-Caveat Lector-

http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/5/19003.html

   Eurocops want seven-year retention of all phone, Net traffic

   [6]By: [7]Andrew Orlowski in San Francisco
   Posted: 16/05/2001 at 20:30 GMT

   The official EU body that represents the member governments will
   recommend the long-term retention of personal data at a meeting with
   the European Commission later this month, according to documents
   leaked to London-based civil liberties journal Statewatch.
   The Council of the European Union, which represents the 15 member
   governments, will discuss implementing a policy originally designed
   with the FBI six years ago. It calls for the retention of "every phone
   call, every mobile phone call, every fax, every e-mail, every
   website's contents, all internet usage, from anywhere, by everyone, to
   be recorded, archived and be accessible for at least seven years,"
   notes the journal.

   The proposal gives law enforcement agencies powers far beyond
   authorised, approved interceptions. Existing provisions permit data to
   be retained for the length of the billing period, up to 90 days.
   The proposals are being rushed in front of the European Commission
   before the European Parliament can agree on a common privacy position
   in June. The Parliament is already working on personal privacy
   legislation, and bouncing the other two European institutions now is
   the Eurocops' best chance of putting their draconian provisions into
   place.

   Anonymity is bad for business

   Last November, the Council's Working Party on Police Co-operation put
   its case succinctly:- "It is impossible for investigation services to
   know in advance which traffic data will prove useful in a criminal
   investigation. The only effective national legislative measure would
   therefore be to prohibit the erasure or anonymity of traffic data."
   The European Commission's Justice and Home Affairs Council will debate
   the proposal on May 28.

   The law enforcement agencies, argues the proposal, must have access to
   "user addresses, equipment identities, user name/passwords, port
   identities, mail addresses etc" The agencies are also to be provided
   with "the full name of the person (company), the residential address
   and credit card details."

   The Council's proposal takes its cue from UK law enforcement body NCIS
   (National Criminal Intelligence Service), which last year [8]proposed
   that telcos and ISPs store data for one year for 'real-time
   monitoring' purposes, after which the data would be archived for seven
   more years in a gigantic new data warehouse.

   This paragraph in the NCIS document justifies the demands:-
   "The Police Service is now in its third major era ... and is now a
   directed patrolling, proactive and reactive investigation service,"
   notes the document. "The Crime and Disorder Act empowers ... the
   national law enforcement bodies in appropriate intrusive data
   collection in their central role. The lack of appropriate legislation
   on communications data retention does not sit happily with this
   strategic direction." [our emphasis]

   A gallery of baddies, ranging from organised crime to the authors of
   the Melissa and I Love You viruses, are evoked to justify the
   draconian new approach to Lauren Order.
   In the looking-glass world of law enforcement, the cops and spooks
   argue that long-term data retention actually boosts the public's faith
   in e-commerce:-

   "The obligation for operators to erase and make traffic data
   anonymous, besides obstructing seriously crime investigations, also
   can lead to a decreasing confidence in, particularly, the electronic
   commerce..." according to the leaked document.

   The EU's own privacy watchdogs - regularly criticised for the opt-outs
   provided to law enforcement agencies - have condemned the move. The
   International Working Group on Data Protection in Telecommunications
   deems the storing of data on all telecommunications and Internet
   traffic for extended periods "disproportionate and therefore
   unacceptable." Even the Council's own documents accept that the cops'
   demands "would probably not be considered proportionate."

   Statewatch editor Tony Bunyan was officially refused the documents on
   the grounds that public oversight would "impede the efficiency of the
   ongoing deliberations".

   Statewatch has launched a new website [9]SOS Europe with Privacy
   International to highlight the proposal. It contains full texts of the
   leaked deliberations [10]here.

   8. http://cryptome.org/ncis-carnivore.htm
   9. http://www.statewatch.org/soseurope.htm
  10. http://www.statewatch.org/news/2001/may/03Cenfopol.htm

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to