-Caveat Lector-

WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!

Navy flag-lowering plan confirmed
CINCPACFLT officer:
'There was a proposal to
change the regulations'

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--

By Geoff Metcalf
© 2000 WorldNetDaily.com

A high-ranking U.S. Navy officer has confirmed WorldNetDaily's Aug. 23 report
that President Bill Clinton wanted to lower the American flag beneath the
level of Vietnam's flag during a planned trip to the Southeast Asian country
before he leaves office.
One of WND's more controversial reports in recent months, the exclusive story
by reporter Geoff Metcalf had two parts: One, that the president was secretly
planning a trip to Southeast Asia after the November election but before the
end of his term, and two, that he planned to have a U.S. Navy ship, with him
onboard, lower its flag -- in violation of long-standing Navy regulations --
to below the level of the Vietnamese flag when the U.S. ship pulled into
Vietnam's territorial waters.

While the idea of the commander in chief using the Navy's flag to "bow"
before the communist Vietnamese infuriated an enormous number of U.S.
military personnel, the story also elicited swift denial from the Navy.

"The Navy is not aware of any planned trips by the President to China or
Vietnam aboard a Navy ship," said Alan P. Goldstein, assistant chief of
information for technology integration in the Navy's Office of Information in
the Pentagon. "I ... can assure you that there are no plans to change the
regulations governing the flying of the U.S. flag on U.S. Navy warships,"
Goldstein added, noting that "federal statutes determine Navy Regulations on
the flying of the national ensign on Navy vessels and are not subject to
alteration by the Department of the Navy."

At the same time, in an e-mail alert widely circulated on the Internet, Phil
Alperson, legislative director for Rep. Ronnie Shows, D-Miss., announced:

I have spoken with White House officials. They UNAMBIGUOUSLY state the
following:


There are no plans at this time for the President to make such a trip.

If he were to make such a trip, there is no way he will alter Navy
regulations requiring that the U.S. flag always fly above any other flag.
THIS IS AN UNFOUNDED RUMOR THAT MUST STOP NOW!

Nevertheless, within weeks the White House acknowledged that Clinton would
indeed make the trip, a development reported widely, by the Associated Press
and USA Today among others.

As to the validity of the second half of WND's story -- the alleged plan to
avoid offending the Vietnamese government by temporarily lowering the
American flag below the level of the communist nation's flag -- there has
been no independent confirmation until now.

Yesterday, WorldNetDaily received this letter, on letterhead, from a
high-ranking U.S. Navy officer in CINCPACFLT (Commander In Chief U.S. Pacific
Fleet), written to a high government official who was one of WND's original
sources for the story. Per the CINCPACFLT officer's request, his name and
rank are being withheld from publication:

Thanks for sending those news accounts concerning Clinton's planned trip to
Vietnam and the proposed change to Navy regulations.

You asked what the hell is going on in the Navy. In a nutshell, and
unfortunately, one or more of our Navy spokesmen are not being truthful. That
in itself is a sad event and serves to illustrate what has happened to the
military under this administration. There was a proposal to change the
regulations to accommodate a presidential trip to Vietnam and Vietnam
requires that its flag fly in the superior position. ... The good news is
that there appears to be no support for the proposal on the staff, but the
bad news is there is more to this story.

The direction to submit the request apparently did not originate on the
CINCPACFLT staff, but was directed from above, probably up at the SECDEF
[Secretary of Defense] level. Unfortunately, everyone serving in this
administration seems to have been corrupted by it, or perhaps all of
Clinton's DoD appointees were corrupt coming in the door. No one is talking
about this issue on the staff anymore, which strongly suggests that the news
story killed the initiative. If I were a betting man, I would bet that this
is a dead issue.

To clarify one facet of the story, I am sure that there never was any
intention for Clinton to go to Vietnam on a Navy ship, although he may
envision himself traveling on a Navy ship, as did Franklin D. Roosevelt. I
believe that the concept was for a port visit by one of our ships concurrent
with his visit. In any event, is it not interesting that the White House
finally owned up to the visit after this news article broke? I put nothing
past this guy and I hope Mr. Metcalf keeps burning him. I'd like to get word
to him that his story is accurate, but this administration is vindictive and
I would like to leave the Navy with my rank and retirement intact.

Clinton, who conferred with Vietnamese President Tran Duc Luong about the
upcoming trip during Tran's September trip to the United Nations Millennium
Summit, will reportedly discuss the development of economic ties with Hanoi.
In 1995, Clinton reestablished diplomatic relations with Vietnam.




*COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational
purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]

Want to be on our lists?  Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists!


******************************************************************************

*******************
A vote for Bush or Gore is a vote to continue Clinton policies!
A vote for Buchanan is a vote to continue America!
Therefore a vote for Gore or Bush is a wasted vote for America!
Don't waste your vote!  Vote for Patrick Buchanan!


Today, candor compels us to admit that our vaunted two-party system is a
snare and a delusion, a fraud upon the nation. Our two parties have become
nothing but two wings of the same bird of prey...
Patrick Buchanan

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/">www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html">Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to