-Caveat Lector-
>From www.polyconomics.com
{{<Begin>}}
Memo on the Margin
November 8, 1999
Open Immigration???
Memo To: Geraldo Rivera, Rivera Live on CNBC
From: Jude Wanniski
Re: Open Borders
I heard you had an interesting hour-long interview with Pat Buchanan last week
(November 2), so I got a transcript from Burrell’s on Friday. Coincidentally,
you discussed Pat’s views on immigration the same day the WSJournal ran a lead
editorial advocating open borders. Pat, of course, is totally opposed to open
borders, as am I, although my reasoning is a bit different than his. He reasons
that the combination of a million legal immigrants a year, plus a few million
illegals, is straining the nation’s ability to assimilate this largely Hispanic
population into our distinctly Anglo-American culture. His point has some
validity, I think, but not enough to carry the argument. He would like to limit
legal immigration to 250,000 a year, a quarter of where it is, while I would
simply insist that there be no special bilingual education program that
discourages assimilation. My grandparents came from Poland, the Ukraine, and
Lithuania late in the 19th century or early in the 20th. They spoke no English
nor could they read or write in any language -- not having spent a single day
in school. But under the economic and social pressure to assimilate, their
children learned English, then the popular culture, and essentially taught
their parents as they learned. My Lithuanian grandmother taught herself to read
in her native language and in English, then taught my grandfather, who never
learned how to write -- but for the last 40 years of his life read the NYTimes
every day and the New York Lithuanian language paper, Laisve. The experience
put me squarely on the side of those who oppose bilingual education.
My reason for opposing open borders is related to the WSJ’s advocacy of
unlimited immigration. Its Friday editorial noted Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan’s
concern that the unemployment rate is getting so low that demand for labor is
outstripping supply, and could cause wage inflation. So the Journal thinks we
can solve that problem by importing labor. The Journal, of course, has become
an Establishment newspaper, and the Establishment historically has favored more
immigration at the time of tight labor markets. In the early days of the
republic, when Alexander Hamilton was trying to develop a manufacturing sector
in New England, he supported a high tariff to encourage infant industry --
although not so high as to discourage federal revenues needed to retire our
bonded indebtedness. Hamilton also favored open immigration because of the lure
of cheap western lands, which acted as a drain on the labor pool available to
the Eastern mercantile class. There was an early tendency among the
Hamiltonians to lock in the western lands as government property, but the
Jeffersonians won out easily in that debate. It was not until the 20th century,
when we reached our "manifest destiny" in settling the nation from coast-to-
coast did the idea of open immigration come to an end. Please note, Geraldo,
that while almost none of the eastern United States is owned by the federal
government, most of the western states are still in federal hands. Nevada,
which is as big as several Northeastern states combined, is still 95% "owned"
by the government.
My difference with the Journal’s editorial position is that it really has in
mind skimming off the best and the brightest of countries like Mexico, who come
here not because they face political or religious persecution in their
homelands. They come because their economies remain stagnant, with little or no
opportunity for their advancement or for their children’s. Because they are the
most unhappy with the state of affairs they face at home, and because they tend
to be more educated, more willing to take the kinds of risks associated with
emigration, the Established elites who keep their economies stagnant are happy
to see them leave. In Mexico, every time the folks at the bottom of the pile
look like they are about to make some political headway, the ruling class
screws up the economy with a tax increase or a currency devaluation, and
emigration across the Rio Grande swells to new heights. After the surprise
December 1994 peso devaluation sent the economy reeling, members of the Zedillo
government had the nerve to publicly note that the long border with the United
States was acting as a safety valve, to release the malcontents.
Where, after all, are malcontents created? In recent years, Geraldo, the broad
and deep flow of immigrants to the United States, from Asia and Latin America,
has been created by the economic errors of the United States government, our
Treasury Department and our Federal Reserve -- and the perverse blunders of the
International Monetary Fund and World Bank. These are Establishment
institutions, meant to serve the monied class. Or do you really think the poor
people of the world are so inferior in intelligence that they have no choice
but to work for $1 a day South of the Border or the minimum wage up north?
If you were to privately ask the editors of the WSJournal why there is so much
misery and poverty in the world, they would tell you this themselves. They know
how our big banks and major industrialists collude in managing international
economic policy, that the IMF, while technically independent, is essentially an
agent of the big New York and European banks. For years, Jack Kemp has been
calling for the resignation of the IMF’s director, Michel Camdessus, and his
replacement by Pedro Aspe, who was finance minister of Mexico in the years when
its government was refusing to play the IMF game. When was the last time you
saw the WSJournal call for the replacement of Camdessus? His management has
brought about more human suffering in the last dozen years than you can shake a
stick at.
Do you see what I mean, Geraldo? The Establishment does not want anybody
rocking the boat. It prefers the status quo. It would have been just as easy
for the Journal on Friday to ask why it is we have a million and a half able-
bodied men, most of them African-Americans, salted away in federal and state
prisons. If Greenspan needs more bodies to prevent "wage inflation," he could
find a way to direct that labor to jobs that are high enough to support a
family. Instead, he prefers the wages to be kept low, so the profits of the
industrialists he serves will not disappoint their shareholders.
I do agree with you that some of Pat Buchanan’s views are too harsh, even
extreme, but in a larger sense, he really is serious about trying to bring
about the kinds of reforms that will reverse the disparity of living standards
that has grown wider and wider as the rich get richer and the poor fill up our
prisons. Please take note of these sincere comments on your show, Geraldo,
because they may come in handy when you have Pat on again some day. It is a
long way to the November 2000 elections.
{{<End>}}
A<>E<>R
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Integrity has no need of rules. -Albert Camus (1913-1960)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said
it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your
own reason and your common sense." --Buddha
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that
prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart
information and ideas through any media and regardless
of frontiers." Universal Declaration of Human Rights
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
"Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will
teach you to keep your mouth shut." Ernest Hemingway
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
