-Caveat Lector-

<http://www.nature.com/nsu/010315/010315-9.html>

Fall put leaves on trees

JOHN WHITFIELD

A carbon dioxide slump put leaves on the trees


For the first 40 million years of their existence, land plants
didn't bother to make leaves ‹ just green stems and small, spiny
protrusions. Leaves only evolved, researchers now suggest, when a
drop in the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere meant that
the benefits of intercepting more light began to outweigh the
dangers of overheating.

>From living and fossil plants, and geochemical information about
past environments, David Beerling, of the University of
Sheffield, UK, and colleagues have reconstructed the period when
leafiness became a viable lifestyle1.

"We don't really know why leaves evolved," says Paul Kenrick, a
plant palaeontologist at London's Natural History Museum,
"nobody's thought of carbon dioxide as being a factor in leaf
evolution before."

The amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is reflected in
the number of 'stomata' that plants produce. Stomata are the
pores that let gases in and out, and out of which water
evaporates, cooling the plant.

The earliest plants had very few stomata. This served them well
in a carbon dioxide-rich atmosphere, and helped to stop them
drying out. Any leaves produced by such non-porous plant life
would have quickly perished from overheating, Beerling's team
calculate.

Leafless plants, though, were preparing the world for their
successors: about 380 million years ago, plants seems to have
brought about a 90% drop in the atmospheric concentration of
carbon dioxide. Plants lock up carbon in their woody tissues and
roots, and by breaking up rocks, increasing the rate at which
carbon passes out of the atmosphere.

The new atmosphere changed the economics of photosynthesis.
Plants developed lots of stomata ‹ making them better at taking
up carbon dioxide, and at staying cool. Branched green stems
became webbed, and highly divided, blade-like leaves developed,
from which one-piece leaves quickly followed.

Hand-in-hand with leaf evolution came sophisticated systems to
transport water through the plant. This better plumbing may also
have allowed plants to increase in size and complexity.

Although the new leafy plants had to work harder to get carbon
dioxide, they could capture more solar energy without
overheating. So plant productivity increased, and animal life
would have had more food.

Of course, it's hard to know what the world was like 400 million
years ago, harder still to work out how the life of the time
adapted to it. "We are assuming that modern and ancient plants
had the same responses," Beerling admits. Stomata and plants'
responses to carbon dioxide seem not to have changed much in the
past 400 million years: today, plants are making fewer stomata in
response to the increased carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

Kenrick comments that, with more and better plant fossils from
between 410 and 370 million years ago, researchers should be able
to back up the relationship between leaves and carbon dioxide, or
to shoot it down. One would expect, for example, to see leaves
first appear in plants from cooler, temperate regions, where
overheating is less of a danger. The ball, says Kenrick, is now
in the fossil-hunters' court.

=================================================================
             Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:
                    *Michael Spitzer*  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
=================================================================

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to