-Caveat Lector-
July 6, 2001
Panel finds CIA soft on China
By Bill Gertz
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
A commission of outside experts has concluded that CIA reporting
on China is biased and slanted toward a benign view of the emerging
communist power.
Numerous classified intelligence reports on China, including those
on Chinese military and security issues, were reviewed by a 12-member
commission and found to be flawed, according to U.S. government
officials and outside experts close to the panel.
The commission concluded in a final report that China-related CIA
intelligence reports and programs suffered from an "institutional
predisposition" to play down or misinterpret national security problems
posed by Beijing's communist regime.
The commission also said CIA analysts had "overreached" in
making many incorrect or misleading assessments about China's
military and political activities.
The conclusions of the commission are contained in a classified
report. The commission was headed by retired Army Gen. John Tilelli, a
former commander of U.S. forces in Korea.
"There were numerous instances where [CIA analysts] just missed
it," said one official who has read the report.
The commission included several academics such as Harvard
University professor Stephen Rosen, Princeton University professor
Aaron Friedberg and University of Pennsylvania professor Arthur
Waldron, as well as former Ambassador to China James Lilley. Peter
Rodman, a current nominee for assistant defense secretary also took
part, as did retired Army Col. Larry Wortzel, a former attache in China
who is currently with the Heritage Foundation.
The panel met three times with CIA Director George J. Tenet. CIA
sources said Mr. Tenet tried unsuccessfully to persuade the
commission to soften its findings, arguing that its findings would fuel
critics of the agency.
One of those critics is Sen. Richard C. Shelby, Alabama Republican
and the vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, who took
the lead in pushing for the CIA to form the "competitive analysis"
commission.
Mr. Shelby said in an interview that the CIA has "not viewed China in
a realistic way."
"They have tried to look the other way when China, in my opinion,
may be moving toward a belligerent stand, if not attitude," Mr. Shelby
said. "They are always looking the other way to put their spin on the
U.S.-Chinese relationship, that everything is going well in the long run.
"It's just not very real. China is, has been and I believe will be a big
competitor of ours, economically, militarily, politically, in every respect.
They could be our biggest adversary. They are certainly not our
strategic partner as Clinton and Gore would lead you to believe."
A Pentagon report issued in December by the Office of Net
Assessment, headed by long-time defense strategist Andrew Marshall,
also criticized U.S. intelligence shortfalls on China. The report said the
Pentagon could not predict the outcome of a conflict between China and
Taiwan because of major "intelligence gaps."
CIA China analysts and senior officials, including Mr. Tenet, declined
to be interviewed. A CIA spokesman denied that its analysts were
biased and said they "call them as they see them."
One China specialist, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, said
the most serious problem of the China analysts at the CIA is their failure
to recognize the growing danger of a Sino-U.S. war.
"War is a come-as-you-are party, and the Chinese are thinking
about that very seriously," the specialist said. "The problem is you can't
find those guys at CIA thinking about it."
Official statements about the possibility of military conflict between
Washington and Beijing have been dismissed by senior CIA analysts as
hollow rhetoric, the specialist said.
While most of the analyses reviewed by the panel are classified,
some of the CIA China division's work is public. Based on published
materials and interviews with officials who have seen its classified
studies, the following problems were identified to The Washington Times:
c The CIA provided poor analytical support to the White House
during the recent Hainan island incident. Agency analysts failed to
properly predict Beijing's reactions in the aftermath of a collision
between a U.S. EP-3E surveillance plane and a Chinese F-8 fighter jet
over the South China Sea, in which 24 American service members were
held hostage on Hainan island.
c The CIA's top analyst on Chinese foreign policy, Paul Heer,
reported in the journal Foreign Affairs last year that the idea there are
divisions within the Chinese leadership between hard-liners and
centrists is a "false dichotomy" that is "misguided and even dangerous."
His view reflects classified CIA analysis that came under fire from
the Tilelli commission and is contrary to the widespread views within
other U.S. intelligence agencies that major internal divisions do exist
within Beijing's communist regime. Mr. Heer believes "competing
schools of thought coexist" within institutions and leaders.
c The CIA has failed to conduct a thorough analysis of Chinese
military inroads into Latin America, despite Beijing's recent agreement
with Havana to begin upgrading military equipment to Cuba, visits by
senior Chinese military leaders to the region and other activities in the
hemisphere. The agency's reporting is said to lag behind those of the
U.S. Southern Command, the Pentagon's Miami-based command
responsible for Latin America.
c In response to congressional pressure for better intelligence
analysis on China, the CIA intelligence directorate hired some 30 new
analysts. However, those hired were required to pass a litmus test to
assure they held views in tune with senior analysts who have a benign
view of China.
c Sensitive intelligence reports from the CIA Directorate of
Operations and the FBI were suppressed within the CIA intelligence
directorate.
One U.S. intelligence official close to the CIA said the problem is
that senior analysts have not done enough to foster a diversity of views
on Chinese security issues.
"Their basic working assumption is that China must become a
strategic partner," this official said of the senior analysts. "Analysts are
promoted who hold those views."
--
Best Wishes
When even one American -- who has done nothing wrong -- is forced by
fear to shut his mind and close his mouth, then all Americans are in
peril. - Harry Truman.
<A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A>
DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.
Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
<A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
<A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/";>ctrl</A>
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Om
