-Caveat Lector-

from:
http://www.aci.net/kalliste/
 <A HREF="http://www.aci.net/kalliste/">The Home Page of J. Orlin Grabbe</A>
-----
Today's Lesson from Pan


by Knut Hamsun



We got into the boat, she sat beside me on the same thwart and touched me
with her knee. I looked at her, and she looked at me for a moment in return.
I felt better when she touched me with her knee. I began to feel recompensed
for that bitter day and to regain my good spirits, when she suddenly changed
her position, turned her back on me and began talking to the Doctor, who was
sitting at the tiller. For a full quarter of an hour I simply did not exist
for her. Then I did something I regret and have not yet forgotten. Her shoe
slipped off; I seized it and hurled it far out over the water--whether from
joy at her nearness or from some urge to assert myself and remind her of my
existence, I do not know. It all happened so quickly; I did not think, I just
acted on impulse. I was as if paralyzed by what I had done; but what good was
that? It was done.
-----
Waco


Davidian Compound Ringed by FBI Cameras


But, oops, we lost all the tape.

The Branch Davidian compound was ringed with FBI closed-circuit cameras and
secret government sensing devices during the entire 1993 standoff, and the
cameras were used throughout April 19, the day federal agents launched a tank
and tear-gas assault, government documents show.
But despite written statements from FBI agents and technicians that
recordings were made, no videotape from the surveillance cameras has ever
been made public by the federal government. Critics of the government's
actions in the standoff say their efforts to obtain such videos have been
blocked for years by the FBI and the Department of Justice.
Congressional investigators who recently began re-examining investigations of
the standoff said Wednesday that they cannot say what Congress has been told
about the use of closed-circuit cameras at the compound because the matter
involves government secrets.
"Until that information is declassified, we cannot discuss it," said Mark
Corallo, spokesman for the House Government Reform Committee.
An FBI spokesman said he would need to look into the matter further before
commenting. A Justice Department spokesman did not return calls Wednesday
night.
Lawyers for surviving sect members who have filed a massive wrongful-death
lawsuit against the federal government say they are outraged because they
have been told repeatedly by government lawyers that the only FBI cameras in
use on April 19 were infrared cameras deployed in airplanes high above the
sect's compound.
"We have asked for every possible form of recording known to man that could
have been utilized at Mount Carmel," said the lead lawyer for the group,
Michael Caddell of Houston. "We have been told that the only thing that
exists are the [infrared] tapes and the surveillance tapes from FBI bugs
inside the compound."
Written statements
But formal written statements, known as FBI 302s, obtained by The Dallas
Morning News show that at least five FBI agents were sent to the compound
near Waco to maintain closed-circuit cameras.
"CCTV [closed-circuit TV] monitoring sites . . . were all around the
compound," one FBI technical expert stated in a June 1993 interview detailed
in a three-page FBI 302. "This enabled observers to see everything that was
going on at the compound without showing themselves."
One agent reported watching from the closed-circuit TV system as FBI tanks
began gassing the compound on April 19, the documents state. A supervisor
from the FBI's Quantico, Va., training academy said that the FBI's cameras
were also running as the compound caught fire with sect leader David Koresh
and more than 80 followers inside, according to a second FBI 302.
The supervisor's June 1993 statement said that recordings were routinely made
from the closed-circuit cameras that ringed the compound to help document FBI
actions during the 51-day standoff.
Mr. Caddell said he believes that FBI officials may have withheld information
about the cameras because of the images that they captured on April 19. He
noted that references to the closed-circuit television cameras were blacked
out on the formal statements or FBI 302s that the Justice Department has so
far disclosed in the civil wrongful-death lawsuit.
Two retired Defense Department experts hired by Mr. Caddell's law firm and a
third expert retained by congressional investigators have said that the FBI's
infrared airborne video cameras recorded thermal flashes from the compound
and from government positions on April 19 that could only have come from
gunfire.
FBI officials have insisted that FBI agents did not fire a single shot that
day or at any other time during the 51-day siege. The compound fire erupted
six hours into the FBI's tank and tear-gas assault, and government
investigators ruled that it was deliberately set by the Branch Davidians.
Act of nature?
Government officials have said the repeated bursts of white flashes recorded
on the infrared were caused by sunlight reflecting on mud puddles or shiny
debris around the compound.
"We remain confident that it was not gunfire," FBI spokesman John Collingwood
said Wednesday.
But outside experts, including a retired satellite imagery analyst who spent
months studying the infrared tape from the standoff, said the rhythmic
flashes could not have been caused by anything found in nature.
Recently released copies of the FBI's infrared tapes show that many of the
flashes emanating from the compound and all of the flashes that come toward
the building from around government positions occurred on the back side of
the compound. That rear area was not visible to commercial network television
cameras that captured images of the tear-gas assault from media observation
posts about a mile and a half away.
"Clearly, whatever those cameras recorded may very well reveal the presence
of government gunmen on April 19," Mr. Caddell said. "Consider the
alternative. If this evidence showed conclusively that there was no
government gunfire on April 19, don't you think the government would've
trotted this out front and center six years ago?
"This is clearly a deliberate, intentional coverup by people high within the
FBI hierarchy," he said. "This type of closed-circuit TV system and recording
system would've required approval from FBI higher-ups, and they've known for
the last six years that this information was withheld."
FBI logs, reports and other documents state that the bureau's agents began
setting up closed-circuit cameras within hours after arriving in Waco on Feb.
28, 1993. The standoff began that day when gunfire broke out as agents from
the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms tried to arrest sect
leader David Koresh and search the compound for illegal weapons.
Four ATF agents and six Branch Davidians died, and the FBI's hostage rescue
team was called in to try to resolve the standoff.
One hand-written log from the FBI's forward command post in Waco stated that
approval for the first camera was granted at 10:57 p.m. by a deputy assistant
FBI director in Washington. The next morning, officials at the FBI's crisis
command post in Washington called to request notification "when the CCTV
hookup is completed and the scene is visible in the HRT CP [command post]."
Use of robots
Seven days later, FBI agents asked the Defense Department to send prototype
robots equipped with video and audio recording devices to the scene,
according to Defense Department documents provided by the National Security
News Service, a nonprofit, Washington-based research group.
The Defense Department documents, obtained by the news service under the
federal Freedom of Information Act, state that three of the robots were
shipped the next day.
The robots, designed for battlefield reconnaissance and surveillance,
"possess day and night cameras, forward-looking infrared imaging sensors,
acoustics sensors, video recorder and two-way voice communication," according
to a March 1993 Defense Department memo provided by the news service.
Federal officials now re-examining the government's actions during the Branch
Davidian standoff say the federal government has classified all information
about the robots' performance.
The devices were not effective, officials stated, because the lenses of their
cameras fogged in heavy Texas spring rains and their fiber-optic cables were
repeatedly severed by the treads of tanks and Bradley fighting vehicles used
by the FBI.
U.S. District Judge Walter Smith of Waco, who is overseeing the Branch
Davidians' ongoing wrongful-death lawsuit, issued an order in August
demanding that all government documents related to the incident be turned
over to his court.
A general from the U.S. Army's Special Forces briefed the judge Friday on the
government's system of classifying and handling sensitive documents.
Recent government filings state that the Defense Department has more than
6,000 pages of classified documents on the siege. The FBI, ATF and CIA have
reported an unspecified number of classified documents, and even the U.S.
Commerce Department has reported nine classified documents on the standoff.
In a similar memo written last month, the Treasury Department reported "three
documents that we have referred to the office of counsel to the president in
order to assess a possible claim of executive privilege."
Already declassified military documents state that U.S. Special Forces went
to Waco to help operate classified military equipment. A May 1995 memo states
that those soldiers were ordered not to videotape anything that happened on
April 19.
No information given
Tim Evans, a Fort Worth lawyer who represented one of the surviving Branch
Davidians prosecuted in a 1994 federal trial, said no information about the
cameras or resulting videotapes was ever given to the sect's defense team.
He said that violates a federal rule requiring government disclosure of
anything that might be helpful to defendants.
"Sadly, I'm not surprised," said Mr. Evans, whose client was among three
Davidians acquitted. "Once again, crucial evidence has been hidden not only
from the public but the jury who convicted and the judge who sentenced the
survivors of this holocaust to an average of 30 years without parole."
Mr. Caddell said the information about the cameras strengthens his argument
that the government's account of the siege is not credible.
"For six years, they said no pyrotechnics were ever used on April 19. For six
years, they said there was no recording of FBI radio traffic. For six years,
no video recordings. For six years, the only infrared recordings still in
existence from April 19 started at 10:42 a.m. For six years, they said we
didn't know what David Koresh was planning inside Mount Carmel," Mr. Caddell
said. "Now we know that all of these were lies. The real question is, is
there anything that they told us about Mount Carmel that was true?"
Dallas Morning News, October 14, 1999


Nukes of Hazard


Calm After Coup


We bomb India tomorrow.

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan - Pakistan was calm Wednesday as the army chief, one day
after his swift seizure of power, held meetings with the president, top
generals and various politicians on the nation's political course.
The army chief of staff, General Pervez Musharraf, met late Wednesday
afternoon with President Mohammed Rafiq Tarar for about an hour at the
presidency in Islamabad, officials said.
Army sources, meanwhile, said that a key policy statement, promised by the
general in a broadcast after the army dismissed the government of Prime
Minister Nawaz Sharif, was expected Thursday. Earlier, there had been
indications the statement might be issued on Wednesday.
A military source said that consultations were under way on how to run the
nation and on ''what is in the best interest of the country.''
Sources said that General Musharraf met much of Wednesday with a variety of
people, including former politicians and constitutional experts, fueling
speculation that he may try to cobble together an administration of former
politicians and technocrats to rule for a protracted period of time.
President Tarar, known as a friend of the Sharif family, has only a
figurehead role in the country's affairs but can become important in the
event of a constitutional crisis. Political sources said that General
Musharraf might be trying to seek a presidential nod for the military's
plans, but they said it was doubtful the president would give any support to
the military because of his close ties with the Sharif family.
On Tuesday, General Musharraf was dismissed without warning by Mr. Sharif,
but within hours the general turned the tables as his troops took control of
strategic points throughout the country.
The general's move was apparently sparked by lingering resentment that the
civilian government had backed down in the conflict with India over the
disputed border region of Kashmir earlier this year.
Sources in both Pakistan and India say they believe that it was General
Musharraf who orchestrated the incursion last spring by Islamic militants
into the Indian part of Kashmir. That incursion led to months of fighting.
Unlike in the previous interventions by the military, in 1958, 1969 and 1977,
General Musharraf did not declare martial law, which would have dissolved
Parliament and abrogated or suspended the country's constitution.
The Indian prime minister, Atal Bihari Vajpayee, said after being sworn in
for a new term Wednesday that India remained committed to developing friendly
ties with its neighbor but called for Islamabad to create the right
environment. ''We are concerned about the developments in Pakistan,'' he
said. ''We are monitoring the situation and keeping ourselves fully informed.
India's policy toward Pakistan is consistent and principled.'' He added, ''We
wish the people of Pakistan well.''
Similarly, the Indian foreign minister, Jaswant Singh, said there was
''neither any cause for anxiety or alarm'' after the military takeover.
Speaking after a special meeting of the cabinet committee on security, he note
d that for peace talks between India and Pakistan to resume, Islamabad would
have to take concrete steps.
Mr. Singh said the Indian armed forces were not on high alert, as had been
reported. ''Troops have not been increased, nor is there a necessity,'' he
said.
India and Pakistan stood on the brink of a fourth war earlier this year after
armed intruders occupied strategic heights on the Indian side of the control
line in Kashmir.
Mr. Sharif and his brother Shahbaz, chief minister of Punjab province, were
being held in ''protective custody'' at the prime minister's residence in
Islamabad. Also in custody was the intelligence chief, Lieutenant General
Khawaja Zia Uddin, who had been named by Mr. Sharif to succeed General
Musharraf, as were other government officials. Mr. Sharif's government had
been in power since February 1997.
Streets in Pakistan's major cities were reported to be calm Wednesday, and
the army scaled back its presence in key installations, including state
television and Islamabad airport, where international and domestic flights
resumed after being halted overnight.
Troops, meanwhile, raided various places in Islamabad and Rawalpindi, as
elsewhere in Pakistan to arrest key figures of the Sharif government.
On Tuesday night, as troops took up positions around the centers of power,
many Pakistanis danced in the streets and waved flags, celebrating the ouster
of a prime minister who had become increasingly unpopular because of a
deteriorating economy and his power struggle with political opponents and the
military.
There was a bank holiday Wednesday, and the Karachi stock market did not
open.
With the country left without a formal government, bureaucrats sat in their
offices in most government departments in Islamabad but without their
ministers, some of whom were under detention. Some ministries, including
planning and finance, were shut on Wednesday under army orders, government
sources said.
''No one knows what the situation is, who is in charge,'' a government worker
said.
It was not yet clear what would become of the Parliament and four provincial
assemblies, or of the pro-Sharif provincial governments.
Mr. Sharif has been accused of trying to consolidate his power by weakening
institutions such as the judiciary and provincial governments. He also has
been accused of using heavy-handed tactics to quell opposition protests.
In Mr. Sharif's hometown of Lahore, people swayed to the rhythm of drums,
waving their hands and congratulating the army for its takeover. Outside the
Sharif family home in a posh Lahore neighborhood, scores of armed soldiers
stood guard while small groups of people cursed the former prime minister as
corrupt.
Mr. Sharif had given no reason for firing General Musharraf, who had been on
his way back from Sri Lanka, but there had been tension between Mr. Sharif
and the military since the prime minister bowed to U.S. pressure and called
for withdrawal of guerrillas from the Indian side of disputed Kashmir in
July.
General Musharraf, addressing the Pakistani people on national television in
the early hours of Wednesday, said he had taken power to save the country
from ruin. ''I wish to inform you that the armed forces have moved in as a
last resort, to prevent further destabilization,'' he said.
The general issued a sharp warning aimed at India, saying that ''no outside
forces'' should try to take advantage of the ''prevailing situation in
Pakistan.''
On Wednesday night, the United Nations secretary-general, Kofi Annan, urged
the military leadership ''to take early measures to restore civilian rule and
the constitutional process.''
Meanwhile, a senior member of Mr. Sharif's party, Mushahidullah, said that
the deposed prime minister's life was in danger. He said Mr. Sharif was
''being pressured to submit his resignation. His life is in danger. He is
still the prime minister of Pakistan.''
Key anti-Sharif politicians pressed Wednesday for the formation of an interim
government to hold new elections.
International Herald Tribune, October 14, 1999


Japanese Finance


Bank of Japan Changes Policy?


Maybe not.

The Bank of Japan will start conducting outright purchases of short-term
government securities in a new attempt to deliver more funds into the banking
sector.

The central bank yesterday denied that this move represented any significant
change in its policy stance, which aims to provide the markets with enough
liquidity to drive overnight interest rates towards zero.

However, the Bank was now seeking "flexible" measures to push liquidity into
the economy more effectively, its policy board said.

The change was interpreted by some traders as a hint that the policy board
was trying to respond to recent political criticism that the Bank was not
doing enough to weaken the yen and push down long-term interest rates.

The Japanese currency fell by ¥1 against the dollar after the announcement,
to trade at around ¥107.7 in late Tokyo trading.

The currency later pushed lower, to ¥108, but then moved sharply higher in US
trading, erasing the day's earlier losses, reflecting scepticism that the
change represented a significant shift of policy.

"The Bank of Japan has opened up new options for monetary policy but there is
no guarantee they are going to use them," said Robert Sinche, currency
strategist for Citibank in New York. "We are not convinced that they have
committed themselves to any change."

Matthew Poggi, an economist at Lehman Brothers, said: "I think the pressure
is still on the Bank and I suppose somewhere down the track they may be in a
position to ease if the yen continues to strengthen or the economy falters."

Yesterday's decision, which followed an unusually long - eight-hour - meeting
of the policy board, is made at a particularly sensitive moment for the Bank.

In recent weeks some politicians in the ruling Liberal Democratic party have
called on the Bank to attempt to weaken the yen by pumping more funds into
the markets or buying long-term government bonds. Last month's G7 meeting of
finance ministers in Washington appeared to raise the pressure on the Bank to
act.

However, the Bank has refused to do this, arguing that policy was already so
loose that the money that the Bank is already supplying to the markets is no
longer feeding into the economy.

Yesterday's decision suggests that bank officials still have no intention of
caving into political pressure. But they also want to counter criticism that
they are failing to help the economy.

Consequently, the new measures aim to make the existing policies work more
effectively, rather than change the overall direction of policy in a
significant way. "The aim of the decision is to ensure that the effects of
the zero interest rate policy permeate the markets and Japan's economy,"
Masaru Hayami, the Bank's governor said.

Under these new measures, the Bank will widen the list of banks and brokers
permitted to receive funds from the Bank in normal monetary operations. It
also plans to start conducting repurchase agreements using two-year
government securities, in addition to the four, six and ten-year operations
used at present.

The Bank will also start outright purchases of three-month and six-month
finance and treasury bills, a form of government securities. This could help
push down interest rates in the three and six-month money markets, although
the Bank said details would be decided at the next monetary policy meeting.
As an additional measure, the Bank promised to supply ample liquidity to the
markets over the year-end to calm any concern about so called Y2K computer
problems.

Mr Sinche said that the size of the immediate reaction in the currency
markets was mainly caused by the fact that many short-term speculators had
sold dollars for yen ahead of the announcement. The news then caused those
investors to buy back dollars rapidly, causing the yen to fall, he said.
The London Telegraph, October 14, 1999
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
Omnia Bona Bonis,
All My Relations.
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to