-Caveat Lector-

From:

The Observer (http://www.newsunlimited.co.uk/observer/ )

Nato bombed Chinese deliberately

Nato hit embassy on purpose
Kosovo: special report

John Sweeney and Jens Holsoe in Copenhagen and Ed Vulliamy in
Washington

Sunday October 17, 1999

Nato deliberately bombed the Chinese embassy in Belgrade during
the war in Kosovo after discovering it was being used to transmit
Yugoslav army communications.

According to senior military and intelligence sources in Europe
and the US the Chinese embassy was removed from a prohibited
targets list after Nato electronic intelligence (Elint) detected
it sending army signals to Milosevic's forces.

The story is confirmed in detail by three other Nato officers - a
flight controller operating in Naples, an intelligence officer
monitoring Yugoslav radio traffic from Macedonia and a senior
headquarters officer in Brussels. They all confirm that they knew
in April that the Chinese embassy was acting as a 'rebro'
[rebroadcast] station for the Yugoslav army (VJ) after alliance
jets had successfully silenced Milosevic's own transmitters.

The Chinese were also suspected of monitoring the cruise missile
attacks on Belgrade, with a view to developing effective
counter-measures against US missiles.

The intelligence officer, who was based in Macedonia during the
bombing, said: 'Nato had been hunting the radio transmitters in
Belgrade. When the President's [Milosevic's] residence was bombed
on 23 April, the signals disappeared for 24 hours. When they came
on the air again, we discovered they came from the embassy
compound.' The success of previous strikes had forced the VJ to
use Milosevic's residence as a rebroadcast station. After that
was knocked out, it was moved to the Chinese embassy. The air
controller said: 'The Chinese embassy had an electronic profile,
which Nato located and pinpointed.'

The Observer investigation, carried out jointly with Politiken
newspaper in Denmark, will cause embarrassment for Nato and for
the British government. On Tuesday, the Queen and the Prime
Minister will host a state visit by the President of China, Jiang
Zemin. He is to stay at Buckingham Palace.

Jiang Zemin is still said to be outraged at the 7 May attack,
which came close to splitting the alliance.The official Nato
line, as expressed by President Bill Clinton and CIA director
George Tenet, was that the attack on the Chinese Embassy was a
mistake. Defence Secretary William Cohen said: 'One of our planes
attacked the wrong target because the bombing instructions were
based on an outdated map.'

Later, a source in the US National Imagery and Mapping Agency
said that the 'wrong map' story was 'a damned lie'.

Tenet apologised last July, saying: 'The President of the United
States has expressed our sincere regret at the loss of life in
this tragic incident and has offered our condolences to the
Chinese people and especially to the families of those who lost
their lives in this mistaken attack.

Nato's apology was predicated on the excuse that the three
missiles which landed in one corner of the embassy block were
meant to be targeted at the Yugoslav Federal Directorate for
Supply and Procurement, the FDSP. But inquiries have revealed
there never was a VJ directorate of supply and procurement at the
site named by Tenet. The VJ office for supplies - which Tenet
calls FDSP - is some 500 metres down the street from the address
he gave. It was bombed later.

Moreover the CIA and other Nato intelligence agencies, such as
Britain's MI6 and the code-breakers at GCHQ, would have listened
in to communication traffic from the Chinese embassy as a matter
of course since it moved to the site in 1996.

A Nato flight control officer in Naples also confirmed to us that
a map of 'non-targets': churches, hospitals and embassies,
including the Chinese, did exist. On this 'don't hit' map, the
Chinese embassy was correctly located at its current site, and
not where it had been until 1996 - as claimed by the US and NATO.

Why the Chinese were prepared to help Milosevic is a more murky
question. One possible explanation is that the Chinese lack
Stealth technology, and the Yugoslavs, having shot down a Stealth
fighter in the early days of the air campaign, were in a good
position to trade. The Chinese may have calculated that Nato
would not dare strike its embassy, but the five-storey building
was emptied every night of personnel. Only three people died in
the attack, two of whom were, reportedly, not journalists - the
official Chinese version - but intelligence officers.

The Chinese military attache, Ven Bo Koy, who was seriously
wounded in the attack and is now in hospital in China, told Dusan
Janjic, the respected president of Forum for Ethnic Relations in
Belgrade, only hours before the attack, that the embassy was
monitoring incoming cruise missiles in order to develop
counter-measures.

Nato spokesman Lee McClenny yesterday stood by the official
version. 'It was a terrible mistake,' he said, 'and we have
apologised.' A spokesman for the Chinese embassy in London said
yesterday: 'We do not believe that the embassy was bombed because
of a mistake with an out-of-date map.'


=================================================================
             Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:                    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                      *Mike Spitzer*     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                         ~~~~~~~~          <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

   The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
       Shalom, A Salaam Aleikum, and to all, A Good Day.
=================================================================

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to