who "watched in silent opposition." That
voice belonged to an Iraqi woman, Yasmine Allen, set to vote in
the U.S. for the first time this year. MSNBC's Tom Llamas
explained that when she "saw photos of Iraqi prisoners reportedly
being mistreated by U.S. troops, this comment from the President
offended her." The Bush comment: "Because we acted, torture
chambers were closed." Allen charged: "That whole thing about, you
know, closing the chambers of torture. Has he even watched the
news the last few days? What is he talking about?" Llamas
helpfully added that "despite President Bush's insistence that the
war in Iraq will bring that same freedom to her former countrymen,
Yasmine says the war is the very reason she'll vote to remove him
from office."

    "Iraqi Woman Set to Vote for First Time in U.S." read the on-
screen graphic over the story aired multiple times on MSNBC during
the day Friday, including, the MRC's Brad Wilmouth tracked down,
at 1:36pm EDT, 3:34pm EDT and, during Lester Holt Live, at 4:48pm
EDT.

    Anchor Contessa Brewer introduced the 4pm hour playing of the
piece by promising that the story would provide an "insight into
the key issue of Iraq" from a "first-time voter." Brewer asserted:
    "Now to the battle for the White House. The presidential race
comes down to a handful of battleground states, and Ohio is one of
them. So MSNBC had Tom Llamas there for nearly three months
focusing on the issues and the voters that will carry the day for
either George Bush or John Kerry. To get insight into the key
issue of Iraq, Tom spoke with one first-time voter, a woman born
in Baghdad."

    The Llamas piece began with a campaign clip of Bush in Ohio:
"I'm here to say I need your help and want your help to lead this
country for four more years."
    Llamas zoomed in an a lonely minority: "In Warren County,
Ohio, President Bush doesn't have to look far for support -- 70
percent of this county voted for Bush in 2000. And this crowd in
Lebanon echoed that same support. But at this rally, a single
voice, Yasmine Allen, watched in silent opposition."
    Yasmine Allen, Iraqi-American citizen: "I made up my mind a
long time ago which way I would vote, precisely a year ago."
    Llamas, over video of Allen in her kitchen: "Born in Iraq,
Yasmine became a U.S. citizen in 2002. Her interest in politics
brought her to the President's speech. For her, this election is
about one issue: Iraq. Dealing with the ongoing conflict there has
become both personal-"
    Allen in her living room: "Second cousin of mine, his wife,
their house was bombed while she was asleep in the bed, and she
died leaving behind a husband a two young children."
    Llamas: "-and political."
    Allen, street side by stores: "I saw some promise in Bush, but
I was clearly mistaken."
    Llamas: "And when Yasmine saw photos of Iraqi prisoners
reportedly being mistreated by U.S. troops, this comment from the
President offended her:"
    Bush: "Because we acted, torture chambers were closed."
    Allen: "That whole thing about, you know, closing the chambers
of torture. Has he even watched the news the last few days? What
is he talking about? I mean, that is, he shouldn't have even gone
there."
    Llamas: "In November, Yasmine Allen will vote for the first
time in a democratic election. Yet despite President Bush's
insistence that the war in Iraq will bring that same freedom to
her former countrymen, Yasmine says the war is the very reason
she'll vote to remove him from office."
    Allen: "America was never in danger from Iraq, so to kill even
one Iraqi person, you know, for that claim, is a lie, and I do not
want the blood of these people on my hands."
    Llamas: "And as the President stops in towns like Lebanon
painting a positive picture of Iraq's future,"
    Bush: "This country will finish what we have begun. We will
see that Iraq is free and self-governing and democratic."
    Llamas: "-it's pictures like these that make Yasmine's
attitude on Iraq less hopeful."
    Allen: "Not in the near future. It's going to take a very long
time. I don't see it being a better place in the next decade."
    Llamas wrapped up: "In Lebanon, Ohio, Tom Llamas, MSNBC."

    If there isn't one yet, maybe Allen could head up a new group,
Ungrateful Iraqi-Americans for Kerry.



    > 4) Peter Jennings on Friday night claimed an anti-Bush march
in Cuba, led by Fidel Castro, was "a reminder today of other
tension in the world." Without any acknowledgment that
participation was not voluntary, Jennings touted how it was "an
enormous anti-American demonstration" with "a couple of hundred
thousand people" protesting "new restrictions imposed by the Bush
administration on money transfers and travel to Cuba." Jennings
relayed how Castro "criticized the war in Iraq and said that
President Bush was trying to impose what he, Mr. Castro, called
‘world tyranny.'"

    Earlier in the day on MSNBC, Chris Jansing highlighted how in
Havana "hundreds of thousands took to the streets to protest
tighter U.S. embargos" and how Castro "defended Cuban socialism
and called President Bush a fraud who wants to impose his tyranny
on the world."

    But neither Jennings nor Jansing showed, as did Bob Novak in
awarding his "Outrage of the Week" Saturday night on CNN's Capital
Gang, how the protesters carried signed with a picture of Bush
altered to make him look like Adolph Hitler.

    A two-paragraph AP dispatch in Saturday's New York Times noted
how "posters bore swastikas and portrayed Mr. Bush in a Nazi
uniform with a Hitler mustache." The brief story also relayed: "In
an example of the worldwide fallout of the Iraqi prisoner scandal,
organizers distributed signs printed with photos of abused Iraqis
and the words, 'This would never happen in Cuba.'"

    The CBS and NBC newscasts Friday night, as well as CNN's
NewsNight, ignored the communist propaganda event.

    On the May 14 World News Tonight, Jennings announced, over
wide-angle video of a crowd walking on street by the ocean,
followed by close-ups of people waving Cuban flags and of Castro
walking at front of the crowd:
    "A reminder today of other tension in the world. There was an
enormous anti-American demonstration in Cuba today. A couple of
hundred thousand people showed up to demonstrate new restrictions
imposed by the Bush administration on money transfers and travel
to Cuba. The Cuban leader, Fidel Castro, also criticized the war
in Iraq and said that President Bush was trying to impose what he,
Mr. Castro, called 'world tyranny.'"

    The MRC's Brad Wilmouth observed that on MSNBC's Lester Holt
Live, at 4:51pm EDT, anchor Chris Jansing intoned over matching
video:
    "Now to Havana, Cuba, where hundreds of thousands took to the
streets to protest tighter U.S. embargos on that communist
country. Workers, students and soldiers marched past the American
diplomatic mission waving Cuban flags and shouting slogans against
President Bush. A frail-looking Fidel Castro defended Cuban
socialism and called President Bush a fraud who wants to impose
his tyranny on the world."



    > 5) Pool-side at a Baghdad hotel recently, Toby Harnden of
London's Daily Telegraph recounted in the latest edition of The
Spectator magazine, "I was accosted by an American magazine
journalist of serious accomplishment and impeccable liberal
credentials." Harnden related how she told him that "not only had
she 'known' the Iraq war would fail but she considered it
essential that it did so because this would ensure that the 'evil'
George W. Bush would no longer be running her country. Her editors
back on the East Coast were giggling, she said, over what a
disaster Iraq had turned out to be. 'Lots of us talk about how
awful it would be if this worked out.' Startled by her candour, I
asked whether thousands more dead Iraqis would be a good thing.
She nodded and mumbled something about Bush needing to go."

    Harnden also disclosed that since the violence in Iraq
prevents reporters from venturing very far beyond their hotels,
"the dirty little secret is that the endless 'stand-ups' you see
on your screens are based on no reporting at all."

    An excerpt from Harnden's recollection of his disturbing
conversation with a fellow journalist, which James Taranto
highlighted Friday in his "Best of the Web" column for
OpinionJournal.com ( http://wwwopinionjournal.com/best ), as
published in the May 15 edition of The Spectator, a British-based
weekly:

....The other day, while taking a break by the Al-Hamra Hotel
pool, fringed with the usual cast of tattooed defence contractors,
I was accosted by an American magazine journalist of serious
accomplishment and impeccable liberal credentials.

She had been disturbed by my argument that Iraqis were better off
than they had been under Saddam and I was now -- there was no
choice about this -- going to have to justify my bizarre and
dangerous views. I'll spare you most of the details because you
know the script -- no WMD, no ‘imminent threat' (though the point
was to deal with Saddam before such a threat could emerge), a
diversion from the hunt for bin Laden, enraging the Arab world.
Etcetera.

But then she came to the point. Not only had she ‘known' the Iraq
war would fail but she considered it essential that it did so
because this would ensure that the 'evil' George W. Bush would no
longer be running her country. Her editors back on the East Coast
were giggling, she said, over what a disaster Iraq had turned out
to be. 'Lots of us talk about how awful it would be if this worked
out.' Startled by her candour, I asked whether thousands more dead
Iraqis would be a good thing.

She nodded and mumbled something about Bush needing to go. By this
logic, I ventured, another September 11 on, say, September 11
would be perfect for pushing up John Kerry's poll numbers. 'Well,
that's different -- that would be Americans,' she said, haltingly.
'I guess I'm a bit of an isolationist.' That's one way of putting
it.

The moral degeneracy of these sentiments didn't really hit me
until later when I dined at the home of Abu Salah, a father of six
who took over as the Daily Telegraph's chief driver in Baghdad
when his predecessor was killed a year ago. It was a -- sadly --
rare opportunity to speak to ordinary Iraqis in a social setting.

As the lights went out for the third time that evening, we
discussed what life after Saddam was like. It was possible to talk
freely now, said his sister Jenan, but the Americans had not yet
brought either peace or democracy. Two months ago, the family had
been forced to raise $40,000 for the release of her abducted
brother-in-law.

She had decided not to apply for a job at the new American Embassy
because of the dangers. 'My friend worked as a translator for the
Coalition,' she said. 'One night her car was ambushed by the
resistance and they killed her with a bullet to the head.' This
week, a neighbour's three-year-old daughter had been kidnapped.
All Jenan longed for was stability.

Iraq is so dangerous now that hardly any television journalists
venture out of the Al-Hamra or the Palestine Hotel, where lager
and post-barbecue spliffs help relieve the tension of being in a
war zone. There are insurance problems and the brooding, ex-SAS
bodyguards forbid any excursions. The dirty little secret is that
the endless 'stand-ups' you see on your screens are based on no
reporting at all. Those of us who work for newspapers grow our
Shia beards or, in the case of the women and the occasional John
Simpson wannabe, wear hijabs and trust in fate, our relative
anonymity and the skill and bravery of Abu Salah and his kind to
get us to Najaf and Fallujah without being summarily executed. But
what we can accomplish is limited.

Into this journalistic vacuum it is all too easy for the
prejudices of the press corps -- tourists looking through
telescopes -- to flow more freely than ever and the resulting
reports to be distorted and incomplete. After the horrifying
videotape slaughter of Nick Berg, there will be even greater
reluctance among Westerners to leave their fortified hotels and
compounds....

    END of Excerpt

    For the piece in full:
http://www.spectator.co.uk/article.php?table=old&section=current&issue=2004-05-15&id=4605

    So, who is this "American magazine journalist of serious
accomplishment and impeccable liberal credentials"? We know she's
a woman and she had to be in Baghdad sometime during the past few
weeks. From Harnden's tone, I'd also guess that she's stationed
there long-term, not someone who parachutes in for a few days.

    Have a guess? I'd lean toward someone you don't see much or at
all on TV.

    And at which magazine are the "editors back on the East
Coast...giggling...over what a disaster Iraq had turned out to
be."

    The "east coast" is another clue, though it doesn't eliminate
many news-oriented magazines.

    So, we're looking for a female journalist who works for a
magazine based on the East Coast.

    E-mail your guesses, for both her name and the name of the
magazine for which she toils, to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

    In a future issue, I'll run the guesses I think have some
plausibility.



    > 6) Network anchors and reporters greeted Monday's
legalization in Massachusetts of same-sex marriage by hailing, in
the words of ABC's Elizabeth Vargas, how the state is "making
history" with the "cultural and political milestone." NBC's Rehema
Ellis warned Sunday night that the right to same-sex marriage
"could be in jeopardy" due to the threat of a constitutional
amendment to ban it. NBC anchor John Seigenthaler treated same-sex
marriage as equivalent with civil rights on race as he plugged an
upcoming story on the 50th anniversary of the school desegregation
case: "When we come back, another battle over equal rights in the
classroom half a century ago."

    Monday's morning shows all showcased interviews with same-sex
couple about to get married in the Bay State. ABC's Diane Sawyer
giggled about "history being made" as she featured a lesbian
couple.

    On Sunday night, ABC anchor Elizabeth Vargas led her
broadcast: "On World News Tonight this Sunday: Same sex marriage
crosses the threshold. Massachusetts prepares to make history as
the first state to allow gays to legally wed."

    She set up the lead story: "Good evening. Massachusetts is
just hours away from making history as the first state in the
union to legalize gay marriage..."

    After Ron Claiborne profiled a lesbian couple set to marry on
Monday Provincetown, Vargas led into a brief discussion, with ABC
News Political Director Mark Halperin, by referring to same-sex
marriage as "a major cultural and political milestone" on which
both Bush and Kerry have been "curiously quiet."

    Over on Sunday's NBC Nightly News, Seigenthaler plugged an
upcoming story: "Still to come on NBC Nightly News this Sunday:
History in Massachusetts. Tomorrow it will became the first state
to allow same-sex marriages. But the controversy is not over."

   Rehema Ellis focused on a lesbian couple who see a "civil
rights breakthrough," but dark clouds are ahead, Ellis ominously
intoned: "Last November, in a landmark decision, the state's
highest court ruled same-sex couples have the right to wed. But
that right could be in jeopardy. Some Massachusetts lawmakers want
a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage and replace it
with civil unions."

    Following the Ellis piece, Seigenthaler promoted a look back
at the 1954 Brown v Board of Education Supreme Court decision:
"When we come back, another battle over equal rights in the
classroom half a century ago."



    # Tonight on NBC's Vegas, one of the stars, who plays a
security coordinator at a Las Vegas casino/resort, is called to
active duty to go to Iraq.


-- Brent Baker


    >>> Support the MRC, an educational foundation dependent upon
contributions which make CyberAlert possible, by providing a tax-
deductible donation. To safely and securely donate via PayPal:
https://www.paypal.com/xclick/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&i
tem_name=Media+Research+Center&item_number=Media+Research+Center&n
o_note=1&tax=0&currency_code=USD

    Or, if you can't get the lengthy link into your browser's
address line, go to the MRC's home page
( http://www.mediaresearch.org ) and click on the gold "Support
the MRC" logo in the top right corner. That will take you to the
same place.

    To subscribe to CyberAlert, go to:
http://www.mediaresearch.org/cybersub.asp

    Or, send a blank e-mail to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

    To unsubscribe, use the link at the very bottom of this
message.

    Send problems and comments to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

    You can learn what has been posted each day on the MRC's Web
site by subscribing to the "MRC Web Site News" distributed every
weekday afternoon. To subscribe, go to:
http://www.mediaresearch.org/cybersub.asp#webnews <<<

====================================================================
Update Your Profile:
   http://mrccyberalert.f.topica.com/f/?bUrD57.bnHBmK.d2JhY29u
Unsubscribe:
   http://mrccyberalert.f.topica.com/f/?bUrD57.bnHBmK.d2JhY29u.u
Confirm Your Subscription:
   http://mrccyberalert.f.topica.com/f/?bUrD57.bnHBmK.d2JhY29u.c
Delivered by Topica:
   http://www.topica.com/?p=T3FOOTER

www.ctrl.org
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!   These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to