-Caveat Lector-

 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999
 Subj: Reining in the Regulators


               Reining in the Regulators

 by DOUG FIEDOR
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Heads Up

 House Republicans finally started asking a few questions
 about the regulatory bureaucracy.  We do not think they
 asked the correct questions on this round.  Nevertheless,
 the information they demand will be interesting.

 For over 50 years, Congress has allowed the vast federal
 regulatory bureaucracy to do darn near as it wished.
 Congress would pass an open ended law stating some type of
 goal, and a bunch of desk-bound regulators (with the help of
 their Non Government Organization friends and interested big
 industry lobbyists) would promulgate a few hundred rules and
 regulations impacting on the unsuspecting American people
 with the full force of law.

 That being done, the federal regulation bureaucracy
 decided they needed their own special armed police force.
 Next, they wanted their own special court system, a court
 system in which they can hire and fire their own judges.
 Soon, most regulatory agencies were all three branches of
 government rolled into one.  Then, they took their cue
 from the IRS's tried and proven tactics and stated that
 violations of their edicts would be a civil crime so that
 the Bill of Rights would not apply and a citizen would
 be guilty in one of their little kangaroo courts until
 proven innocent.

 The Democratic run Congress loved this arrangement.  The
 people were properly controlled, and the Congress Critter
 could stand back and tell any constituent falling into
 the clutches of that unconstitutional system:  "It ain't
 my fault, I'm on your side against this out of control
 bureaucracy."

 It is Congress' fault, though.  Under orders of the
 socialist Roosevelt administration, Congress created the
 mess.  Then, every year thereafter, they expanded on it.

 Now, Republicans in Congress are starting to look at the
 federal regulatory bureaucracy a little.  And they realize
 what a real mess they have on their hands.  There is little
 or nothing about the federal regulatory bureaucracy that
 even comes close to being authorized by powers given to the
 federal government by the Constitution.  And now, being the
 majority in both houses, the problem is the Republicans'
 responsibility.

 Here's the problem:  Most Republicans (not the old ones,
 they are lost causes) know that, like the IRS, the whole of
 the regulatory system makes a total mockery of that "rule of
 law" we call our Constitution.  Regulatory agencies are,
 in fact, executive, legislative and judicial branches rolled
 into one bureaucracy.  They are much closer to the communist
 politburo form of government than anything our Founding
 Fathers ever envisioned.  But, that has become our system
 and no one knows how to change it back.

 Because, to abolish the regulatory system would mean a gross
 loss of power for the federal government.  The people could
 not be controlled as strictly.  Even the suggestion of a
 cutback would cause a chorus of socialists -- Clinton, the
 Democrats in Congress and their sycophants in the press --
 to scream bloody murder.

 So, Congress is going to tinker with the regulatory system
 a little.

 Now comes the "Regulatory Right-to-Know Act of 1999,"
 or HR 1074.  It just passed the House last week and now
 goes to that sink hole called the Senate.

 The House estimated that it costs the American people
 an extra $700 billion in hidden costs every year just to
 comply with federal rules and regulations.  Republicans
 in the House want to know how much, if any, of this money
 is getting measurable results.

 "Americans deserve to know where their hard- earned tax
 dollars are going, and this bill will provide that
 information," said House Commerce Committee Chairman
 Tom Bliley (R-VA), chief sponsor of the bill.

 The socialists and liberals in the federal government are
 up in arms, though.  The Clinton administration and the
 old line Democrats oppose the bill, saying the benefits of
 federal health and safety rules are difficult to quantify
 and the bill would put unneeded new burdens on federal
 agencies.

 Yeah, they would have to be a little bit accountable
 for once.

 The bill requires the director of the Office of Management
 and Budget to submit to Congress an annual analysis of the
 impact of federal rules and paperwork on both the public and
 private sector.  In that analysis, the costs and benefits of
 each agency and agency program, rule and regulation must be
 specified and the OMB must include a report on duplications
 and inconsistencies between agencies.

 Furthermore, "the Director of the Office of Management and
 Budget shall arrange for 2 or more persons that have
 nationally recognized expertise in regulatory analysis and
 regulatory accounting, and that are independent of and
 external to the Government, to provide peer review of each
 accounting statement and associated report."

 And so it goes.  Still, in any form, and for any reason,
 the federal regulatory bureaucracy is unconstitutional.
 That is the real fact Congress should be addressing.



 ---------------------------------------------------------
                   Previous Editions at:
              http://www.uhuh.com/headsup.htm
                            and
              http://mmc.cns.net/headsup.html


 ---------------------------------------------
 Enjoy a 90 day free trial subscription to the E-mail edition
 of The Vigo Examiner.  You will receive up to three of our
 top stories, editorials of letters each day.  Send your
 trial subscription request to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




.

DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
==========
CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting propagandic
screeds are not allowed. Substance—not soapboxing!  These are sordid matters
and 'conspiracy theory', with its many half-truths, misdirections and outright
frauds is used politically  by different groups with major and minor effects
spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought. That being said, CTRL
gives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and always suggests to readers;
be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no credeence to Holocaust denial and
nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
========================================================================
Archives Available at:
http://home.ease.lsoft.com/archives/CTRL.html

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
========================================================================
To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om

Reply via email to