-Caveat Lector-

from -
http://www.techcentralstation.com/1051/techwrapper.jsp?PID=1051-250&CID=1051-020
602C

Not So Candid Camera
By Radley Balko 02/06/2002

This is the age of machinery,
A mechanical nightmare,
The wonderful world of technology.

I was born in a welfare state
Ruled by bureaucracy
Controlled by civil servants
And people dressed in grey
Got no privacy, got no liberty
Cos' the twentieth century people
Took it all away from me.

--The Kinks' Ray Davies, in "20th Century Man."

Last September, Angela Brock-Smith, a resident of Washington D.C., was issued a
$50 speeding ticket for barreling her white truck at 45-mph through a 30-mph
speed zone, The Washington Times reported last week. There's just one problem.
Angela Brock-Smith doesn't own a white truck. She owns a blue Chevy Lumina. And
it hasn't puttered, much less barreled, a foot since it broke down last July -
two months before her "violation."

It seems that one of D.C.'s new revenue-generating toys, an automated
photo-snapping radar affixed to the side of the road, couldn't get a good read
on the offending truck's license plate. So somebody saw an "AR," and a "049,"
and guestimated it to be Brock-Smith's "AR8049" tag. They guessed wrong.

The D.C. radars are installed and operated by Affiliated Computer Systems, which
gets $29 for every ticket issued by its cyber-cops. The company already operates
cameras in Hawaii and Australia, among other places.

Here's the kicker: When Brock-Smith appealed her ticket, guess who got first
crack at her mailed-in complaint? No, it wasn't a traffic court, or a D.C.
bureaucrat. It was ACS, the very company that profits from her ticket. ACS, a
private company, serves as cop, judge, jury and executioner. And they make $29
for every execution.

Red-Light Districts

Automated camera speed traps snuck into public acceptance after the success of
automated red-light cameras. Red-light cameras have been around for several
years now, and have effectively reduced the number of red-light runners.

But while red-light cameras did dramatically reduce infractions at dangerous
intersections, it's not yet clear that they are in fact the best solution to
red-light running.

Last summer, a study conducted in Fairfax County, Virginia, home to cameras
operated and profited by Lockheed Martin, found that simply increasing the
"yellow" time at a given intersection by 1.5 seconds dropped red-light
infractions by 96%, significantly more than the decrease effected by installing
cameras.

Now, picture yourself a city councilman. You have two options to better road
safety, increase yellow times at intersections in your town, which will bring in
no new revenue, or install camera-cops that have in some cases issued 500
citations per hour (as the camera at New York Avenue and 4th St. in Northwest
D.C. has) and could generate millions for city coffers (Sydney, Australia raked
in over $20 million AU from camera citations in 2000).

In fact, for city officials facing tight budgets, it might be tempting to
shorten yellows. After all, wouldn't shaving a few fractions off of city yellows
seem preferable to raising taxes or cutting city services?

There are more problems. A recent University of Virginia study found that on
high-speed multi-lane highways - the camera-laden George Washington Parkway in
D.C., for example - automated cameras were able to provide clear images of
plate, driver and vehicle just 3% of the time.

Keeping Tabs

And then there are privacy concerns. When the National Park Service first
floated the idea of automated cameras on D.C.'s George Washington Parkway, House
Majority Leader Dick Armey worried that such cameras might intrude on commuter
privacy. The Washington Post mocked Armey in an editorial, asserting that
hauling two tons of steel down a public highway at an unsafe speed merits no
protection of privacy.

Perhaps. But consider a woman in the United Kingdom who got in hot water when an
intersection camera caught her joyriding in her husband's pet sports car - a car
he'd forbidden her to drive.

Drivers.com reports that ACME Rent-a-Car in Connecticut has installed GPS
positioning in all of its rentals. Your speed, position and mileage are
monitored from above. Violate the company's speed limit, and suffer an automatic
$150 charge on your next credit statement.

The same Web site reports that the United Kingdom is considering installing GPS
systems in every car in the country within ten years. Satellite navigation,
combined with digital roadmaps preprogrammed with local laws, would cut off the
fuel supply in your car once you've hit the speed limit. Let's hope your wife
isn't in labor. Sweden and Holland are exploring similar programs.

And this month's National Review reports that Finland has taken all of this a
step further. In Finland, fines for traffic violations are tied to personal
income. Consequently, in the past, when a cop pulled you over, he'd ask what you
make - and maybe you'd fib. No more. In 1999 a new system was installed, whereby
the cop can tap into your public records via cellular phone. Voila! On the spot,
he issues you a ticket that's proportional to your net worth.

The magazine goes on to report a delicious karmic dress-down. It seems that two
offenders since the new system was installed are Anssi Vanjoki and Pekka
Ala-Pietila, director and president, respectively, of cellular giant Nokia.
Between them, the two execs were fined the U.S. equivalent of $134,000. This,
for one red-light violation and one speeding violation - 16-mph over the limit.
But don't feel bad for them. It's Nokia technology that makes the whole system
possible.

Finally, as the National Motorists Association points out, there is an important
distinction between red-light running and speeding: Red-light runners are almost
always a legitimate hazard. Every violation carries high potential for accidents
and, because most light-runners are gunning to clear the intersection, every
accident carries high potential for fatalities. But everybody speeds, and not
all speeding is unsafe. Highways are built with speeders in mind, and there's a
fair amount of arbitrariness to speed zones. That's why cops generally give
drivers five or ten miles per hour leeway.

It's easy to dismiss this as sour grapes. Red-light runners and speeders are,
after all, breaking the law - and on public roads. So why concern ourselves with
how they're caught? Because these systems are ripe for abuse, for error, and for
bureaucratic snafu. To tie law enforcement to pro-rata profiteering builds in
perverse incentives.

Freedom of movement is a fundamental natural right. The U.S. Supreme Court has
consistently upheld that right, making exceptions only in the interest of
national security. But freedom to travel is meaningless without the freedom to
travel anonymously. And emerging technologies -- with the potential to link
satellite positioning with speed with built-in navigation systems with personal
and financial records -- threaten to obliterate any degree of anonymity.

So in the future, watch your speed and watch your red lights. Watch that you're
not caught someplace embarrassing. Because even if you're not watching, someone
else probably will be.

<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 <A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to