-Caveat Lector-

from:
http://www.aci.net/kalliste/
<A HREF="http://www.aci.net/kalliste/">The Home Page of J. Orlin Grabbe</A>
-----
Nukes R Us

US Says China Stole Nuclear Secrets from Los Alamos

White House says secrets were just borrowed

WASHINGTON -- Working with nuclear secrets stolen from a U.S. government
laboratory, China has made a leap in the development of nuclear weapons:
the miniaturization of its bombs, according to administration officials.

Until recently, China's nuclear weapons designs were a generation behind
those of the United States, largely because Beijing was unable to
produce small warheads that could be launched from a single missile at
multiple targets and form the backbone of a modern nuclear force.

But by the mid-1990s, China had built and tested such small bombs, a
breakthrough that officials say was accelerated by the theft of U.S.
nuclear secrets from Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico.

The espionage is believed to have occurred in the mid-1980s, officials
said. But it was not detected until 1995, when American experts
analyzing Chinese nuclear test results found similarities to America's
most advanced miniature warhead, the W-88.

By the next year, government investigators had identified a suspect, an
American scientist at Los Alamos laboratory, where the atomic bomb was
first developed. The investigators also concluded that Beijing was
continuing to steal secrets from the government's major nuclear weapons
laboratories, which had been increasingly opened to foreign visitors
since the end of the Cold War.

The White House was told of the full extent of China's spying in the
summer of 1997, on the eve of the first U.S.-Chinese summit meeting in
eight years -- a meeting intended to dramatize the success of President
Clinton's efforts to improve relations with Beijing.

White House officials say they took the allegations seriously; as proof
of this they cite Clinton's ordering the labs within six months to
improve security.

But some U.S. officials assert that the White House sought to minimize
the espionage issue for policy reasons.

"This conflicted with their China policy," said a U.S. official, who
like many others in this article spoke on condition of anonymity. "It
undercut the administration's efforts to have a strategic partnership
with the Chinese."

The White House denies the assertions. "The idea that we tried to cover
up or downplay these allegations to limit the damage to United
States-Chinese relations is absolutely wrong," said Gary Samore, the
senior National Security Council official who handled the issue.

Yet a reconstruction by The New York Times reveals that throughout the
government, the response to the nuclear theft was marked by delays,
inaction and skepticism -- even though senior intelligence officials
regarded it as one of the most damaging spy cases in recent history.

Initially, the FBI did not aggressively pursue the criminal
investigation of lab theft, U.S. officials said. Now, nearly three years
later, no arrests have been made.

Only in the last several weeks, after prodding from Congress and the
secretary of energy, have government officials administered lie detector
tests to the main suspect, a Los Alamos computer scientist who is
Chinese-American. The suspect failed a test in February, according to
senior administration officials.

At the Energy Department, officials waited more than a year to act on
the FBI's 1997 recommendations to improve security at the weapons
laboratories and restrict the suspect's access to classified
information, officials said.

The department's chief of intelligence, who raised the first alarm about
the case, was ordered last year by senior officials not to tell Congress
about his findings because critics might use them to attack the
administration's China policies, officials said.

And at the White House, senior aides to Clinton fostered a skeptical
view of the evidence of Chinese espionage and its significance.

White House officials, for example, said they determined on learning of
it that the Chinese spying would have no bearing on the administration's
dealings with China, which included the increased exports of satellites
and other militarily useful items. They continued to advocate looser
controls over sales of supercomputers and other equipment, even as
intelligence analysts documented the scope of China's espionage.

Samore, the Security Council official, did not accept the Energy
Department's conclusion that China's nuclear advances stemmed largely
from the theft of U.S. secrets.

In 1997, as Clinton prepared to meet with President Jiang Zemin of
China, he asked the CIA for a quick alternative analysis of the issue.
The agency found that China had stolen secrets from Los Alamos but
differed with the Energy Department over the significance of the spying.


In personal terms, the handling of this case is very much the story of
the Energy Department intelligence official who first raised questions
about the Los Alamos case, Notra Trulock.

Trulock became a secret star witness before a select congressional
committee last fall. In a unanimous report that remains secret, the
bipartisan panel embraced his conclusions about Chinese espionage,
officials said. Taking issue with the White House's view, the panel saw
clear implications in the espionage case for U.S.-China policy, and has
now made dozens of policy-related recommendations, officials said.

A debate still rages within the government over whether Trulock was
right about the significance of the Los Alamos nuclear theft. But even
senior administration officials who do not think so credit Trulock with
forcing them to confront the realities of Chinese atomic espionage.

China's technical advance allows it to make mobile missiles, ballistic
missiles with multiple warheads and small warheads for submarines -- the
main elements of a modern nuclear force.

While White House officials question whether China will actually deploy
a more advanced nuclear force soon, they acknowledge that Beijing has
made plans to do so.

In early 1996 Trulock traveled to CIA headquarters to tell officials
there of the evidence his team had gathered on the apparent Chinese
theft of U.S. nuclear designs.

As Trulock gathered his charts and drawings and wrapped up his
top-secret briefing, the agency's chief spy hunter, Paul Redmond, sat
stunned.

At the dawn of the Atomic Age, a Soviet spy ring that included Julius
Rosenberg had stolen the first nuclear secrets out of Los Alamos. Now,
at the end of the Cold War, the Chinese seemed to have succeeded in
penetrating the same weapons lab.

"This is going to be just as bad as the Rosenbergs," Redmond recalled
saying.

The evidence that so alarmed him had surfaced a year earlier. Senior
nuclear weapons experts at Los Alamos, poring over data from the most
recent Chinese underground nuclear tests, had detected eerie
similarities between the latest Chinese and U.S. bomb designs.

>From what they could tell, Beijing was testing a smaller and more lethal
nuclear device configured remarkably like the W-88, the most modern,
miniaturized warhead in the U.S. arsenal. In April 1995, they brought
their findings to Trulock.

Officials declined to detail the evidence uncovered by the Los Alamos
scientists, who have access to a wide range of classified intelligence
data and seismic and other measurements.

But just as the scientists were piecing it together, they were handed an
intelligence windfall from Beijing.

In June 1995, they were told, a Chinese official gave CIA analysts what
appeared to be a 1988 Chinese government document describing the
country's nuclear weapons program. The document, a senior official said,
specifically mentioned the W-88 and described some of the warhead's key
design features.

The Los Alamos laboratory, where the W-88 had been designed, quickly
emerged as the most likely source of the leak.

One of three national weapons labs owned by the Department of Energy,
Los Alamos, 35 miles outside Sante Fe, N.M., was established in 1943
during the Manhattan Project. Trulock and his team knew just how
vulnerable Los Alamos was to modern espionage.

The three labs had long resisted FBI and congressional pressure to
tighten their security policies. Energy officials acknowledge that there
have long been security problems at the labs.

Los Alamos and Sandia National Laboratories, also in New Mexico, had in
1994 been granted waivers from an Energy Department policy that visiting
foreign scientists be subjected to background checks.

Lab officials resented the intrusions caused by counterintelligence
measures, arguing that restrictions on foreign visitors would clash with
the labs' new mandate to help Russia and other nations safeguard their
nuclear stockpiles.

The Clinton administration was also using increased access to the
laboratories to support its policy of engagement with China, as had been
done under previous, Republican administrations.

In December 1996, for example, China's defense minister, Gen. Chi
Haotian, visited Sandia on a Pentagon-sponsored trip. Energy Department
officials were not told in advance, and they later complained that Chi
and his delegation had not received proper clearances, officials said.

Still, there is no evidence in this case that foreign visitors were
involved in the theft of information.

In late 1995 and early 1996, Trulock and his team took their findings to
the FBI. A team of FBI and Energy Department officials traveled to the
three weapons labs and pored over travel and work records of lab
scientists who had access to the relevant technology.

By February the team had narrowed its focus to five possible suspects,
including a computer scientist working in the nuclear weapons area at
Los Alamos, officials said.

This suspect "stuck out like a sore thumb," said one official. In 1985,
for example, the suspect's wife was invited to address a Chinese
conference on sophisticated computer topics even though she was only a
secretary at Los Alamos. Her husband, the real expert, accompanied her,
a U.S. official said.

By April 1996, the Energy Department decided to brief the White House. A
group of senior officials including Trulock sat down with Sandy Berger,
then Clinton's deputy national security adviser, to tell him that China
appeared to have acquired the W-88 and that a spy for China might still
be at Los Alamos.

"I was first made aware of this in 1996," Berger, now national security
adviser, said in an interview.

By June the FBI formally opened a criminal investigation into the theft
of the W-88 design. But the inquiry made little progress over the rest
of the year. When Energy Department officials asked about the inquiry at
the end of 1996, they came away convinced that the bureau had assigned
few resources to the case.

A senior bureau official acknowledged that his agency was aware of the
Energy Department's criticism but pointed out that it was difficult to
investigate the case without alerting the suspects.

The bureau maintained tight control over the case. The CIA
counterintelligence office, for one, was not kept informed of its
status, according to Redmond, who has since retired.

Energy Department officials were also being stymied in their efforts to
address security problems at the laboratories.

After Frederico Pena became energy secretary in early 1997, a previously
approved counterintelligence program was quietly placed on the back
burner for more than a year, officials said.

In April 1997, the FBI issued a classified report on the labs that
recommended, among other things, reinstating background checks on
visitors to Los Alamos and Sandia, officials said. The Energy Department
and the labs ignored the FBI recommendation for 17 months. An Energy
Department spokeswoman was unable to explain the delay.

Another official said, "We couldn't get an order requiring the labs to
report to counterintelligence officials when the Chinese were present.
All those requirements had been waived."

In early 1997, with the FBI's investigation making scant progress and
the Energy Department's counterintelligence program in limbo, Trulock
and other intelligence officials began to see new evidence that the
Chinese had other, ongoing spy operations at the weapons labs.

But Trulock was unable to quickly inform senior U.S. officials about the
new evidence. He asked to speak directly with Pena, the energy
secretary, but had to wait four months for an appointment.

In an interview, Pena said he did not know why Trulock was kept waiting
until July but recalled that he "brought some very important issues to
my attention and that's what we need in the government."

Pena immediately sent Trulock back to the White House -- and to Berger.

"In July 1997 Sandy was briefed fully by the DOE on China's full access
to nuclear weapons designs, a much broader pattern" said one White House
official.

Officials said Berger was told that there was evidence of several other
Chinese espionage operations that were still under way inside the
weapons labs.

That news, several officials said, raised the importance of the issue.
The suspected Chinese thefts were no longer just ancient history,
problems that had happened on another administration's watch.

Berger quickly briefed Clinton on what he had learned and kept him
updated over the next few months, a White House official said.

As Trulock spread the alarm, his warnings were reinforced by CIA
Director George Tenet and FBI Director Louis Freeh, who met with Pena to
discuss the lax security at the labs that summer.

"I was very shocked by it, and I went to work on shifting the balance in
favor of security," Pena said. He and his aides began to meet with White
House officials to prepare a presidential order on lab security.

The FBI assigned more agents to the W-88 investigation, gathering new
and more troubling evidence about the prime suspect.

According to officials, the agents learned that the suspect had traveled
to Hong Kong without reporting the trip as required by government
regulations. In Hong Kong, officials said, the FBI found records showing
that the scientist had obtained $700 from the American Express office.
Investigators suspect he used it to buy an airline ticket to Shanghai,
inside the People's Republic of China.

With Berger now paying close attention, the White House became deeply
involved in evaluating the seriousness of the thefts and solving the
counterintelligence problems at the laboratories.

Trulock's new findings came at a crucial moment in U.S.-China relations.
Congress was examining the role of foreign money in the 1996 campaign,
amid charges that Beijing had secretly funneled money into Democratic
coffers.

The administration was also moving to strengthen its strategic and
commercial links with China. Clinton had already eased the commercial
sale of supercomputers and satellite technology to China, and now he
wanted to cement a nuclear cooperation agreement at the upcoming summit,
enabling American companies to sell China new commercial nuclear
reactors.

In August 1997, Berger flew to Beijing to prepare for the October
summit. He assigned Samore, a senior NSC aide in charge of proliferation
issues, to assess the damage from the Los Alamos spy case.

After receiving a briefing from Trulock in August, Samore asked the
CIA's directorate of intelligence to get a second opinion on how China
had developed its smaller nuclear warheads. It was, an NSC aide said, "a
quick study done at our request."

The analysts agreed that there had been a serious compromise of
sensitive technology through espionage at the weapons labs, but were far
less conclusive about the extent of the damage. The CIA argued that
China's sudden advance in nuclear design could be traced in part to
other causes, including the ingenuity of Beijing's scientists.

"The areas of agreement between DOE and CIA were that China definitely
benefited from access to U.S. nuclear weapons information that was
obtained from open sources, conversations with DOE scientists in the
U.S. and China, and espionage," said a U.S. official.

"The disagreement is in the area of specific nuclear weapons designs.
Trulock's briefing was based on a worst-case scenario, which CIA
believes was not supported by available intelligence. CIA thinks the
Chinese have benefited from a variety of sources, including from the
Russians and their own indigenous efforts."

Samore assembled the competing teams of CIA and DOE analysts in
mid-October for a meeting in his White House office that turned into a
tense debate.

The CIA report noted that China and Russia were cooperating on nuclear
issues, indicating that this was another possible explanation of
Beijing's improved warheads.

Trulock said this was a misreading of the evidence, which included
intercepted communications between Russian and Chinese experts. The
Russians were offering advice on how to measure the success of nuclear
tests, not design secrets. In fact, Trulock argued, the Russian
measurement techniques were used to help the Chinese analyze the
performance of a weapon that Los Alamos experts believed was based on a
U.S. design.

"At the meeting, Notra Trulock said that he thought the CIA was
underplaying the effect that successful Chinese espionage operations in
the weapons labs had had on the Chinese nuclear weapons program," said
one official.

Relying on the CIA report, Samore told Berger in late September that the
picture was less conclusive than Trulock was arguing. Officials said he
began to relay that view before hearing Trulock's rebuttal of the CIA
study at the October meeting.

Samore told Berger "there isn't enough information to resolve the
debate, there is no definitive answer, but in any event this clearly
illustrates weaknesses in DOE's counterintelligence capability," said
one official familiar with Samore's presentation.

CIA officials strenuously deny that the agency's analysts intended to
downplay Trulock's findings.

The FBI inquiry was stalled. At a September 1997 meeting between FBI and
Energy Department officials, Freeh concluded that the bureau did not
have enough evidence to arrest the suspect, according to officials.

The crime was believed to have occurred more than a decade earlier.
Investigators did not then have sufficient evidence to obtain a secret
wiretap on the suspect, making it difficult to build a strong criminal
case, according to U.S. officials. FBI officials say that Chinese spy
activities are far more difficult to investigate than the more
traditional espionage operations of the former Soviet Union.

But even if the bureau couldn't build a case, the Energy Department
could still take some action against someone holding a U.S. security
clearance. Freeh told DOE officials that there was no longer an
investigative reason to allow the suspect to remain in his sensitive
position, officials said. In espionage cases, the FBI often wants
suspects left alone by their employers for fear of tipping them off
prematurely.

But the suspect was allowed to keep his job and retain his security
clearances for more than a year after the meeting with Freeh, according
to U.S. officials.

In late 1997, the NSC did begin to draft a new counterintelligence plan
for the weapons labs, and Clinton signed the order mandating the new
measures in February 1998. In April, a former FBI counterintelligence
agent, Ed Curran, was named to run a more vigorous counterintelligence
office at Energy Department headquarters.

The administration explained aspects of the case to aides working for
the House and Senate intelligence committees beginning in 1996. But few
in Congress grasped the magnitude of what had happened.

In July 1998, the House Intelligence Committee requested an update on
the case, officials said. Trulock forwarded the request in a memo to,
and in conversations with, Elizabeth Moler, then acting energy
secretary. Ms. Moler ordered him not to brief the House panel for fear
that the information would be used to attack the president's China
policy, according to an account he later gave congressional
investigators. Ms. Moler, now a Washington lawyer, says she does not
remember the request to allow Trulock to brief Congress and denies
delaying the process.

In October, Ms. Moler, then deputy secretary, stopped Trulock from
delivering written testimony on espionage activities in the labs to a
closed session of the House National Security Committee.

Ms. Moler told Trulock to rewrite his testimony to limit it to the
announced subject of the hearing, foreign visitors to the labs, an
Energy Department spokeswoman said. The issue came up nonetheless when
committee members asked follow-up questions, Energy Department officials
said.

Key lawmakers began to learn about the extent of the Chinese theft of
U.S. nuclear secrets late in 1998, when a select committee investigating
the transfers of sensitive U.S. technology to China, chaired by Rep.
Christopher Cox, R-Calif., heard from Trulock.

Administration officials say that Congress was adequately informed, but
leading Democrats and Republicans disagree. Rep. Norman Dicks, D-Wash.,
the ranking minority member on the House Intelligence Committee and also
a member of the Cox committee, said that he and Rep. Porter Goss,
R-Fla., chairman of the House intelligence panel, were not adequately
informed.

"Porter Goss and I were not properly briefed about the dimensions of the
problem," he said, adding: "It was compartmentalized and disseminated
over the years in dribs and drabs so that the full extent of the problem
was not known until the Cox committee."

Last fall, midway through the Cox panel's inquiry, a new secretary of
energy, Bill Richardson, arrived on the job.

After being briefed by Trulock, Richardson quickly reinstated background
checks on all foreign visitors, a move recommended 17 months earlier by
the FBI. He also doubled the counterintelligence budget and placed more
former FBI counterintelligence experts at the labs.

But Richardson also became concerned about what the Cox panel was
finding out.

So in October he cornered Berger at a high-level meeting and urged him
to put someone in charge of coordinating the administration's dealings
with the Cox committee.

Berger turned again to Samore, officials said.

By December, Dicks, in his role as the ranking Democratic member of the
Cox panel, was growing impatient with the administration's slow response
to ongoing requests from the committee and its inaction on the Los
Alamos spy case. Dicks told Richardson, a former colleague in the House,
that he needed to take action, Richardson recalled.

Dicks' complaints helped prompt Richardson to call Freeh twice in one
day in December about the inquiry, an official said.

The suspect was given a polygraph, or lie-detector test, in December, by
the Energy Department. Unsatisfied, the FBI administered a second test
in February, and officials said the suspect was found to be deceptive.
It is not known what questions prompted the purportedly deceptive
answers.

As the FBI investigation intensified, the Cox Committee completed a
700-page secret report which found that China's theft of US secrets had
harmed U.S. national security -- saving the Chinese untold time and
money in nuclear weapons research.

After hearing from both the CIA and Energy Department analysts, the
bi-partisan panel unanimously came down on the side of Trulock's
assessment, officials said.

Now, the CIA and other agencies, at the request of the Cox Committee,
are conducting a new, more thorough damage assessment of the case, even
as the debate continues to rage throughout the intelligence community
over whether Trulock has overstated the damage from Chinese espionage.

Meanwhile, Trulock has been moved from head of DOE's intelligence office
to acting deputy. While Richardson and other Energy Department officials
praise Trulock's work and deny he has been mistreated, some in Congress
suspect he has been demoted for helping the Cox Committee.

Redmond, the CIA's former counterintelligence chief, who made his name
by unmasking Soviet mole Aldrich Ames at the CIA, has no doubts about
the significance of what Trulock uncovered.

He said: "This was far more damaging to the national security than
Aldrich Ames."

The New York Times, March 6, 1999


Nukes R Us

China Says Taiwan Is Last Straw

No missiles, no way


China yesterday warned the US that inclusion of Taiwan in a mooted
US-backed missile defence shield would be the "last straw" in
deteriorating bilateral relations and would have serious consequences.


The warning, the toughest yet in a raw dispute over possible US
deployment in Asia of the so-called theatre missile defence (TMD)
system, came from a senior Chinese official.


While the official did not directly threaten a military response to
deployment, he said : "Chinese people would be willing to die" to
protect their country's dignity and sovereignty. He asked, rhetorically,
how the US would feel if China began supplying missile technology to a
US state.


China regards Taiwan, which split from the mainland in 1949, as its own
province and has maintained a long-standing threat to attack the island
if it declares independence or if a foreign power tries to win
independence for it.


TMD deployment in Taiwan, the official said, would amount to "direct US
involvement in a hostile act against China; a physical alliance with
Taiwan". It might also reassure Taipei to the extent that it decides to
declare independence, he added.


China has previously said the installation of such a defence system - a
technology still largely on the drawing board - to protect US forces and
allies in Asia would constitute a cold war act of containment against
it. The US has not yet made a decision on whether to deploy a TMD system
in Asia, possibly including Taiwan, but it is under active consideration
in Washington.


The issue has over the past few weeks become the single largest source
of friction in US-China ties, and one which threatens to overshadow a
visit to Washington by Zhu Rongji, the Chinese premier, due in April.


The official dismissed suggestions this week by Madeleine Albright, US
secretary of state, that China could work to avoid the deployment of TMD
by improving ties with Taiwan and co-operating with the US to prevent
North Korea's development of long-range missiles.


He said there was no room for negotiation or compromise with Washington
over any plan to include Taiwan under a TMD umbrella which, it is
assumed, would be able to protect the island from missiles that the
Pentagon says China has been moving to locations near the island.


It was not clear what Beijing would regard as the defining act of TMD
deployment. But the official mentioned the possible US sale to Taiwan of
Aegis warships - which are equipped with anti-missile defences - as a
potential trigger. Taipei newspapers have said the island is interested
in buying Aegis.


The official had a milder reaction to the possibility that the US might
erect TMD defences for Japan, the main US ally in Asia. Tokyo and
Washington began actively to study the installation of such a defensive
shield following the test-firing of a North Korean missile into the sea
near Japan last August.


The official said only that if Tokyo was to acquire TMD defences, it
would "not be good for our relations with Japan".

The Financial Times, March 6, 1999


The Religion Business

Pat Robertson Teams Up with Bank of Scotland

Someone's got to launder all that cash


At first it sounded like a hoax. Bank of Scotland, one of the oldest
British banks - which even retains the privilege of printing Scottish
bank notes - is to launch a direct bank in the US in partnership with
Pat Robertson. Mr Robertson is best known internationally for his failed
bid for the Republican presidential nomination in 1988, backed by the
party's ranks of conservative evangelical Christians.


Famed for such feats as ordering Hurricane Gloria to divert its course
away from his television station ("I felt that if I couldn't move a
hurricane, I could hardly move a nation"), he seems an extraordinary
partner for a staid British bank attempting to bring telephone banking
to the US.


The fact that William Hendry, the Bank of Scotland director who first
discussed the deal with him, was a passionate supporter of Celtic, the
Glasgow soccer club which represents Scotland's Catholic community, only
adds to the sense of the bizarre. In the UK, Bank of Scotland had chosen
J. Sainsbury, a supermarket chain, as a partner; it was hard to see the
conservative firebrand as comparable.


But that would be to mistake Mr Robertson's career so far. The
68-year-old made his name as a politician and evangelist, but his
greatest successes have been as a businessman. Most spectacularly, he
sold International Family Entertainment, the parent company of his US
cable network, to Rupert Murdoch for $1.9bn two years ago.


His business interests have stretched to include diamond mining,
chemicals (where he started his career) and banking (he was a director
of one of Virginia's larger banks during the 1980s). He is a director of
Laura Ashley, the UK clothes retailer. And he has another vital passport
for success in American business: a law degree from Yale.


Hence Mr Hendry's enthusiasm. "Pat brings three things. He has
entrepreneurial spirit. He has knowledge of banking. And we feel he has
really good knowledge of where many Americans are looking for value and
service products."


Mr Robertson dabbled in business before being ordained, working as a
management trainee for W.R. Grace, the chemicals company. His career as
a television evangelist has shown a strong grasp of marketing. He
virtually invented television evangelism and has been its most
successful exponent. His avuncular style has proved more durable than
the histrionics of other television preachers, such as Jimmy Swaggart.


With a loan of $37,000, he bought his first network, which he renamed
the Christian Broadcasting Network (CBN), in 1961. It was the first
station registered with the Federal Communications Commission to devote
more than half of its broadcast time to religious programming. As a
religious organisation, and technically a non-profit company, it
benefited from a lenient tax regime.


To keep it afloat in the early years, Mr Robertson became the first
tele-evangelist to offer toll-free numbers, encouraging viewers to
identify themselves more closely with the network. (Admittedly, the
policy was revealed to have a downside in the 1980s when Mr Robertson's
political opponents began telephoning his number round the clock,
costing him as much money as possible.)


CBN expanded its programming to include old Hollywood films, and popular
nostalgic series such as The Waltons, leaving his flagship 700 Club as
the only overtly Christian programme on the network (and even it is
packaged like a conventional morning magazine programme, with news,
opinions from Mr Robertson and general interest topics). Later, the CBN
empire broadened to include Family Channel (the ninth largest cable
network in the US), a university, and Operation Blessing, a relief
agency.


Mr Robertson has also dabbled in private interests, including diamond
mining in Africa. This led to allegations that Operation Blessing
aeroplanes, funded by donations, were being used for the benefit of Mr
Robertson's mining interests - although he has always maintained he
repaid Operation Blessing for their use.


The only problem was that all this activity became too profitable to
sustain CBN's tax-exempt status. In 1990, International Family
Entertainment, the entity subsequently sold to Rupert Murdoch, was
formed to buy out the Family Channel from CBN. Mr Robertson and his
family controlled the company, although CBN and Regent University also
had significant stakes.


This collection of interests has certainly created powerful loyalty
among viewers. And that may well be his decisive attraction. Although
Bank of Scotland is not prepared to talk about its marketing plans until
its direct banking venture has been cleared by US regulators, Mr
Robertson offers arguably as strong and trusted a brand in the US as the
Sainsbury supermarket chain does in the UK.

The Financial Times, March 6, 1999


US Stock Market

Dow Soars to New High Above 9700

Joe Bag-of-Wind delivers more forecasts

NEW YORK - With economic news that could hardly have been more favorable
behind it, the Dow Jones industrial average soared 2.8 percent to a
record high on Friday.
The blue-chip stock average rose 268.68 points to close at 9,736.08,
above the previous record of 9,643.32 set Jan. 8. The surge on Friday
followed a 191.52-point rise on Thursday.

What sparked the advance Friday was the release of U.S. employment
statistics for February, the first official data for the month. The
government said 275,000 jobs were created last month, above what
economists had been predicting but less than what some inflation-wary
analysts had feared.

Other parts of the report indicated that inflation remained quiescent.
Although the number of jobs rose, the unemployment rate crept up to 4.4
percent from 4.3 percent in January. More important on the inflation
front was that average hourly earnings rose just 0.1 percent, showing
that even though companies are hiring many new workers they are not
having to raise wages to get and keep them.

The data went a long way toward allaying fears that the Federal Reserve
Board would push interest rates higher when its policy-setting Open
Market Committee meets at the end of the month. Last week, the central
bank's chairman, Alan Greenspan, said the Fed expected the economy to
expand at a healthy clip of 2.5 percent to 3 percent this year, and that
the dangers of that expansion igniting inflation were about evenly
balanced with deflationary forces arising from weak economies in other
countries and productivity gains.

Despite the noncommittal nature of his comments, interest rates in the
bond market rose in the days after he spoke as investors focused on the
warnings about inflation. The 30-year Treasury bond's yield, which had
been 5.41 percent on the eve of Mr. Greenspan's testimony, ended at 5.69
percent on Thursday, but after Friday's unemployment news fell to 5.59
percent.

''These are figures even bond traders could love,'' Ken Mayland, chief
economist of KeyCorp in Cleveland said. ''The real surprise, especially
in the face of tight labor markets, was the minuscule rise of average
hourly earnings. The 3.6 percent 12-month increase in wages is something
both companies and bond traders can live with.''

The good news about U.S. inflation and interest rates was tonic to stock
markets in Europe. In Japan, meanwhile, the benchmark stock index jumped
5.01 percent as markets there continued to respond to aggressive
monetary-easing measures by the Bank of Japan.

The decline of U.S. interest rates since the end of 1994, when the
30-year Treasury yielded more than 7.8 percent, is one of the key
reasons the Dow industrials have risen in value by more than 150 percent
since that time. Scanty bond yields make stocks attractive investments,
and the low interest rates also make it inexpensive for companies to
finance expansion.

Joseph Battipaglia, chairman of investment policy at Gruntal & Co., said
the market was poised for further gains this year. He predicted the Dow
would rise an additional 10 percent.

''Two concerns that the market has had in the last several weeks were
that U.S. interest rates were going to move higher and that
personal-computer demand and consumption were slowing,'' he said. Those
factors had kept the Dow trading in a range of about 9,100 to 9,300 for
most of this year.

The Nasdaq composite index, which is influenced by trends among
technology stocks, had fallen 10 percent from the beginning of February
until Wednesday, as concern about growth in the computer industry grew.

Recently, however, ''the broader market was starting to have a better
tone,'' Mr. Battipaglia said. Economic data has been supportive as the
United States seems destined for its ninth year of expansion.

On Friday, the Nasdaq composite closed up 45.38 points, or 2 percent, at
2,338.27.

This week, Mr. Battipaglia said, several developments led investors to
think that technology companies were devising ways to deal with the
slackness in their markets. He cited the announcements that
International Business Machines Corp. would supply parts to Dell
Computer Corp. in a seven-year deal that would make it easy for the
retailer to extend its rapid expansion and that Hewlett-Packard Co.
would break itself into two companies to improve its focus.

He also noted that Texas Instruments Inc. said its first-quarter sales
would rise as much as 6 percent in the first quarter, which gave the
company's shares a boost.

More broadly, Mr. Battipaglia said, the weakness in overseas economies
and financial markets that has weighed on Wall Street in recent years
seems to be abating. He said there were signs that Japan's economy would
begin growing, helping to lift Asia out of recession and expanding
markets for U.S. exporters.

On the New York Stock Exchange, Boyds Collection was the most-active
issue on its first day of trading. The maker of handcrafted stuffed
animals and other collectible items was trading at the offering price of
$18.

International Herald Tribune, March 6, 1999
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
Omnia Bona Bonis,
All My Relations.
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End
Kris

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to