-Caveat Lector- http://news.independent.co.uk/world/politics/story.jsp?story=388267 News | Sport | Argument | Education | Money | Travel | Enjoyment
Home > News > World > Politics Knives sharpen for Powell, the 'double loser' By Rupert Cornwell in Washington 18 March 2003 "War is always a failure," runs the French mantra as the clock ticks towards a US-led invasion of Iraq. In that case, war is always a failure of diplomacy. Small wonder then that fingers are being pointed at the man in charge of US diplomacy, the Secretary of State, Colin Powell. Yesterday, it should be said, there was scant whiff of failure in the air at the State Department, as General Powell appeared before the press to perform the funeral rites of Iraq diplomacy, minutes after the debacle in New York had been sealed when Britain, America and Spain withdrew their joint resolution to the UN. The Secretary of State was measured. France again was singled out as the guilty party. He was "disappointed" at events, but Saddam Hussein, he asserted, was "guilty of all charges". And he had no regrets at not having done things differently. Proudly, he pointed to resolution 1441, whose unanimous passage last November in retrospect appears the high water mark for Colin Powell in this Iraq crisis. But Washington is a cruel place. When an administration faces a decision as fraught as this, hardly has the outcome been settled than the post- mortems begin. This time, the instant verdict (possibly to be amended) is that General Powell, once regarded as a beacon of moderation of this administration, its best-liked and most trusted spokesman abroad, is the loser. He is a loser in a double sense. The obvious defeat lies in his insistence that the President go the UN route. From the outset, Dick Cheney, the Vice-President, and Donald Rumsfeld, the Defence Secretary, said that would entrap Washington in a diplomatic web. They have been proved right, as 1441 has been revealed for what it was from the outset, an agreement to disagree. On the weekend television talk shows, the battle was subtly replayed. Mr Cheney seemed mildly amused by France's role, perhaps because he had never been bothered by what the UN might or might not do. But General Powell mentioned France a dozen times, his usually affable features reflecting a suppressed fury at how Paris had scuppered chances of achieving a multilateral solution. America is accustomed to getting its way, so why had it not this time? Might it be because General Powell had not done the spadework? Some say he has travelled so little in person to Europe and elsewhere in the past few months, to sell the Bush case to doubtful publics (as the far more embattled Tony Blair has done in Britain). But yesterday the general said phone and conference-call diplomacy offered the "biggest bang for the time", and noted that he had met Security Council foreign ministers several times in New York. As war looms, the Bush administration is presenting the familiar face of unity to the world, and General Powell is a loyal trooper. But privately the Secretary of State has been been furious at the diplomatic blunderings of Mr Rumsfeld. And privately he might be wondering how much longer he is for this administration, once the Iraqi dust has settled. Also in Politics Bush sets the timetable for war: 48 hours and counting Diplomatic defeat for Britain and US, but the squabbling continues 'The day of your liberation is near' A climactic day on which the old order was left in ruins Blame game doesn't alter our stance, says France Legal | Contact us | Using our Content | © 2001 Independent Digital (UK) Ltd Forwarded for your information. The text and intent of the article have to stand on their own merits. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without charge or profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ "Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe simply because it has been handed down for many genera- tions. Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumoured by many. Do not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of teachers, elders or wise men. Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find that it agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all. Then accept it and live up to it." The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutra <A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/";>www.ctrl.org</A> DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion & informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis- directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html <A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html";>Archives of [EMAIL PROTECTED]</A> http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ <A HREF="http://archive.jab.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/">ctrl</A> ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
