-Caveat Lector- >From Mind Control-L : >> Hi All - Back to haarping again ;-) I really think this list needs to address formally the various levels of formal scientific research and evidence. This thread is now discussing the areas where the various strains of levels of evidence in mind control research intersect. For example: -Peer review science -Published scientific journal -Administrative regulation proceedings (eg National Environmental Policy Act- NEPA Environmental Impact Statement) FORTUNATELY, the issue of HAARP"S detrimental environmental impact has been legislatively and administratively initiated. The environmental impact information which led to the US Congress requiring an environmental impact statement, in contravention of the US Navy's categorical denials of ANY environmental impact by HAARP, were THE EARTH ISLAND ARTICLES previously posted. Earth Island are public champions, IMHO. It may offend the sensibilities of peer review-oriented analysts on the list, but the Earth ISland articles were given awards for their public service, which led to the US Congress determination. When Earth Island was rebuiding its website, we (EcoNews Service) offered to reprint the award winning Earth ISland articles, and they are at: http://www.globalpsychics.com/lp/Insights/HAARP_project.htm http://www.globalpsychics.com/lp/Insights/HAARP_project1.htm PEER REVIEW: Let me repeat here the arguments of the previous post on the procedural SPECIOUSNESS of constantly asking for peer review research on issues involving covert black ops operations like HAARP. "Peer review" is not a mantra. RESEARCH QUOTE: >> Thanks. I am glad to get the information to you. But the "peer review" issue remains a razor's edge question - more proper for "in vitro" science than "in vivo" public interest investigation. Mind control issues are more "in vivo", because there apparently is a covert force attempting to actively mask and hide the technology. That is a key issue in mind control "research". Thus, I still think that the "peer review" question is a touchy subject in mind control research, and should be used sparingly and consciously. Something Rotten at the Core of Science? by David F. Horrobin http://news.bmn.com/hmsbeagle/95/viewpts/op_ed END OF QUOTE<< The US Congress and the implementation of administrative law under the National Environmental Policy Act do not require peer-review research in order to make HAAARP comply with NEPA, so why should this mlist require more? HAARP MIND CONTROL EFFECTS - Finally, I submit that the following initial finding raises a presumption that HAARP may in fact implement mood altering mind control on human populations. Again, the appropriate standard for mind control research here is advocacy science, not peer review science. From Mind Control-L re HAARP & Limbic System: >>I'm looking for support in the literature for Marshall D. Smith's hypothesis that .9 Hz affects the limbic system, and "...would seem to be the base beat frequency of the two HAARP pulse generators as they beat together sweeping upward through the Schumann Frequency." (http://elfrad.org/2000/haarp.htm): According to an article in Journal of Neurotherapy, http://www.snr-jnt.org/NFBArch/Reprints/aa-nt.htm: "There are three main patterns of hippocampal [limbic] field potentials: 1) theta or RSA (rhythmic slow activity), between 3 and 11 Hz (depending on species); 2) LIA (large amplitude irregular activity) in a broad range between 0.5 and 25 Hz; 3) beta, fast waves between 20 and 60 Hz. Rhythmic inputs can entrain oscillations in the hippocampus across a range of frequencies." .9 Hz would fall into the LIA area, but I'm not sure what that means--perhaps there's someone on the lists with knowledge of neurology? However, there is an interesting correlate of .9 Hz: It is approximately the resonant frequency of the lunar-earth system, as explained by Charlie Plyler at http://www.elfrad.net/Moon.htm: "This frequency varies from .9 to .95 hertz. The signal above has a center frequency of .9373 hz. The wavelength of this frequency is 319,877km or 198,711 miles. We are aware of the fact that a moving body in free space that possesses a magnetic field will generate a frequency with a wavelength equal to the distance from another magnetic body such as our earth. The moon at this time was 387,692 km or 242,307 miles distant. This was fairly close to the wavelength of the anomalous signal. If we were detecting the presence of the moon, it seems that we would be logging the signal for a greater duration of time rather than a few minutes." If we accept the hypothesis that mammalian neural functioning is developed phylogenetically by driving from exogenous electromagnetic rhythms in nature, there should be a concomitant of lunar motion. That's normally thought of as correlated with the the mammalian reproductive cycle and there's some evidence of correlations of lunar cycles with violent behavior. Other examples of neural driving by exogenous electromagnetic rhythms that support this hypothesis include the alpha rhythm (centered at 8 Hz, the Schumann resonance frequency, corresponding to the wavelength of the Earth-ionosphere diameter), and the universal tremor reflex (10 Hz, corresponding to the wavelength of the Earth's diameter). Is there any further evidence for the neural effects of .9 Hz?<< END OF HAARP QUOTE Now let's agree to disagree, but let us be clear about the various levels of research that are appropriate in this advocacy field. Thanks for reading this, Alfred Webre Vancouver, BC EcoNews Service http://www.ecologynews.com ===== <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
