-Caveat Lector- >From http://www.security-policy.org/papers/1999/99-D121.html {{<Begin>}} Search Publications About the Center Contact Us Support the Center Publications of the Center for Security Policy No. 99-D 121 DECISION BRIEF 21 October 1999 Clinton Legacy Watch # 44: Pandering to Hispanic Vote at Expense of National Security (Washington, D.C.): Evidence continues to mount on two sensitive matters that President Clinton is subordinating national security interests to a blatant appeal for the votes of Hispanic Americans. Such behavior would hardly be a first for an Administration that has repeatedly shown a willingness to do whatever it takes to win elections with little regard to the ominous implications for the Nation's defense.(1) The implications of such steps are often hard to quantify with precision and, in any event, are likely to bear their bitter fruit on someone else's watch. This may not be the case, however, with respect to his recent decisions to grant clemency for sixteen Puerto Rican terrorists and to acquiesce to the trespassing by separatists that has resulted in a multi-month hiatus in the Navy and Marine Corps' live-fire training at their range on Vieques, a small island adjacent to Puerto Rico. In these instances, the President has acted -- apparently to endear himself and his friends running in 2000 to Puerto Rican and other Hispanic voters -- in the face of direct warnings by his Administration's relevant experts that by so doing, he is unnecessarily risking American lives. Giving a New Lease on Life to the FALN Today's New York Times gives front-page, above-the-fold treatment to an article detailing some of the extraordinary -- and in some cases, odious -- developments that have led to and accompanied President Clinton's decision to grant the Puerto Rican terrorists their freedom. These include the following (emphasis in quotes added throughout): In July 1997, the Clinton Justice Department, represented by its then-Pardon Attorney, Margaret Love, formally recommended against a grant of clemency for the Puerto Rican nationalists serving time in connection with their roles in the planning and orchestrating of as many as 130 violent acts. Her opinion tracked with the adamant opposition to these releases expressed then and subsequently by the FBI, prison system authorities and relevant federal prosecutors in Illinois and Connecticut. In November 1997, Roger Adams, Ms. Love's successor,(2) and Deputy Attorney General Eric Holder met with Members of Congress who had taken an interest in securing the release of these felons. According to the Times, these senior Justice Department officials advised the legislators that, "because the prisoners had not applied themselves for clemency, this could be taken that they were not repentant" -- an obvious appeal that they be encouraged to do so, in order to facilitate the President's desire to grant clemency. On 9 April 1998, Adams contacted a staff member for one of these Congressman, Luis Gutierrez (D-IL), and -- as the Times put it: "counseled the staff aide as to how the statement should be worded for maximum effect. In the end, the prisoners provided a long ambiguous statement, with no explicit statement of regret." Instead of giving President Clinton a recommendation against releasing the Puerto Rican terrorists -- as Ms. Love had done -- Adams sent him this year a report that the "contained no explicit recommendation, but instead offered Mr. Clinton a range of options." The Times also reports that, at a hearing yesterday, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-UT) noted in a hearing yesterday that "just a month after Mr. Clinton's clemency offer, Attorney General Janet Reno said in a report that the nationalist groups that the prisoners had been aligned with posed an 'ongoing threat' to national security....Factors that increase the threat from such groups include 'the impending release from prisons of members of these groups jailed for prior violence.'" It appears that, eventually, one of the most politicized Justice Departments in American history became an agent of the Clinton-Gore Administration's determined effort to secure the release of felons who are judged by the law enforcement community to continue to constitute a serious menace to the public safety and national security. Rewarding Civil Disobedience While Potentially Sacrificing the Lives of Americans in Uniform The other front the Clinton Administration has opened against U.S. national interests in its campaign to endear itself to Puerto Rican (and perhaps other Hispanic-American) voters involves the live-fire training facility on the island of Vieques, near Puerto Rico. A Senate Armed Services Committee hearing on Tuesday powerfully underscored what is at stake in the current stand-off over the Navy and Marines' use of this, the only such facility suitable for combined arms landings in the Atlantic: If trespassers currently occupying the bombing range -- with the tacit, if not explicit, support of Governor Pedro Rossello, are not promptly removed and joint amphibious training allowed to resume on Vieques, the USS Eisenhower carrier battle group will deploy in February with three of its six ships not fully certified for combat operations. As two out of the last three such battle groups to deploy went directly from Vieques to combat operations, this lack of training could not only put American personnel in harm's way without the training they expect and deserve. It could also unnecessarily risk their lives. In testimony before the Armed Services Committee, the top Navy and Marine Corps officers -- Admiral Jay Johnson and General Jim Jones, respectively -- put it this way: It is important to understand the vital contribution that Vieques Island makes to our national security. Hydrography, geography, and surrounding airspace make Vieques unique. It lies outside heavily used commercial air corridors and sea routes, providing uniquely un-encroached sea and air space for training. It is a superior site for rehearsing amphibious operations, the only site for aerial mine warfare training, and is the only place on the East Coast where aircraft, naval surface ships, and ground forces can employ combined arms training with live ammunition expenditure under realistic conditions. Integral to that, it is the only range on the East Coast that allows sailors and Marines to conduct naval gunfire training, one of our most important missions.... If we cannot train under this realism, sailors and Marines, when placed in a combat situation, will not only face the certain chaos that comes with combat but will also face the uncertainty which comes from handling and expending live ordnance for the first time in a highly complex, time synchronized combat operation....Failing to provide for adequate live-fire training prior to combat will place our Nation in the position of risking needless casualties through unpreparedness. 'Rush' to Judgment The hearing took place in the immediate aftermath of the release of a report on the future status of military operations on Vieques, a small island near Puerto Rico. This panel was chaired by Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Francis Rush and comprised of a former senior Marine (General Richard Neal), a former senior naval officer (Vice Admiral Diego Hernandez) and retired Representative Lee Hamilton. The panel's key recommendations included (emphasis added): "The Department of the Navy should immediately conduct a priority assessment of the training requirements at Vieques with the objective of ceasing all training activities at Vieques within five years. The Navy should take necessary programming actions to ensure that adequate resources are available to facilitate the identification and preparation of alternative locations, to institute necessary training methods and to provide for restoration and transfer to Puerto Rico of the Eastern Maneuver Area." "Effective immediately, the Navy [should] reduce the expenditure of live fire (bombs, naval gunfire and artillery) [at Vieques] by 50 percent from 1998 activity levels and reduce the availability of the impact area from 365 days per year to 130 days per year." Unfortunately, the Rush panel was not able to identify alternatives -- either in terms of locations elsewhere in the United States where such training could be undertaken or with respect to simulation technology that might end the need for live-fire exercises on Vieques. Its three members present made clear in their testimony, moreover, that in the absence of such alternatives, the Navy and Marine Corps would have to continue to make use of that facility on at least a limited basis. The problem lies, as Sen. Bob Smith (I-NH) observed at the hearing, with suggesting that the Navy will be able, in President Clinton's words,(3) to "work around" the use of Vieques in five years' time when there is no firm basis for believing the current need can be satisfied otherwise. The Clinton Administration is employing a similar approach -- with potentially debilitating consequences for U.S. security -- with respect to landmines(4) and nuclear testing.(5) Although members of the Rush panel claimed that politics was not a factor in their Solomonic recommendation, the environment in which they were deliberating is clearly politically supercharged. Vice President Gore has expressed his solidarity with those who oppose the continued use of the Vieques range. Governor Pedro Rossello, who serves as the Gore campaign's finance co-chairman in Puerto Rico, has actively encouraged the trespassers to continue their illegal occupation of the range and vowed to do everything in his power to prevent a resumption of that facility's operations. For his part, President Clinton has let his National Security Advisor know of his desire to halt live- fire exercises on the island. And the day the Rush panel's report was published, Senate candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton issued a statement calling for "an immediate and permanent end to the bombing." The Bottom Line President Clinton's decision to free unrepentant Puerto Rican terrorists should not appeal to loyal Hispanic-Americans any more than it does to others who might be victimized in the event they resume their old, violent ways. Similarly, that ethnic minority should be no less appalled by the prospect of sending U.S. military personnel -- some 6,000 of whom are Puerto Ricans in the Navy and Marines -- into harm's way without the training they require, training currently available only at Vieques. A more responsible, not to mention more respectful, approach to cultivating Hispanic-American voters than pandering to them as President Clinton has done on these two Puerto Rico-related issues would be to foster an appreciation of their shared interest with the rest of the Nation in promoting, not imperiling, the "common defense." - 30 - 1. To name but one, notorious example, the President's authorization of the sale of supercomputers and other advanced, militarily relevant technologies to Communist China at a time when he was soliciting illegal campaign funds from sources with ties to the People's Liberation Army and Chinese intelligence. For more on this subject, see the new book by best-selling authors William Triplett and Ed Timperlake, entitled Red Dragon Rising: Communist China's Military Threat to America (Washington, D.C. Regnery Press, 1999). 2. An interesting question arises: In light of the high level of White House interest in accommodating Puerto Rican pressure groups, was Mr. Adams' willingness to accede to the release of these terrorists a factor in his selection for the position of Pardon Attorney at the Justice Department? 3. See the Center's Decision Brief entitled The 'Smoking Gun': Sen. Inhofe Secures Proof of Sandy Berger's Involvement in Clinton's Pandering to Puerto Rican Separatists (No. 99-D 104, 23 September 1999). 4. See Some Memorial Day: Clinton Forgets The Military in Embracing Landmine Ban That Will Put Them at Risk (No. 98-D 89, 23 May 1998). 5. See C.T.B.T. Truth or Consequences #7: Realistic Explosive Testing is Required to 'Remanufacture' Existing Nuclear Weapons (No. 99-D 113, 12 October 1999). NOTE: The Center's publications are intended to invigorate and enrich the debate on foreign policy and defense issues. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of all members of the Center's Board of Advisors. Top of Page © 1988-1999, Center for Security Policy {{<End>}} A<>E<>R ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Integrity has no need of rules. -Albert Camus (1913-1960) + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your common sense." --Buddha + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + It is preoccupation with possessions, more than anything else, that prevents us from living freely and nobly. -Bertrand Russell + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + "Everyone has the right...to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers." Universal Declaration of Human Rights + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + "Always do sober what you said you'd do drunk. That will teach you to keep your mouth shut." Ernest Hemingway + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without charge or profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER ========== CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing! These are sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright frauds is used politically by different groups with major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply. Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector. ======================================================================== Archives Available at: http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ ======================================================================== To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email: SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Om
