-Caveat Lector-

------- Forwarded message follows -------
Date sent:              Mon, 19 Mar 2001 06:52:31 -0800
From:                   Harv Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject:                Re: IMAGES: Massive Spy-Satellite Program to Cost Billions
To:                     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Send reply to:          [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Folks--

I have been interested in the black triangles for many years.  It started
with my personal investigation of a remarkable account back in 1985 here in
Texas.  In 1989, in Laramie, Wyoming, I and about 20 other people had a
sighting that lasted about 20 minutes.  On the Cosmic Conspiracies website
at:
http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk I have two, admittedly highly speculative,
articles regarding these fabulous craft.

Over the years, I've come to regard about all rocket technologies as
old-fashioned and dangerous, surviving  and existing as cover for the real
work of back-engineering UFO technology and to keep the all- precious
economy juggernaut rolling along.  The space shuttle, of course, being the
prime example of these "make-work" activities. (Only one hundred flights in
20 years is outrageous.)  The Osprey aircraft probably is another
multibillion- dollar boondoggle/diversion as would be the recently canceled
X-33 space plane, etc.)

As a result, I've been long interested in exactly how the fleets of
operational UFO-derived craft would be funded.  Building a few prototypes is
one thing, but to start putting together operational fleets for active duty
is quite another.  I've been waiting for a contrived program to be feed to
the public which would provide such funding while offering an explanation to
the public for the expense.  A key component for such a program would be to
place it against a national defense backdrop such that few would want to
attack it in terms of expense or purpose. This news article posted by Steve
gives us clues about how this charade is going to be pulled.  I have
extracted a couple of pertinent sections, but if you glossed over the entire
article, go back and carefully read between the lines.

HH


>Still, most state officials said
> they know little about the project. "I don't think most people are aware
of
> how big this is," said Mike Marando, spokesman for the California
> Technology, Trade and Commerce Agency. "We know California benefits
> substantially, but by exactly how much we just don't know." The National
> Reconnaissance Office hasn't helped. The enigmatic agency announced
> the contract in a three-paragraph news release posted on its bare-bones
> Web site little more than a year ago. The project is officially known as
> Future Imagery Architecture. Despite slowly opening itself up in recent
> years, the NRO still remains one of the most secretive government
> agencies. Even its innocuous logo--a space probe circling the globe--was
> a secret until 1994. Besides saying it awarded the contract to Boeing "to
> develop, provide launch integration and operate the nation's next
> generation of imagery reconnaissance satellites," not much else has been
> revealed. Virtually everything else about the contract--its dollar amount,
the
> number of satellites to be built, who is doing what and where, and the
> capabilities of the satellite--is secret. Even the duration of the
contract is
> deemed classified. "This program is so secret that most of the people who
> work on it won't have a good sense of what they are doing," said Loren
> Thompson, a defense analyst at the Arlington, Va.-based Lexington
> Institute.

------- End of forwarded message -------

ANOMALOUS IMAGES AND UFO FILES
http://www.anomalous-images.com

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to