http://www.eurekalert.org/releases/js-ulo081000.html

    Contact: Steven Milloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] 202-467-8586 Junkscience.com

    'Unsafe' levels of dioxin in gourmet ice cream; more dioxin in Ben & Jerry's
than gasoline refinery effluent, researchers report

    Levels of dioxin in a sample serving of Ben & Jerry's brand ice cream are
approximately 2,200 times greater than the level of dioxin allowed in a
"serving" of wastewater discharged into San Francisco Bay from the Tosco
Refinery, according to a study presented at the Dioxins 2000 conference today in
Monterrey, California.

    Ben & Jerry's promotional literature, available at its "scoop shops" and on
its web site, states, "Dioxin is known to cause cancer, genetic and reproductive
defects and learning disabilities... The only safe level of dioxin exposure is
no exposure at all." Dioxin is a by-product of industrial processes and may also
be created naturally through combustion of plant materials.

    The study authors report that, according to Ben & Jerry's and current U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency standards, the level of dioxin measured could
cause about 200 "extra" cancers among lifetime consumers of Ben & Jerry's ice
cream. Under the EPA's pending assessment of dioxin, the estimate would increase
to about 2,000 "extra" cancers.

    "The level of dioxin in a single serving of the Ben & Jerry's World's Best
Vanilla Ice Cream tested was almost 200 times greater than the "virtually safe
[daily] dose" currently used by the EPA, said Michael Gough, lead study author.
Gough is a former government scientist who chaired the U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services advisory panel on the effects of dioxin-contaminated Agent
Orange on U.S. Air Force personnel in Vietnam.

    "An independent laboratory measured 0.79 ± 0.38 parts per trillion of dioxin
in the sample of ice cream. A serving of that ice cream would contain 80
picograms of dioxin. In contrast, the Tosco Refinery wastewater is permitted to
contain 0.14 picograms of dioxin per liter. " said Gough.

    "Our result has measurement error associated with it and the sample may or
may not be representative of all Ben & Jerry's ice cream. But our result is
consistent with current scientific literature," added Gough. The result was
confirmed by a second independent laboratory using a different methodology.

    Gough and co-author Steven Milloy of Junkscience.com noted they believe
existing scientific evidence does not credibly link low levels of dioxin
exposure with human health effects. "But not everyone agrees," said Milloy. "Ben
& Jerry's and Greenpeace - the company's source for information on dioxin - have
concluded that dioxin is not safe at any level."

    "If dioxin is so dangerous, perhaps Ben & Jerry's should remove its ice
cream from the market until it is 'safe,' consistent with the company's
promotional literature," suggested Milloy.

    "Many children enjoy Ben & Jerry's ice cream," said Milloy, "but by the
company's own standards, its ice cream is not safe. According to our test, a
40-pound child may consume in a serving of Ben & Jerry's about 740 times the
level of dioxin the EPA says is 'safe.' Under the EPA's pending assessment of
dioxin, the amount would be 7,400 times greater than the EPA standard. Is Ben &
Jerry's choosing corporate profits over children's health?" Milloy asked. "An
appropriate new flavor either would be 'Tasty Toxics' or 'World's Best
Hypocrisy'."

                                      ###

    The study is titled "CALUX and GC/MS Analysis of TEQ Contamination for Risk
Assessment of Exposure to Dioxins in Ice Cream." It will be presented as poster
P-251, in the poster session on Thursday, August 17.

    For further information, please contact Steve Milloy at 202-467-8586 or
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
-----------------------
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is
distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and
educational purposes only. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
-----------------------





________________________________________________________
                           1stUp.com - Free the Web
   Get your free Internet access at http://www.1stUp.com

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to