-Caveat Lector-

from:
http://www.zolatimes.com/V2.43/pageone.html
<A HREF="http://www.zolatimes.com/V2.43/pageone.html">Laissez Faire City Times
- Volume 2 Issue 43</A>
The Laissez Faire City Times
December 21, 1998 - Volume 2, Issue 43
Editor & Chief: Emile Zola
-----
Please Don't Give Me Liberty!

a book review by Sunni Maravillosa


Gerry Spence is well known in libertarian circles for representing Randy
Weaver in his murder trial. That, along with the alluring title of his
new book, Give Me Liberty!, provides reason enough for the book to be
picked up, and talked about, amongst lovers of freedom.

Spence has divided Give Me Liberty! into three sections: the first
presents his argument that we are, in his words, "the new American
slaves"; the second deals with freeing the self; and the third, with
freeing the nation. Also presented in Part III are twenty-six "dreams to
liberty"; these are steps that Spence recommends we take to reclaim our
society. Throughout the book, Spence draws on the power of example,
providing scenarios of those whom he seeks to emancipate--the poor, the
injured, the forgotten--as well as conversations with capitalists,
corporate executives, the wealthy, judges, lawyers, and others who, he
claims, enslave us as well as themselves. However, the overblown style
Spence employs on every page quickly reduces the effectiveness of these
images--they become hyperbole, along with much of the book's narrative.

The primary promulgator of today's slavery is the free market, according
to Spence--our corporate capitalism enslaves those who work for it,
those who purchase from it, and those who run it. (He seemingly uses
"capitalism" interchangeably with "free enterprise".) We are all slaves
to the pursuit of profit, yet we think we are free. Even the judicial
system, Spence maintains, is in the thrall of the giant corporations
whose existence was enabled by a series of judicial rulings in the
1800s. His approach to dealing with corporations is laid out in his
dreams to liberty, but first, Spence describes how to free the self.

It is in Part II--Freeing the Self--that Spence is at his best. He
understands the true nature of freedom--born of the sole individual,
given to the self by the self, and nurtured by one's refusal to allow
others to enslave oneself. He recognizes security as the enemy of
freedom, and shares these insights with clarity and passion. Yet Spence
spends relatively little time on these ideas, preferring instead, it
would seem, to browbeat his readers with more depressing stories and
hyperbole, such as: ". . . work, and its puritanical elevation as among
the greatest of virtues, is a religion that converts the diamonds of
human creativity into the coal of the industrial machine" (p. 142). Such
a technique may work well in the courtroom, but in a book of over three
hundred pages, it quickly loses its effectiveness and begins to grate.
The effect is to take what should have been an uplifting, positive
message and cloak it in pain and suffering. Who would want to pursue
liberty when it's presented in that fashion?

Throughout much of the first two sections, the reader might successfully
interpret much of Spence's message as coming from a libertarian-leaning
position. The disparaging remarks about free enterprise are, to this
point, rather few, and one can interpret them in ways that aren't
threatening to a pure free-market perspective. With Part III--Freeing
the Nation--it becomes more challenging to continue with such an
interpretation, as Spence begins to lay out his dreams, the steps he
recommends we take to free ourselves and our society.

The first solid indication that Spence's view of liberty is at odds with
most libertarian interpretations comes in his second dream, which calls
for compulsory voting as an interim step toward incorruptible leaders.
>From there, hopes quickly fade, as he begins to promote other compulsory
acts--such as a lottery to raise campaign funds--and committees formed
to select a council of leaders "to whom we will delegate those
responsibilities we do not have the courage to exercise for ourselves".
When Spence clearly--in italics--renounces self-government as a viable
alternative on page 231, one wonders why most libertarians would
continue reading. One reason is to have a clear picture of what Gerry
Spence is promoting.

Spence says he wants liberty, for all people who are now slaves of the
corporations (employees, consumers, competitors, and CEOs alike). To
change our government, he suggests the eventual abolition of voting for
candidates--those who serve are to be selected by lot. He calls for
committee after committee to oversee, to appoint, to watchdog, not only
government and the legal system, but also those dastardly corporations
as well. Have we not already got ample evidence of the failure of this
approach? More importantly, how does this free individuals--who are not
permitted to duck their selection or appointment--and, by extension,
society?

What Spence is advocating seems to be an egalitarian socialism--reading
between his rhetoric it's much of the same class-struggle arguments that
led to the bolsheviks co-opting the Russian revolution. The most casual
student of politics recognizes the failure of their form of socialist
government. He makes excellent points about the inequity of power and
justice in our society today, yet his solutions seem as open to
domination by special interests as the present system. Spence's
denouncement of our current economic system as a workable one misses the
mark, because from the outset it has not been a system of free markets.

Spence employs great examples, and paints evocative (if overblown by the
hyperbole) images. His legal points are no doubt accurate. He's an
advocate for the downtrodden, and he wants "the little people" to enjoy
a freedom they've never had, according to him. What he's proposing in
order to accomplish that isn't liberty in any sense that most
libertarians would use the term. Gerry Spence is extremely passionate
about something he believes in very strongly, and probably thinks that
what he's advocating is something better than what most people have
today. But, what he's proposing seems to be a different set of chains,
perhaps with fur-lined cuffs to be more comfortable for the wearer.

If the cry is "Give me liberty!" of this variety, my reply is, "Please
don't!"



------------------------------------------------------------------------

Give Me Liberty! copyright 1998 by Gerry Spence. Published by St.
Martin's Press, ISBN #0-312-19267-3. 341 pages.

-30-


from The Laissez Faire City Times, Vol 2, No 43, Dec. 21, 1998
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Laissez Faire City Times is a private newspaper. Although it is
published by a corporation domiciled within the sovereign domain of
Laissez Faire City, it is not an "official organ" of the city or its
founding trust. Just as the New York Times is unaffiliated with the city
of New York, the City Times is only one of what may be several news
publications located in, or domiciled at, Laissez Faire City proper. For
information about LFC, please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Published by
Laissez Faire City Netcasting Group, Inc.
Copyright 1998 - Trademark Registered with LFC Public Registrar
All Rights Reserved
-----
Aloha, He'Ping,
Om, Shalom, Salaam.
Em Hotep, Peace Be,
Omnia Bona Bonis,
All My Relations.
Adieu, Adios, Aloha.
Amen.
Roads End
Kris

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to