-Caveat Lector-

This article from NYTimes.com
has been sent to you by [EMAIL PROTECTED]


/-------------------- advertisement -----------------------\


Enjoy new investment freedom!

Get the tools you need to successfully manage your portfolio
from Harrisdirect.  Start with award-winning research.  Then
add access to round-the-clock customer service from
Series-7 trained representatives.  Open an account today and
receive a $100 credit!

http://www.nytimes.com/ads/Harrisdirect.html

\----------------------------------------------------------/


Bristol-Myers and Glaxo Said to Discuss Possible Merger

May 31, 2002
By MELODY PETERSEN with ANDREW ROSS SORKIN






GlaxoSmithKline and Bristol-Myers Squibb have held
preliminary discussions about the possibility of a merger,
executives close to the talks said yesterday.

Both drug makers have been struggling in the last year
because they have been unable to discover enough new drugs
to make up for products that are now losing their patent
protection.

So far, the negotiations have been exploratory only,
considering whether a GlaxoSmithKline purchase of
Bristol-Myers would work rather than the details of how to
execute it, the executives said.

Top executives from each company have held meetings at
Bristol-Myers's Princeton, N.J., offices in the last two
weeks, according to Hemant K. Shah, an independent
pharmaceutical analyst in Warren, N.J.

Both companies refused to comment last night.

But
comments last week by Dr. Jean-Pierre Garnier,
GlaxoSmithKline's chief executive, heightened speculation
that the companies were contemplating a deal. When an
analyst asked him about possible acquisitions, Dr. Garnier
said if he found a good deal, he would not pass it up.

Two weeks ago, John Coombe, GlaxoSmithKline's chief
financial officer, told analysts that Bristol-Myers was "on
our radar screen."

Executives close to GlaxoSmithKline, the world's
second-largest drug company, based in Britain, say the
company has reservations about acquiring Bristol-Myers
because of uncertainty over how deep its problems go. An
executive close to Bristol-Myers said it was unclear
whether Peter R. Dolan, that company's chief executive, was
even willing to sell the company with its stock price as
low as it is now. One executive put the chance of such a
deal at less than 50 percent.

Bristol-Myers has made several mistakes in the last year,
including agreeing to pay almost $2 billion for the rights
to sell Erbitux, a cancer drug that was being developed by
ImClone. Soon after signing that deal, federal regulators
refused to accept the drug's application for approval
because of problems with the scientific data. The companies
are now working to resubmit the application.

At the same time, Bristol-Myers tried last year to
compensate for its loss of sales to generic drug makers by
giving wholesalers incentives to buy larger supplies of
medicine than they needed. That tactic came back to haunt
Bristol-Myers this year. The distributors now must use up
the glut of inventory on their shelves, cutting
Bristol-Myers sales this year by hundreds of millions of
dollars.

Like many other analysts, Mr. Shah believes that it is, as
he put it, "almost inevitable" that Bristol-Myers will be
taken over.

Several top executives have left the company in recent
months, including its chief financial officer and the
executive in charge of its pharmaceutical business.
"Bristol has a pretty empty nest upstairs," Mr. Shah said.

Mr. Shah said he had been told that strategists at other
companies, including Novartis and Johnson & Johnson, were
considering a deal with Bristol-Myers.

Bristol-Myers has a few promising drugs in its research
pipeline, including aripiprazole, for schizophrenia, and
atazanavir, for AIDS. But both Bristol-Myers and
GlaxoSmithKline are now struggling to find enough new
medicines, so joining their two pipelines would not solve
their essential problem, some analysts say.

Viren Mehta, a partner at Mehta Partners, a health care
investment firm in Manhattan, said he had heard rumors
about GlaxoSmithKline acquiring Bristol-Myers.

While a combination would still leave them without enough
new drugs, he said, it would create significant savings as
the companies eliminated duplicate jobs and functions.
Those savings would help provide a buffer for the next
couple of years, he said. In his view, the savings would
also help supply the money to pay for research using
genomics and other new technologies, which are not yet
producing new drugs but hold great promise.

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/31/business/31DRUG.html?ex=1023853454&ei=1&en=a160409079a7ee17



HOW TO ADVERTISE
---------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters
or other creative advertising opportunities with The
New York Times on the Web, please contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or visit our online media
kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo

For general information about NYTimes.com, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Copyright 2002 The New York Times Company

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to